Asana vs Planview AdaptiveWork comparison

Asana and Planview are both solutions in the Project Management Software category. Asana is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.8, while Planview is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.0. Asana holds a 2.9% mindshare in PMS, compared to Planview’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Asana users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Planview users who would recommend it.

Asana

Read 52 Asana reviews

2,849 Views
1,852 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Planview AdaptiveWork

Read 8 Planview AdaptiveWork reviews

989 Views
692 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Asana

Planview AdaptiveWork

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Planview AdaptiveWork and Asana are project management solutions competing in delivering efficient task and project coordination. Asana seems to have the upper hand due to its rich feature set, although at a higher cost, while Planview AdaptiveWork is highlighted by users for its affordability and supportive customer service.

Features: Planview AdaptiveWork stands out with its advanced portfolio management, resource allocation capabilities, and customizable workflows, making it ideal for large enterprises needing detailed planning. Asana excels in intuitive task management, team collaboration, and various view options like Gantt chart and Kanban boards, appealing to teams of diverse sizes by ensuring ease of use and flexibility in operation.

Room for Improvement: Planview AdaptiveWork could improve its user interface for a smoother experience, possibly addressing its noted steeper learning curve and enhancing integration with other popular tools. Asana can expand its reporting tools to offer deeper analytical insights, streamline its mobile app functionalities, and potentially reduce pricing to become more cost-competitive.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Asana offers an easy cloud-based deployment noted for its simplicity and user-friendly interface. It provides comprehensive support services that facilitate new user adoption. Planview AdaptiveWork also delivers a complete cloud solution, albeit with a more complex onboarding process, offset by personalized customer support that caters to individual setup needs.

Pricing and ROI: Planview AdaptiveWork is regarded as budget-friendly, offering favorable ROI for organizations with complex requirements and constraints. Asana, while more expensive, justifies the cost with its robust feature offerings and has been perceived as providing value for its ease and flexibility.

To learn more, read our detailed Asana vs. Planview AdaptiveWork Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Asana vs. Planview AdaptiveWork

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,886 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Asana

Ranking in Project Management Software

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Sales & Marketing (5th)

Planview AdaptiveWork

Ranking in Project Management Software

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Project Management Software category, the mindshare of Asana is 2.9%, down from 6.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Planview AdaptiveWork is 1.1%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Management Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Asana	2.9%
Planview AdaptiveWork	1.1%
Other	96.0%

Project Management Software

Featured Reviews

Rusira Sathnindu

Automation Engineer at AdUp

Task tracking has streamlined sprint work but complex navigation still needs simplification

Asana's UI is a little bit too complex for me. Sometimes I get confused. Sometimes I mis-navigate. Asana is a very complicated product, but if it could offer a different kind of UI for different types of people, that would be better. This UI is good for a power user, but for a normal user who just comes to see what their tasks are, a simplified UI would be more appropriate. Sometimes the navigation is a little bit clunky. Sometimes I click back on things that I do not want to click back on. Everything else is good, and the UI is the only part that I see could use a little bit of improvement.

Read full review

reviewer2383668

Product Manager at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Helps to organize projects across multiple teams and automates manual tasks

Integration with other tools can sometimes be a hiccup, but this isn't necessarily a limitation of Planview AdaptiveWork. It's more often a result of company policies regarding integration with other systems and tools. From what I've gathered from discussions on various platforms, it appears that AdaptiveWork does integrate well with other tools. However, our experience is limited due to company policy restrictions. Some teams use it in agile settings. We follow the waterfall approach. I would recommend it, but users should ensure they strategically build out their workflows and logic. I rate the overall product an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution is easier and faster to use compared to Jira. It's not very structured and you can add sub-tasks and issues easily."

"Asana has a wonderful user experience that is very easy to interact with and has tons of integrations with other products and tools."

"It's an easy way to communicate."

"Asana has positively impacted my organization by providing flexibility, improving time to market, and enhancing collaboration."

"The solution appears to be quite stable."

"It is stable and easy to set up."

"The most valuable feature of Asana is the tracking of comments and documents in one place."

"Asana allows you to create your own project with sub sections with subtasks that can be assigned. The feature I really love is that you can tag people to notify them that there has been progress on a project as well as add attachments."

More Asana pros

"Clarizen Slide Publisher has helped increase transparency and communication with project stakeholders for us."

"Clarizen's strength is reporting. Aside from reporting, I also like the ability to create customized workflow and custom actions. The workflow rules are handy. For example, you can create custom fields and dependent picklists."

"I like the project management solution. It's really nice."

"The feature that has improved our project planning the most is the ability to create custom workflows, which allows us to automate manual tasks that project managers need to perform. The collaboration feature enhances our team's productivity by allowing individuals to see the impact of their decisions on projects owned and managed by other teams."

Cons

"The mobile application of Asana has to be improved a lot because no one wants to do a complete project management task on mobile."

"We don't get enough notifications."

"There just needs to be a bit more direction on how to use it at the outset."

"More features can be added."

"There is room for improvement in integrating Asana with different technology vendors."

"Auto-shift is an essential feature for planning, but it's currently not there. It should have this feature so that when you move a task that depends on another task, the dates should be auto-shifted. For example, you have two tasks dependent on each other. When the parent task is moved or delayed, the child task should also be delayed, and the date should be shifted. When we have a very long timeline, it's very complex to go task by task and shift the dates on the task. Auto-shift is a fantastic and basic feature of project management, and having such a feature in Asana would make our lives much easier. If Asana added this feature, it would complete the suit and close the project management cycle because currently, there is a gap."

