Atlan vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance comparison

Atlan and Microsoft are both solutions in the Data Governance category. Atlan is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.7, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.6. Atlan holds a 2.1% mindshare in DG, compared to Microsoft’s 27.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Atlan users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Atlan

Read 6 Atlan reviews

669 Views
443 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Purview Data Gove...

Read 56 Microsoft Purview Data Governance reviews

20,922 Views
10,531 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Atlan

Microsoft Purview Data Gove...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Microsoft Purview Data Governance and Atlan are products in the data management and governance category. Microsoft Purview may have the edge due to its seamless Azure integration, while Atlan offers a more adaptable and comprehensive feature set.

Features: Microsoft Purview Data Governance provides robust data cataloging, data classification, and data mapping. It supports data lineage and compliance tracking, crucial for enterprises. Atlan is recognized for its flexibility, collaborative workspace, and powerful analytics, offering custom workflows and real-time collaboration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Purview benefits from straightforward deployment within the Azure ecosystem and reliable Microsoft customer support. Atlan offers a flexible, cloud-agnostic deployment model with good customer service that aids in onboarding and troubleshooting.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Purview Data Governance's pricing aligns with Azure's consumption-based model, which provides predictable costs for users within the Azure ecosystem. Atlan's subscription model may represent a higher upfront investment but could potentially deliver superior ROI through greater feature richness and flexibility.

To learn more, read our detailed Atlan vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Atlan vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,265 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Atlan

Ranking in Data Governance

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Purview Data Gove...

Ranking in Data Governance

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Microsoft Security Suite (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of Atlan is 2.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Purview Data Governance is 27.8%, down from 28.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Governance

Featured Reviews

Leon Pereira

Senior Analytics Engineer at virginmediao2

Enhanced data management with intuitive data lineage and metadata visualization

Certain UI changes could make Atlan more user-friendly. While they have an Excel add-in for interaction with Atlan, it's in its early stages and could be improved. Additionally, data observability capabilities could be enhanced to provide more alerts on stale or outdated data via communication tools like Microsoft Teams, Slack, or email.

Read full review

James McDowall

Senior Microsoft Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

The sensitivity and retention options in Purview are excellent

Some of the menu headings may not be easy to understand for some people. For example, when I first used Purview, I noticed that one of the self-compliance centers had changed its name. Microsoft has done a huge amount of updates, and sometimes it's hard to keep track of what Purview can do. We almost constantly have to explore it. Maybe Microsoft could have a 365 roadmap where we can look at upcoming features, or some kind of bulletin announcement for Purview users that explains new features and what they can do in simple terms. We could also look at the menu settings. In my experience of using Purview, we've never used it as an exclusive system for IT professionals or technical staff. We were very keen that other specialists around the business made use of some of these features because we thought that some of what Purview could do was relevant to other departments as well as IT. For example, we have HR managers and financial staff who use it. I think that some of the terminology in Purview is pitched toward IT and tech professionals, and it may not be immediately understood by other specialists. This is something that could be improved.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Overall, I rate Atlan as a ten out of ten."

"Overall, I rate Atlan a nine out of ten."

"As a senior analytics engineer, Atlan's ability to show end-to-end data lineage is the most important feature for me."

"The AI part is integrated for enriching metadata engagement, making it a comprehensive tool."

"The best feature of Atlan is its integration with communication platforms like Microsoft Teams and Slack, so business users don't have to go into a data catalog to see metadata about data assets."

"Atlas is quite intuitive."

"They also offer automated lineage embedded in the connectors, allowing us to track where the data is coming from and where it's going. We find it very efficient in cataloging data sources. Additionally, the user-friendly interface is a big plus, making it easy for users to familiarize themselves with the solution. These two features, in my opinion, stand out the most."

More Atlan pros

"The custom classifications are one of the most valuable features."

"Microsoft Purview offers data protection across a multi-cloud and multi-platform environment."

"Purview's greatest benefit for us is data discovery."

"The reporting is excellent. Limiting what people can see is also valuable, especially when tagging documents."

"The time to onboard is pretty short."

"The sensitivity labeling is the most valuable feature because it is the foundation for automating the encryption process and ensuring proper data handling across the organization."

"The best part is that I can create classifications per my requirements. I use it to classify multiple platforms like AWS, GCP, Azure, and different file sharing systems."

"One important feature is data security, which both end users and the organization seek."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance pros

Cons

"There are some improvements. There is a feature called Playbooks, which basically allows me to automate certain activities that would otherwise be manual. It's a very interesting feature, but there is room to improve it because, depending on the task you automate, the playbooks seem to have a hard time handling the task. So, it could be improved there. Even though it's a great feature, it can evolve further."

"One of the main areas for improvement is its governance capabilities. Atlan supports only basic out-of-the-box workflows, and it becomes challenging to customize features like how data owners should approve access to data assets."

"One area that could be improved is the capability to find duplicates of datasets."

"Certain UI changes could make Atlan more user-friendly."

"The product could be improved by offering scheduled email reports for managed assets."

