Avolution ABACUS vs LeanIX comparison

Avolution and SAP LeanIX are both solutions in the Enterprise Architecture Management category. Avolution is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0, while SAP LeanIX is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3. Avolution holds a 4.0% mindshare in AM, compared to SAP LeanIX’s 15.9% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Avolution users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of SAP LeanIX users who would recommend it.

Avolution ABACUS

Read 15 Avolution ABACUS reviews

2,185 Views
1,107 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

LeanIX

Read 21 LeanIX reviews

6,813 Views
3,380 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Avolution ABACUS

LeanIX

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Avolution ABACUS and LeanIX compete in the enterprise architecture domain, with LeanIX holding an edge in feature-rich solutions, making it a potentially superior choice due to its comprehensive capabilities.

Features: Avolution ABACUS is known for its advanced modeling and analytics tools, with capabilities such as detailed architecture views, portfolio management, and impact analysis. LeanIX provides features like flexible integration capabilities, real-time data management, and advanced reporting tools, including a user-friendly interface and extensive catalog and diagram management. LeanIX’s ability to provide ongoing architecture innovation and its expansive feature set often leads to higher satisfaction among users.

Room for Improvement: Avolution ABACUS could enhance its BI integration features, streamline customization processes, and expand its frameworks. LeanIX could improve by reducing its complexity for non-technical users, optimizing its cloud configuration features, and offering more extensive free content in their LeanIX Store.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Avolution ABACUS offers a straightforward deployment process with traditional service structures, emphasizing strong support channels. LeanIX adopts a modern cloud-based deployment approach, ensuring quick setup and adaptability along with consistent helpdesk access, offering a distinct advantage in ease of deployment and service offerings over Avolution ABACUS.

Pricing and ROI: Avolution ABACUS is favored for its lower initial setup costs and flexible pricing models, appealing to budget-conscious organizations seeking good ROI. LeanIX, although typically more expensive, justifies its cost with higher long-term benefits through effective resource management and strategic investment opportunities for robust enterprise architecture solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Avolution ABACUS vs. LeanIX Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Avolution ABACUS vs. LeanIX

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,168 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Avolution ABACUS

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

LeanIX

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Enterprise Architecture Management category, the mindshare of Avolution ABACUS is 4.0%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LeanIX is 15.9%, up from 12.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Architecture Management

Featured Reviews

JoseCamacho

Freelancer at a consultancy with 1-10 employees

Supports evaluating architecture through corporate objectives

I conducted an evaluation of enterprise architecture at the European Court in Luxembourg, reviewing and analyzing existing implementations to identify potential improvements and providing recommendations I conduct evaluations to identify potential improvements and make recommendations, forming a…

Read full review

NickGenoese

Consultant at Ngen Consulting

Streamlines the process of identifying apps nearing end-of-life or requiring retirement and facilitates informed decisions about app retention

When we input our inventory and components, it tells us which ones are nearing end-of-life, deprecated, or obsolete. It also categorizes them. We've added flags, essentially tags, to mark certain things as non-strategic technologies. Using LeanIX, we made conscious decisions about which technologies are strategic and which aren't. This allows us to generate reports highlighting applications written in non-strategic technologies, giving us a better picture of our inventory size and what needs to migrate to the cloud or our target technology. So, it's about understanding what we have, seeing how it aligns with our strategic direction, and then driving the movement towards that direction.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is that it has a customizable meta-model, which is key."

"The ease of modeling and the ease of showing interconnectivity and relationships is the most valuable. It is fairly simple and out of the box. It is customizable in many ways. It is a pretty good tool."

"Scalable and stable tool for roadmapping and modeling, with a good dashboard, end-to-end impact analysis, and portfolio management."

"It's more than just an enterprise architecture tool as it has a lot of nice features, e.g. messaging, simulation, etc."

"The tool's implementation is straightforward as everything is readily available. For instance, setting up a portal is seamless, allowing easy publishing and access to data. However, integrating with other tools like BI, Power BI, or Grafana requires setting up pipelines between them."

"The technical support is very good. They are responsive and the answers they provide are detailed."

"The most valuable feature is the traceability, you can trace any object to the other."

"There are a lot of different features, but the business/decision-maker feature, visibility, and dashboards are most valuable."

More Avolution ABACUS pros

"My favorite feature of LeanIX is its ability to induct attribute-driven surveys."

"The most valuable features are the clean user interface and the fact sheet feature in Application Portfolio Management. The tool integrates well with ServiceNow, which is the usual CMDB platform."

"It offers neat visualization and referencing functionality while enabling the creation of landscape maps and showing the relationship between different applications."

"I can develop a report and then do a presentation, or develop a report and some other diagrams and then put them all in one presentation, and from there, I can present things directly, so there is no need to move images."

"Ease of use is the most valuable feature. From an enterprise architecture perspective, it's not too cumbersome with too many functionalities, yet it has a lot of attributes for the content it covers."

