AWS CodePipeline vs LaunchDarkly comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and LaunchDarkly are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.4, while LaunchDarkly is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 5.7% mindshare in BA, compared to LaunchDarkly’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of LaunchDarkly users who would recommend it.

AWS CodePipeline

Read 23 AWS CodePipeline reviews

2,709 Views
2,128 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

LaunchDarkly

Read 7 LaunchDarkly reviews

141 Views
37 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS CodePipeline

LaunchDarkly

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

AWS CodePipeline and LaunchDarkly compete in the software development lifecycle space. LaunchDarkly holds the upper hand due to its advanced feature management capabilities that allow for enhanced control over feature delivery.

Features: AWS CodePipeline offers automation of code changes, integration with AWS services, and efficient delivery. LaunchDarkly provides real-time feature management, A/B testing, and control of feature toggles, giving it a distinct advantage in managing dynamic features.

Room for Improvement: AWS CodePipeline could improve by simplifying its setup process and extending integration capabilities outside the AWS ecosystem. Enhancements in its UI and user documentation could benefit LaunchDarkly by making complex deployments more intuitive and providing users with more detailed support resources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS CodePipeline integrates seamlessly with AWS infrastructure, providing scalability but requires familiarity with AWS services. LaunchDarkly offers an easy setup process, complemented by strong technical support and detailed documentation, catering to diverse tech environments.

Pricing and ROI: AWS CodePipeline's pricing is embedded within the AWS ecosystem, which can be cost-effective with significant use but presents challenges for smaller teams. LaunchDarkly, with its pricing reflective of its specialized features, offers high ROI for teams focused on strategic feature releases, making its cost worthwhile for advanced deployments.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodePipeline vs. LaunchDarkly Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodePipeline vs. LaunchDarkly

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,862 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodePipeline

Ranking in Build Automation

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

LaunchDarkly

Ranking in Build Automation

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of AWS CodePipeline is 5.7%, down from 8.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LaunchDarkly is 0.3%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Udhay Prakash Pethakamsetty

Data Engineer Manager at Capgemini

A fully managed service with excellent integrations and a flexible architecture

Compared to any other tools, AWS products provide better integrations. We have tools for all our needs. The integrations are good. The product is a fully managed service. We specify the various stages in the CI/CD process. We can do it without any external tools. Going through everything is usually an overhead for developers. It is like a configuration. We need to configure it only once. The integration with other AWS services has helped us. Our life as a developer is easy. We need not focus on the integration manually. If we work with third-party tools, we must consider connectivity, role management, security, authentication, and authorization. In AWS CodePipeline, if we have IAM roles configured and KMS for the credentials, we need not worry about anything else. Everything can be done within the tool. The integrations are the best part. We can track everything. The connectivity and scalability are good. The architecture is also flexible enough. We can add multiple things.

Read full review

James Bayhylle

Principal Technical Program Manager at ChowNow

Provides risk-free releases with control access and A/B testing

It allowed us to deploy faster. Despite having a rigorous code review process that slowed things down, once the code was reviewed, LaunchDarkly enabled safe deployments. If there was ever an issue, we could easily roll back a particular release by simply turning off the feature flag. When configuring and setting this up, begin with feature sets that are relatively small in scope. This helps build the necessary skills to leverage the product effectively while maintaining control over the blast radius, thus reducing risk to your customers and application in case of misconfiguration. As you gain more experience with the solution, it's crucial to have a process to manage feature flag sprawl, as mentioned earlier. Implementing a life cycle management system for your feature flags is essential. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten because of its intuitiveness and ease of use.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In AWS, the Cloud DevOps is a managed service from CodeCommit and this has removed the need for a lot of manual steps."

"The integration with other applications is fabulous."

"Different applications can be enhanced with AWS CodePipeline"

"CodePipeline allows integration with any source code and facilitates deployment to EC2 or ECS, which is highly valuable."

"The best thing about AWS CodePipeline is that we don't have to manage agents."

"Code deployment is the best feature."

"The integrations are good."

"The product is a one-stop solution that you can use to integrate, deploy and host your application."

More AWS CodePipeline pros

"The initial setup is very easy."

"I like that it offers the ability to control the flags."

"From the development side, it allows us to manage multiple things."

"It has really helped during the series of product lines and faster deployment and faster development."

"I appreciate that we can release any feature in production and maintain control over it."

"The setup is easy."

"The ability to turn off a flag is crucial when a task is not complete, especially if there is an error in a commit."

