


Imperva Application Security Platform and Fortinet FortiWeb are leaders in the application security domain. Imperva offers superior adaptability and threat intelligence, whereas Fortinet is known for cost-effective solutions and machine learning capabilities.
Features: Imperva Application Security Platform includes proactive defense measures against DDoS attacks, bot management, and user behavior analytics. It provides high adaptability with customizable policies and strong threat intelligence. Fortinet FortiWeb features machine learning, geographic blocking, and URL filtering, focusing on threat detection and mitigation through advanced analytics.
Room for Improvement: Users of Imperva suggest enhancements in deeper analytics, improved policy flexibility, and a more intuitive user interface. Fortinet FortiWeb could benefit from advancements in its machine learning capabilities, reduced false positives, and improved documentation. Scalability and upgrade paths are also noted as areas for FortiWeb.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Imperva supports various deployment models, including public, private, and hybrid clouds, providing flexibility but receiving mixed reviews on on-premises support. Fortinet FortiWeb focuses mainly on on-premises and hybrid deployments, with users appreciating its reliable technical support and easy appliance management.
Pricing and ROI: Imperva is often seen as expensive, offering a high return on investment due to its advanced features, yet its licensing model is seen as complex. Fortinet FortiWeb is recognized as a cost-effective choice, providing transparent pricing and being suitable for both SMEs and large enterprises with flexible plans.
My experience with the pricing or licensing of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is that many features can be accessed for free, so the pricing is definitely reasonable.
They know how much money they are losing while the system is down, so by increasing the possibility of not having a down website or web application, return on investment can be calculated easily.
I was able to save over seven million dollars last year as return on investment in the company.
I have seen a return on investment with Imperva Application Security Platform, as it is generally associated with time savings, because the review of alerts and the visibility it gives saves us significant operational time.
I would rate the technical support with Cloudflare as excellent every time I've had to contact them.
The technical support of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall rates between five and seven at maximum.
Their support is truly exceptional when I compare it with similar large-sized companies.
The expertise of engineers varies across different time zones, affecting the effectiveness of the support provided, especially during our daytime.
The back-end development team is available, and if any issue arises, they will help us immediately by providing solutions when contacted.
I would rate the technical support of Imperva DDoS as ten.
They need to work faster on the response time because of issues of urgent replies.
Responsive support addressing urgent needs.
The scalability of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall rates between 8 to 9, as it depends upon the use cases and what exactly the client needs.
You can add additional boxes that combine together to achieve a bigger throughput for investigation and research.
99% of customers are using the cloud version of Imperva DDoS protection, so they just purchase the new license and scale as needed.
I have not even needed support after deployment, since it has remained stable.
It is easy to always scale to add more users.
The stability of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall deserves a perfect 10 out of 10.
We have not faced any significant issues during deployments.
It is also a stable product without much glitch or downtime.
One notable drawback is that, unlike Fortinet, which offers fast track labs and continuous enablement, Imperva Application Security Platform lacks lab access and fast track labs for enablement and product advertising.
The stability of Imperva DDoS is very good, as it seems they have a lot of servers around the world.
The product can improve by having more multitenancy capability, which is currently not available.
I think they're doing a good job with DNS and as support for any domains that I create or that my clients create, it's mandatory for me to ensure they have Cloudflare as their DNS provider.
And maybe something similar to Pushpin that Fastly has, which is an option where you can push messages that then can be scaled globally over the network.
If the GUI includes notifications and improved logging capabilities that allow us to see traffic and store logs for six months, that would be very helpful.
Fine-tuning is a room for improvement in Fortinet FortiWeb.
After the customer submits a specific question and requests troubleshooting help from Fortinet support, it takes at least three to five days to provide a proper answer.
To convince my clients, a purely on-prem solution would be ideal since they are financial institutions.
Maybe Imperva DDoS could use endpoints to get information about the attacks before they commence from the endpoint level or establish cooperation with endpoint vendors to share this information.
Regarding return on investment, ROI, I can say it is noticeable with Imperva Application Security Platform.
For VM machines, the price increases based on CPU configurations of 2, 4, or 8 CPUs.
Most security products charge less at the time of purchase because of competition, but when we go to renewals, the prices become very high.
Fortinet FortiWeb is cost-effective compared to solutions like F5.
I would rate the pricing of Imperva DDoS as five, where one is very cheap and ten is very expensive.
We have noticed faster response times and fewer security alerts because after doing some custom policy tuning, everything seemed to be aligned and we have fewer attacks to monitor and fewer alerts to monitor.
