AppNeta by Broadcom vs ScienceLogic comparison

Broadcom and ScienceLogic are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #17 with an average rating of 9.2, while ScienceLogic is ranked #33 with an average rating of 7.4. Broadcom holds a 0.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to ScienceLogic’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of ScienceLogic users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

```html

AppNeta by Broadcom and ScienceLogic compete in the network monitoring and IT infrastructure management space. AppNeta leads with real-time network performance insights, while ScienceLogic stands out for automation capabilities, making it a preferred choice for comprehensive IT operations management.

Features: AppNeta offers real-time data analytics, multi-site support, and end-user experience monitoring. ScienceLogic provides extensive asset discovery, strong automation capabilities, and effective cloud monitoring, beneficial for hybrid and multi-cloud environments.

Room for Improvement: AppNeta could enhance its automation features, improve scalability, and offer more comprehensive cloud support. ScienceLogic might refine its documentation for easier setup, streamline certain processes for simplicity, and enhance its user interface for better navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AppNeta is noted for its straightforward deployment process and clear documentation, facilitating a smoother setup. ScienceLogic may require more configuration but compensates with responsive, knowledgeable customer service for users needing comprehensive support.

Pricing and ROI: AppNeta has a lower setup cost, appealing for quick ROI with minimal upfront investment. ScienceLogic, with potentially higher initial costs, offers long-term value through robust automation, leading to efficiency improvements and cost savings over time.

```

To learn more, read our detailed AppNeta by Broadcom vs. ScienceLogic Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

AppNeta by Broadcom vs. ScienceLogic

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,649 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Juniper Mist Premium Analytics

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Juniper Mist Premium Analytics is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AppNeta by Broadcom is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 1.6%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

ALEXANDRE VIANNA

CTO at Redeswirelessbrasil

May 3, 2024

Has a single dashboard, but is expensive

We use this solution to manage our mission environment The single dashboard is a valuable feature. The technical support needs improvement. The initial setup is straightforward. The solution is expensive. I rate the pricing an eight out of ten. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of…

Read full review

Cliff Chapman

Architect at Linkstatus Ltd

Dec 15, 2022

Excellent support, easy configuration, and a reliable tool to know what the problem is and where the problem is

They should try and make diagnostics run a bit quicker. When the problem occurs on a network, AppNeta runs automatic diagnostics on the end-to-end path. The path it was testing only to the destination, it now runs the same test to all of the devices and all the intermediate devices. Depending on the number of intermediate devices, it can take several minutes to run. If we're trying to find or diagnose a problem that only lasts two or three minutes, it may be that the diagnostics is still running by the time the problem is cleared. The only thing, which I have also mentioned to AppNeta in the past, is that there should be much faster and much more lightweight diagnostics, which can be completed within 30 seconds or one minute, rather than in 5 to 10 minutes. Currently, when we have short-duration problems, we use a different tool, but we only use that different tool for short-duration problems. With AppNeta, as long as the problem exists for more than a few minutes, such as within 10 to 15 minutes, we can normally tell where the problem is. However, most of the problems that we deal with are intermittent. They're very rarely a permanent condition that needs to be addressed. That makes it more difficult to troubleshoot. We would look to see at least two or three events and hope they show the same results to raise our confidence that we've actually found the problem, rather than just a problem.

Read full review

GauravSingh4

CEO at Parker Digital

Jul 21, 2022

Great integrations, power flow, and good support

They need a little more self-service. Some of the places where there's still a dependency on defense logic. If those could be eliminated, that would be ideal. They've done a fantastic job eliminating a lot of those dependencies and there's a lot of self-service. However, some of the areas where we could have it connect to, for example, Splunk or ServiceNow, in a self-care version versus having to go back to their engineers, that's an area where they could do a little more. There are still a lot of engineers who get involved versus if it's a little more API-driven and self-served dashboard connections. Doing it the other way would just make life easier for users.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."

"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."

"A lot of times one of the AppNeta transactions showed that there is an issue, whereas everything seemed to be working properly. Once we dug into it, we realized that it really was highlighting a problem that otherwise we would not have seen."

"The main feature that we use is what they call Delivery, which is the testing of network paths end-to-end."

"The solution's technical support is very good."

"This solution helps prove that, if we move to cloud, we'll still be as effective as we are on-premises."

"We get complete, hop-by-hop visibility into the internet and we can know how much latency is taking place from one hop to another. That way, we know whether a particular hop belongs to the ISP, or that it is something owned by our own client's office, or is something to do with the SaaS network."

