Fortinet FortiEDR is pretty cheap compared to other EDR products because it provides three-for-one contracts. Fortinet FortiEDR has significantly lowered the operational costs of threat management and response.
CIO at a manufacturing company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 10
Mar 7, 2024
We license it per employee, so as long as the employee count remains the same, the licensing won't change. We have it installed on every device. We got a good deal on licensing, so it is in the competitive range. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with ten being expensive, and one being cheap. The pricing is fixed. However, we had larger configuration costs associated with the implementation.
Senior Manager Business Development at Adapt Information Technologies (Pvt) Ltd
Real User
Top 5
Feb 13, 2024
Fortinet FortiEDR is available at a very competitive price compared to the other products in the market. Customers also know about the prices of the Other products in the market, and they are aware that Fortinet FortiEDR's prices are cost-effective.
The pricing is significantly high. The implementation of this solution required us to allocate additional funds beyond our initial budget. However, due to thorough testing and careful solutions, we are confident in its capabilities and scalability for the next three years. While the cost may have been high, we view it as a worthwhile investment due to Fortinet's reliability and long-term performance.
The price is on the higher side. It's in the upper quadrant. The hardware costs about €100,000 and about €20,000 annually for access. Support costs extra. We are paying for the net bundle.
Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Consultant
Mar 9, 2023
The pricing for FortiEDR is pretty high. It's not affordable for small companies. I'd rat the affordability three out of ten in terms of affordability, with ten being affordable.
Fortinet FortiEDR is priced pretty competitively if you compare it to other companies that are in the same boat, like Palo Alto, who have similar product suites. It is reasonable. In the industry, they call Fortinet the Chevy of Perimeter Security and Palo Alto the Cadillac. I think that's undeserved. I think Fortinet is actually, in the long run, a better product, but it has that reputation because of their pricing. Palo Alto, right off the bat, charged a much higher premium, which created the illusion that you're getting a better product. Palo Alto products are brutally expensive. But that's the way Palo Alto works and it works for them. Although, I've heard rumors that they're changing their channel model where they're going after enterprise customers directly, rather than forcing it through the channel. Fortinet is a 100% channel, Palo Alto is not. And that's affecting them. If you look at stock prices and earnings, Fortinet is actually doing better.
Fortinet FortiEDR is a real-time endpoint protection, detection, and automated response solution. Its primary purpose is to detect advanced threats to stop breaches and ransomware damage. It is designed to do so in real time, even on an already compromised device, allowing you to respond and remediate incidents automatically so your data can remain protected.
Fortinet FortiEDR Features
Fortinet FortiEDR has many valuable key features, including:
Easily customizable
Real-time proactive risk...
The pricing is moderate; I cannot label it as cheap, but it is moderate compared to other main solutions.
It's reasonably priced compared to other vendors' similar products.
The solution costs less than 10,000 for 100 users. Users have to pay additional costs to have the solution on the cloud.
Fortinet FortiEDR is pretty cheap compared to other EDR products because it provides three-for-one contracts. Fortinet FortiEDR has significantly lowered the operational costs of threat management and response.
The platform is cost-effective. I rate the pricing a ten.
The pricing of the solution is on the high end compared to its offerings and capabilities.
The solution is not expensive. However, CrowdStrike is more expensive.
We license it per employee, so as long as the employee count remains the same, the licensing won't change. We have it installed on every device. We got a good deal on licensing, so it is in the competitive range. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with ten being expensive, and one being cheap. The pricing is fixed. However, we had larger configuration costs associated with the implementation.
Fortinet FortiEDR is available at a very competitive price compared to the other products in the market. Customers also know about the prices of the Other products in the market, and they are aware that Fortinet FortiEDR's prices are cost-effective.
The pricing is significantly high. The implementation of this solution required us to allocate additional funds beyond our initial budget. However, due to thorough testing and careful solutions, we are confident in its capabilities and scalability for the next three years. While the cost may have been high, we view it as a worthwhile investment due to Fortinet's reliability and long-term performance.
It is expensive and I would rate it an eight out of ten.
The price is on the higher side. It's in the upper quadrant. The hardware costs about €100,000 and about €20,000 annually for access. Support costs extra. We are paying for the net bundle.
I rate FortiEDR an eight out of ten for affordability.
I'm not familiar with pricing, but it looks a bit costly compared to other vendors.
The pricing is good. Prices used to be lower, but I think they are getting higher.
The pricing is typical for enterprises and fairly priced. Deals are negotiated with an account manager.
The pricing for FortiEDR is pretty high. It's not affordable for small companies. I'd rat the affordability three out of ten in terms of affordability, with ten being affordable.
The pricing is a bit expensive. I'd rate it eight out of ten, with ten being very expensive.
The price is comprable to other endpoint security solutions.
Licensing costs could be lower.
Fortinet FortiEDR is priced pretty competitively if you compare it to other companies that are in the same boat, like Palo Alto, who have similar product suites. It is reasonable. In the industry, they call Fortinet the Chevy of Perimeter Security and Palo Alto the Cadillac. I think that's undeserved. I think Fortinet is actually, in the long run, a better product, but it has that reputation because of their pricing. Palo Alto, right off the bat, charged a much higher premium, which created the illusion that you're getting a better product. Palo Alto products are brutally expensive. But that's the way Palo Alto works and it works for them. Although, I've heard rumors that they're changing their channel model where they're going after enterprise customers directly, rather than forcing it through the channel. Fortinet is a 100% channel, Palo Alto is not. And that's affecting them. If you look at stock prices and earnings, Fortinet is actually doing better.
There are no issues with the pricing.
There are no additional costs.