Avada Software Infrared360 vs HPE System Management Homepage comparison

Avada Software and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the Server Monitoring category. Avada Software is ranked #36, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.0. Avada Software holds a 0.2% mindshare in SM, compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Avada Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users who would recommend it.

Avada Software Infrared360

Read 13 Avada Software Infrared360 reviews

63 Views
32 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE System Management Homepage

Read 8 HPE System Management Homepage reviews

564 Views
454 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Avada Software Infrared360

HPE System Management Homepage

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 6, 2024

HPE System Management Homepage and Avada Software Infrared360 compete in the tech management tools category. Avada Software Infrared360 has the upper hand due to its robust features and comprehensive value.

Features: HPE System Management Homepage provides device monitoring, notifications, and competitive pricing. Avada Software Infrared360 offers cross-platform capabilities, detailed data monitoring, and versatile features.

Room for Improvement: HPE System Management Homepage needs better integration options, a modernized look, and enhanced performance analytics. Avada Software Infrared360 requires enhanced reporting, better performance analytics, and refined user interface elements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE System Management Homepage is straightforward to deploy but has inconsistent support quality. Avada Software Infrared360 is praised for its easy setup and reliable customer service.

Pricing and ROI: HPE System Management Homepage offers cost-effective pricing with satisfactory ROI. Avada Software Infrared360 is more expensive but justifies the cost through advanced features, indicating a higher perceived ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Avada Software Infrared360 vs. HPE System Management Homepage Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Avada Software Infrared360 vs. HPE System Management Homepage

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,712 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Avada Software Infrared360

Ranking in Server Monitoring

36th

Average Rating

8.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (77th), Business Activity Monitoring (5th), Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) (11th)

HPE System Management Homepage

Ranking in Server Monitoring

17th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Server Monitoring category, the mindshare of Avada Software Infrared360 is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE System Management Homepage is 1.8%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Server Monitoring

Featured Reviews

it_user685326

Vice President at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

An offsite team performs a daily infrastructure health check and sends reports to the technical/management teams.

Administration, Monitoring, and Delegation are the most valuable features of the solution. * Administration: It provides a centralized audit trail of all the infrastructure changes. * Monitoring: It gives the ability to integrate with my company's global notification system, and the ability to proactively automate corrective actions. * Delegation: It allows non-technical users to inspect their individual components within the total infrastructure without disturbing other components and without bothering the technical teams.

Read full review

Juan Esteban

Consultant at Freelance

Offers reliability and helps with the virtualization part

The product integrates with our company's existing IT infrastructure, especially when it comes to MicroK8s and other on-premises servers. The tool also helps with the virtualization in the ecosystem of our company, where there are other tools from HPE. Performance and network optimization are some of the beneficial areas in terms of server management. Speaking about how the remote management ability of the product impacted our company's IT operations, I would say that my organization has dealt with areas like RDP, DDI, and DMC, depending on the requirements of our final customers. In my experience, the product has contributed four hours in terms of reliability and to ensure the uptime of our servers. When it comes to the day-to-day use of HPE System Management's interface, I would say that it connects with some of the best tools and Hyper-V console with the help of Microsoft. I recommended the solution to those who plan to use it. I rate the overall product an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It allows non-technical users to inspect their individual components within the total infrastructure without disturbing other components and without bothering the technical teams."

"It has role-based access to queues, giving us more insights into problems."

"It's what we use for monitoring our MQ system, so the features that they provide are just really, really good."

"The administration piece makes it very easy to do MQ administration. It gives us a lot more flexibility and capabilities."

"We have easily created use case testing harnesses for specific flows that incorporate various message types."

"Monitoring that ties into our incident management system"

"The product's initial setup phase is easy with the help of the framework consisting of Microsoft Azure."

"This solution has improved our organization through the provision of efficient resource utilization and capacity planning."

"This is a good product and I recommend it."

"The managing and monitoring are the solution's most valuable features. They are something I find quite helpful in my work."

"I think it's stable, scalable, and flexible."

"The interface is in continuous development and improves version by version."

Cons

"We are still working with the FTE/MFT subscription monitoring and reporting functionality. That is an area in which we would like to see further development taking place."

"One area where they could improve is with their documentation. Some sections are not up to date with new release information and providing additional samples in some areas would be very helpful."

"The UI can be cumbersome - but we are still using the Viper interface and we have not had the time to check out the Alloy interface which is supposed to be much improved."

"Some of the graphics in the interface could be improved. It's pretty basic. Some interfaces are not up to what you're used to seeing on other, more Windows-like tools."

"The user interface could be sexier and more ergonomic. The competing products have similar problems."

"We desire a dashboard that could accumulate BOQ lengths per tenant on one screen for all tenants."

