We performed a comparison between Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"It is stable and scalable."
"The ease of deployment and configuration is valuable. It's very easy compared to other vendors like Sophos. Sophos' configuration is complex. Fortinet is a lot easier to understand. You don't need a lot of admin knowledge to do the configuration."
"Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"The main thing is that I feel safe. Because the processes that have been used to get a handle on the attackers are much better than other competitors"
"Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"It never fails. Bitdefender always catches all of the viruses that have been detected on customer sites."
"I find Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus to be a pretty good solution for the mid-level market, specifically for organizations with up to two hundred fifty users. I like that it is an averagely priced solution. It also has a straightforward installation that can be completed within three to five minutes. Its technical support is also good enough."
"Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus is highly stable."
"The best thing about Bitdefender is that it has got top-notch features and it is not tied to specific countries like some other antivirus tools."
"EDR's most valuable feature is its basic protection from malware and viruses."
"This is a feature-rich product."
"The detection engine running on endpoints works very well and provides a good protection level."
"The most valuable feature is endpoint protection."
"Has some great features not available elsewhere."
"We've found the solution to be stable."
"The solution provides high-end security that is critical for financial institutions and bankers."
"The most valuable feature of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is security. It has better security than other solutions, such as Symantec."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Pros →
"Detections could be improved."
"The solution is not stable."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"Everything with Fortinet having to do with their cloud services. They need to invest more in their internal infrastructure that they are running in the cloud. One of the things I find with their cloud environment compared to others' is that they go cheap on the equipment. So it causes some performance degradation."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"We'd like to see more one-to-one product presentations for the distribution channels."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"The solution seems to be pretty amateur for an EDR solution, and it should be more in sync in terms of features, with solutions such as FireEye and SentinelOne."
"The mobile version needs improvement."
"Adding a feature like Data Loss Prevention would be beneficial."
"There are some issues with EDR's web policy blocking sites that are marked as exceptions."
"The installation process could be more streamlined."
"The prices can go down a little bit."
"It does not cover all of our security issues."
"Kaspersky needs to strengthen its standing in the market."
"The main problem with Endpoint is that Kaspersky is a Russian company, and my clients prefer not to use it."
"Kaspersky EDR lacks protection from recent ransomware."
"The product should release more frequent updates. The tool needs to improve its scalability as well."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Cons →
More Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Pricing and Cost Advice →
Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus is ranked 54th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 4 reviews while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is ranked 17th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 44 reviews. Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus is rated 7.6, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus writes "Averagely priced, has a straightforward installation, and worth recommending to the mid-level market, but its performance needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert writes "Solid security and performance; overall a useful tool". Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus is most compared with HP Wolf Security, CrowdStrike Falcon, Open EDR, Darktrace and Trend Vision One, whereas Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is most compared with Trend Vision One, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Cynet, IBM Security QRadar and Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS). See our Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.