"I like the tool’s integration and maps."

"The solution has a very useful assessment tool that automatically populates from input data to produce a detailed analysis of customer's environments."

"The usability is very high. It almost looks like a Facebook for Enterprise architecture, it's pretty nice. It's HTML5 based. The repository is very easy. It has 10 different ways of sorting the objects you have in your architecture repository. Maintaining new data or to add data to your repository is very easy."

More LeanIX pros

Cons

"The reporting could be easier to configure."

"They should take more initiative to implement things that competing products have already come out with."

"It is vastly scalable but you can't run it on a Mac or Linux so it has limitations."

"While this is one of the most powerful tools on the market it does not integrate well with Microsoft Office or others."

"The usability of the tool is an area with shortcomings that need improvement."

"The most valuable features are the catalog and the diagram."

"In the future, there could be improvements in integration and enhancements."

"While Avolution ABACUS is flexible, it can be complex to work with as it requires knowledge of specific configurations to customize the product."

More Avolution ABACUS cons

"They're probably positioned pretty well. I hope that they would not focus that much on the business architecture, and they would focus more on the overall cloud strategy and how we can leverage multi-cloud and transition back and forth from other cloud providers. With a lot of current vendors, you get locked in with one cloud, and then you try to migrate to someone else, and it becomes very problematic. What they need to do is to look at the overall data strategy, and they probably need to amplify their data strategy, especially around multi-cloud."

"They could include a combination of LeanIX and some modeling extensions."

"Improvements in user interface simplicity could be made, particularly with the reporting and filtering capabilities."

"The solution needs to incorporate a data patch tool that moves within and irons data."

"What would make LeanIX better is more variety in terms of reporting, and more flexibility with its data importing feature."

"The solution’s API integration needs to improve. I would like to see a digital screen watch feature also in the solution."

"LeanIX experiences a lot of server timeouts. Nearly every transaction needs to be done twice due to these issues."

"They should improve the out of the box connectors that they provide. They should see if clients are really ready to adapt them."

More LeanIX cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of Avolution ABACUS is reasonable, given the features they offer in comparison to other tools."

"My company makes annual payments toward the licensing costs of the solution. Considering the product's capabilities, its prices are very reasonable."

"It is expensive."

"There is a subscription for this solution. We are on an annual subscription because you sometimes receive special offers the longer you subscribe."

"The solution's pricing is not an issue."

"It is competitive. It is not chump change. I am just using the studio version. I am not using the full enterprise version, which would probably cost me three times more for single-use, but it gives a lot more capability and analysis. It is server-based as well, and it is reasonably priced compared to a lot of the other tools. There are other tools that have other sorts of capabilities, but in order to use them, you'd really have to have like 50 users for the price to become justifiable."

"I'm paying on a yearly basis. I don't know whether it's a highly expensive tool or not. I'm getting a single version of it, and I don't have the enterprise part on it because I don't need the server component, and I don't need a web browser component. My estimate would be that it's a very reasonably priced tool given that you don't need to have licenses with everyone in order to get the information and the decision support capabilities out of the tool. You use the enterprise edition on top of the studio, which is the heart of the tool. I am not aware of any additional costs."

"This solution is expensive for some people's budgets and they need to offer a Lite version at a cheaper price"

More Avolution ABACUS pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is very good. We definitely get good value for the money."

"It cost me $91,000 a year for 300 applications. For any enterprise, 300 applications are minimal, as many have well over 1,000 applications."

"There is a sweet spot of where they need to be on pricing right now. They could go up a little bit in pricing, but it has to do with the cost savings, and it has to do with the practitioners using it. I use it where I get cost savings and I can justify it, but they probably have the ability to flex a 10% up channel on their sales on that. So, they could increase their settle price, not their offering price, when they sell. They can probably hold that up a little bit higher than it is because there are cost savings that we can drive from it."

"The solution's pricing is based on a licensing model that is competitive and in line with other products."

"LeanIX uses application-based account licensing, where the cost is multiplied by the number of applications in the software implementation."

"I would rate the pricing a one out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"The tool needs to include more flexible licensing options. We do not use the tool all the time. So pricing should be considered only when we use the tool."

"As the tool is cloud-based, its cost is more affordable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Government

14%

Computer Software Company

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Avolution ABACUS?

The tool's implementation is straightforward as everything is readily available. For instance, setting up a portal is seamless, allowing easy publishing and access to data. However, integrating wit...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Avolution ABACUS?

It's pricey compared to Essential, Deltek, or Essential Cloud. However, its diagramming capabilities and metamodel design make it worth it. But it's not for large user bases. It has modules for app...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Avolution ABACUS?

While Avolution ABACUS is flexible, it can be complex to work with as it requires knowledge of specific configurations to customize the product. It would be beneficial to have seminars or other met...