Cons

"AWS CodePipeline functions well, but there's room for improvement in providing technical support to regular customers who haven't purchased developer support. I mean, having it available for everyone, even if it's not a 24-hour service. It would be more useful if specific support hours were available for assistance."

"In AWS CodePipeline, we can only use certain tools for which AWS provisions plugins."

"If there are many dependancies involved in the setup, it may take a long time."

"AWS CodePipeline doesn't offer much room for customization."

"AWS CodePipeline works effectively, and I haven't identified any specific areas needing improvement as it has been quite satisfying in terms of deployment needs."

"I would appreciate if we don't have to install any agents, even for EC2, to deploy using CodeDeploy into EC2 servers. It would help if AWS allows application deployment without requiring the Fortify agent installation."

"One downside in AWS is that when you attempt to push a change in, it misses that part, or it could be because some variables are not set correctly."

"It would be best if AWS CodePipeline provided multiple integration options directly by providing some URLs."

More AWS CodePipeline cons

"The feature where one feature flag is dependent on another could be explored more for our usage."

"I have used LaunchDarkly for around two and a half years and I haven't faced any issues with it."

"We need experience to use it, and the initial setup can be difficult. Also, sometimes it has breakdowns."

"When the system has an excessive number of feature flags, managing them can become cumbersome."

"Fetching information about multiple flags in a single action would be beneficial."

"Right now, no improvements are needed."

"I strongly believe they need to develop a strategy for handling situations where LaunchDarkly goes down."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing of this solution is dependent upon your needs including how many jobs you daily and how many times the developer will be changing codes and completing deployments."

"AWS offers free business or enterprise support services."

"Compared to other cloud services, AWS CodePipeline falls a bit more on the pricey side. I see that the price of the product has been increasing for the past few years."

"I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."

"AWS CodePipeline is quite affordable. I've been running around four pipelines and the cost is around one dollar per month. It rarely exceeds two dollars."

"The product is quite expensive compared to other solutions."

"It is a straightforward approach where you pay for the resources you consume as they offer a subscription-based licensing model."

"The pricing is manageable."

More AWS CodePipeline pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which AWS solution would you choose - CodeStar or CodePipeline?

Both AWS solutions deliver solid options, with uniquely different features. AWS CodeStar allows for quick development, building, and deployments of apps. It also provides web application and web se...

See all answers

What do you like most about AWS CodePipeline?

Code deployment is the best feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodePipeline?

AWS CodePipeline and its associated services do not incur significant additional charges. The cost primarily comes from deploying other AWS resources like EC2 and S3 alongside the pipeline.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LaunchDarkly?

I consider the pricing to be high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LaunchDarkly?

We need experience to use it, and the initial setup can be difficult. Also, sometimes it has breakdowns. I would rate LaunchDarkly a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LaunchDarkly?

We use LaunchDarkly for managing feature flags. It helps manage the keys to control what users view on our screens.

See all answers

Comparisons

GitLab vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 65% of the time

Jenkins vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 11% of the time

GitHub Actions vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 8% of the time

AWS CodeStar vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 7% of the time

Tekton vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 4% of the time

More AWS CodePipeline Competitors

Harness vs LaunchDarkly

Compared 100% of the time

More LaunchDarkly Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodePipeline

April 2025

Download AWS CodePipeline product report

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

April 2025

Download LaunchDarkly product report

Also Known As

CodePipeline

No data available

Overview

AWS CodePipeline is a fully managed continuous delivery service that helps you automate your release pipelines for fast and reliable application and infrastructure updates. CodePipeline automates the build, test, and deploy phases of your release process every time there is a code change, based on the release model you define. This enables you to rapidly and reliably deliver features and updates. You can easily integrate AWS CodePipeline with third-party services such as GitHub or with your own custom plugin. With AWS CodePipeline, you only pay for what you use. There are no upfront fees or long-term commitments.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

LaunchDarkly is acclaimed for its feature flag management, enabling safer, high-velocity code deployment and precise control over rollouts. Organizations use it to test, deploy, and manage features across user segments, performing canary releases and quick rollbacks without new code deployment. Users praise its robust flag system, real-time updates, detailed targeting, comprehensive analytics, and strong integration capabilities, significantly enhancing development efficiency and productivity.

LaunchDarkly

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodePipeline vs. LaunchDarkly

April 2025

Free Report: AWS CodePipeline vs. LaunchDarkly

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodePipeline vs. LaunchDarkly and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS CodePipeline vs. LaunchDarkly report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.