Bamboo vs GoCD comparison

Atlassian and Thoughtworks are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Atlassian is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0, while Thoughtworks is ranked #17 with an average rating of 6.5. Atlassian holds a 4.3% mindshare in BA, compared to Thoughtworks’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 78% of Atlassian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Thoughtworks users who would recommend it.

Bamboo

Read 23 Bamboo reviews

1,865 Views
1,772 Comparison Views

78% willing to recommend

GoCD

Read 7 GoCD reviews

1,175 Views
670 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Bamboo

GoCD

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

GoCD and Bamboo compete in the CI/CD tools category, each with unique strengths. GoCD appears to have the upper hand in flexibility and cost-effectiveness, while Bamboo stands out with its integration capabilities within the Atlassian ecosystem.

Features: GoCD offers value stream visualization, advanced workflow modeling, and configuration as code, facilitating complex pipeline designs. Bamboo provides deep integration with JIRA, Bitbucket, and other Atlassian tools, making it attractive to organizations within this ecosystem. Bamboo also benefits from its customizable build and deployment features that are tailored to organizational needs.

Room for Improvement: GoCD could improve its plugin availability and expand official support options beyond community assistance. Enhancements in the user interface could also increase adoption rates. Bamboo can improve its pricing structure to be more accessible to smaller enterprises, increase plugin diversity, and enhance documentation for more straightforward user onboarding.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GoCD provides a straightforward setup with an open-source platform backed by a strong community, though its support is primarily community-driven. Bamboo offers robust support with an intuitive cloud or on-premises deployment model, appealing to enterprises that prefer direct support channels from a proprietary tool.

Pricing and ROI: GoCD, as open-source, offers no setup costs, creating immediate savings and encouraging risk-free experimentation. While Bamboo requires initial investment, its ROI is enhanced through an integrated ecosystem that can elevate productivity, despite the upfront expense.

To learn more, read our detailed Bamboo vs. GoCD Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bamboo vs. GoCD

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,481 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bamboo

Ranking in Build Automation

10th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GoCD

Ranking in Build Automation

17th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (18th), Release Automation (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of Bamboo is 4.3%, down from 8.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GoCD is 2.1%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Bamboo	4.3%
GoCD	2.1%
Other	93.6%

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Christo Louw

Director at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Automation has streamlined build and deployment workflows and provides clear project reporting

Regarding improvements for Bamboo, I can't think of anything right now. Bamboo is serving the purpose that we needed it for. I would say pipelines for model building could be an area of focus. However, I can't really comment on that because I haven't looked at Bamboo to assist with machine learning pipelines. If they haven't focused on building MLOps pipelines, that's definitely an area where they could assist businesses. I haven't looked at what Bamboo offers for MLOps, so it's possible that they've already built in features. Machine learning and AI are in big demand at the moment. If they haven't focused too much on MLOps, that's probably where they can improve.

Read full review

RajeshReddy

Dev Ops Engineer at Infosys

The UI is colorful, but the user experience must be improved

We can see all the pipelines with a simple search. The UI is colorful. The user experience is very rich. The product is very easy to learn if we know a bit of the basics. If we have someone to show us how to use it, it is very easy.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In my experience Bamboo is scalable."

"In Bamboo, build and deployment have been segregated. The build plan and deployment plan are different. When comparing Bamboo to other solutions, the native feature you will not find in another tool, such as Jenkins. They have segregated the build and deployment plan. This means, building the application and deploying it are two separate parts in Bamboo, they have segregated it apart from the UI. This makes the tool a bit better compared to other tools."

"One of the big things that made us choose Bamboo, is it seamlessly integrates its APIs into NetSuite, which is our main ELP system."

"Bamboo's integration with the rest of Atlassian's tech tools, like Jira, helps manage the end-to-end development and release process."

"The tool is useful for continuous deployment."

"Bamboo was used extensively in our organization for PCA compliance."

"The most valuable features of Bamboo are its performance and UI. Additionally, there are a lot of useful plugins, integration with other solutions, such as Bitbucket and Jira, and a helpful online community."

"The most valuable feature of Bamboo is that it is a good tool for CI/CD integration."

More Bamboo pros

"The UI is colorful."

"The most notable aspect is its user interface, which we find to be user-friendly and straightforward for deploying and comprehending pipelines. We have the ability to create multiple pipelines, and in addition to that, the resource consumption is impressive."

"GoCD's open-source nature is valuable."

"Permission separations mean that we can grant limited permissions for each team or team member."

Cons

"Bamboo can improve by providing more with scripting, such as they have with Jenkins. Bamboo is more UI-driven at this time, Jenkins is going in that direction too."