"Delivery and experience are valuable. The usage in terms of the traffic application captures and other similar things is also valuable."

"The product helps us understand networks and user experience. It helps us to understand the issues."

"The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support."

"The best feature is the highly flexible graphs."

"The solution provides good infra-monitoring features."

"Provides agentless monitoring so there's no need to install the agent on each server."

"One of the valuable features is rapid dashboards."

"The flexibility to support most technologies. The way ScienceLogic gathers data from multiple sources is vital to our customers. As we work with new customers (often with different technology requirements), ScienceLogic is flexible enough to support our clients’ varying network needs."

"When it comes to features, the power pack is the most valuable."

"Best feature of all is detailed monitoring of services, processes, ports and SSL certificates and or web content."

More ScienceLogic pros

Cons

"The technical support needs improvement."

"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."

"I think some of the product's documentation has shortcomings and needs improvement."

"AppNeta by Broadcom needs to add more features to its dashboards. It also needs to work on providing out-of-the-box reports."

"They should try and make diagnostics run a bit quicker. When the problem occurs on a network, AppNeta runs automatic diagnostics on the end-to-end path. The path it was testing only to the destination, it now runs the same test to all of the devices and all the intermediate devices. Depending on the number of intermediate devices, it can take several minutes to run. If we're trying to find or diagnose a problem that only lasts two or three minutes, it may be that the diagnostics is still running by the time the problem is cleared. The only thing, which I have also mentioned to AppNeta in the past, is that there should be much faster and much more lightweight diagnostics, which can be completed within 30 seconds or one minute, rather than in 5 to 10 minutes."

"Instead of integrating with other people, they should expand their interior capabilities."

"Cloud monitoring could be better. That's one of the biggest pain points for me. I have shared this feedback with them multiple times, but they're limited to some extent. That's one area where I've seen a problem."

"Having to deal with configuring the end devices using a USB stick is a bit cumbersome. It would be nice if there was a better way of handling that."

"I would like to see some advanced dashboard features. It could also be integrated with third-party tools. For example, an integration with a reporting solution would be helpful. Out-of-the-box, there are few dashboards or reports. What it does have is useful, but there should be additional dashboards."

"One important area we feel could be improved is the UI. It takes a lot of clicks to do very simple tasks."

"The product must educate its strategic partners for deployment."

"They should add CLI command modes and scripts for high performance."

"They should improve database issues in HA and Failover mode, and provide documentation for all users , even if they are not customers."

"ScienceLogic could improve the implementation, it could be made easier."

"The product's reporting functionalities have certain shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required."

"ScienceLogic does not have application monitoring. We definitely need something integrated within ScienceLogic to monitor applications so that we don't have to rely on monitoring tools to monitor other applications. At least the ones that are market leaders, such as SAP, Oracle, and others."

"From a performance perspective, it needs to improve a lot."

More ScienceLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."

"We typically don't get involved in the commercial side, but the list price is probably something like $3,000 for a small probe. However, that gives all of the features that the probe can do, whether or not you use them. In the old days, up until two or three years ago, each of the separate features was a separately licensable module so that you could add things that you wanted, and you didn't have to add things that you didn't want. They've changed all that now, and everything the probe can do is a part of the base license."

"The small probe is probably around $3,000 and the very large probe that they make for massive data centers might be $50,000 or $60,000. It's a subscription model, so the payment is per year."

"Broadcom software is always a little expensive because they provide quality."

"I find the solution's price to be fairly good."

"It's worth the money."

"AppNeta by Broadcom is not expensive."

"I inherited this from a different version, and I haven't yet gone through a renewal because we had purchased three years upfront. So, to me, that still remains to be seen. Once it comes up for renewal, we'll see what happens. Especially because now it is Broadcom, it is going to change anyway."

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."

"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."

"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."

"It comes with the OS built in, so no need to purchase an OS license or DB license."

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

44%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Juniper Mist Premium Analytics?

We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Juniper Mist Premium Analytics?

The solution is expensive. I rate the pricing an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Juniper Mist Premium Analytics?

The technical support needs improvement.

See all answers

What open source tool can one use to measure bandwidth from one's upstream service provider?

One I am looking closely at is AppNeta. They have an appliance that can digest the flow and do a better job than N...

See all answers

What do you like most about AppNeta?

The product helps us understand networks and user experience. It helps us to understand the issues.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AppNeta?

AppNeta by Broadcom is not expensive.

See all answers

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

The product's reporting functionalities have certain shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required....