"If the solution could provide better integration to make it easier to manage everything on different servers, that would be helpful. Whatever servers a company has, be it IBM, Dell, etc., if the System Management could be a platform that links all of them together, it would make management across different server types easier."

"I think that support integration could be improved."

"The product should increase the processing capacity and allow speedy deployment, as both of them are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

"The return on investment report is too difficult to understand."

"Our customers would like to see the price lowered."

"The quality of service and support for this solution needs to be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Avada Software's licensing metric is very good because the license fees are based on the number of connections (which have not increased for us very much over the years) rather than the CPU processing power (which increases significantly whenever our hardware is upgraded) or the number of users (which has increased for us a lot since our original purchase)."

"Start small, then increase licensing later as per your demand."

"Because the licensing is at the QMGR level, you need to have at least a small cushion of licenses for occasional enterprise needs."

"Our internal budget calculation model incorporates the pricing per endpoint for any new projects. However, as our footprint for distributed queue managers shrinks as part of our shared middleware hub deployment, the initial licensing and support costs have been reduced over the last five years."

"My company has invested 30,00,000 USD in the product."

"The price of this product is fair."

"The support is yearly-based and the license is permanent."

"The license was included when we purchased the server."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,712 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

41%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Hospitality Company

Computer Software Company

18%

Real Estate/Law Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about HPE System Management?

The product's initial setup phase is easy with the help of the framework consisting of Microsoft Azure.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE System Management?

My company has invested 30,00,000 USD in the product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE System Management?

The product should increase the processing capacity and allow speedy deployment, as both of them are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM MQ vs Avada Software Infrared360

Compared 70% of the time

Dynatrace vs Avada Software Infrared360

Compared 30% of the time

More Avada Software Infrared360 Competitors

Lenovo XClarity Controller vs HPE System Management Homepage

Compared 82% of the time

Zabbix vs HPE System Management Homepage

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs HPE System Management Homepage

Compared 8% of the time

More HPE System Management Homepage Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Avada Software Infrared360

April 2025

Download Avada Software Infrared360 product report

Buyer's Guide

Server Monitoring

March 2025

Download HPE System Management Homepage product report

Also Known As

Infrared360

HP System Management

Overview

Avada Software specializes in Enterprise Middleware solutions. Founded by some pioneers in SOA, MQ and J2EE technology, Avada’s Flagship product, Infrared360, is a holistic & innovative private cloud enabled portal providing self-service administration, monitoring, load testing, auditing & statistical reporting for Enterprise Middleware including IBM’s middleware stack of MQ, IIB (message broker), WAS, and Datapower, as well as other applications servers such as JBoss, TC Server, Weblogic, and other messaging technologies such as Tibco EMS and Kafka*.

Accessed via any web browser on any device, Infrared360 is a single web application, yet scales to 2500+ endpoints without deploying anything (no agents, no scripts) to those endpoints.

Using trusted ‘spaces’ and delegated visibility and control, the portal uniquely provides different business units or even different application users virtual ‘spaces’ in which to work. Within those spaces are only the objects and resources the user has been granted visibility. Role policy dictates permissions on those resources.

It is the ONLY Enterprise Messaging Solution with a built in SOA engine that lets you leverage internal and external services for managing and correcting problems within your middleware messaging environment.

*Kafka coming soon

Avada Software

The HPE System Management Homepage (SMH) consolidates and simplifies the management of ProLiant and Integrity servers running Microsoft Windows or Linux, or HPE 9000 and HPE Integrity servers running HP-UX 11i. By aggregating data from HPE Insight Management Agents and other tools, SMH provides a secure and intuitive interface to review in-depth hardware configuration and status data, performance metrics, system thresholds and software version control information. SMH can also be used to access the HPE Lights-Out Management processor on ProLiant and Integrity servers. SMH is part of the Service Pack for ProLiant (SPP) or the Integrity Support Pack (ISP), and can be extended to meet specific system management requirements by integrating additional plug-in tools. SMH is easy to install and can be extended to meet specific system management requirements by integrating additional HPE plug-in management tools that include HPE Online Diagnostics and HPE Software Version Control Agents.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

USBank, Southwest Airlines, Visiting Nurse Services of New York, Aon Hewitt, Parker Hannifin, Cantonal Bank of Zurich (ZKB), Hagemeyer NA, and many others

Infotec

Buyer's Guide

Avada Software Infrared360 vs. HPE System Management Homepage

March 2025

Free Report: Avada Software Infrared360 vs. HPE System Management Homepage

Find out what your peers are saying about Avada Software Infrared360 vs. HPE System Management Homepage and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,712 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Avada Software Infrared360 vs. HPE System Management Homepage report.

See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.