Bamboo vs CircleCI comparison

Atlassian and CircleCI are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Atlassian is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0, while CircleCI is ranked #16. Atlassian holds a 4.5% mindshare in BA, compared to CircleCI’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 78% of Atlassian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of CircleCI users who would recommend it.

Bamboo

Read 23 Bamboo reviews

1,848 Views
1,756 Comparison Views

78% willing to recommend

CircleCI

Read 7 CircleCI reviews

1,000 Views
990 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Bamboo

CircleCI

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 11, 2025

Bamboo and CircleCI are leading competitors in the CI/CD landscape. Bamboo holds an edge for enterprises leveraging multiple Atlassian products, while CircleCI offers a streamlined setup for cloud-native environments.

Features: Bamboo integrates seamlessly with Atlassian tools such as Jira and Bitbucket, offers robust Java support, and allows branching of build and deployment jobs without templates. CircleCI provides simplicity in CI pipelines with preinstalled browser support, quick setup, and container-based builds.

Room for Improvement: Bamboo could benefit from a reduced learning curve, better integration with modern plugins, and improved Docker support. CircleCI users highlight the need for interface enhancements, clearer billing, and extended support for platforms like Microsoft Azure.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bamboo offers controlled deployment environments primarily on-premises with hybrid cloud capabilities, but customer service can be forum-dependent. CircleCI is flexible for cloud-native enterprises, mainly operating in public cloud environments, though both tools can improve internal processes and communication efficiency.

Pricing and ROI: Bamboo's pricing is influenced by the number of remote agents, potentially becoming costly, but offering justified value with good hardware investment. CircleCI's costs are considered high with transparency issues, though users find the features and time-saving benefits provide substantial ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Bamboo vs. CircleCI Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bamboo vs. CircleCI

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,310 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bamboo

Ranking in Build Automation

10th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

CircleCI

Ranking in Build Automation

16th

Average Rating

6.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Software Development (32nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of Bamboo is 4.5%, down from 8.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CircleCI is 3.3%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Bamboo	4.5%
CircleCI	3.3%
Other	92.2%

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Christo Louw

Director at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Automation has streamlined build and deployment workflows and provides clear project reporting

Regarding improvements for Bamboo, I can't think of anything right now. Bamboo is serving the purpose that we needed it for. I would say pipelines for model building could be an area of focus. However, I can't really comment on that because I haven't looked at Bamboo to assist with machine learning pipelines. If they haven't focused on building MLOps pipelines, that's definitely an area where they could assist businesses. I haven't looked at what Bamboo offers for MLOps, so it's possible that they've already built in features. Machine learning and AI are in big demand at the moment. If they haven't focused too much on MLOps, that's probably where they can improve.

Read full review

RahulArora

Global Head - DevOps and AIOps Startegist at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Automated CI/CD pipelines have transformed deployment speed and collaboration for my teams

CircleCI offers fast parallel builds, easy integration with GitHub, and the ability to deploy applications on Kubernetes pods, which are amazing features. Fast parallel builds and GitHub integration have definitely helped my team reach faster time to market for our applications. Previously, our deployment used to take a couple of hours when doing it manually, but with CircleCI pipeline, our hours-long job has been converted to a couple of minutes. Its simplicity, fast pipeline execution, and strong GitHub and GitLab integrations are definitely unique advantages I discovered while using CircleCI. Time saved is one of the key aspects I have seen since using CircleCI. I have noticed fewer deployment errors, and it has helped me with easy debugging. Time saved is directly proportional to the cost and effort saved. CircleCI has positively impacted my organization by integrating directly with my Git repositories as a fully managed SaaS platform. CircleCI has a great impact on my team's collaboration and communication, with around 25 to 40 developers and DevOps engineers using it daily across multiple repositories and environments, helping us use it at scale. CircleCI has significantly increased our release frequency and deployment speed compared to before I started using it. CircleCI improves security for my organization by enforcing automated checks in the pipeline and securely managing secrets through environment variables while providing auditable deployments. CircleCI integrates seamlessly with my DevOps toolchain by connecting directly to GitHub, container registries, and my cloud platform AWS, allowing the entire CI/CD flow from code commit to deployment and monitoring with minimal manual effort.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The main benefits Bamboo provides for me and my team are the automation to pick up code changes and automate the deployments, building images."