See all answers

Any experience with Strategic Project Portfolio Management Solutions?

Hi @Cheryl Joseph Looking at the crossover between Project and Portfolio management with EA, then Planview could be a good choice. If looking at Portfolio Management from an EA perspective then Le...

See all answers

What do you like most about LeanIX?

The ability to import data and generate reports from it. That's where its power lies.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LeanIX?

LeanIX is associated with high costs. It cost me $91,000 a year for 300 applications. For any enterprise, 300 applications are minimal, as many have well over 1,000 applications. The first pricing ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs Avolution ABACUS

Compared 24% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs Avolution ABACUS

Compared 15% of the time

Visio vs Avolution ABACUS

Compared 11% of the time

ARIS BPA vs Avolution ABACUS

Compared 9% of the time

BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs Avolution ABACUS

Compared 8% of the time

More Avolution ABACUS Competitors

ServiceNow vs LeanIX

Compared 22% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs LeanIX

Compared 15% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs LeanIX

Compared 9% of the time

iServer vs LeanIX

Compared 7% of the time

Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs LeanIX

Compared 4% of the time

More LeanIX Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Avolution ABACUS

December 2024

Download Avolution ABACUS product report

Buyer's Guide

LeanIX

December 2024

Download LeanIX product report

Learn More

Avolution

SAP LeanIX

Overview

ABACUS is the enterprise architecture tool designed to have the quickest time-to-value. You can use it to build and maintain rich visual models from existing company data. ABACUS comes with standard industry frameworks as well as advanced analytic tools and best-in-class roadmapping and reporting functionality.

With Avolution ABACUS You Can:

Strategize and analyze your organizational architecture with ease using data-driven diagrams
Enjoy connected data, models, and metrics across your whole enterprise
Work directly and securely in your browser, which is ideal for global teams and remote working

Avolution ABACUS Features:

Modeling and roadmapping: ABACUS offers a fully provisioned modeling environment for enterprise and IT architecture, strategic planning, and digital business management.
Digital collaboration: Avolution ABACUS includes a feature that allows you to set up dashboards so you can tell data stories using business-friendly visualizations.
Portfolio management: Anyone can update their own data, which, in turn, reduces the workload of the enterprise architecture team.
Data-driven architecture: ABACUS’s data-driven architecture gives you the opportunity to design and automate key calculations using out-of-the-box or simple no-code algorithms.
Collaborative data management: Using this feature, you can save time with single sign-on (SSO) and AD Integrations; You can embed directly in MS Teams, Confluence, or other workplace social software.
Dynamic data visualizations: ABACUS’s graph view allows you to navigate through systems in a dynamic environment, as opposed to static diagram views.

Avolution ABACUS Benefits:

Time efficient: Models and roadmaps automatically stay up-to-date, saving your organization a lot of time so you can focus on other priorities instead.
Centralized location: With Avolution ABACUS, you can connect all data in one place, keeping everything both consistent and accurate.
Full flexibility: ABACUS gives you full flexibility to adapt and configure your own metamodels with ease.
Complete visibility: Your whole enterprise can have visibility of the architecture through the use of digital collaboration and visually clear dashboards.
Machine learning: With Avolution ABACUS, you can employ machine learning to speed data management and analysis.
Spot dependencies: ABACUS helps your organization spot dependencies and impacts that might trip up your projects.
Fully customizable: Avolution ABACUS is fully customizable; Select, configure, or adapt your repository and metamodel. You can also automate metrics and analytics specific to your business.

Reviews from Real Users:

Andre W., Enterprise Architect at Enterprise Architecture Perspectives, says, "The most valuable feature is that it has a customizable meta-model, which is key.”

The Lead Enterprise Domain Architects at a financial services firm feels that "The product is easy to use and well-structured for the integrations we need it to make.”

"There are plenty of features available, such as the ability to test applications for issues and a user-friendly dashboard,” says Suresh T., Enterprise Digital Solution Architect at a tech services company.

LeanIX delivers collaborative Enterprise Architecture designed for modern IT. Our open, data-driven architecture management model helps organizations adapt to the evolving demands of digital. From agile to multi-cloud and beyond, architecture teams using LeanIX have the power to strategically support the business and report 45% reduction in time to value delivery. More than 90,000 users across enterprises worldwide rely on LeanIX to manage their IT landscape, including adidas, Bosch, 7Eleven, and Zalando.

Sample Customers

Barclays

adidas, Bosch, Chico's, Haworth, Helvetia, KuKa, Osram, Telekom, TUI, Santander, Swarovski, Vaillant, 7Eleven, and Zalando.

Buyer's Guide

Avolution ABACUS vs. LeanIX

December 2024

Free Report: Avolution ABACUS vs. LeanIX

Find out what your peers are saying about Avolution ABACUS vs. LeanIX and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Avolution ABACUS vs. LeanIX report.

See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.