Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Automai AppVerify vs CrossBrowserTesting comparison

Automai Corporation and SmartBear are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Automai Corporation is ranked #40, while SmartBear is ranked #28. Automai Corporation holds a 0.2% mindshare in FT, compared to SmartBear’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of SmartBear users are willing to recommend the solution.
Automai AppVerify
  • 115 Views
  • 84 Comparison Views
CrossBrowserTesting
Read 19 CrossBrowserTesting reviews
  • 850 Views
  • 669 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Automai AppVerify and CrossBrowserTesting based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, BrowserStack and others in Functional Testing Tools.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 814,649 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

Automai AppVerify
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
40th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Regression Testing Tools (25th)
CrossBrowserTesting
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
28th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Automai AppVerify is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CrossBrowserTesting is 0.9%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Use Automai AppVerify?
Share your opinion
Michael Hutchison - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 7, 2020
Static screenshots are the feature most often used, because they are a simple method of detecting problems
When developing new pages that have questionable functionality or coding, we will often use CBT to test it in a variety of browsers and devices. CBT works with our testing environment and development site.  Our greatest concern is universal appearance and functionality, thus we test a great many…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"A few intermediary pricing options for small QA teams would be nice, e.g., unlimited screenshots, "as you need it" parallel tests, etc."
"SmartBear offers bundles of products that work together."
"It is worth the pricing as the product is supported on multiple platforms and browsers."
"The lowest price point is very reasonable. It is also useful if only one person in the company needs to check on the browser display."
"CrossBrowserTesting offered the best value for its price."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
24%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Government
9%
Educational Organization
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Comparisons

No data available
BrowserStack vs CrossBrowserTesting Logo
BrowserStack vs CrossBrowserTesting
Compared 54% of the time
Tricentis Tosca vs CrossBrowserTesting Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs CrossBrowserTesting
Compared 22% of the time
Bitbar vs CrossBrowserTesting Logo
Bitbar vs CrossBrowserTesting
Compared 13% of the time
Sauce Labs vs CrossBrowserTesting Logo
Sauce Labs vs CrossBrowserTesting
Compared 11% of the time
More CrossBrowserTesting Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Regression Testing Tools
October 2024
Automai AppVerify reportDownload Automai AppVerify product report
Buyer's Guide
CrossBrowserTesting
November 2024
CrossBrowserTesting reportDownload CrossBrowserTesting product report
 

Also Known As

AppVerify, NRG Global AppVerify
No data available
 

Learn More

Automai Corporation
SmartBear
 

Overview

Continuous Regression Testing for Agile, DevOps, and Continuous Delivery teams. A solution to test any of your applications from the user standpoint. Scripts are created without writing a line of code. Streamline your testing processes and be assured all changes are verified. Get a free POC here: https://www.nrgglobal.com/application-performance-monitoring-appswatch/

CrossBrowserTesting is a cloud testing platform that gives instant access to 1500+ different real desktop and mobile browsers for testers, developers, and designers.

  • Native debugging tools make manual testing easy to inspect and correct HTML, CSS, and JavaScript errors on any browser.
  • Take automated screenshots across multiple browsers at once, then compare side-by-side against historical test runs.
 

Sample Customers

Cap Gemini
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Accenture, Sony, Los Angeles Times, ADP, Verizon, T-Mobile, Wistia
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
October 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, BrowserStack and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.