Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

MANTA Flow vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance comparison

Manta and Microsoft are both solutions in the Data Governance category. Manta is ranked #29, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.6. Manta holds a 0.7% mindshare in DG, compared to Microsoft’s 23.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Manta users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
MANTA Flow
Read 2 MANTA Flow reviews
  • 431 Views
  • 313 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Microsoft Purview Data Gove...
Read 57 Microsoft Purview Data Governance reviews
  • 18,511 Views
  • 9,700 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Microsoft Purview Data Governance and MANTA Flow compete in data governance and lineage. Microsoft Purview leads in pricing and support satisfaction, while MANTA Flow offers superior features.

Features: Microsoft Purview Data Governance provides a centralized platform for managing data assets, ensuring compliance, and implementing access policies. It emphasizes integration with Azure services. MANTA Flow offers comprehensive data lineage visualization, automatic impact analysis, and compatibility with multiple data environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Purview's deployment is streamlined within Azure environments, supported by robust service. MANTA Flow offers a flexible deployment model, supporting on-premises and cloud integrations, although it may be more complex to set up.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Purview Data Governance is cost-effective for enterprises with investments in Microsoft technologies, providing good returns due to ecosystem integration. MANTA Flow, with potentially higher initial setup costs, delivers significant ROI through detailed lineage and impact analysis, beneficial for complex data environments.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed MANTA Flow vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
MANTA Flow vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 849,190 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

MANTA Flow
Ranking in Data Governance
29th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Purview Data Gove...
Ranking in Data Governance
1st
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
57
Ranking in other categories
Microsoft Security Suite (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of MANTA Flow is 0.7%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Purview Data Governance is 23.9%, down from 25.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Governance
 

Featured Reviews

LeandroSodré - PeerSpot reviewer
Very Powerful, with cloud based scalability, and highly efficient for both business and technical teams
I had some difficulties, trying to use the direct link which is metadata through files that you can upload to MANTA Flow and you can just say from there where that data is going. But we just figured out that sometimes, depending on the level of the granularity that if you want to link the object, you can not. For example, if you want to link the objects just by schema, sometimes it does not work. So you need to scroll down and link each table. Sometimes the table level does not work, and you need to go deeper and go to link column to column. We figured out that this was a bug in MANTA Flow, and we talked to them and I think they were fixing it. But in our case, we just realized that if we could link the objects at the lowest level possible, it would work. I was trying to develop, right now, some kind of automation to compare the listed revision that I have in MANTA Flow with some other revision. And I would like to do it in an automatic way. I would like to have some kind of API where I could call this object and the revision that I want and the same object and another revision that I wanted to compare with. And I could not see it as some API in MANTA Flow, and we have this feature on the user interface. I think it would be very powerful because if you want to automate just warn the data owners the structures were updated by looking at the object level, and send an email to these owners to see if that change makes sense.
Read full review
James McDowall - PeerSpot reviewer
The sensitivity and retention options in Purview are excellent
Some of the menu headings may not be easy to understand for some people. For example, when I first used Purview, I noticed that one of the self-compliance centers had changed its name. Microsoft has done a huge amount of updates, and sometimes it's hard to keep track of what Purview can do. We almost constantly have to explore it. Maybe Microsoft could have a 365 roadmap where we can look at upcoming features, or some kind of bulletin announcement for Purview users that explains new features and what they can do in simple terms. We could also look at the menu settings. In my experience of using Purview, we've never used it as an exclusive system for IT professionals or technical staff. We were very keen that other specialists around the business made use of some of these features because we thought that some of what Purview could do was relevant to other departments as well as IT. For example, we have HR managers and financial staff who use it. I think that some of the terminology in Purview is pitched toward IT and tech professionals, and it may not be immediately understood by other specialists. This is something that could be improved.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is stable. We have not found any fatal errors yet."
"I believe it is very powerful. And for technicians, you can see the impact analysis, you can compare versions. So you can see some revisions against some of the oldest ones. You can compare and see which pipelines were updated between them. I think it is very helpful to both sides, the technical and business teams."
"The most valuable aspect of Purview is its PowerShell connectivity, enabling automation."
"It gives you the opportunity to know your data and apply policies around it. If those policies are flouted, you can always track what's happening. You have options such as alerting the person who is committing that action, or you can take automatic action by blocking, for example, an email that is been sent externally. It's very useful."
"I like Purview's data discovery features. It automatically scans and identifies all the fields. In the last project, the customer required us to have some of the codes we specified in this, and we had to structure the codes in a specific way. We can define the structure."
"The time to onboard is pretty short."
"The ability to classify data quickly and effortlessly is arguably Microsoft Purview's most valuable feature."
"Microsoft Purview offers data protection across a multi-cloud and multi-platform environment."
"My favorite features are eDiscovery and insider risk management, because these are the major threats to an organization that can't be easily traced."
"Purview's ability to connect to iOS, Mac, and Android devices is critical."
More Microsoft Purview Data Governance pros
 

