Splunk Enterprise Security and Apica compete in the domain of data analytics and monitoring solutions. Based on the comparisons, Splunk appears to have the advantage with its advanced data handling features and comprehensive analytics capabilities, while Apica excels in monitoring with its flexibility and cost-effectiveness.
Features: Splunk Enterprise Security offers robust searching and analysis for large data volumes, flexible data ingestion from various sources, and powerful visualization tools for operational intelligence. It utilizes schema-on-read and SPL for versatile data handling. Apica focuses on performance monitoring with customizable synthetic checks, diverse protocol monitoring, and impressive alert frameworks.
Room for Improvement: Splunk could improve user-friendly workflows, dashboard flexibility, and visualization customizability, along with better documentation and integration processes. Apica needs enhancements in GUI performance and alert accuracy, possibly benefitting from containerization for management simplicity. Both could align more closely with evolving technology needs.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk provides versatile deployment options across public cloud, private cloud, on-premises, and hybrid environments, with generally responsive customer service but variable in support quality. Apica offers smooth hybrid and public cloud deployments, prioritizes budget-friendly customer service, and could streamline enterprise licensing processes for better usage.
Pricing and ROI: Splunk provides premium features at a high cost, often based on data volume, resulting in a varied ROI depending on organizational needs. Conversely, Apica is noted for its cost-effectiveness, with licensing based on check volumes, delivering a favorable ROI by reducing labor costs and improving error resolution efficiency.
Splunk's cost is justified for large environments with extensive assets.
If you want to write your own correlation rules, it is very difficult to do, and you need Splunk's support to write new correlation rules for the SIEM tool.
The technical support for Splunk met my expectations.
APICa is scalable.
It is easy to scale.
They struggle a bit with pure virtual environments, but in terms of how much they can handle, it is pretty good.
It provides a stable environment but needs to integrate with ITSM platforms to achieve better visibility.
It is very stable.
When editing scripts, only one can be accessed at a time, risking changes affecting other folders.
Splunk Enterprise Security would benefit from a more robust rule engine to reduce false positives.
What Splunk could do better is to create an API to the standard SIEM tools, such as Microsoft Sentinel.
Data retention can be better. If we want to look at the data for five months or six months, that is not available to us. We only have a history of 20 or 30 days.
The platform requires significant financial investment and resources, making it expensive despite its comprehensive features.
I saw clients spend two million dollars a year just feeding data into the Splunk solution.
Splunk is priced higher than other solutions.
It is useful for both performance and automation testing, facilitating access to headers and payloads easily, enhancing scripts with dynamic values.
This capability is useful for performance monitoring and issue identification.
They have approximately 50,000 predefined correlation rules.
Splunk Enterprise Security's most valuable features are its stability and the robust Splunk Search Processing Language.
Apica offers a unified platform to remove complexity and cost associated with data management. You collect, control, store, and observe your data and can quickly identify and resolve performance issues before they impact the end-user. Apica Ascent swiftly analyzes telemetry data in real-time, enabling prompt issue resolution, while automated root cause analysis, powered by machine learning, streamlines troubleshooting in complex distributed systems. The platform simplifies data collection by automating and managing agents through the platform’s Fleet product. Its Flow product simplifies and optimizes pipeline control with AI and ML to help you easily understand complex workflows. Its Store component allows you to never run out of storage space while you index and store machine data centrally on one platform and reduce costs, and remediate faster. Observe offers modern observability data management, helping you with MELT data, effortless dashboarding, and seamless integration of synthetic and real data.
Splunk Enterprise Security is widely used for security operations, including threat detection, incident response, and log monitoring. It centralizes log management, offers security analytics, and ensures compliance, enhancing the overall security posture of organizations.
Companies leverage Splunk Enterprise Security to monitor endpoints, networks, and users, detecting anomalies, brute force attacks, and unauthorized access. They use it for fraud detection, machine learning, and real-time alerts within their SOCs. The platform enhances visibility and correlates data from multiple sources to identify security threats efficiently. Key features include comprehensive dashboards, excellent reporting capabilities, robust log aggregation, and flexible data ingestion. Users appreciate its SIEM capabilities, threat intelligence, risk-based alerting, and correlation searches. Highly scalable and stable, it suits multi-cloud environments, reducing alert volumes and speeding up investigations.
What are the key features?Splunk Enterprise Security is implemented across industries like finance, healthcare, and retail. Financial institutions use it for fraud detection and compliance, while healthcare organizations leverage its capabilities to safeguard patient data. Retailers deploy it to protect customer information and ensure secure transactions.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.