AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs NetApp SnapCenter comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and NetApp are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #26 with an average rating of 7.6, while NetApp is ranked #51 with an average rating of 7.7. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 0.5% mindshare in BRS, compared to NetApp’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NetApp users who would recommend it.

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Read 16 AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery reviews

548 Views
450 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

NetApp SnapCenter

Read 27 NetApp SnapCenter reviews

1,230 Views
801 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

NetApp SnapCenter

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and NetApp SnapCenter are two prominent products in the disaster recovery market. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery seems to have the upper hand in handling large-scale deployments efficiently, while NetApp SnapCenter excels in integration capabilities.

Features: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery provides comprehensive recovery options, high scalability, and flexibility. It can handle large-scale deployments efficiently. NetApp SnapCenter offers robust integration with various storage solutions, ease of managing backup and recovery tasks, and detailed documentation.

Room for Improvement: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery could benefit from more intuitive configuration processes, enhanced reporting features, and better user guidance. NetApp SnapCenter needs improved speed and performance, performance optimization in large deployments, and better user experience for large-scale use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is relatively straightforward to deploy but demands a steep learning curve. Customer service receives high marks for responsiveness. NetApp SnapCenter has a more complex deployment process requiring specialized knowledge, but users appreciate the detailed documentation and support quality.

Pricing and ROI: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery offers competitive pricing with a clear cost structure, delivering substantial ROI, especially for large enterprises. NetApp SnapCenter has higher initial setup costs but provides value through its extensive feature set and reliable performance.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. NetApp SnapCenter Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. NetApp SnapCenter

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,646 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

26th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (19th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (14th)

NetApp SnapCenter

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

51st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp SnapCenter is 0.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Vijay Londhe

Assistant Programmer at Mahadis

Managed services with seamless integration and good reliability

Since I have to view everything on the console, the previous application solutions like IBM and Sanavi showed the RPO and RTO status directly. In AWS Disaster Recovery Service, these details are not available, making it difficult to check my replication status. I have to calculate whether my data is replicated to the Adarabad region or not. These features, if available in AWS, would be beneficial.

Read full review

Mir Gulzar Ahmed

IT Manager at Synergy Computers

Integrates well with various applications , provides a cloning feature for creating snapshots or clones of volume and a centralized command

It is basically centralized command control software. When the users visualize the workflow of the backup, the management and the customer storage administrator know the ins and outs of the backup and recovery. They can make the strategy for their backup and recovery and the certainty of their backups and restore. Strategic planning: Also, it is easy to make a strategy when you have visualized the inflow and outflow of the backup and recovery. With the CLI or native way, without any UI or management tool, you might not be able to create any strategy at all. This is especially important when you have multiple storage systems inside your data center or organization. You need a tool that connects and visualizes the workflow of the backup and recovery from all the storage systems and NetApp storage systems installed within the organization. It is very important when you have multiple storage systems, and you need to manage your backup and recovery workflow. Ease of Management: Unlike other storage vendors, NetApp has its own product called SnapCenter. Other vendors need to acquire third-party software or integrate with other software to manage storage systems. NetApp has its own solution, which is SnapCenter. NetApp's SnapCenter gels well with their storage systems and products. Ease of management is already there. It's a fine software with easy installation, management, and understanding. It's not a complicated software to understand.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The setup is pretty straightforward."

"CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is a fairly stable solution."

"It offers seamless integration with services like ACL, EKS, and Fargate for deploying containerized applications."

"Since it is a managed service, I reduce my time to manage infrastructure and applications."

"The initial setup is pretty straightforward, it's not complex."

"The solution is dependent on the network bandwidth. For example, if they have a bandwidth of 10Mbps the solution will run a little heavier. If the bandwidth is good the solution runs well."

"It's on the cheaper side and not too expensive for users."

"The strong points are the stability and scalability of the solution, as well as the convenience of it being cloud-based."

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery pros

"You can quickly deploy new virtual environments. It provides efficient and easy-to-use data protection. If a file goes missing or corruption occurs, you can restore it swiftly using the snap restore feature, allowing you to return to work almost immediately."

"The centralized GUI is the best feature, that there is only one webpage where we can see the states of all the backup jobs. We can see all the tasks that are running and we can quickly see if one fails; if they are running or have any issues. We have all that in one place."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"Restoring and cloning are easy to do."

"The simplicity of backup and restore directly with VMware is an advantage and the time to backup and restore is reduced."

"We have been very satisfied with the technical support's help. Their knowledge level is great. For a noncritical question, they will get back to us within a day."

"Technical support has been very helpful when we have issues."

"The backup features are the most valuable because they allow the DBAs to replace SnapManager for Oracle (SMO), which is going away, and to do cloning as well. We can also clone to different servers and have the actual backup clone mounted on different servers. And we can split easily too."

