Top 10 CrossBrowserTesting Alternatives

4.5 out of 5

19 reviews
100% willing to recommend

291 followers

Top CrossBrowserTesting Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to CrossBrowserTesting based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT One, and BrowserStack. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

SmartBear Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with SmartBear, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Tricentis Tosca

4.1 out of 5

Tricentis Tosca

4.1 out of 5

Tricentis Tosca excels in flexibility and depth through model-based automation and enterprise integration. In comparison, CrossBrowserTesting provides cost-efficient, specialized browser and device compatibility with easy cloud deployment, appealing to companies prioritizing quick setup and cross-platform testing for web and mobile applications.

Download CrossBrowserTesting vs. Tricentis Tosca Report

Pricing

Tricentis Tosca has a higher initial setup cost, while CrossBrowserTesting offers more affordable setup options.

View comparison

Pricing

Tricentis Tosca has a higher initial setup cost, while CrossBrowserTesting offers more affordable setup options.

OpenText UFT One

4.0 out of 5

OpenText UFT One

4.0 out of 5

OpenText UFT One offers robust test automation with extensive scripting and ALM tool integration, ideal for enterprise environments. In comparison, CrossBrowserTesting provides cloud-based browser compatibility testing and real device flexibility. OpenText targets large-scale automation, while CrossBrowserTesting suits teams needing straightforward deployment and cost-effectiveness.

Download CrossBrowserTesting vs. OpenText UFT One Report

Pricing

OpenText UFT One has a higher setup cost compared to CrossBrowserTesting, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup. CrossBrowserTesting provides affordability in setup while OpenText UFT One might require a larger initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

BrowserStack

4.0 out of 5

BrowserStack

4.0 out of 5

BrowserStack excels in support and pricing, appealing to cost-conscious buyers seeking rapid deployment. In comparison, CrossBrowserTesting offers advanced features and integration, attracting those prioritizing automation and comprehensive toolsets despite higher costs. BrowserStack's simplicity contrasts with CrossBrowserTesting's detailed documentation and automation capabilities.

Download BrowserStack vs. CrossBrowserTesting Report

Pricing

BrowserStack offers a straightforward setup process with no initial costs, while CrossBrowserTesting involves a setup fee that may increase initial investment. The absence of setup costs in BrowserStack highlights a cost-effective entry compared to CrossBrowserTesting.

View comparison

Pricing

Sauce Labs

4.4 out of 5

Sauce Labs

4.4 out of 5

Sauce Labs excels in automation and CI/CD integrations, appealing to those prioritizing scalability and speed. In comparison, CrossBrowserTesting's extensive browser and device compatibility offers better real-world testing scenarios. Sauce Labs supports robust deployments, while CrossBrowserTesting delivers instant testing setups and competitive pricing.

Download CrossBrowserTesting vs. Sauce Labs Report

Pricing

Sauce Labs requires no initial setup cost; however, CrossBrowserTesting imposes a moderate setup fee. Sauce Labs focuses on ease of entry, whereas CrossBrowserTesting may present a financial consideration upfront.

View comparison

Pricing

Worksoft Certify

4.2 out of 5

Worksoft Certify

4.2 out of 5

Worksoft Certify excels in automation with scriptless tools and enterprise integration. In comparison, CrossBrowserTesting offers broad browser compatibility with real-time testing. Worksoft Certify provides structured support, while CrossBrowserTesting's cloud-based model ensures easy access, catering to diverse testing requirements.

Download CrossBrowserTesting vs. Worksoft Certify Report

Pricing

Worksoft Certify has higher initial setup costs, whereas CrossBrowserTesting offers a more budget-friendly setup option, highlighting a key cost difference for potential users.

View comparison

Pricing

Worksoft Certify has higher initial setup costs, whereas CrossBrowserTesting offers a more budget-friendly setup option, highlighting a key cost difference for potential users.

LambdaTest

4.3 out of 5

LambdaTest

4.3 out of 5

CrossBrowserTesting offers live device testing with strong customer support, appealing to varied business needs. In comparison, LambdaTest provides extensive browser coverage and advanced automation, making it a compelling choice for teams prioritizing scalability and feature-rich environments.

Download CrossBrowserTesting vs. LambdaTest Report

Pricing

CrossBrowserTesting requires an initial setup cost while LambdaTest offers a more straightforward setup process. CrossBrowserTesting involves additional configuration which may incur further expenses, contrasting with LambdaTest's ease of starting without significant upfront costs.

View comparison

Pricing

Automai AppVerify

1 out of 5

Automai AppVerify

1 out of 5

Continuous Regression Testing for Agile, DevOps, and Continuous Delivery teams. A solution to test any of your applications from the user standpoint. Scripts are created without writing a line of code. Streamline your testing processes and be assured all changes are verified.Get a free POC here:https://www.nrgglobal.com/application-performance-monitoring-appswatch/

View comparison

Related categories

Functional Testing Tools

Mobile App Testing Tools

Regression Testing Tools