Avolution ABACUS vs erwin Evolve by Quest comparison

Avolution and erwin by Quest are both solutions in the Enterprise Architecture Management category. Avolution is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0, while erwin by Quest is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.0. Avolution holds a 3.9% mindshare in AM, compared to erwin by Quest’s 2.9% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Avolution users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of erwin by Quest users who would recommend it.

Avolution ABACUS

Read 14 Avolution ABACUS reviews

2,265 Views
1,145 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

erwin Evolve by Quest

Read 19 erwin Evolve by Quest reviews

1,132 Views
705 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Avolution ABACUS

erwin Evolve by Quest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Avolution ABACUS and erwin Evolve by Quest compete in the enterprise architecture and modeling category. Avolution ABACUS has an edge in deployment simplicity, whereas erwin Evolve offers robust features and integration capabilities.

Features: Avolution ABACUS is flexible in modeling capabilities, enhancing enterprise architecture analysis. Its interoperability with diverse data formats increases usability. Among erwin Evolve's standout features are strong governance capabilities, extensive process modeling, and the ability to integrate various systems efficiently.

Room for Improvement: Avolution ABACUS could enhance its governance features to better suit compliance-focused organizations. Improving integration processes may augment its system functionality. Its reporting features could benefit from more advanced customization options. Erwin Evolve could simplify its initial deployment process. Enhancements in user interfaces would aid less technically inclined users. Better integration with specific data storage systems could improve utility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Avolution ABACUS is praised for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, ensuring smooth implementation. Erwin Evolve's deployment can be complex, but it compensates with comprehensive support and training, providing robust customer assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Avolution ABACUS may offer a lower initial setup cost, appealing to those focused on cost-efficient strategies with adaptable features promising good ROI. In contrast, erwin Evolve, with a higher setup cost, delivers substantial ROI through its extensive feature suite, potentially favoring organizations aiming for long-term strategic benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Avolution ABACUS vs. erwin Evolve by Quest Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Avolution ABACUS vs. erwin Evolve by Quest

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,649 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Avolution ABACUS

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

erwin Evolve by Quest

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Enterprise Architecture Management category, the mindshare of Avolution ABACUS is 3.9%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of erwin Evolve by Quest is 2.9%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Architecture Management

Featured Reviews

BPMexp67

BPM Expert at a consultancy with 1-10 employees

Sep 15, 2019

Powerful and customizable, but the interface needs to be more user-friendly and it needs dashboards

The user interface needs improvement because it is not user-friendly. They need dashboards because I think that it is really important in the market at the moment. Dashboards seem to be the solid bridge between the business and IT departments, and I didn't see anything there. The people that are going to decide to buy the product are the top management, and they are not interested in seeing the everyday operational aspects. Rather, they want to see results, which is why you need dashboards. They have an open door for integration with the model, but that's all. Integration with third-party tools needs to be improved. We did some research on this, and they have open doors with certain tools, but at least in this assessment, it was not clear how to do it. They say that you can do it, but we could not figure out how. So, this is an odd part that I think they can make more clear. I asked whether they have APIs available, or whether we had to create them from scratch, but I didn't get an answer. There is a feature called the versioning of the models, and it is not easy. It is hard because it requires a lot of technical skill to work with a model, process, or another artifact. If they want to expand in the European market then they are going to have to improve their technical support.

Read full review

ScottLawson

Director IT Architecture at QAD

Jun 22, 2023

Enables us to present data and objects visually, in diagrams, and to make them available via the web. Also enables web-based editing of data.

We tried their collaborative web modeling and we used it with a few people but we tend to not use that piece. We tend to collaborate with the people and then my team of architects draws up the diagram using the modeling tool. We then iterate through those. I would like to use it, but it was a little clunky when they first rolled it out. Overall, it's more about the company having room for improvement. What they need to do is to consolidate more of their products. For example, I was just looking and I couldn't figure out what erwin DT is. It's on the website but it would help if they could put information together and make it more clear as to what products they have and how they work with other things. I hear them talking in the support forums and, when I talk to the representative, they say they're going to do a bunch of stuff but it seems the progress is slow. The changes they need to make are to take their old, legacy product, which we use, and focus a lot on it so they can transform it into a modern cloud tool so that we have fewer little pieces to deal with. They could also fix their security model. It's very confusing to get new people onto the tool and to make sure that your content isn't being exposed to the wrong people.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is easy to use and well-structured for the integrations we need it to make."