"It's one of the best solutions in this line of work. We have many Atlassian products. We use Bamboo, JIRA, Service Desk, and some other Atlassian plugins. We like that it's easy to integrate into each other. It's a suite of services."

"The most valuable features are compiling and deployment."

"The most valuable features of Bamboo are its performance and UI. Additionally, there are a lot of useful plugins, integration with other solutions, such as Bitbucket and Jira, and a helpful online community."

"Bamboo was used extensively in our organization for PCA compliance."

"The tool is useful for continuous deployment."

"The most valuable feature of Bamboo is that it is a good tool for CI/CD integration."

"In my experience Bamboo is scalable."

More Bamboo pros

"The solution offers continuous integration and continuous delivery."

"Enables us to detect exactly which build failed and why, and to push multiple builds to our production environment at a very fast rate."

"The ability to automate the build process in a seamless way and run workflows effortlessly. It supports parallel builds so it can scale well. Also, it covers the basics of any build and integration tool, including email notifications (especially when tests are fixed), project insights, etc."

"Some of the most valuable features include container-based builds, integration with Bit Bucket and being able to store artifacts."

"CircleCI has positively impacted the organization, as it has been used for many years and serves as the main source for application deployment."

"The automation workflow in CircleCI related to third-party applications is very good and allows standardization of applications."

"CircleCI has significantly reduced build and deployment times, saving substantial engineering hours and effort for me, which has directly improved my productivity and release velocity, reflecting incredible ROI."

"It's a stable product."

Cons

"The performance around the deployment feature could be improved."

"One area that could be enhanced is the governance process, particularly with regard to building approvals and transitions between stages. In comparison to other solutions, such as Jira, which features a workflow that supports approval processes, this capability is not natively available in Bamboo. To implement this functionality, integration with other solutions, such as GSM may be necessary. Although some add-ons, such as Adaptavist ScriptRunner, are available in the market to circumvent this limitation, they may not offer the exact functionality needed. Therefore, there is certainly room for improvement in this area."

"Bamboo is a bit complicated to use compared to other solutions, such as GitLab. You have to integrate different actions that are difficult that could be made easier."

"Integrating workflows with other platforms can be challenging. The capabilities of these platforms sometimes fall short compared to others. Initially, it was difficult for us because the plugins were very limited."

"The solution needs to support more customization in the training. What's offered is pretty generic. They need better training and should offer more guidance."

"It should be much easier to use. It shouldn't require a lot of reading to be able to use it. It should have just two or three screens rather than hundreds of screens requiring a lot of clicking. It also requires a lot of integration. It has a steep learning curve. It takes a lot of time to understand and put in the data. There is also no proper training."

"From my personal experience regarding scalability and the ability to scale, I find that sometimes the agents run out of resources and then it takes quite a while to get additional infrastructure."

"The marketing strategy of Bamboo is an area of concern where improvements are needed."

More Bamboo cons

"Integration with Microsoft Azure is one area for improvement. Azure is growing in its user base, and supports various cloud infrastructure components such as Service Fabric, App Service, etc. Some of Azure’s deployment models (like Kudu) require a steep learning curve, but if CircleCI would come up with such features (deployment to App Service) out of the box, it would be amazing."

"The solution’s pricing could be better."

"Billing is a mess."

"A return on investment with CircleCI has not been observed, and no relevant metrics such as time saved or fewer employees needed can be shared."

"I believe debugging complex pipelines and managing credits can sometimes be challenging, especially for large workflows, so these areas can be improved."

"There needs to be some improvement in the user interface of CircleCI."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Bamboo is reasonable."

"I rate the solution's pricing a three out of five."

"If Bamboo could provide more flexibility on pricing, that would help. On the agent side, if you want to increase the number of agents it should be less expensive. If they can provide some better pricing model, it will help, whether we are going to use it or are already using it."