"In Asana, there's no way to add a custom date field."

"We tried, but we haven't been successful with it. If people don't have the training, it is not easy to use. You need to make sure that the people are trained to use the system. They can provide more resources in the form of webcasts and videos that people can use to train themselves and understand how to use it."

More Asana cons

"If I start customizing too many things, Clarizen tends to get really slow in our environment and especially if I'm tunneled in an environment, like if I'm connected to my VPN."

"It could be more user-friendly. I think it is too overwhelming, initially, in terms of possibilities and so on."

"One specific area for improvement could be implementing a development environment to test workflows with live production data."

"I felt like the slide publisher isn't that user-friendly. I think it wasn't that easy to use or to figure out because of formatting constraints, or maybe we need to get better at understanding some of its limitations."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a free version of Asana, but we use the paid version to receive all the features we want. The overall price is reasonable."

"I can describe Asana's pricing as a sweet spot since it is neither very high nor very low, especially regarding the value Asana adds to its products...In our company, we use 50 percent of the features provided by Asana, because of which we only pay 50 percent of Asana's total cost."

"For what it brings to the table, I think Asana is fairly affordable. I would like to see the portfolio feature in our pricing plan, but other than that, it's definitely pretty good."

"We paid a monthly licensing fee for the product."

"The solution's free version can be used for basic functions."

"The price of this solution makes it quite accessible, and the plans fit my budget."

"Price-wise, I think it's an affordable option for mid to large-sized companies."

"Its price is fair. Its licensing cost is cheaper than Microsoft Project. I would rate it a two out of five in terms of pricing."

More Asana pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Marketing Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	40
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Asana?

The solution's user interface is very good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Asana?

The pricing of Asana is slightly high. To add one user is expensive, which makes me cautious about upgrading or adding more users.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Asana?

A rating of eight is given because a downside exists in that everyone has access and notifications are often received for projects that are not involved in, leading to quite a few emails daily, som...

See all answers

What do you like most about Planview AdaptiveWork?

The feature that has improved our project planning the most is the ability to create custom workflows, which allows us to automate manual tasks that project managers need to perform. The collaborat...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Planview AdaptiveWork?

One specific area for improvement could be implementing a development environment to test workflows with live production data.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Planview AdaptiveWork?

See all answers

Comparisons

Jira vs Asana

Compared 16% of the time

monday.com vs Asana

Compared 11% of the time

Wrike vs Asana

Compared 10% of the time

Trello vs Asana

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Project vs Asana

Compared 6% of the time

More Asana Competitors

monday.com vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Compared 10% of the time

Planview Portfolios vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Compared 9% of the time

ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Compared 7% of the time

Planview ProjectPlace vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Compared 6% of the time

Adobe Workfront vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Compared 4% of the time

More Planview AdaptiveWork Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Asana

February 2026

Download Asana product report

Buyer's Guide

Planview AdaptiveWork

February 2026

Download Planview AdaptiveWork product report

Also Known As

No data available

Planview Clarizen

Overview

Asana is web-based software-as-a-service that helps teams coordinate and manage their work. It helps companies move faster by making sure everyone knows the team’s plan and process and who is doing what by when.

Each user can create projects using a list, board, calendar, or timeline view. Within each project, users can add tasks, subtasks, sections, comments, attachments, start and due dates, and custom fields. Project and task followers get notifications on changes or comments on the project and/or task in their Inbox. Individual users can see all of the tasks they're responsible for across all of their projects in a view called My Tasks.

Asana is available in English, French, Spanish, German, and Portuguese.

Asana

AdaptiveWork services the project management software needs of more than 2,500 companies in 76 countries worldwide. They boast a robust client list, including companies such as: Chanel, Cisco, The Walt Disney Company, EA, FedEx, HP, UPS, and VMWare. Founded in 2006, their goal is to change the way collaboration happens within companies of all sizes. AdaptiveWork focuses strongly on the fact that transparency, communication, and idea sharing are key in effective business models.

AdaptiveWork uses the cloud and social communications in their software. This helps AdaptiveWork project management software provide real time updates, maximize efficiency of collaboration, and keep all team members productive and on the same page. AdaptiveWork is fully configurable, and is designed to scale and adapt to different organizational needs. Their task management software is easy to implement, meaning start up will not cost clients time away from their work.

AdaptiveWork offers an enterprise-class project management software solution that fits all businesses' project management needs. With a name created from the words "Clarity" and "Zen", AdaptiveWork's software is designed to help businesses collaborate effectively and create true peace of mind. Project management software doesn't just help get work done; it helps create stronger and more efficient teams. By keeping everyone on the same page, AdaptiveWork task management software helps your team stay focused on the goal of your project.

Planview

Sample Customers

Uber, Vodaphone, NASA, Spotify, Lyft, Baggu, Udacity, Patreon, Flipboard, Dropbox, Intel, Samsung, Airbnb, SFMoma, Hubspot, Trivago

Cisco Capital, JLL, Conagra Brands, Cargill, JLL, IBM, IIROC, Siemens Energy

Buyer's Guide

Asana vs. Planview AdaptiveWork

February 2026

Free Report: Asana vs. Planview AdaptiveWork

Find out what your peers are saying about Asana vs. Planview AdaptiveWork and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Asana vs. Planview AdaptiveWork report.

See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.