Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Avolution ABACUS pros and cons

Vendor: Avolution

4.0 out of 5

14 reviews
87% willing to recommend

553 followers

Pros & Cons summary

Avolution ABACUS offers dynamic customization and a traceable meta-model to meet enterprise needs, enhancing decision-making through visibility of interconnections. It provides responsive support and easy modeling, but has platform limitations on Mac/Linux. Integration issues with Microsoft Office, an outdated UML version, and regional support challenges in Europe and the Middle East affect usability. Users rely on the vendor for dashboard customizations, highlighting a need for built-in intelligence.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Avolution ABACUS allows for dynamic customization to meet specific business needs, enhancing adaptability in varying scenarios.

It offers traceability features enabling users to connect and track any object with ease.

Avolution ABACUS includes a customizable meta-model, which is instrumental for tailoring the tool to specific enterprise architectures.

The platform delivers robust support for roadmapping and modeling, coupled with effective tools for end-to-end impact analysis and portfolio management.

Technical support is highly responsive and provides detailed solutions, ensuring efficient problem resolution and user support.

CONS

Avolution ABACUS cannot be operated on Mac or Linux, posing limitations for users of these platforms.

The product does not have the simulation capability, which would assist in business process analysis and improvements.

Avolution ABACUS lacks integration with Microsoft Office and other platforms.

There is a need for improved regional support and flexibility in model selection.

Updating the UML version used by Avolution ABACUS is necessary as it is outdated.

Avolution ABACUS Pros review quotes

SB

Storekeeper at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jan 12, 2022

It's more than just an enterprise architecture tool as it has a lot of nice features, e.g. messaging, simulation, etc.

Read full review

AW

Enterprise Architect at Enterprise Architecture Perspectives

Mar 9, 2020

The most valuable feature is that it has a customizable meta-model, which is key.

Read full review

BPM Expert at a consultancy with 1-10 employees

Sep 15, 2019

If you face new challenges or issues then you can dynamically customize according to the business needs.

Read full review

Avolution ABACUS

Free Report: Avolution ABACUS Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about Avolution ABACUS. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

reviewer1392906

Lead Enterprise Domain Architects at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Feb 13, 2022

The technical support is very good. They are responsive and the answers they provide are detailed.

Read full review

AW

Enterprise Architect at Enterprise Architecture Perspectives

Dec 23, 2021

There are a lot of different features, but the business/decision-maker feature, visibility, and dashboards are most valuable.

Read full review

RV

Enterprise Architect at Enterprise architecture Tool

May 15, 2024

You can design using a diagram tool installed on your desktop, a key difference from other vendors.

Read full review

AW

Enterprise Architect at Enterprise Architecture Perspectives

Nov 17, 2020

The ease of modeling and the ease of showing interconnectivity and relationships is the most valuable. It is fairly simple and out of the box. It is customizable in many ways. It is a pretty good tool.

Read full review

RS

Enterprise Architect at Roads & Transport Authority

Mar 13, 2024

The tool's implementation is straightforward as everything is readily available. For instance, setting up a portal is seamless, allowing easy publishing and access to data. However, integrating with other tools like BI, Power BI, or Grafana requires setting up pipelines between them.

Read full review

reviewer1392906

Lead Enterprise Domain Architects at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jul 24, 2023

It is a very stable solution...The initial setup of Avolution ABACUS is very easy.

Read full review

IS

Senior Enterprise Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Jan 24, 2022

Scalable and stable tool for roadmapping and modeling, with a good dashboard, end-to-end impact analysis, and portfolio management.

Read full review

Show 2 more reviews (out of 12)

Avolution ABACUS Cons review quotes

SB

Storekeeper at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jan 12, 2022

Having more control over page size is lacking in this product. Print utilization also needs to be improved.

Read full review

AW

Enterprise Architect at Enterprise Architecture Perspectives

Mar 9, 2020

The reporting could be easier to configure.

Read full review

BPM Expert at a consultancy with 1-10 employees

Sep 15, 2019

If they want to expand in the European market then they are going to have to improve their technical support.

