Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Aruba Access Points vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Aruba Access Points
Ranking in Wireless LAN
5th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
37
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Ranking in Wireless LAN
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
5.1
Number of Reviews
119
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Aruba Access Points is 1.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is 12.9%, up from 12.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Wireless LAN
 

Featured Reviews

PRADIPJOSHI - PeerSpot reviewer
Pricing competitiveness and remote management have enhanced network flexibility
One of the most valued aspects of Aruba access points is their price competitiveness; they are available at half the price of Juniper access points. Additionally, they do not require any kind of license for implementation. Despite this, many customers have their own firewall, and they can control everything from their firewall, ensuring flexibility. Furthermore, the ease of management with Aruba access points enables customers to connect them directly to their network via a PoE switch and manage them remotely from mobile devices.
RezaPradipta - PeerSpot reviewer
Streamline network management with a unified dashboard for seamless device integration
The primary use case for Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is mostly for enterprise wireless, including guest Wi-Fi and enterprise Wi-Fi. I use it across various industries with a focus on retail Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN offers a single pane of glass management. It only comes with a controller on the…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Aruba is a controller-based solution. We have some multi-story buildings. We only need to maintain one controller, and we can manage it from a single IP address."
"The tool's most valuable feature is better connectivity."
"Aruba Access Points are reliable and easy to implement."
"The manageability of both on-premise and cloud versions is valuable."
"I would rate the stability a nine out of ten. It is a stable product."
"The solution's support, stability, scalability, and good redundancy features are beneficial for our network management."
"The Adaptive Radio Management feature is quite good."
"Aruba access points protect connectivity, and we don't get interference."
"The most valuable feature of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is that it is fast and does the job."
"Its management is most valuable. It is the major feature of Meraki."
"The solution provides good coverage and identity management. Additionally, the user interface is straightforward."
"I really love their cloud-based dashboard which allows me to see all my locations from one location."
"The ability to manage it remotely is the most valuable. If it has an internet connection, you can get to it. It is a great product for remote clinics. We kind of thought about doing this kind of standalone technology. Meraki is easy to manage. From a management perspective, it is the easiest to use, especially in the cloud. I like Meraki. I even have it in my home."
"It will allow me to integrate another system very quickly, as we continue expanding for our client."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"Multiple access ID capabilities, meshing, and the quality of the product itself are all valuable features."
 

Cons

"In Aruba Access Points, the security part is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"I have to go via HP's process, which is not as good as Aruba's used to be."
"The integration capabilities of the product with the tools from other vendors is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The product is highly priced. They could improve pricing."
"There should be enhancements to support open Wi-Fi technology for seamless authentication across different access points."
"The solution’s updates and firmware are complicated to upgrade."
"The solution's lead time is very slow and should be improved."
"The delivery timeline is a major problem. There are also configuration and integration issues since not many engineers are available in the market who has expertise with the product. Some of our customers also experience network slowness."
"The biggest pain point is that they limit you through firewall throughput. I understand why they do it, but that really grates me. For instance, for 450 Mbps throughput, you're looking at £800 for a router, whereas if you look at the one gig connection, for some of us are lucky enough to have a gig connection, you could almost be spending £3,000 for the option to have one gig connectivity. That's one of the pain points I've got. I don't mind paying for throughput, but I should at least have the option to be able to update that throughput, maybe through extra licensing or something else. It is crazy expensive to jump through to the next one."
"The integration options with third-party applications need enhancement."
"The solution should be more secure."
"if there is a better feature, they write it as beta so you have to be careful."
"The annual maintenance is something that needs to be changed."
"Overall the solution needs to have more time to mature."
"The cost of the devices and the solution itself could be more competitive."
"The throughput of the switches for wireless could be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Overall, I would say the pricing is reasonable and meets our expectations."
"I implemented seven access points in 2015, and I only spent $6,000 for the whole project."
"The product is cheaper than Cisco and Huawei."
"The tool is available in the market at a reasonable price"
"Aruba Central is a bit overpriced for some customers."
"The product's pricing could be better than one of its competitors."
"The solution's pricing is nominal and not as costly as Cisco's."
"The product is costly and comes with a lifetime license. There is neither renewal nor subscription. It is a one-time solution."
"The platform is expensive."
"There are multiple licensing options including three months, six months, and one year."
"I don't deal with pricing directly, however, it's my understanding that it is around $40 per unit."
"It could be more affordable than other solutions."
"The price of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is per unit and it has annual maintenance costs."
"It is expensive, but it is a good product."
"The cost of both the hardware and licensing is high, and it is more than what I would prefer to spend currently."
"This solution is slightly more expensive than others, such as Ruckus Wi-Fi."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.
849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
19%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Aruba Access Points?
After we installed the Aruba switches, the work became faster because the network speed improved.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aruba Access Points?
Due to its pricing, Aruba access points provide good value. They are priced at half the rate of Juniper access points for basic models.
What needs improvement with Aruba Access Points?
I would like Aruba to provide integration capabilities for Microsoft Entra ID, Azure Directory, or other identity verification engines like Okta, Google Identity, or Ping Identity. It is important ...
What are pros and cons of Aruba 515 Series AP vs. Cisco Meraki or Extreme Networks?
Depends. I have personally used both Cisco and Aruba so I am familiar with them. Extreme I am not, so unless they have some feature that I need or want, I wouldn't consider them. Do you have expe...
Which is better - Cisco Wireless or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
Cisco Wireless is very robust, very rugged, and can handle indoor and outdoor coverage extremely well. We found it to be very reliable and to consistently run very efficiently. Cisco Wireless helpe...
How does Ruckus Wireless compare to Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
Cisco’s Meraki Virtual MX is a virtual instance of the Meraki SD-WAN appliance. We liked the Meraki. The Wifi APs are a great feature. The dashboard is a simple interface and easy to learn. It feat...
 

Also Known As

No data available
MR18, MR26, MR32, MR34, MR66, MR72, Meraki Wireless LAN, Meraki WLAN
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Advanced Medical Transport, Banco de Guayaquil, Baylor Scott & White Health, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Calligaris, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Del Papa Distributing, Department of Justice, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Hertz, K&L Gates , LightEdge, Lone Star College System, Management Science Associates, Mindtree, NBC Olympics, Quest, Sony Corporation, The Department of Education in Western Australia, Valley Proteins
Find out what your peers are saying about Aruba Access Points vs. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.