Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Arcserve OneXafe vs NetApp StorageGRID comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Arcserve OneXafe
Ranking in File and Object Storage
30th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Backup and Recovery (99th)
NetApp StorageGRID
Ranking in File and Object Storage
7th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the File and Object Storage category, the mindshare of Arcserve OneXafe is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp StorageGRID is 5.2%, up from 4.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
File and Object Storage
 

Featured Reviews

Use Arcserve OneXafe?
Share your opinion
Werner Broekhuizen - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 12, 2024
Provides seamless data integration and has a reliable technical support team
We use the product to manage large, unstructured files and data requiring scalable storage solutions. It's particularly effective for storing unstructured files efficiently with metadata in one accessible location The product's continual innovation and enhancement in integration capabilities with…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Our licensing is in INR it was around 25 lakhs, which is roughly two million."
"We chose NetApp because of price and performance."
"While we have been able to save money on storage costs, it could be better."
"The licensing that the S3 service provides them from a FabricPool standpoint is more attractive than the licensing from AWS or Azure."
"The price is attractive."
"We save money on storage costs from this solution since it allows us to have a source of revenue from customers consuming the service."
"NetApp is not known for being the cheapest storage option on the market. Almost all of the other storage options we looked at were less expensive than StorageGRID. The price is one thing to criticize, which is what we hear internally and from customers as well. They find the cost of the terabytes in this class of storage a little bit higher than expected."
"The pricing of StorageGRID falls within the typical range for enterprise-grade solutions and is comparable to other vendors such as Dell, NetApp, and Pure Storage."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
21%
Manufacturing Company
20%
Computer Software Company
17%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about NetApp StorageGRID?
The management portals have most significantly improved our data retrieval times. They've made it much easier to restore data compared to our previous methods.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp StorageGRID?
I rate the product pricing around five out of ten—it's negotiable, depending on the circumstances.
What needs improvement with NetApp StorageGRID?
The product's continual innovation and enhancement in integration capabilities with other NetApp solutions could be better.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

StorageCraft OneBlox
Storage GRID
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Sonic, Amazon, Kawasaki, Callaway, Drake University, Mazda, Thales, California Highway Patrol, Guggenheim, Bruker, NASA, Oregon.gov
ASE, DARZ GmbH
Find out what your peers are saying about MinIO, Red Hat, Dell Technologies and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: October 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.