"There is a subscription required to use Bamboo."

"The server products for small teams used to offer excellent pricing. However, Atlassian has since changed the offering and the pricing is more expensive. I do still think the solution offers good value for money."

"I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten."

"The price of CircleCI could be less expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user217035

Senior iOS Developer at a media company with 5,001-10,000 employees

May 27, 2015

Bamboo vs. Jenkins

A biased and subjective comparison of Bamboo and Jenkins as CI servers for mobile development, based on practical experience with both. Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (Delivery, Distribution) has been around for quite a while. But surprisingly enough on a global scale it pretty…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

10%

University

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bamboo?

Bamboo's integration with the rest of Atlassian's tech tools, like Jira, helps manage the end-to-end development and release process.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bamboo?

I rate the solution's pricing a three out of five.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bamboo?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CircleCI?

There is not much experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing because that is managed by the legal team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CircleCI?

CircleCI's Orbs are not as easy to use as they could be. If CircleCI implemented a function approach similar to GitHub Actions, it would be significantly better. CircleCI could be improved if it co...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CircleCI?

For others looking into using CircleCI, study thoroughly about CircleCI's Orbs because they are quite complicated. The overall review rating for CircleCI is 6 out of 10.

See all answers

Comparisons

GitLab vs Bamboo

Compared 21% of the time

GitHub Actions vs Bamboo

Compared 18% of the time

Tekton vs Bamboo

Compared 12% of the time

Harness vs Bamboo

Compared 9% of the time

Chef vs Bamboo

Compared 3% of the time

More Bamboo Competitors

Tekton vs CircleCI

Compared 14% of the time

GitLab vs CircleCI

Compared 11% of the time

TeamCity vs CircleCI

Compared 10% of the time

GitHub Actions vs CircleCI

Compared 9% of the time

AWS CodeBuild vs CircleCI

Compared 4% of the time

More CircleCI Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bamboo

December 2025

Download Bamboo product report

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

December 2025

Download CircleCI product report

Overview

Bamboo is a continuous integration and delivery tool that ties automated builds, tests and releases together in a single workflow. It works great alongside JIRA and Stash providing a fully traceable deployment pipeline.

Atlassian

CircleCI is a continuous integration and delivery platform that automates software development, streamlining the process for engineers and developers. It's valued for its ability to enhance development speed while maintaining high software quality.

Known for its robust CI/CD capabilities, CircleCI supports a wide range of programming languages and integrations, allowing teams to build and deploy code with efficiency and reliability. Its flexibility and automation features help teams quickly adapt to changing project requirements. CircleCI's cloud-based architecture ensures scalability and accessibility, making it an attractive option for modern development environments.

What are CircleCI's key features?

Continuous Integration: Automates code integration with testing to catch errors early.
Continuous Deployment: Simplifies the process of deploying code to production environments.
Customizable Workflows: Offers flexibility in defining build, test, and deployment stages.
Parallel Execution: Speeds up builds by running multiple tasks at once.
VCS Integration: Seamlessly integrates with platforms like GitHub and Bitbucket.

What benefits can users expect when using CircleCI?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlines development workflows, reducing the time to market.
Improved Code Quality: Early error detection through automation increases overall quality.
Scalability: Ability to handle growing workloads as development needs evolve.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates teamwork through shared visibility and control over development processes.

In tech-driven industries, CircleCI enables efficient software development pipelines. Its ability to run automated tests and manage deployments effectively is particularly beneficial in fast-paced, innovation-driven fields like fintech, mobile app development, and SaaS platforms. Offering tools that meet high-demand environments, it supports teams in delivering timely and quality software products.

CircleCI

Sample Customers

Neocleus, MuleSoft, Interspire

Shopify, Zenefits, Concur Technologies, CyberAgent

Buyer's Guide

Bamboo vs. CircleCI

December 2025

Free Report: Bamboo vs. CircleCI

Find out what your peers are saying about Bamboo vs. CircleCI and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bamboo vs. CircleCI report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.