Arista Networks Platform vs MikroTik Cloud Router Switch comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Arista and MikroTik are both solutions in the Ethernet Switches category. Arista is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3, while MikroTik is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.7. Arista holds a 3.8% mindshare in ES, compared to MikroTik’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Arista users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of MikroTik users who would recommend it.

Arista Networks Platform

Read 36 Arista Networks Platform reviews

6,847 Views
5,615 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MikroTik Cloud Router Switch

Read 25 MikroTik Cloud Router Switch reviews

4,460 Views
3,077 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Arista Networks Platform

MikroTik Cloud Router Switch

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Arista Networks Platform and MikroTik Cloud Router Switch compete in the networking domain. Arista Networks Platform has an edge with its extensive scalability and automation, while MikroTik attracts users with its cost-effectiveness and sufficient features for smaller operations.

Features: Arista Networks Platform excels in data center solutions, scalability, and dynamic automation. It offers enterprise-level scalability, advanced data center solutions, and significant automation capabilities. MikroTik Cloud Router Switch focuses on strong routing abilities with efficient operations at a budget-friendly cost, robustness for small-scale use, and cost efficiency.

Room for Improvement: Arista Networks could improve its pricing strategies for smaller companies, simplify its deployment processes, and enhance user-friendly configurations. MikroTik might look to expand its feature set for larger operations, improve its high-level management capabilities, and offer more comprehensive support options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MikroTik Cloud Router Switch facilitates quick and straightforward deployments, catering to quick and easy setups, while its customer service supports simpler needs. Arista Networks Platform, despite the complexity, offers reliable customer support and is suited to larger, more complex infrastructures with comprehensive customer service support.

Pricing and ROI: Arista Networks Platform is higher priced, correlating with its advanced features and significant ROI for extensive solutions. MikroTik Cloud Router Switch offers lower costs, delivering satisfactory ROI for budget-conscious buyers who focus more on value than extensive feature sets.

To learn more, read our detailed Arista Networks Platform vs. MikroTik Cloud Router Switch Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Arista Networks Platform vs. MikroTik Cloud Router Switch

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,383 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Arista Networks Platform

Ranking in Ethernet Switches

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Center Networking (2nd)

MikroTik Cloud Router Switch

Ranking in Ethernet Switches

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Routers (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Ethernet Switches category, the mindshare of Arista Networks Platform is 3.8%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MikroTik Cloud Router Switch is 1.9%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Ethernet Switches Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Arista Networks Platform	3.8%
MikroTik Cloud Router Switch	1.9%
Other	94.3%

Ethernet Switches

Featured Reviews

Dibyendu Das

Director at a tech company with 11-50 employees

Ultra-low latency networking has delivered reliable video workflows and critical operations

The support of Arista Networks Platform is quite complex; it is not very easy to configure. It needs a lot of network expertise for token sheddings and different kinds of configurations. It is very difficult to configure because Arista Networks Platform does not have a flexible GUI like Huawei or Netgear; everything is a very CLI kind of mainframe architecture. Scalability at every single step has a huge upgrade cost which is required for port mapping, connectivity, and transceivers certified by Arista Networks Platform, then the fabric upgrades from a software firmware level. Arista Networks Platform should improve commercial aspects to be affordable. There is no path for growth with a perfect score because the focus is more on reducing costs globally.

Read full review

Andriejus Artamonovas

IT Specialist at a outsourcing company with 501-1,000 employees

Has supported deeper configuration through traffic mirroring and advanced VLAN setup

The main reason why MikroTik Cloud Router Switch is usually chosen is its raw performance to price ratio. In comparison to UniFi switches, MikroTik Cloud Router Switch can mirror all ports for traffic inspection for further traffic analysis, which UniFi cannot do. VLANs in MikroTik Cloud Router Switch are always useful. The way MikroTik implements VLAN-aware switching at the bridge level is hidden in the configuration. Making CRS work as a simple VLAN-aware switch requires deeper configuration, which is not intuitive. VLANs support individual interfaces not part of the bridge, allowing for double VLANing. You can create a VLAN interface in the interfaces context and also create a bridge interface, add physical ports, create VLANs for that bridge interface, and assign tagged and untagged ports and VLANs. Load balancing is one of the key components. The feature itself is quite efficient and works reliably on MikroTik Cloud Router Switch. The very basic setup is one of my favorites because they have their protocol where I can connect through the MAC address right on Layer 2, and I don't lose connectivity to the switch if I mess up with bridging or IP addressing.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Arista Networks Platform offers a clean dashboard page with only useful options that do not include unnecessary tabs or features that customers mostly don't want to use."

"The platform is easy to scale."

"As a reseller and partner of Arista, the biggest advantages of Arista Networks Platform are ease of use, ease of configuration, and excellent support from Arista in terms of configuration."

"The user-friendly policy manager lets us apply different controls for various user groups easily."