The pricing is not transparent to me; it's what the vendors give, or whatever the channel partner offers that you can negotiate on.
The custom rules and the geo-redundant geographical rule feature, which allows me to implement geographical rules for customers, add significant value.
The best features of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall are multiple, including the WAF, rate limiter, and bot attack protection.
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall's advanced reporting and analytics tools add a layer that we're able to visualize and see before it actually hits the local firewall.
Fortinet FortiWeb has positively impacted my organization because most of our servers and applications are secure from hackers and other security threats.
Fortinet's pricing is way more competitive than Cisco or Palo Alto.
The machine learning-based threat detection is significant, as it uses a learning method that eases the configuration burden, making it very useful.
The API security feature is particularly valuable because most attackers do not try to come in from where it is expected.
If someone attempts to access the server, the WAF blocks that SSRF alert, or RCE, Remote Code Execution alert, blocking immediately based on the signature, not only by the payload or the IP address.
It reduces the DDoS attacks and reduces the attacks from threat actors, including SQL Injection and zero-day attacks, by using dynamic application profiling from Imperva.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Fortinet FortiWeb | 6.5% |
| Imperva Application Security Platform | 7.6% |
| Cloudflare Web Application Firewall | 4.7% |
| Other | 81.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 16 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 60 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 27 |
| Large Enterprise | 36 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 88 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 25 |
| Large Enterprise | 66 |
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall integrates DDoS protection, load balancing, and firewall capabilities. Its ease of use, configurability, and robust security measures make it a versatile choice for protecting web applications.
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall provides a comprehensive defense against threats with advanced reporting and robust security measures. It includes DNS integration, rate limiting, and extensive rule sets, all within a SaaS model that allows API configurability. Users value its caching, scalability, and pricing, although enhancements are needed in rate-limiting and third-party integration. Improvements in customer support, especially in India, real-time controls, and user documentation are also desired. Users seek a more intuitive dashboard, better log management, and improved alert systems, along with multitenancy capabilities and enhanced reporting.
What are the key features of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall?Cloudflare Web Application Firewall finds application in industries like banking and retail by acting as a comprehensive security gateway, managing authentication and authorization while protecting web applications from malicious Layer 7 traffic. It also implements load balancing, CDN, and zero-trust policies, supported by advanced reporting, analytics tools, and threat scoring to meet specific industry needs.
Fortinet FortiWeb provides advanced web application protection, using AI-driven threat detection and seamless integration with Fortinet products, ensuring robust security and easy management. It's favored for its scalability in protecting websites, mobile apps, and APIs from threats like SQL injection.
Fortinet FortiWeb offers robust web application security with features like machine learning-driven threat detection, load balancing, and OWASP protection. Its comprehensive security measures include web traffic filtering and DDoS protection, making it ideal for securing APIs and web servers. Cost-effectiveness and easy deployment further enhance its appeal as it serves banking, e-commerce, and industrial sectors. Areas needing enhancement include load balancing capabilities, comprehensive documentation, and improved support response times, addressing user-reported issues such as false positives and integration challenges. Documentation for cloud deployment is crucial for enhanced logging and performance stability.
What are Fortinet FortiWeb's Key Features?Companies across banking, e-commerce, and financial sectors implement Fortinet FortiWeb for its comprehensive security features in protecting web applications from SQL injection and cross-site scripting. Its use as a web application firewall provides essential protection and load-balancing capabilities, ensuring compliance with standards like PCI DSS in cloud environments and industrial settings.
Imperva Application Security Platform delivers comprehensive and continuous web threat protection. Renowned for its ease of use, it shields web applications and databases from various cyber threats while integrating seamlessly with cloud and on-premises environments.
Imperva Application Security Platform protects web environments by offering advanced security measures against threats like DDoS attacks, SQL injections, and cross-site scripting. As a robust web application firewall, it provides extensive monitoring and bot management capabilities. The platform integrates content delivery networks for enhanced performance and scalability, while real-time traffic analysis ensures consistent protection. Despite its strengths, improvements can be made in policy management and customization options. Users seek better integration with third-party tools and more competitive pricing models. The inclusion of AI for enhanced analytics is also anticipated.
What are the key features of Imperva Application Security Platform?Imperva Application Security Platform is implemented in industries needing strong database and application protection. Companies use it to enforce geolocation restrictions and manage bots, benefiting sectors like finance and e-commerce where data security and threat monitoring are critical. Its ability to protect and ensure data accessibility makes it integral to business operations prioritizing cyber resilience.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.