"It should be much easier to use. It shouldn't require a lot of reading to be able to use it. It should have just two or three screens rather than hundreds of screens requiring a lot of clicking. It also requires a lot of integration. It has a steep learning curve. It takes a lot of time to understand and put in the data. There is also no proper training."

"One area that could be enhanced is the governance process, particularly with regard to building approvals and transitions between stages. In comparison to other solutions, such as Jira, which features a workflow that supports approval processes, this capability is not natively available in Bamboo. To implement this functionality, integration with other solutions, such as GSM may be necessary. Although some add-ons, such as Adaptavist ScriptRunner, are available in the market to circumvent this limitation, they may not offer the exact functionality needed. Therefore, there is certainly room for improvement in this area."

"The solution needs to support more customization in the training. What's offered is pretty generic. They need better training and should offer more guidance."

"Integrating workflows with other platforms can be challenging. The capabilities of these platforms sometimes fall short compared to others. Initially, it was difficult for us because the plugins were very limited."

"Scalability depends on the use case. If it is really a big customer with a lot of tests, it might not be a scalable option for them."

"Bamboo is a bit complicated to use compared to other solutions, such as GitLab. You have to integrate different actions that are difficult that could be made easier."

"Bamboo’s technical support services, in terms of speed of response, need improvement."

More Bamboo cons

"The aspect that requires attention is the user management component. When integrating with BitLabs and authenticating through GitLab, there are specific features we desire. One important feature is the ability to import users directly from GitLab, along with their respective designations, and assign appropriate privileges based on that information. Allocating different privileges to users is a time-consuming process for us."

"The tool must be more user-friendly."

"The documentation really should be improved by including real examples and more setup cases."

"It is difficult to assign different access levels because it relies on separate keys for developer and admin access, which could be simplified."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the solution's pricing a three out of five."

"The price of Bamboo is reasonable."

"There is a subscription required to use Bamboo."

"The server products for small teams used to offer excellent pricing. However, Atlassian has since changed the offering and the pricing is more expensive. I do still think the solution offers good value for money."

"I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten."

"If Bamboo could provide more flexibility on pricing, that would help. On the agent side, if you want to increase the number of agents it should be less expensive. If they can provide some better pricing model, it will help, whether we are going to use it or are already using it."

"It's an open-source and free tool."

"This is an open-source solution and it is inexpensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,481 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user217035

Senior iOS Developer at a media company with 5,001-10,000 employees

May 27, 2015

Bamboo vs. Jenkins

A biased and subjective comparison of Bamboo and Jenkins as CI servers for mobile development, based on practical experience with both. Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (Delivery, Distribution) has been around for quite a while. But surprisingly enough on a global scale it pretty…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

University

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bamboo?

Bamboo's integration with the rest of Atlassian's tech tools, like Jira, helps manage the end-to-end development and release process.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bamboo?

I rate the solution's pricing a three out of five.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bamboo?

See all answers

What do you like most about GoCD?

The UI is colorful.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GoCD?

One area of product improvement is the access control system. It is difficult to assign different access levels because it relies on separate keys for developer and admin access, which could be sim...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GoCD?

The solution helps us deploy microservices across multiple environments.

See all answers

Comparisons

GitLab vs Bamboo

Compared 19% of the time

GitHub Actions vs Bamboo

Compared 16% of the time

Tekton vs Bamboo

Compared 10% of the time

Harness vs Bamboo

Compared 8% of the time

Bitbucket vs Bamboo

Compared 4% of the time

More Bamboo Competitors

GitLab vs GoCD

Compared 13% of the time

Jenkins vs GoCD

Compared 9% of the time

GitHub Actions vs GoCD

Compared 9% of the time

Tekton vs GoCD

Compared 8% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs GoCD

Compared 7% of the time

More GoCD Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bamboo

January 2026

Download Bamboo product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

December 2025

Download GoCD product report

Also Known As

No data available

Adaptive ALM, Thoughtworks Go

Overview

Bamboo is a continuous integration and delivery tool that ties automated builds, tests and releases together in a single workflow. It works great alongside JIRA and Stash providing a fully traceable deployment pipeline.

Atlassian

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers businesses a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility. It was designed for continuous delivery and the concepts essential to this practice are built in at the core.

Thoughtworks

Sample Customers

Neocleus, MuleSoft, Interspire

Ancestry.com, Barclay Card, AutoTrader, BT Financial Group, Gamesys, Nike, Vodafone, Haufe Lexware, Medidata, Hoovers

Buyer's Guide

Bamboo vs. GoCD

December 2025

Free Report: Bamboo vs. GoCD

Find out what your peers are saying about Bamboo vs. GoCD and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,481 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bamboo vs. GoCD report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.