"The best part is the single operating system that they have. Regardless of your model, it's the same operating system functioning across the board, which means you don't have to worry about backward compatibilities between your older switches and the new ones that you deploy."

"I would tell potential users that if they are supporting a media or trading kind of business, they should go for Arista because it is a low-latency switch that will meet the expectation of the business."

"Arista Networks Platform has a feature that helps with monitoring and management."

"The most valuable features of the Arista Networks Platform are the EVPN and VXLAN, and it has comprehensive features."

More Arista Networks Platform pros

"I think that Mikrotik is the best solution for SOHO and small businesses because the price is very good and it includes a lot of features."

"I like that it's quite flexible and addresses different issues. It's quite easy to use, and the pricing is great. We find them to be very capable switches."

"The beauty of MikroTik is that you have flexibility with the routing parts."

"It is easy to set up the solution."

"The best aspect is that it remains affordable."

"It is user-friendly, reliable, and cheap."

"This solution is very similar to the on-premises version making it easy to use for those who know the architect."

"A valuable aspect is its user-friendly configuration, making it accessible even for individuals with basic technical knowledge."

More MikroTik Cloud Router Switch pros

Cons

"Some new features are needed."

"The product fails to offer functions related to cloud orchestration, making it in areas where improvements are required."

"For my particular use, the only potential improvement I see is in power consumption."

"The solution is quite expensive. One of the negative aspects of it is the pricing."

"I see some areas for improvement, particularly with pricing."

"The solution needs to accommodate new features."

"From VMware, I think the cost of the tools is very high."

"Arista Networks Platform should focus on improving the compatibility or integration with Cisco solutions."

More Arista Networks Platform cons

"Improvements are needed with respect to some of the security, especially for VPN links between vendors other than Cisco."

"Technical support could be better."

"Proper LACP support, more software support for hardware capabilities, true wirespeed Layer 3 routing."

"In medium to large sectors, there's a necessity for managing aspects like proxy firewalls."

"Antispam and antivirus features should be included in the future."

"It happens that you may find your network is down, if you reboot the switch, they come up. However, sometimes, they reset themselves. That's a big issue."

"The area for improvement is security. MikroTik is mostly used by medium and small businesses, so the security is not as robust as Cisco."

"It can be difficult to identify key functions for MikroTik Cloud Router Switch. I experience functionality limitations, particularly when trying to find specific features."

More MikroTik Cloud Router Switch cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Arista is very expensive. Not everybody is in a position to spend $70,000 to $80,000 for one switch."

"Cost wise, Arista Networks Platform is more expensive than other networking solutions."

"The price of the Arista Networks Platform could be less expensive for the hardware and license."

"I rate the product price a seven on a scale of one to ten where ten is high price and one is low price."

"Arista Networks Platform was cheaper than Cisco. I have heard that the product is affordable for enterprise-sized companies."

"It is pretty pricey for a networking platform. It is on par with Cisco."

"Network devices are generally expensive. However, during the evaluation, Arista was the most inexpensive vendor."

"The customer price for an Arista router is approximately $7,000 USD, while Cisco's is around $18,000."

More Arista Networks Platform pricing and cost advice

"They came with the licensing when we purchased them."

"I consider it to be a cost-effective solution."

"In Pakistan, if you buy this cloud router, it's approximately $700 for the device."

"The price is competitive."

"MikroTik is really cheap compared to the competitors."

"This product has a one-time cost and there is no licensing fee."

"The licensing for MikroTik is great. It's easy to enter, especially for small businesses. Their model is great."

"The price of the solution is fair and there is a one-time license purchase only."

More MikroTik Cloud Router Switch pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Ethernet Switches solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

13%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Arista Networks Platform?

The initial setup cost is high compared to others, and I find the initial setup cost to be very high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Arista Networks Platform?

Arista Networks Platform could improve its command line management. Coming from a Cisco background, the adjustment period was challenging. While similar in some areas, the AOS concept, especially a...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Arista Networks Platform?

I have worked with deploying Arista Networks Platform in data center environments, particularly for spine and leaf architectures. The configurations involved Zero Touch Provisioning, which went ver...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MikroTik Cloud Router Switch?

The Python solution pricing is on the lower side.

See all answers

What needs improvement with MikroTik Cloud Router Switch?

It can be difficult to identify key functions for MikroTik Cloud Router Switch. I experience functionality limitations, particularly when trying to find specific features. It would be beneficial to...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for MikroTik Cloud Router Switch?

