

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Aruba Access Points compete in the wireless networking category. Cisco Meraki holds the advantage for users needing a simple, cloud-based solution, while Aruba's robust security and integration make it preferable for enterprise-level deployments.
Features: Cisco Meraki offers intuitive cloud management, easy configuration, and solid security capabilities ideal for smaller organizations. Users enjoy the comprehensive dashboard for monitoring and reporting, making management straightforward even for limited IT resources. Cisco's cloud integration supports seamless updates and central management. Aruba Access Points provide exceptional network mobility, reliable connectivity, and compatibility with third-party technologies. Users can expect strong security features, including advanced multi-device configuration options and manageable guest portals. Aruba's deployment flexibility and integration with the broader network infrastructure make it suitable for enterprises seeking an enhanced wireless experience.
Room for Improvement: Cisco Meraki's licensing model is a concern, as non-renewal causes functionality loss, challenging for management. More advanced routing features and enhanced third-party integration are desirable. Aruba could improve scalability, accelerate technical support responsiveness, and address pricing concerns for more extensive deployments.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Meraki offers versatile deployment options through its emphasis on cloud solutions, accommodating both public and private cloud environments. Its customer service has mixed reviews, although support responsiveness is generally appreciated. Aruba focuses on on-premises setups with available hybrid cloud solutions, catering to enterprise needs. Customer feedback highlights Aruba's accessible and supportive service team, enhancing user satisfaction.
Pricing and ROI: Cisco Meraki is priced higher due to its robust cloud capabilities, offering clear ROI for smaller setups by lowering operational costs despite recurring licensing fees. Aruba Access Points are competitively priced, with some models including lifetime licenses, balancing features at a slightly better price point. Both solutions promise significant ROI, though the value is contingent on the organization size and specific requirements.
This is why we do not require technical support, as the solution remains simple without AI implementation.
It is acceptable; it was not very cheap, but it was acceptable, and we can tell our customers, 'This is a good solution and you should pay this once and you have this solution forever.'
A company called ACT is very good at support.
For technical support alone, I would give them a score of nine out of ten.
Because we work with different HP products, such as servers, storage, and high-end switches, technical assistance is only needed when there are issues on the compute side.
I would rate Cisco support a 10, as the response time and process via the dashboard are easy, and response times are always within the SLA.
It would be better if the SLA of technical support was less than four hours.
There are some problems with their technical support when it comes to the whole Meraki system.
Aruba access points integrate well with existing networks via PoE switches.
Scalability and expandability are adjusted from day one based on expansion and growth projections.
Every decision the central management makes takes extra latency to send over to the local area network.
Meraki is not scalable enough since it straightforwardly maps its products to segmented specifications.
The failure rate is very rare.
The only thing the customers need is that wireless communications work stably.
Stability is not an issue for me because it comes with Cisco's proven manufacturer quality.
We have experienced many instances where we have experienced a lag in our network, and I am not sure if it is due to their devices or our network.
Everyone discusses AI, but for providing wireless access to users, AI only plays its part when analytics are needed.
There are some problems in assessing the performance of Aruba Access Points in environments with high user density.
Some customers comment that the shape and size of the access point is a little big, especially the one installed in the guest room.
The most important improvement needed is to eliminate the limitation of uplinks.
Some of the newer models of the Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN access point have encompassed the new wireless protocols and increased the strength of their antennas.
The solution supports Wi-Fi 6.
The pricing is reasonable and lower than competitors.
They are priced at half the rate of Juniper access points for basic models.
When comparing pricing between Aruba Access Points and Forti, I find Aruba to be on the higher side.
The pricing of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is not competitive enough for the SMB market compared to other brands.
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is on par with other devices in that category, offering competitive pricing.
My experience with the pricing of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is that it is competitive with other providers offering paid subscriptions.
We receive support from Aruba, with assistance from the country manager in providing better quotations and support for projects.
Additionally, they do not require any kind of license for implementation.
Price-wise, they are cheaper than Cisco and other options.
It also manages security clients and switches, providing a single dashboard to manage multiple network infrastructures.
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN has helped optimize network traffic very effectively, as we do prioritization for streaming and web conferencing apps, resulting in a clear, visible improvement in performance.
The ability to program all access points from the Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN dashboard, view the status of all of them, and examine the individual devices connected to each access point is very valuable.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN | 10.2% |
| Aruba Access Points | 3.2% |
| Other | 86.6% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 21 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 69 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 27 |
| Large Enterprise | 31 |
Aruba Access Points are a preferred choice for enterprises, providing efficient wireless connectivity across corporate settings, educational institutions, and healthcare facilities with both indoor and outdoor deployment options.
Aruba Access Points deliver reliable Wi-Fi and network access tailored for enterprise and guest connectivity, supporting IoT devices in diverse environments such as warehouses and offices. They ensure secure connections with features like VPN management and 802.1x authentication, along with flexibility in deployment. Users can benefit from their robust warranty, ease of use, and seamless integration possibilities. The devices facilitate convenient management through both on-premise and cloud solutions, although there is a need for improved coverage, security, and integration features.
What are the standout features of Aruba Access Points?In specific industries, Aruba Access Points are implemented to enhance patient record access and guest connectivity in healthcare, support interactive learning environments in education, and streamline operations in warehouses with IoT integration. Their deployment aligns with industry-specific requirements, ensuring reliable connectivity and secure access to critical applications.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.