Arcserve Cloud Direct vs Zerto comparison

Arcserve and Zerto are both solutions in the Cloud Backup category. Arcserve is ranked #52, while Zerto is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.8. Arcserve holds a 0.3% mindshare in CB, compared to Zerto’s 4.2% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Zerto users are willing to recommend the solution.

Arcserve Cloud Direct

Read 1 Arcserve Cloud Direct review

320 Views
233 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Zerto

Read 279 Zerto reviews

8,163 Views
4,101 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Arcserve Cloud Direct

Zerto

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Arcserve Cloud Direct and Zerto based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Commvault, Zerto and others in Cloud Backup.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Backup Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 831,265 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Arcserve Cloud Direct

Ranking in Cloud Backup

52nd

Average Rating

5.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery as a Service (17th)

Zerto

Ranking in Cloud Backup

3rd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

279

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (2nd), Cloud Migration (4th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Cloud Backup category, the mindshare of Arcserve Cloud Direct is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zerto is 4.2%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Backup

Featured Reviews

reviewer1321896

Junior Service Desk Operator at a cloud solution provider with 11-50 employees

Good backup retention but it is not a reliable platform and it doesn't giving any sort of alerts that things are not working

StorageCraft wasn't getting full backup coverage. It was backing up around 1 to 2% of the points. It was not a reliable platform and it wasn't giving any sort of alerts that things were not working. The majority of stuff wasn't backed up, so we really weren't happy with them. That's when we went on the look for a new solution.

Read full review

Shri Sharan

Solutions architect at Kyndryl

Is user-friendly, saves us time, and costs

We encountered some issues during Active Directory recovery. When we implemented Active Directory, we provided feedback to Zerto regarding the challenges of recovering AD from the on-premises environment to the disaster recovery site. Unlike other virtual machines, AD recovery presents unique difficulties due to its active-active nature. It's unclear whether these challenges stem from Zerto itself or limitations within Microsoft Active Directory. However, in our experience using Zerto for AD recovery compared to other technologies, we faced data discrepancies that necessitated workarounds to bring AD online at the DR site. Certain applications we migrated from production relied on Active Directory authentication. To ensure successful application functionality at the DR site, a functional AD environment was a prerequisite to application migration. Therefore, our initial step involved copying and guaranteeing a running AD instance on the DR side before application recovery. However, upon attempting application authentication on the DR side, data inconsistencies prevented successful authentication. To address this, we created an isolated clone of the AD environment and conducted tests. Through trial and error, we were able to develop workarounds to resolve the issue. Notably, these challenges were specific to Active Directory; other VMs didn't exhibit similar problems.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The backup retention was pretty good. Being able to archive users who had been backed up, is a good functionality. Even if they've been deactivated it'll keep the backups and keep them protected."

"The stability is good, and I have never had any customers say anything bad about it. Some have used it for years and have not had any problems."

"The Move feature is the most valuable feature because it allows us to move the VM from our old environment to our new environment with minimal disruption."

"I really like how you can test the failover as often as you need."

"Zerto is easy to use and the interface is very intuitive."

"The most valuable feature is the customization that allows me to set my protection group myself."

"The UI is straightforward. It makes it very simple to group our resources and understand that our production workloads are covered because we can set them up as granular or as non-granular as we want."

"It reduced the backup recovery time of our main backup solution by several hours. It's reduced our time because before we have to build a system and restore the data, we install the application and restore the data that took us at least a good 24 hours to do that. And now it's really minutes for us to recover our backup solution."

"The best feature of Zerto is the fast, automated backup and recovery. The data lift for applications is short, with minimal data loss."

More Zerto pros

Cons

"StorageCraft wasn't getting full backup coverage. It was backing up around one to 2% of the points. It was not a reliable platform and it wasn't giving any sort of alerts that things were not working."

"We have had some issues with trying to get certain parts of the backup or restore functionality to work."

"From the technical side, there can be a little bit more PowerShell integration. I know it leverages APIs, but people still use PowerShell. Some people would rather use PowerShell if that is an option."

"Adding or changing VPGs (Virtual Protection Groups) may require restarting replication."

"The onset of configuring an environment in the cloud is difficult and could be easier to do."

"I would like to see a couple of details regarding awareness of VM events coming outside of ZVR."

"This solution could be improved if it met all the requirements that we look for including supporting multiple operating systems. We would prefer to use one solution for DR and backup."

"We had some issues with replication, especially on Linux, but we have already resolved them."

"The syncing of the replication needs improvement. My experience has been that, every once in a while, when you go to do a failover, it tells you it's not syncing. Then you have to troubleshoot and figure out why it's not fully synced up."