I mostly work with network equipment now, focusing mainly on routers. I work with FortiGates and MikroTik routers. When referring to FortiGate routers, I mean the firewalls, but not the enterprise-...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Catalyst Switches vs Arista Networks Platform

Compared 24% of the time

Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches vs Arista Networks Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Cisco Ethernet Switches vs Arista Networks Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Cisco Nexus vs Arista Networks Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Aruba Switches vs Arista Networks Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Arista Networks Platform Competitors

MikroTik Routers and Switches vs MikroTik Cloud Router Switch

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Enterprise Routers vs MikroTik Cloud Router Switch

Compared 7% of the time

Huawei Enterprise Routers vs MikroTik Cloud Router Switch

Compared 7% of the time

TP-Link Omada Switches vs MikroTik Cloud Router Switch

Compared 5% of the time

Fortinet FortiSwitch - Data Center vs MikroTik Cloud Router Switch

Compared 5% of the time

More MikroTik Cloud Router Switch Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Arista Networks Platform

October 2026

Download Arista Networks Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

MikroTik Cloud Router Switch

September 2026

Download MikroTik Cloud Router Switch product report

Also Known As

7000 Series

MikroTik CRS Series

Overview

Arista Networks Platform offers ultra-low latency and scalability with high bandwidth while simplifying network management through its intuitive dashboard. It enables robust support for EVPN and VXLAN, making it a top choice for modern data centers requiring efficient and effective networking solutions.

Designed to minimize complexity, Arista Networks Platform integrates seamlessly with a single operating system, providing streamlined operations. With automation capabilities via EOS and CloudVision, it enhances visibility and provisioning. Platinum and titanium power supplies contribute to reduced carbon footprints, aligning with sustainability goals. While configuration complexity and high pricing pose challenges, it remains a preferred choice for data center networking, offering premium performance and cost-effectiveness. It excels in environments like smart cities and finance, providing stability and scalability essential for demanding applications.

What are the key features of Arista Networks Platform?

Ultra-Low Latency: Ensures prompt data transmission and network responsiveness.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing network demands and data loads.
High Bandwidth: Supports increased data transfer rates for efficient network operations.
Intuitive Dashboard: Enhances manageability and monitoring with streamlined interfaces.
EVPN and VXLAN Support: Provides flexible and robust networking options.
Platinum and Titanium Power Supplies: Reduce carbon footprint while ensuring reliable performance.
EOS and CloudVision Automation: Improves visibility, provisioning, and network operation efficiency.

What benefits should users look for in Arista Networks Platform?

Cost-Effectiveness: Balances premium performance with investment value.
Reduced Complexity: Streamlined integration simplifies network management.
Improved Visibility: Enhanced automation capabilities offer better monitoring and control.
High Throughput: Supports demanding applications with reliable data handling.
Sustainability: Eco-friendly power options align with environmental goals.

Arista Networks Platform is widely implemented across industries such as finance and smart cities, supporting critical applications in network security and scalable infrastructure. It is instrumental in data center networking, video production workflows, and robotic automation. Users benefit from its spine-leaf architectures and wireless connectivity, particularly in sectors requiring high throughput and reliability.

Arista

MikroTik Cloud Router Switch offers a balance of price and performance ideal for businesses needing efficient routing and traffic management. It enables load balancing, VLAN support, and comprehensive monitoring, making it suitable for diverse network environments.

MikroTik Cloud Router Switch is recognized for its flexible routing capabilities and cost-efficient solutions, benefiting sectors like public services and education. With user-friendly setup and advanced configuration options, it efficiently manages ISP business routes, integrates into corporate networks, and scales for government projects and data centers. However, it could benefit from improvements in security aspects like VPNs, and better technical support. While admired for intuitive interfaces, there’s a desire for enhancements in hardware quality, MPLS support, and OS utilization.

What are the key features of MikroTik Cloud Router Switch?

Flexible Routing: Allows for sophisticated traffic management suited for ISPs and corporate networks.
Intuitive Interfaces: User-friendly GUI and command-line setup for ease of use across tech levels.
Advanced Security: Offers firewall features and VPN support for secure network environments.
Load Balancing: Efficiently manages network traffic to optimize performance.
VLAN Support: Enables segmenting networks to enhance security and management.

What benefits should users expect in MikroTik Cloud Router Switch?

Cost Efficiency: Competitive pricing aligned with high-performance delivery.
Scalability: Adaptable to network size, from small organizations to data centers.
User-Friendly: Simple setup and flexible configuration reduce deployment time.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Effective tools for real-time traffic and network status insights.
Support for Diverse Applications: Integrates well into educational, governmental, and commercial settings.

MikroTik Cloud Router Switch sees extensive use in industries requiring robust networking, like ISPs for core routing and client management, as well as government and educational sectors for large-scale network integration. Key users include distributors and service providers, leveraging its traffic control and secure routing in complex environments.

MikroTik

Sample Customers

American Internet Services

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Arista Networks Platform vs. MikroTik Cloud Router Switch

September 2026

Free Report: Arista Networks Platform vs. MikroTik Cloud Router Switch

Find out what your peers are saying about Arista Networks Platform vs. MikroTik Cloud Router Switch and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Arista Networks Platform vs. MikroTik Cloud Router Switch report.

See our list of best Ethernet Switches vendors.

We monitor all Ethernet Switches reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.