"The challenge is in the lineage, where it requires improvement."

"One of the main areas for improvement is its governance capabilities."

More Atlan cons

"Reflecting organizational changes within Purview is impractical."

"We have had some issues automating our document management with Power Apps. I haven't been super-disappointed with anything except for Power Apps, which kinda drives me nuts. I think it's because I am a coder who can do things properly, and I keep trying to do things there, but it's not working out the way. The security team is pretty quick. I'm kind of a thorn in their side. I always try to get around stuff. They haven't come to me for anything saying, "Hey, I can't find this information." They're pretty good. Maybe, there's a lack of documentation, but that doesn't seem to be an issue for our team."

"he one thing it doesn't do is data quality."

"The product needs improvement to edit the number of assets. It needs to be more inuitive as well."

"In terms of the competence of the tools with the Microsoft ecosystem, the product can do better."

"Some of the menu headings may not be easy to understand for some people."

"Privacy features should be integrated into the core product rather than offered as optional add-ons, as privacy is not a luxury but a fundamental requirement."

"Two features are unsupported—custom insights and the DLP component—that would be beneficial to me as a consultant and for the customer in terms of security and monitoring. Regarding security, DLP would provide a more granular level of data masking. Custom insights would offer more detailed monitoring and alerts that can notify customers of failures or anything requiring urgent action."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay per-user license. It's a different classification model than with other solutions, where they usually charge you for resources. So, that was a better model for us. And because of this difference in models or classification, it was cheaper for us to go with Atlan."

"The pricing depends on the client's requirements and the number of applications."

"The pricing is moderate. It's not too expensive, but it's not the most competitive."

"It is cheap. It is based on consumption. If somebody wants to start using it, the price is definitely cheaper than a tool like Collibra."

"The solution is extremely affordable for the K-12 space."

"Aside from the complexity of the pricing model, the price itself is realistic. Features like AI components and automatic classification require additional licenses. Still, anyone can start using Purview with a basic E3 license if they're using Microsoft 365 and grow with additional licenses as needed. Overall, we're satisfied with the price."

"Microsoft Purview has a pay-per-use pricing model, so it's one of the most cost-effective tools, as your cost will be based on your usage. It's a pricing model that Microsoft has nailed down, making it great whether you're a small organization or a multinational, giant organization."

"The categorization within the licensing could be improved. There are a lot of solutions within Microsoft Purview. If the licensing could be a bit clearer and the solutions could be better categorized according to function and across multiple environments, that would be excellent. The licensing is very confusing."

"The pricing is reasonable because it's part of the 365 E3 or E5 license you buy."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Insurance Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Atlan?

They also offer automated lineage embedded in the connectors, allowing us to track where the data is coming from and where it's going. We find it very efficient in cataloging data sources. Additi...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Atlan?

Atlas is competitively priced compared to other data governance platforms like Collibra and Informatica. The only major drawback is its lack of an integrated data quality module.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Atlan?

The challenge is in the lineage, where it requires improvement. Atlas needs to capture areas where organizations use less known applications.

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Purview?

It is designed to seamlessly connect to various data sources, which is particularly beneficial for our customers who primarily use Microsoft technologies.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Purview?

The auto-tagging feature should be available at a lower licensing level.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Purview?

Auto-tagging should be available at lower levels of licensing. Right now, a high level of licensing is needed for auto-tagging, and this feature should be made available at a lower license level.

See all answers

Comparisons

Collibra Governance vs Atlan

Compared 19% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs Atlan

Compared 19% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Atlan

Compared 9% of the time

Ataccama ONE Platform vs Atlan

Compared 7% of the time

More Atlan Competitors

Collibra Governance vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 19% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 11% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 7% of the time

Ataccama ONE Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 2% of the time

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Atlan

January 2025

Download Atlan product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview Data Governance

January 2025

Microsoft Purview Data Governance report

Download Microsoft Purview Data Governance product report

Also Known As

No data available

Microsoft Purview, MS Azure Purview

Learn More

Atlan

Video not available

Microsoft

Overview

Atlan is a comprehensive data management platform designed to enhance data democratization, governance, and collaboration across departments in organizations. It offers a centralized data catalog, intuitive user interface, and robust governance framework to ensure data security and compliance. Users appreciate its efficiency in streamlining processes, promoting better communication, and providing insightful analytics, which drive organizational growth and success.

The new Microsoft Purview portal offers an enhanced governance experience, serving as a unified platform for managing and governing data across various sources, including Azure, Microsoft 365, on-premises, and multicloud environments. Designed to streamline governance, compliance, risk, and security efforts, the new portal provides a user-friendly interface and unlocks advanced features like live view and preset scans. Existing users of Microsoft Purview can upgrade to this enhanced experience, gaining access to improved user interface, enhanced capabilities, and consolidated management of data assets. Additionally, the upgrade sets the stage for future developments, including account consolidation and fine-grained access control.

Buyer's Guide

Atlan vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance

January 2025

Free Report: Atlan vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlan vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Atlan vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance report.

See our list of best Data Governance vendors.

We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.