More NetApp SnapCenter pros

Cons

"I have not seen any areas that need improvement at this time."

"The cost of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is seen as expensive."

"Definitely there should be better logging. From a customer perspective I would like to see more logs on what is happening. If there is an issue, I would like to know what the problem is. Right now, we have to depend on the support of the vendor to check and let us know, because we don't have access to a lot of logging information."

"The UI could be a little sleeker."

"Since I have to view everything on the console, the previous application solutions like IBM and Sanavi showed the RPO and RTO status directly. In AWS Disaster Recovery Service, these details are not available, making it difficult to check my replication status."

"I would like to see better support for creating and working with archives."

"The solution's network setup and a lot of the control tower setup could be improved."

"An improved AWS pricing model is needed."

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery cons

"I feel a little bit that during the whole process of putting this software into production we were like a beta program. It was full of bugs... For example, we had a problem with truncating our Exchange log files... It has improved over time."

"Some of the minor functionalities from SnapManager did not transfer over to SnapCenter. These should be added in future releases."

"If it was possible to create backups on non-NetApp storage, that would be helpful."

"The GUI is still so-so. I' don't use the GUI that often anymore because it's really slow, refreshing disks, refreshing hosts, and you have to click a lot."

"The documentation could be a little bit better so that we could handle more of the troubleshooting ourselves, rather than having to go through support."

"We have experience some difficulties with our current support. We are engaging in engineering level support because some of our problems are more technical."

"The product lags in terms of availability."

"Since the solution's initial setup is complex, it should make training documents available in the public space."

More NetApp SnapCenter cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"I rate the price of CloudEndure Disaster Recovery a six out of ten."

"The pricing is better now that they had come out with the Tier 2 which replicates a little less often. In comparison to what I would have been spending with any other type of solution, the pricing is fair."

"We were happy with the pricing that they gave us."

"It has saved us money from having to buy hardware for disaster recovery."

"Where the price adds up, there are CloudEndure licenses, then there is the AWS environment, and finally, there is the AWS storage, so cumulatively, it adds up."

"I feel the product's pricing is a good value. Licensing is pretty straightforward."

"They license us on a per machine basis. We have a set number of machines, which we have licensed."

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery pricing and cost advice

"The licensing is well-designed because it's already included in some packages with NetApp storage. Therefore, for most customers, it's okay as the SnapCenter license is already included in some NetApp bundles."

"It comes free with the amount of equipment we purchase from NetApp. In terms of pricing, zero is my favorite number."

"The license for SnapCenter was included with the storage array."

"Pricing is very good because if you already have NepApp controllers, then it's included."

"We see a financial value with SnapCenter because we don't have to license Commvault, which is pretty expensive."

"It's free. The license is included with other NetApp products."

"We have a site license, so it comes with the product."

"The product is inexpensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

12%

Healthcare Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

21%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is a fairly stable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

The setup is actually managed by our partner. I have taken a rate of per user. Licensing is completely managed by the partner. I am paying per user and per GB storage cost, while the infrastructure...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

In its current state, ECL integrates with CloudWatch for basic logging and monitoring, yet improvements could include more detailed logs for specific actions, like when I perform actions such as pu...

See all answers

What do you like most about NetApp SnapCenter?

Most banks and financial institutions use the solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp SnapCenter?

If you have a license, you don't need to buy anything extra. If you have multiple storage systems and want to manage them with a central tool, you are covered.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp SnapCenter?

There is always a chance for improvement. One thing that might be improved is the ease of management. It might be made a little less complicated.

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Backup vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 40% of the time

Azure Site Recovery vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 20% of the time

Zerto vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 9% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 8% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 7% of the time

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Competitors

Synology DSM vs NetApp SnapCenter

Compared 27% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs NetApp SnapCenter

Compared 18% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs NetApp SnapCenter

Compared 16% of the time

Cohesity DataProtect vs NetApp SnapCenter

Compared 9% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs NetApp SnapCenter

Compared 7% of the time

More NetApp SnapCenter Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

April 2025

Download AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery product report

Buyer's Guide

NetApp SnapCenter

March 2025

Download NetApp SnapCenter product report

Also Known As

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery

SnapCenter

Overview

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery enables real-time replication and rapid recovery to enhance organizational resilience. Key features include block-level data replication, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and automated recovery orchestration. Users benefit from increased efficiency, improved workflows, and enhanced data management, significantly improving organizational performance and business continuity.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Unified, scalable platform for application-consistent data protection and clone management. This software simplifies backup, restore, and clone lifecycle management with application-integrated workflows.

NetApp

Sample Customers

Agio, Cloud Nation, Limelight Networks

All for One Steeb AG, Accenture

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. NetApp SnapCenter

April 2025

Free Report: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. NetApp SnapCenter

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. NetApp SnapCenter and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. NetApp SnapCenter report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.