Cons

"One area of improvement for MANTA Flow is to add as many new data sources as possible. We have found that maybe they can support 100, but not 101, unfortunately."
"I would like to have some kind of API where I could call this object and the revision that I want and the same object and another revision that I wanted to compare with. And I could not see it as some API in MANTA Flow, and we have this feature on the user interface."
"Running eDiscovery once a day takes quite a long time because it has to fetch your data. I also want the eDiscovery results to be improved. At the same time, I would like to get a centralized page where I could see records management applied to my Office 365 tenant visualized instead of waiting for a custom script to run through the complete tenant."
"The product must provide better integrations with OS X and iOS."
"There are some limitations with regard to the lineage of data from different parts of the system."
"The product needs improvement to edit the number of assets. It needs to be more inuitive as well."
"Although you can explore the data, that creates a great interest in data lineage or the data flow. How does it go from a source to a platform to a Power BI report, for example? It is possible, to some extent, to see that with Purview, but the lineage feature requires some manual work on the development side or more work from Microsoft to improve on it."
"I try to avoid opening tickets with Microsoft due to long response times, which is frustrating."
"Some of the menu headings may not be easy to understand for some people."
"As Microsoft Purview got a little more mature, the deployments got a little more complex, as we were kind of seeing that there are a lot of ways, like there were a hundred ways to do one thing or less."
More Microsoft Purview Data Governance cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As a service company, we don't care about the price because the customer is paying, but the customers consider MANTA to be reasonable."
"I consider it cost-efficient because of the metrics it provides."
"The categorization within the licensing could be improved. There are a lot of solutions within Microsoft Purview. If the licensing could be a bit clearer and the solutions could be better categorized according to function and across multiple environments, that would be excellent. The licensing is very confusing."
"I would rate the cost of Microsoft Purview a six out of ten with ten being the most expensive."
"Currently, the licensing differs for the governance side compared to the risk and compliance side."
"While Purview's standard pricing might not be accessible to most small businesses, we were fortunate to benefit from the educational pricing which made it a financially viable option for our needs."
"To get the full features of Purview, we currently need E5 enterprise licenses, which are expensive."
"Purview's price is pretty high when you factor in storage costs."
"The price is reasonable because most of our clients already have an E3 license, which makes implementation easy."
More Microsoft Purview Data Governance pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
37%
Non Profit
11%
Insurance Company
9%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Purview?
It is designed to seamlessly connect to various data sources, which is particularly beneficial for our customers who primarily use Microsoft technologies.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Purview?
The auto-tagging feature should be available at a lower licensing level.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Purview?
Auto-tagging should be available at lower levels of licensing. Right now, a high level of licensing is needed for auto-tagging, and this feature should be made available at a lower license level.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Collibra Lineage vs MANTA Flow Logo
Collibra Lineage vs MANTA Flow
Compared 58% of the time
Alation Data Catalog vs MANTA Flow Logo
Alation Data Catalog vs MANTA Flow
Compared 19% of the time
More MANTA Flow Competitors
Collibra Governance vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance Logo
Collibra Governance vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance
Compared 19% of the time
Varonis Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance Logo
Varonis Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance
Compared 13% of the time
Collibra Lineage vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance Logo
Collibra Lineage vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance
Compared 10% of the time
Alation Data Catalog vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance Logo
Alation Data Catalog vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance
Compared 9% of the time
Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance Logo
Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance
Compared 6% of the time
More Microsoft Purview Data Governance Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Data Governance
April 2025
MANTA Flow reportDownload MANTA Flow product report
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Purview Data Governance
April 2025
Microsoft Purview Data Governance reportDownload Microsoft Purview Data Governance product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Microsoft Purview, MS Azure Purview
 

Overview

Data Lineage Done Right
MANTA’s unified lineage platform maps all information flows to give you a complete overview of your data pipeline. Save money on manual labor by automating data lineage discovery; keep your data pipeline healthy by preventing data incidents; and migrate painlessly to the cloud.

Manta

The new Microsoft Purview portal offers an enhanced governance experience, serving as a unified platform for managing and governing data across various sources, including Azure, Microsoft 365, on-premises, and multicloud environments. Designed to streamline governance, compliance, risk, and security efforts, the new portal provides a user-friendly interface and unlocks advanced features like live view and preset scans. Existing users of Microsoft Purview can upgrade to this enhanced experience, gaining access to improved user interface, enhanced capabilities, and consolidated management of data assets. Additionally, the upgrade sets the stage for future developments, including account consolidation and fine-grained access control.

Microsoft
Buyer's Guide
MANTA Flow vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance
April 2025
Free Report: MANTA Flow vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance
Find out what your peers are saying about MANTA Flow vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our MANTA Flow vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance report.
See our list of best Data Governance vendors.

We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.