Read full review

Avolution ABACUS

Free Report: Avolution ABACUS Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about Avolution ABACUS. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

reviewer1392906

Lead Enterprise Domain Architects at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Feb 13, 2022

The company needs to update the UML version they are using for the product as it is quite old.

Read full review

AW

Enterprise Architect at Enterprise Architecture Perspectives

Dec 23, 2021

I use reference models, which are taxonomies, in my EA work. It is a reference model/taxonomy of things with capabilities, sub capabilities, and sub-sub capabilities, so you're working it down. I haven't yet found a simple way to implement that in Abacus. It could be that it is there, but I don't know how to do it.

Read full review

RV

Enterprise Architect at Enterprise architecture Tool

May 15, 2024

The tool doesn't have any intelligence built in. We have to design the dashboards ourselves, which is a challenge because we have to depend on the vendor for customizations.

Read full review

AW

Enterprise Architect at Enterprise Architecture Perspectives

Nov 17, 2020

It doesn't have the simulation capability, which would be helpful in doing some business process analysis and improvements.

Read full review

RS

Enterprise Architect at Roads & Transport Authority

Mar 13, 2024

Avolution ABACUS has the drawback of needing data filtering at the development level, unlike some tools that offer filtering at deployment. Two areas where Avolution ABACUS could be improved are regional support and flexibility in model selection. Sometimes, it's challenging to access support or updates in certain regions, which can slow down progress. Additionally, it would be beneficial if the tool allowed more flexibility in selecting multiple models within a single unit.

Read full review

reviewer1392906

Lead Enterprise Domain Architects at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jul 24, 2023

The usability of the tool is an area with shortcomings that need improvement.

Read full review

IS

Senior Enterprise Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Jan 24, 2022

Their local presence in the Middle East could be scaled more, particularly in customer service. It would be good if they'd also have mobile dashboards for executive management out of the box.

Read full review

Show 3 more reviews (out of 13)

Product Categories

Product Categories

Enterprise Architecture Management

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs Avolution ABACUS

LeanIX vs Avolution ABACUS

erwin Data Modeler by Quest vs Avolution ABACUS

MEGA HOPEX vs Avolution ABACUS

SAP PowerDesigner vs Avolution ABACUS

iServer vs Avolution ABACUS

BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs Avolution ABACUS

IDERA ER/Studio vs Avolution ABACUS

Planview Portfolios vs Avolution ABACUS

erwin Evolve by Quest vs Avolution ABACUS

Ardoq vs Avolution ABACUS

Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs Avolution ABACUS

QualiWare X vs Avolution ABACUS

See all alternatives

Product Categories

Product Categories

Enterprise Architecture Management

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs Avolution ABACUS

LeanIX vs Avolution ABACUS

erwin Data Modeler by Quest vs Avolution ABACUS

MEGA HOPEX vs Avolution ABACUS

SAP PowerDesigner vs Avolution ABACUS

iServer vs Avolution ABACUS

BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs Avolution ABACUS

IDERA ER/Studio vs Avolution ABACUS

Planview Portfolios vs Avolution ABACUS

erwin Evolve by Quest vs Avolution ABACUS

Ardoq vs Avolution ABACUS

Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs Avolution ABACUS

QualiWare X vs Avolution ABACUS

See all alternatives

Related questions

8

How to export UML-based model from IBM RSA into Avolution ABACUS?

125

Can you recommend a graphic illustration tool to model the architecture of IT systems?

23

When evaluating Architecture Management, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

85

Tools to Develop and Manage IT Infrastructure Road-maps

84

Sparx system comparing with ARIS and IBM blueworks.

174

What EA tool would you advise us to use?

157

What are some business benefits associated with enterprise architecture?

44

Any experience on newer/low-cost cloud based EA Modelling Tools?

117

How to model an enterprise architecture? What tools and templates can I use?

36

How to export IBM Rational System Architect data into Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management (by Software AG)?