"If you face new challenges or issues then you can dynamically customize according to the business needs."

"The technical support is very good. They are responsive and the answers they provide are detailed."

"The tool's implementation is straightforward as everything is readily available. For instance, setting up a portal is seamless, allowing easy publishing and access to data. However, integrating with other tools like BI, Power BI, or Grafana requires setting up pipelines between them."

"The most valuable feature is the traceability, you can trace any object to the other."

"The most valuable feature is that it has a customizable meta-model, which is key."

"You can design using a diagram tool installed on your desktop, a key difference from other vendors."

"There are plenty of features available such as the ability to test applications for issues and a user-friendly dashboard."

More Avolution ABACUS pros

"The ability to share and collaborate on the solution is its most valuable feature."

"You can use different kinds of diagrams to represent the architecture setting."

"Evolve is like a tank. You can do whatever you want with the solution, but you need to customize it. I think that it's not very aligned with the framework for enterprise architecture. MEGA is focused on these enterprise architectures, but it's only for that. With Evolve, you can do everything you want with professional services."

"There is a model behind it. It's really nice that the Evolve front-end, as it builds a website, keeps those relationships in mind. You can even go to a procedure and see all the applications that are related to it. Then you can go into that application and see all the standard operating procedures that that application is a part of. It's just very connected."

"We can efficiently deploy business models into the databases and generate SQL scripts."

"One of the most valuable features is the website that sits on top of the database. There's a database of objects and how they are related, and you can make views and diagrams and visual elements out of that information on the website. The website is the part that is called Evolve and we use the Evolve Designer and publish the website out to our employees. They can click around and navigate and search, etc."

"The feature that stands out for me is the ease of configuring objects and the screens to show them. It's really easy to add a new type of object in this reference. Creating a new type of object, using it, and evolving it a little bit in terms of what we can document about it are the main features that made us decide to use this provider."

"By placing the data and the metadata into a model, which is what the tool does, you gain the abilities for linkages between different objects in the model, linkages that you cannot get on paper or with Visio or PowerPoint. That is a huge discriminator."

More erwin Evolve by Quest pros

Cons

"Having more control over page size is lacking in this product. Print utilization also needs to be improved."

"It doesn't have the simulation capability, which would be helpful in doing some business process analysis and improvements."

"While this is one of the most powerful tools on the market it does not integrate well with Microsoft Office or others."

"If they want to expand in the European market then they are going to have to improve their technical support."

"I use reference models, which are taxonomies, in my EA work. It is a reference model/taxonomy of things with capabilities, sub capabilities, and sub-sub capabilities, so you're working it down. I haven't yet found a simple way to implement that in Abacus. It could be that it is there, but I don't know how to do it."

"The tool doesn't have any intelligence built in. We have to design the dashboards ourselves, which is a challenge because we have to depend on the vendor for customizations."

"It is vastly scalable but you can't run it on a Mac or Linux so it has limitations."

"Their local presence in the Middle East could be scaled more, particularly in customer service. It would be good if they'd also have mobile dashboards for executive management out of the box."

More Avolution ABACUS cons

"I would like it to be easier to make changes and then deploy them into production, especially when you have multiple web servers or front-ends. It would be nice to make a change and then have it propagate to the production servers in a more automated fashion."

"It could have had a more streamlined navigation. It seemed that when you went to the explorer panel, there were just so many different ways of doing the work that I could not remember, "How did I do this? How did I get to that point in that model to get back to it?" If I wanted to build a new one, where do I start? It just seemed like there was such a smorgasbord of ways of doing it that it was just overwhelming."

"I would like to see an improvement in the output of the solution."

"Business process modelling could be improved."

