Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) vs Wazuh comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Wazuh's customer service is highly rated, with excellent paid support and active community forums for troubleshooting assistance.
We use the open-source version of Wazuh, which does not provide paid support.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
5.1
Wazuh's interface is complex, lacking integration, scalability, AI capabilities, and requires better support, efficiency, and automated features.
The integration modules are insufficiently developed, necessitating the creation of custom integration solutions using tools like Logstash and PubSub.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.1
Wazuh's scalability is mixed, requiring technical expertise, with feedback ranging from four to ten, noting resource challenges.
Scalability depends on the configuration and the infrastructure resources like compute and memory we allocate.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Wazuh is cost-effective but includes support and infrastructure expenses, appealing to smaller organizations despite scalability limitations.
Totaling around two lakh Indian rupees per month.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.2
Wazuh is generally stable with minor glitches, suitable for small to mid-level businesses, often affected by configuration issues.
The stability of Wazuh is strong, with no issues stemming from the solution itself.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.9
Wazuh provides cost-effective, open-source security with integration, compliance, monitoring, and vulnerability assessment for diverse systems and platforms.
We found the MITRE framework mapping and the agent enrollment service to be the most valuable features of Wazuh.
 

Categories and Ranking

ArcSight Enterprise Securit...
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
14th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
96
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Wazuh
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
3rd
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
44
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (2nd), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) is 1.2%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wazuh is 15.5%, up from 11.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
 

Featured Reviews

Ramnesh  Dubey - PeerSpot reviewer
Allows for monitoring logs according to industry standards within ESM but has a total capacity capped at 12 TB, limiting real-time data retention periods
The first limitation is with the ArcSight Data Storage Manager (ADSM). ArcSight's total capacity is currently capped at 12 TB. This becomes an issue if a customer needs a longer real-time data retention period, such as exceeding 90 days or reaching a year or even ten months. Increasing the disk space beyond 12 TB is not currently possible. So, increasing the storage capacity is one area for improvement. Additionally, the real-time data retention is limited due to the 12 TB restriction. Depending on the Events Per Second (EPS) you receive, you might only be able to retain data for seven to ten days. Overall, the 12 TB limit is the main issue we face in terms of maximizing real-time data storage. Moreover, there are a few improvements I would like to see in future releases. My main suggestion for ArcSight is to simplify the deployment process. Currently, the installation process is quite complex. There are various components involved, including transformations, multiple installations, and containerization for various components. Ideally, I'd recommend that ArcSight allow the entire installation, including the ESM and database, to be completed within a single unified setup process for a streamlined experience. Additionally, having readily available and well-organized documentation for the step-by-step installation process would be incredibly helpful. I would also like to see better support.
Vikrant Puranik - PeerSpot reviewer
It integrates seamlessly with AWS cloud-native services
I worked with Splunk, Curator, ArcSight, and some legacy solutions that no longer exist. They became obsolete or transitioned to a different product. Cost-effectiveness was one reason we switched. We had to decide whether to spend $500,000 on a commercial product or rely on our skills to deploy an open-source solution. The big difference between Wazuh and other solutions is maturity and customization. Wazuh's scalability and out-of-the-box functionality are slightly lagging behind, but Wazuh has improved a lot since the first time we saw it. Others have more search capabilities, whereas Wazuh depends on Elasticsearch. Searching is a bit slower in Wazuh.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

VS
Jun 28, 2015
Qradar vs. ArcSight
Continuing with the SIEM posts we have done at Infosecnirvana, this post is a Head to head comparison of the two Industry leading SIEM products in the market – HP ArcSight and IBM QRadar Both the products have consistently been in the Gartner Leaders Quadrant. Both HP and IBM took over niche SIEM…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
10%
Computer Software Company
16%
University
7%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which is the best SIEM tool for a mid-sized financial services firm: Arcsight or Securonix?
In my market, a lot of financial companies had or have an ArcSight installation. Just because in former times it was pretty good. Now a lot of them are looking for a more effective solution due to ...
What do you like most about ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)?
We utilize ArcSight ESM for real-time threat detection in our organization. We have custom rules that we've developed on top of the WAN services, along with scheduled licensing activities.
What do you like most about Wazuh?
Integrates with various open-source and paid products, allowing for flexibility in customization based on use cases.
What needs improvement with Wazuh?
The latest version, 4.9, has improved the interface significantly. I am yet to explore more about the update to identify further areas for improvement. So far, the recent updates have addressed mos...
What is your primary use case for Wazuh?
We use Wazuh for our Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) needs. It serves as a log aggregator and provides us the capability to monitor our servers for brute force attacks and other se...
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus ArcSight, HPE ArcSight, ArcSight
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Lake Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Bank AlJazira, Banca Intesa, and Obrela.
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) vs. Wazuh and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.