Atlan vs MANTA Flow comparison

Atlan and Manta are both solutions in the Data Governance category. Atlan is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.7, while Manta is ranked #29. Atlan holds a 2.0% mindshare in DG, compared to Manta’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Atlan users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Manta users who would recommend it.

Atlan

Read 6 Atlan reviews

854 Views
529 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MANTA Flow

Read 2 MANTA Flow reviews

431 Views
313 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Atlan

MANTA Flow

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

MANTA Flow and Atlan are products in the data management category. Atlan has the upper hand with a comprehensive feature set that justifies its premium pricing, while MANTA Flow appeals to those seeking cost-effectiveness and strong customer support.

Features: MANTA Flow focuses on data lineage, impact analysis, and detailed visualizations for compliance and risk management. Atlan offers a collaborative platform, scalability, and ease of integration across various ecosystems. MANTA Flow prioritizes depth in data processing, while Atlan caters to collaborative environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MANTA Flow offers straightforward deployment with robust customer service, emphasizing quick setup and efficient support solutions. Atlan has a mature deployment model with extended support services, requiring a longer integration phase but providing comprehensive assistance.

Pricing and ROI: MANTA Flow, with lower setup costs, is attractive for organizations with tighter budgets, offering quick ROI with lower financial risk. Atlan requires a higher initial investment but presents long-term benefits with its extensive feature set, appealing to those seeking long-term value through rich functionalities.

To learn more, read our detailed Atlan vs. MANTA Flow Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Atlan vs. MANTA Flow

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Atlan

Ranking in Data Governance

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MANTA Flow

Ranking in Data Governance

29th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of Atlan is 2.0%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MANTA Flow is 0.7%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Governance

Featured Reviews

Leon Pereira

Senior Analytics Engineer at virginmediao2

Enhanced data management with intuitive data lineage and metadata visualization

Certain UI changes could make Atlan more user-friendly. While they have an Excel add-in for interaction with Atlan, it's in its early stages and could be improved. Additionally, data observability capabilities could be enhanced to provide more alerts on stale or outdated data via communication tools like Microsoft Teams, Slack, or email.

Read full review

LeandroSodré

Data Governance Analyst at Data Meaning, Inc.

Very Powerful, with cloud based scalability, and highly efficient for both business and technical teams

I had some difficulties, trying to use the direct link which is metadata through files that you can upload to MANTA Flow and you can just say from there where that data is going. But we just figured out that sometimes, depending on the level of the granularity that if you want to link the object, you can not. For example, if you want to link the objects just by schema, sometimes it does not work. So you need to scroll down and link each table. Sometimes the table level does not work, and you need to go deeper and go to link column to column. We figured out that this was a bug in MANTA Flow, and we talked to them and I think they were fixing it. But in our case, we just realized that if we could link the objects at the lowest level possible, it would work. I was trying to develop, right now, some kind of automation to compare the listed revision that I have in MANTA Flow with some other revision. And I would like to do it in an automatic way. I would like to have some kind of API where I could call this object and the revision that I want and the same object and another revision that I wanted to compare with. And I could not see it as some API in MANTA Flow, and we have this feature on the user interface. I think it would be very powerful because if you want to automate just warn the data owners the structures were updated by looking at the object level, and send an email to these owners to see if that change makes sense.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The AI part is integrated for enriching metadata engagement, making it a comprehensive tool."

"Atlan is helpful for identifying datasets and discovering PI data, such as the classification levels of datasets (gold, silver, bronze)."

"Overall, I rate Atlan as a ten out of ten."

"The technical support services are good."

"The best feature of Atlan is its integration with communication platforms like Microsoft Teams and Slack, so business users don't have to go into a data catalog to see metadata about data assets."

"As a senior analytics engineer, Atlan's ability to show end-to-end data lineage is the most important feature for me."

"They also offer automated lineage embedded in the connectors, allowing us to track where the data is coming from and where it's going. We find it very efficient in cataloging data sources. Additionally, the user-friendly interface is a big plus, making it easy for users to familiarize themselves with the solution. These two features, in my opinion, stand out the most."

"Atlas is quite intuitive."

More Atlan pros

"I believe it is very powerful. And for technicians, you can see the impact analysis, you can compare versions. So you can see some revisions against some of the oldest ones. You can compare and see which pipelines were updated between them. I think it is very helpful to both sides, the technical and business teams."

"The solution is stable. We have not found any fatal errors yet."

Cons

"There are some improvements. There is a feature called Playbooks, which basically allows me to automate certain activities that would otherwise be manual. It's a very interesting feature, but there is room to improve it because, depending on the task you automate, the playbooks seem to have a hard time handling the task. So, it could be improved there. Even though it's a great feature, it can evolve further."

"The product could be improved by offering scheduled email reports for managed assets."

"Certain UI changes could make Atlan more user-friendly."

"One area that could be improved is the capability to find duplicates of datasets."

"One of the main areas for improvement is its governance capabilities."

"Certain UI changes could make Atlan more user-friendly."

"The challenge is in the lineage, where it requires improvement. Atlas needs to capture areas where organizations use less known applications."

"One of the main areas for improvement is its governance capabilities. Atlan supports only basic out-of-the-box workflows, and it becomes challenging to customize features like how data owners should approve access to data assets."

More Atlan cons

"One area of improvement for MANTA Flow is to add as many new data sources as possible. We have found that maybe they can support 100, but not 101, unfortunately."

"I would like to have some kind of API where I could call this object and the revision that I want and the same object and another revision that I wanted to compare with. And I could not see it as some API in MANTA Flow, and we have this feature on the user interface."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay per-user license. It's a different classification model than with other solutions, where they usually charge you for resources. So, that was a better model for us. And because of this difference in models or classification, it was cheaper for us to go with Atlan."

"As a service company, we don't care about the price because the customer is paying, but the customers consider MANTA to be reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Insurance Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

38%

Non Profit

11%

Insurance Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Atlan?

They also offer automated lineage embedded in the connectors, allowing us to track where the data is coming from and where it's going. We find it very efficient in cataloging data sources. Additi...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Atlan?

Atlas is competitively priced compared to other data governance platforms like Collibra and Informatica. The only major drawback is its lack of an integrated data quality module.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Atlan?

The challenge is in the lineage, where it requires improvement. Atlas needs to capture areas where organizations use less known applications.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Atlan

Compared 50% of the time

Collibra Governance vs Atlan

Compared 13% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs Atlan

Compared 13% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Atlan

Compared 7% of the time

Ataccama ONE Platform vs Atlan

Compared 7% of the time

More Atlan Competitors

Collibra Lineage vs MANTA Flow

Compared 58% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs MANTA Flow

Compared 24% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs MANTA Flow

Compared 18% of the time

More MANTA Flow Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Atlan

April 2025

Download Atlan product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Governance

April 2025

Download MANTA Flow product report

Overview

Atlan is a comprehensive data management platform designed to enhance data democratization, governance, and collaboration across departments in organizations. It offers a centralized data catalog, intuitive user interface, and robust governance framework to ensure data security and compliance. Users appreciate its efficiency in streamlining processes, promoting better communication, and providing insightful analytics, which drive organizational growth and success.

Atlan

Data Lineage Done Right
MANTA’s unified lineage platform maps all information flows to give you a complete overview of your data pipeline. Save money on manual labor by automating data lineage discovery; keep your data pipeline healthy by preventing data incidents; and migrate painlessly to the cloud.

Free Report: Atlan vs. MANTA Flow

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlan vs. MANTA Flow and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Atlan vs. MANTA Flow report.

See our list of best Data Governance vendors.

We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.