"Add some ability to do conditional Visualization on the models and in reports (some ideas) – maybe as a specialized Theme or Diagram or Display."

"If it had fewer features to model all kinds of architecture, it would be less complicated."

"With the Excel importing, the "up to date" part is the challenge. If we had a real-time integration, we could keep things up to date for whatever kinds of change points we had. With Excel, it is more that you have to export from one system then import it to another, so it's better for data that doesn't change that often."

"The solution's integration capabilities with other tools in our system has not been all that well done. We have people who use ARIS, who use System Architect and, of course, Visio. erwin has very limited ways to import and export from those kinds of tools. It's not a very easy thing to do."

More erwin Evolve by Quest cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My company makes annual payments toward the licensing costs of the solution. Considering the product's capabilities, its prices are very reasonable."

"There is a subscription for this solution. We are on an annual subscription because you sometimes receive special offers the longer you subscribe."

"It is expensive."

"To get a fairly extensive license for Enterprise Architects from Spark is approximately US $400.00, maybe less, but with Avolution Abacus it was approximately US $2000.00 per year, and that includes maintenance with the Abacus tool."

"It is competitive. It is not chump change. I am just using the studio version. I am not using the full enterprise version, which would probably cost me three times more for single-use, but it gives a lot more capability and analysis. It is server-based as well, and it is reasonably priced compared to a lot of the other tools. There are other tools that have other sorts of capabilities, but in order to use them, you'd really have to have like 50 users for the price to become justifiable."

"The cost of Avolution ABACUS is reasonable, given the features they offer in comparison to other tools."

"This solution is expensive for some people's budgets and they need to offer a Lite version at a cheaper price"

"The solution's pricing is not an issue."

More Avolution ABACUS pricing and cost advice

"Unless you are a one person shop – always go with the Workgroup edition and Concurrent licensing."

"The cost is something like $15,000, per license. But I haven't looked at those numbers in three years. It was over $100,000 to initially set everything up and get it all configured."

"I think erwin is quite expensive. I have difficulty selling the portal, in fact."

"I estimate that we pay between $40,000 and $50,000 a year for the solution, not including the upfront costs to buy things the first time."

"The licensing enables you to differentiate between people who edit the content and the people who consume it. We are able to keep the licensing costs down by keeping the "contributor" licenses to a minimum, and we then just roll out the content in a read-only version for the rest of our users."

"Yearly, our cost is €100,000."

"On a yearly basis, our licensing costs are 50,000 euro. There are no additional costs because we are on a SaaS model."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Government

15%

Computer Software Company

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

17%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Avolution ABACUS?

The tool's implementation is straightforward as everything is readily available. For instance, setting up a portal is seamless, allowing easy publishing and access to data. However, integrating wit...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Avolution ABACUS?

It's pricey compared to Essential, Deltek, or Essential Cloud. However, its diagramming capabilities and metamodel design make it worth it. But it's not for large user bases. It has modules for app...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Avolution ABACUS?

The tool is quite extensive but doesn't have any intelligence built in. We have to design the dashboards ourselves, which is a challenge because we have to depend on the vendor for customizations. ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering erwin Evolve?

I rate erwin Evolve by Quest a nine out of ten.

See all answers

What do you like most about erwin Evolve by Quest?

We can efficiently deploy business models into the databases and generate SQL scripts.

See all answers

What needs improvement with erwin Evolve by Quest?

erwin Evolve by Quest could have additional features to manage the architecture of enterprises and businesses.

See all answers

Comparisons

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs Avolution ABACUS

Compared 26% of the time

LeanIX vs Avolution ABACUS

Compared 21% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs Avolution ABACUS

Compared 14% of the time

Visio vs Avolution ABACUS

Compared 10% of the time

More Avolution ABACUS Competitors

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs erwin Evolve by Quest

Compared 28% of the time

LeanIX vs erwin Evolve by Quest

Compared 24% of the time

SAP PowerDesigner vs erwin Evolve by Quest

Compared 12% of the time

IDERA ER/Studio vs erwin Evolve by Quest

Compared 11% of the time

Lucidchart vs erwin Evolve by Quest

Compared 5% of the time

More erwin Evolve by Quest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Avolution ABACUS

