We performed a comparison between Atlassian Crowd and Okta Workforce Identity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."One standout feature is the capability to configure various authentication and authorization methods from diverse user directories."
"The most valuable features are predominantly in the directory and development spaces."
"It is dependent on the evolution of your user base. It depends on usage per user, so the more sign-ins there are, the more expensive it becomes, so it works best for smaller companies from a financial perspective."
"Workforce Identity's best features include its user-friendliness and easy setup."
"I like the tool's workflows, which is user-friendly. It can integrate with different applications. I particularly like that users are delighted to access their applications without the hassle of entering their username and password each time. It truly enhances user-friendliness."
"It's reliable and it does what it is advertised to do."
"Okta controls all the users. It has context-based access from the user and type of device. It identifies the risk and can do a step of authentication when that user is trying to access some sensitive application from an unknown device."
"The product requires very little maintenance."
"It has a wide range of MFA options. I prefer "Okta Verify" out of them all."
"Okta Workforce Identity is easy to use and has a lot of components."
"It makes you more efficient, but you have to optimize what you're doing before you get into the software."
"There's a need for effective group membership management, especially for corporate programs."
"The product does not offer enough integration capabilities."
"It is challenging to obtain a comprehensive backup."
"The only area of concern in the solution stems from the fact that my company needs some help regarding the setup phase from a partner."
"Okta Workforce Identity can improve by having more features in governance."
"We have experienced some challenges in integrating this solution with Scope and Cognito."
"UD attribute mapping, Okta group rules, and dynamic usage could use improvement. It also needs more in-depth functionality and features to integrate with RADIUS solutions."
"It would be pricing, which is a tough one because it goes against Microsoft. A lot of companies say they're a Microsoft partner, and they get all their software for free. Okta is like a luxury product, and it's not the most affordable one. I would say if they could work on pricing, it would help. Other than that, they've done great strides in developing a product that is really good. The companies that do see the value tend to invest in it."
"Application updates are lacking. Customer support needs to be improved."
Atlassian Crowd is ranked 17th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 4 reviews while Okta Workforce Identity is ranked 4th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 59 reviews. Atlassian Crowd is rated 9.2, while Okta Workforce Identity is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Atlassian Crowd writes "Enhanced user management offering seamless single sign-on, scalability for large enterprises, and improved configurability through integration with various user sources and directories". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Okta Workforce Identity writes "Extremely easy to work with, simple to set up, and reasonably priced ". Atlassian Crowd is most compared with , whereas Okta Workforce Identity is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Google Cloud Identity, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt and Auth0. See our Atlassian Crowd vs. Okta Workforce Identity report.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
