Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Kaspersky Endpoint Detectio...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
19th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
45
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Trellix Endpoint Security (...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
17th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
53
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (22nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is 1.1%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is 2.1%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
 

Featured Reviews

Kiarash Heydari - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 28, 2023
Solid security and performance; overall a useful tool
We use Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response for different in-depth solutions. It's a useful tool when you want everything in one module and you don't have a big budget for security. Other use cases are behavior detection, policy management, assessments, and patch fixings The most valuable…
Venugopal Potumudi - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 7, 2022
Reliable with good independent modules and a straightforward setup
I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. Having used Trend Micro as well, I would rate Trend Micro higher. However, I would still choose this product as a second option. When we recommend a product, we would recommend something based on the fit of the product and customer requirements. We worked with Defender, we worked with Trend Micro, and we worked with McAfee. All of them almost overlap in multiple use cases. That said, we do see the customer IT strategy and where they're going, and they are adopting Azure more. We know there are certain limitations in their landscape where there may be some old legacy systems, and in that case, then we would either switch back to McAfee or Trend Micro instead of Defender.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is an effective protection solution."
"I like the tool’s response to malware and trojans."
"The most valuable feature of Kaspersky EDR is its simplicity. The console is easy to use and not very complex."
"This is a feature-rich product."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable features of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response are all the features. The features have all helped us and most recently malware has been an issue in our company and malware protection has been effective."
"Kaspersky is easy to use, and it performs well."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is a stable solution."
"Trellix Endpoint Security has a full suite of DLP."
"The performance is good."
"The installation phase of the solution was very easy."
"If the network has seen something, we can use that to put a block to all the endpoints."
"The most valuable feature is user-based policy provision."
"MVISION offers decent protection."
"FireEye Endpoint Security's scalability is awesome. I think it is one of the best on that front."
"It has a feature called Isolation. If a device is compromised, we can connect it to our SOC, and no one would be able to access it. This way we can limit the damage to the network while we are investigating."
 

Cons

"The issue with Kaspersky EDR is the sandbox. I'd like to have the ability to manage it on the cloud as well."
"If it covered more products, it would improve the XDR."
"The prices can go down a little bit."
"The solution is expensive."
"There are some issues with EDR's web policy blocking sites that are marked as exceptions."
"Installing Kaspersky is complex. It requires more work from system admins and takes almost one week to deploy, including integration and mapping with other solutions. You also have to configure Kaspersky EDR sandboxing then set up permissions for various teams and customers."
"An area for improvement in Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is its technical support because currently, technical support is delayed."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response could improve some issues and add new security files."
"The central monitoring dashboard needs improvement."
"The solution can be expensive."
"I hope the solution can be used in cloud systems going forward."
"Upgrading to new versions isn't easy and it can take a long time. Also, other solutions' tamper protection features are better than FireEye's. Clients should have access to our local information, but they shouldn't change settings on the system itself."
"The performance could be better. I noticed that it slows down a bit."
"The integration and display of the dashboards have to be done better."
"The solution needs to work on memory consumption. It is too high."
"The Linux support is very poor. I use base detection. Currently, they are providing malware protection and logon track features in Windows and Mac. These features aren't available in Linux. It will be helpful to extend these capabilities to Linux. We would also like assets grouping and device lock protection features, which are included in their roadmap."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Kaspersky's pricing is very competitive when it comes to comparison with the other solutions."
"The product has a valuable pricing model. We need to purchase its monthly subscription."
"Pricing for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is so-so when you compare it with its competitors. Its pricing isn't cheap nor expensive."
"The solution isn't the cheapest considering what you get. I would rate the pricing as seven out of ten."
"The solution's cost is reasonable compared to other vendors."
"EDR is priced on the cheaper side. Licensing for EDR is available on a yearly basis for around 80 SAR a year."
"There is an annual license to use Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response. The price overall is a bit expensive when compared to other solutions. There are not any additional fees other than the license."
"The solution’s pricing is okay."
"They should reduce the cost or make it free, open-source software."
"The product pricing is high."
"It is based on an annual subscription."
"Pricing for McAfee MVISION Endpoint is not very good, and I would rate its cost three out of five, though I won't be able to mention how much its actual price is."
"It is not so cheap in comparison to Sophos and other solutions."
"Licensing fees are paid yearly."
"Customers would need to purchase a license. If a customer purchases an MVISION Endpoint license, he may use that license to install ENS. It's a flexible license where you have the option to either use the McAfee security software or the Windows Defender managed by McAfee, which is MVISION Endpoint."
"The pricing is mid-ranged and quite reasonable compared to other similar products."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Educational Organization
7%
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?
The integration with our hypervisor is quite smooth, especially within the Kaspersky Enterprise environment. We have many virtual machines, and the integration is helpful.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?
If one is cheap, ten is expensive, I rate the product’s price as a seven out of ten, especially if I compare it with CrowdStrike.
What needs improvement with Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?
I would say that Kaspersky is not too big in the cloud-related area. From an improvement perspective, it would be good if Kaspersky went big in the cloud since it would give the tool a fair chance ...
How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...
What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?
The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.
 

Also Known As

Kaspersky EDR
McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Ferrari, Insolar, Tael, Republic of Serbia
Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation
Find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.