See all answers

Comparisons

ThousandEyes vs Juniper Mist Premium Analytics

Compared 37% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs Juniper Mist Premium Analytics

Compared 31% of the time

Meraki Dashboard vs Juniper Mist Premium Analytics

Compared 21% of the time

InfluxDB vs Juniper Mist Premium Analytics

Compared 12% of the time

More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Competitors

ThousandEyes vs AppNeta by Broadcom

Compared 46% of the time

vRealize Network Insight vs AppNeta by Broadcom

Compared 23% of the time

DX NetOps vs AppNeta by Broadcom

Compared 16% of the time

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs AppNeta by Broadcom

Compared 15% of the time

More AppNeta by Broadcom Competitors

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 16% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 10% of the time

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 10% of the time

Zabbix vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

November 2024

Download Juniper Mist Premium Analytics product report

Buyer's Guide

AppNeta by Broadcom

November 2024

Download AppNeta by Broadcom product report

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic

October 2024

Download ScienceLogic product report

Learn More

Juniper

Broadcom

ScienceLogic

Overview

Juniper Mist Premium Analytics is a comprehensive network analytics solution that provides organizations with valuable insights into their network performance and user experience. The primary use case of this product is to enable IT teams to proactively monitor, troubleshoot, and optimize their network infrastructure.

The most valuable functionality of Juniper Mist Premium Analytics is its AI-driven insights and recommendations. Leveraging machine learning algorithms, it analyzes vast amounts of network data to identify anomalies, predict potential issues, and suggest remediation actions. This proactive approach helps organizations minimize network downtime, improve user experience, and optimize network performance.

By providing real-time visibility into network performance, Juniper Mist Premium Analytics helps organizations quickly identify and resolve network issues. It offers detailed analytics on network traffic, application performance, and user behavior, allowing IT teams to pinpoint the root cause of problems and take immediate action. This not only reduces troubleshooting time but also enhances overall network reliability.

Furthermore, Juniper Mist Premium Analytics enables organizations to optimize their network infrastructure. It provides insights into network capacity utilization, application usage patterns, and user behavior, allowing IT teams to make informed decisions about network design, resource allocation, and capacity planning. This helps organizations to ensure that their network is efficiently utilized and can support the growing demands of their users.

AppNeta is the leader in proactive end-user performance monitoring solutions built for the distributed digital enterprise. With AppNeta, IT and Network Ops teams can assure continuous and exceptional delivery of business-critical applications. AppNeta’s SaaS-based solutions give IT teams essential application and network performance data, allowing them to constantly monitor user experience across any application, network, data center or cloud.

For more information, visit www.appneta.com.

ScienceLogic is a comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring solution that supports networks, servers, cloud environments, and applications, suitable for private cloud and on-premises deployments.

Organizations leverage ScienceLogic for its robust capabilities in monitoring IT infrastructures of all sizes. It offers granular discovery, integration with CMDB, and ticketing systems. Valued for its flexibility, incident automation, remediation, and real-time relationship mapping, it supports hybrid environments with scalable and efficient monitoring functionalities. AI and machine learning enhance its feature set, while ease of deployment and strong support are crucial benefits.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Agentless Configuration: Ensures easy deployment without the need for agents.
Third-Party Integration: Seamlessly integrates with various tools.
Dynamic Component Mapping: Offers real-time relationship and dependency mapping.
Flexible Graphs: Allows custom visual representation of data.
Role-Based Access: Provides tiered access for different user roles.
Infrastructure and Event Management: Efficiently monitors hybrid environments.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Scalability: Handles environments of all sizes efficiently.
AI and Machine Learning: Enhances automation and incident management.
Ease of Deployment: Streamlines initial setup and reduces time to value.
Customization: Custom dashboards and reports cater to specific needs.
Comprehensive Support: Access to excellent support services.

ScienceLogic is implemented across multiple industries, including large enterprises, for its capability to handle complex IT ecosystems. Its integration with CMDB and ticketing systems ensures it fits within existing workflows. Organizations use it to monitor diverse infrastructure landscapes, ensuring seamless performance and quick incident resolution.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Ebay, Citrix, National Instruments, Marriott, AT&T, Bon-Ton, McDonald's, Netflix, PayPal, Uber, QAD

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell

Buyer's Guide

AppNeta by Broadcom vs. ScienceLogic

October 2024

Free Report: AppNeta by Broadcom vs. ScienceLogic

Find out what your peers are saying about AppNeta by Broadcom vs. ScienceLogic and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AppNeta by Broadcom vs. ScienceLogic report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.