November 2024

Download Avolution ABACUS product report

Buyer's Guide

erwin Evolve by Quest

November 2024

Download erwin Evolve by Quest product report

Also Known As

No data available

erwin EA, erwin Business Process, erwin Enterprise Architecture

Learn More

Avolution

erwin by Quest

Overview

ABACUS is the enterprise architecture tool designed to have the quickest time-to-value. You can use it to build and maintain rich visual models from existing company data. ABACUS comes with standard industry frameworks as well as advanced analytic tools and best-in-class roadmapping and reporting functionality.

With Avolution ABACUS You Can:

Strategize and analyze your organizational architecture with ease using data-driven diagrams
Enjoy connected data, models, and metrics across your whole enterprise
Work directly and securely in your browser, which is ideal for global teams and remote working

Avolution ABACUS Features:

Modeling and roadmapping: ABACUS offers a fully provisioned modeling environment for enterprise and IT architecture, strategic planning, and digital business management.
Digital collaboration: Avolution ABACUS includes a feature that allows you to set up dashboards so you can tell data stories using business-friendly visualizations.
Portfolio management: Anyone can update their own data, which, in turn, reduces the workload of the enterprise architecture team.
Data-driven architecture: ABACUS’s data-driven architecture gives you the opportunity to design and automate key calculations using out-of-the-box or simple no-code algorithms.
Collaborative data management: Using this feature, you can save time with single sign-on (SSO) and AD Integrations; You can embed directly in MS Teams, Confluence, or other workplace social software.
Dynamic data visualizations: ABACUS’s graph view allows you to navigate through systems in a dynamic environment, as opposed to static diagram views.

Avolution ABACUS Benefits:

Time efficient: Models and roadmaps automatically stay up-to-date, saving your organization a lot of time so you can focus on other priorities instead.
Centralized location: With Avolution ABACUS, you can connect all data in one place, keeping everything both consistent and accurate.
Full flexibility: ABACUS gives you full flexibility to adapt and configure your own metamodels with ease.
Complete visibility: Your whole enterprise can have visibility of the architecture through the use of digital collaboration and visually clear dashboards.
Machine learning: With Avolution ABACUS, you can employ machine learning to speed data management and analysis.
Spot dependencies: ABACUS helps your organization spot dependencies and impacts that might trip up your projects.
Fully customizable: Avolution ABACUS is fully customizable; Select, configure, or adapt your repository and metamodel. You can also automate metrics and analytics specific to your business.

Reviews from Real Users:

Andre W., Enterprise Architect at Enterprise Architecture Perspectives, says, "The most valuable feature is that it has a customizable meta-model, which is key.”

The Lead Enterprise Domain Architects at a financial services firm feels that "The product is easy to use and well-structured for the integrations we need it to make.”

"There are plenty of features available, such as the ability to test applications for issues and a user-friendly dashboard,” says Suresh T., Enterprise Digital Solution Architect at a tech services company.

erwin is used by more than 50,000 professionals in 60+ countries to get big results from their enterprise data initiatives. erwin is the #1 choice in virtually every industry, from government and healthcare to retail and finance.

erwin Modeling provides a collaborative environment to manage enterprise data through an intuitive, graphical interface. With a centralized view of key data definitions, you can leverage information as a strategic asset and more efficiently manage your data resources to save time and money.

Sample Customers

Barclays

AT&T, Bank of America, Chevron, Duke University, ESPN, Fidelity, GE, JP Morgan Chase, KPMG, McGraw Hill, NASA, Pfizer, Royal Bank of Scotland, Teradata, Union Pacific, Vodafone, Wells Fargo.

Buyer's Guide

Avolution ABACUS vs. erwin Evolve by Quest

October 2024

Free Report: Avolution ABACUS vs. erwin Evolve by Quest

Find out what your peers are saying about Avolution ABACUS vs. erwin Evolve by Quest and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Avolution ABACUS vs. erwin Evolve by Quest report.

See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.