More Zerto cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Zerto is very cost-effective. We get really great value for the cost of the service."

"The pricing is based on virtual machines. They need to do better in regards to their tiering pricing rather than one price per VM. A lot of times we have VMs that are lower tier, such as Tier 2 or Tier 3, but we pay the same price as for Tier 1. I know they are developing this out, but it would be nice if they could provide a little better pricing in regards to their tiering protection."

"Zerto is a little bit on the higher side in terms of pricing. It would be better if they had a pay-as-you-go package."

"Licensing Zerto was very simple. They had a product that fit our size and scale. It made it really easy to choose."

"The cost per VM is a bit high."

"We paid a big investment upfront with renewal fees each year."

"Zerto is pretty reasonable. I haven't checked to see how much Rubrik is going to quote us for their solution. At least for us, the price doesn't play a big factor in the decision-making because it is a pretty small deployment for our use case."

"There may be less expensive solutions on the market but with Zerto, you get what you pay for."

More Zerto pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Backup solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?

Ik fluister:VM Host Oracle en DataGuard hebben we per toeval vervangen door Zerto :-) tijdens de Zerto implementatie en VPG werden de Host Data in write-ack Block-Level gerepliceerd. Qua licentie 1...

See all answers

What do you like most about Zerto?

Its ability to roll back if the VM or the server that you are recovering does not come up right is also valuable. You have the ability to roll back a few seconds or a few minutes. The rollback feat...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zerto?

I would rate the pricing, setup cost, and licensing around a seven on a scale of one to ten. The pricing model could be more flexible to accommodate startup companies with lower budgets.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Veeam Data Platform vs Zerto

Compared 17% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs Zerto

Compared 16% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Zerto

Compared 9% of the time

Rubrik vs Zerto

Compared 8% of the time

Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs Zerto

Compared 6% of the time

More Zerto Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

December 2024

Download Arcserve Cloud Direct product report

Buyer's Guide

Zerto

December 2024

Download Zerto product report

Also Known As

StorageCraft Cloud Services, StorageCraft Disaster Recovery Services, StorageCraft Cloud Backup, Arcserve Cloud Services, Zetta Cloud Backup

Zerto Virtual Replication

Overview

Arcserve Cloud Direct is used for safeguarding data through backup and disaster recovery, swiftly restoring critical data and systems to ensure minimal downtime. It integrates cloud-based management and automated data protection with reliable efficiency.

Arcserve Cloud Direct offers a powerful solution for data protection with automated backup and disaster recovery features. Users appreciate its seamless integration with platforms, emphasizing its reliability and efficiency in preventing data loss. The straightforward setup and intuitive dashboard enhance its usability, while robust security measures safeguard data integrity. Despite its high performance and swift recovery times, users suggest improvements in customer support and reliability of technical assistance. Some face challenges with initial setup complexity, pointing out the need for clearer documentation and more robust features.

What are the most important features of Arcserve Cloud Direct?

Reliable data backup: Ensures consistent data protection and secure storage.
Seamless disaster recovery: Facilitates quick recovery of critical systems and data.
Easy scalability: Allows for flexible and straightforward scaling to meet growing data demands.
Intuitive dashboard: Simplifies management and monitoring of backup and recovery processes.
Robust security: Protects sensitive data against cyber threats and unauthorized access.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Efficient performance: Fast recovery times minimize downtime and maintain business continuity.
Comprehensive support: Assistance in resolving issues and optimizing usage.
Reliability in protecting data: Consistently prevents data loss and ensures accessibility.
Ease of setup: Quick and straightforward implementation without significant technical hurdles.
Scalability: Ability to adjust storage needs as data requirements grow.

Arcserve Cloud Direct's integration capabilities make it suitable for industries with extensive data protection needs, including finance, healthcare, and education. These sectors benefit from its efficient disaster recovery solutions and robust security features, ensuring compliance and safeguarding sensitive information. By offering scalable data protection services, Arcserve Cloud Direct supports businesses in maintaining operational continuity and achieving their data management goals.

Arcserve

Zerto is used for disaster recovery, business continuity, data migration, and ransomware recovery, providing continuous data protection and near real-time replication. Valued for ease of use, efficient failover processes, and versatile integration, it enhances organizational efficiency, reduces errors, and boosts productivity.

Zerto

Sample Customers

Lion

United Airlines, HCA, XPO Logistics, TaxSlayer, McKesson, Insight Global, American Airlines, Tencate, Aaron’s, Grey’s County, Kingston Technologies

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Commvault, Zerto and others in Cloud Backup. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Cloud Backup vendors and best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.