

Imperva Application Security Platform and Azure Front Door compete in the application security space. Imperva is perceived as offering superior specialized security needs with robust features, while Azure Front Door is noted for its integration capabilities and competitive pricing.
Features: Imperva stands out with its robust DDoS protection, user behavior analytics, and ease of deployment, making it ideal for tailored security needs. Azure Front Door's strengths lie in cost-effectiveness, integration with Azure tools, and global CDN capabilities.
Room for Improvement: Imperva needs to refine its pricing model, improve support responsiveness, and enhance policy customization, particularly in certificate management. Azure Front Door should bolster its DDoS protection, extend compatibility beyond Azure, and improve support turnaround times.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Imperva allows for flexible deployment across various cloud environments but receives mixed reviews for customer service. Azure Front Door is streamlined for public cloud deployments, particularly within Azure, and is praised for its reliable technical support.
Pricing and ROI: Despite higher costs, Imperva users highlight its significant ROI through extensive security features. Azure Front Door offers a competitive pricing model, beneficial for small projects, with a favorable cost-to-value ratio when integrated with Azure services.
Azure Front Door offers a quick return on investment once it is set up.
They know how much money they are losing while the system is down, so by increasing the possibility of not having a down website or web application, return on investment can be calculated easily.
I was able to save over seven million dollars last year as return on investment in the company.
I have seen a return on investment with Imperva Application Security Platform, as it is generally associated with time savings, because the review of alerts and the visibility it gives saves us significant operational time.
I am able to set up a critical call with Microsoft, and they respond quickly to tickets with the highest severity.
I would rate the technical support of Imperva DDoS as ten.
They need to work faster on the response time because of issues of urgent replies.
Responsive support addressing urgent needs.
I find that Front Door can become expensive for large-scale projects with more transactions and users.
I consider the scalability of Azure Front Door to be strong.
99% of customers are using the cloud version of Imperva DDoS protection, so they just purchase the new license and scale as needed.
I have not even needed support after deployment, since it has remained stable.
It is easy to always scale to add more users.
I rate Azure Front Door's stability a nine because it is easy to make updates through Azure Portal.
It is also a stable product without much glitch or downtime.
One notable drawback is that, unlike Fortinet, which offers fast track labs and continuous enablement, Imperva Application Security Platform lacks lab access and fast track labs for enablement and product advertising.
We experienced downtime or crashes with Imperva Application Security Platform when traffic went really strong or fast because people tried to get tickets.
If I could use Azure Front Door with private IP addresses, it would be more beneficial.
It relies on the WAF module where users must configure rate-limiting rules, as it does not automatically sense malicious spikes in traffic.
The only significant adjustment required is with URL set parameters that need to be passed for an existing domain.
To convince my clients, a purely on-prem solution would be ideal since they are financial institutions.
Maybe Imperva DDoS could use endpoints to get information about the attacks before they commence from the endpoint level or establish cooperation with endpoint vendors to share this information.
Regarding return on investment, ROI, I can say it is noticeable with Imperva Application Security Platform.
Azure Front Door is cheaper for small projects, companies, or applications compared to using separate tools.
I would rate the pricing of Imperva DDoS as five, where one is very cheap and ten is very expensive.
the setup cost was high, with the hardware installation in the data center being particularly expensive.
We have noticed faster response times and fewer security alerts because after doing some custom policy tuning, everything seemed to be aligned and we have fewer attacks to monitor and fewer alerts to monitor.
Azure Front Door provides DDoS protection and features related to WAF.
Azure Front Door includes a built-in web application firewall, which performs signature-based checks of the request payload, offering protection against common attacks or malicious requests.
The API security feature is particularly valuable because most attackers do not try to come in from where it is expected.
If someone attempts to access the server, the WAF blocks that SSRF alert, or RCE, Remote Code Execution alert, blocking immediately based on the signature, not only by the payload or the IP address.
It reduces the DDoS attacks and reduces the attacks from threat actors, including SQL Injection and zero-day attacks, by using dynamic application profiling from Imperva.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Imperva Application Security Platform | 7.0% |
| Azure Front Door | 4.3% |
| Other | 88.7% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 88 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 25 |
| Large Enterprise | 71 |
Azure Front Door offers advanced web application security and global load-balancing, appreciated for its efficient traffic management and performance analytics. Its features support secure integration and customization, ideal for diverse applications.
Azure Front Door excels in providing a secure entry point for web applications with features like Web Application Firewall, advanced routing rules, and global load-balancing. It ensures robust security with DDoS and bot protection while offering seamless integration and powerful performance analytics. Users find it customizable, scalable, and cost-effective, thanks to its CDN and SSL/TLS support. While deploying and configuring Azure Front Door is straightforward, it benefits from better functionality close to applications, improved DDoS protection, competitive pricing, and enhanced latency and support services.
What are the standout features?Industries such as banking and manufacturing leverage Azure Front Door as a global load balancer and secure web entry point. It provides disaster recovery and optimizes user access for public-facing applications worldwide. The CDN capabilities enhance load times, offering secure exposure to the internet while ensuring effective traffic management across multiple locations.
Imperva Application Security Platform offers advanced security measures including DDoS protection and dynamic profiling, integrating seamlessly with third-party tools to enhance application defense and compliance.
Imperva protects environments from threats like DDoS and ransomware while enhancing application security with features such as threat intelligence, API security, and OWASP Top 10 security. Its platform is known for easy deployment and scalability, effectively managing bots and providing intuitive dashboards for auditing. Users benefit from Imperva's data security, access control, and traffic inspection across cloud and on-premise deployments with seamless integration into automated playbooks for heightened security automation.
What are the key features of Imperva Application Security Platform?Imperva Application Security Platform is implemented in industries for application-level security, shielding client applications from threats leveraging effective bot management and database monitoring to maintain data availability. Organizations utilize its capabilities for automated security playbook integration, securing environments against DDoS and ransomware while ensuring compliance with OWASP Top 10 guidelines.
We monitor all CDN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.