Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer vs Veritas Alta SaaS Protection comparison

Bitdefender and Veritas are both solutions in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category. Bitdefender is ranked #27, while Veritas is ranked #28 with an average rating of 8.0. Bitdefender holds a 0.9% mindshare in ATP, compared to Veritas’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Bitdefender users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Veritas users who would recommend it.

Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer

Read 5 Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer reviews

415 Views
228 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

Read 13 Veritas Alta SaaS Protection reviews

52 Views
38 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer

Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Veritas Alta SaaS Protection and Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer compete in the data security space. Veritas Alta appears to have the advantage in data protection, while Bitdefender excels in threat detection.

Features: Veritas Alta SaaS Protection is known for seamless data backup, robust security policies, and compliance management. Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer stands out with behavior-based malware detection, deep integration with security infrastructures, and proactive threat mitigation. The key differentiator is Veritas' strength in data integrity versus Bitdefender's focus on threat handling.

Room for Improvement: Veritas could enhance cloud integration flexibility, improve minor UI bugs, and streamline additional feature optimizations. Bitdefender could simplify its deployment process, reduce resource usage during threat analysis, and enhance user-interface intuitiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Veritas Alta offers easy deployment and responsive service, simplifying integration for organizations. Bitdefender requires a more involved setup but provides extensive technical support for its specialized needs.

Pricing and ROI: Veritas Alta presents competitive pricing and favorable ROI through scalability, reducing downtime costs. Bitdefender, priced higher, offers strong ROI by effectively mitigating advanced threats, justifying its premium through security effectiveness.

To learn more, read our detailed Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer vs. Veritas Alta SaaS Protection Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer vs. Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,625 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

27th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

28th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

SaaS Backup (11th), SaaS Management Platforms (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category, the mindshare of Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer is 0.9%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veritas Alta SaaS Protection is 0.1%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

Featured Reviews

Basawaraj Vastrad

Technical Director at BD Software Distribution Pvt Ltd

Automated and manual threat analysis provides deep insights for potential threat remediation

The most valuable features of Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer ( /products/bitdefender-sandbox-analyzer-reviews ) include manual and auto-submission. The sandbox analyzer provides a combination of technologies including machine learning-based technologies. Network analytics is performed, and the tool analyzes using threat feeds. Manual and automated submissions allow suspicious files or URLs to be analyzed thoroughly, providing deep insights for further investigation. This information is crucial for making informed decisions on remediating potential threats.

Read full review

SunilPanigrahi

Senior Manager at a logistics company with 10,001+ employees

A stable solution with good duplication capabilities and fair pricing

The duplication is the solution's most valuable feature The backup reports and the dashboard need improvement. I've been using the solution for five years. The solution is quite stable. We haven't had any problems over the past five years of use. Scalability is fine. We keep adding different…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Sandbox Analyzer is easy to use. It's simple to drill down into the data. In a lot of the competing products, an extremely informed end-user can do battle with the tools provided, but in today's market, end-users have less and less time to try and keep up. The CSAW alerts come out every day, and they're huge. Adobe did a master patch last Thursday and another one a few days later."

"The solution is useful in the event of a gray file or grayware, as there are certain files users may download of which we know little about."

"I like the fact that it works pretty well. It can be a little aggressive at times, but I'd rather have it be a little bit aggressive than not catch what it's supposed to catch. We've been running that platform for about five years, and we've not really had any viruses or malware get through. It's also easy to set up, and it's easy to manage."

"It is easy to use, and there is a lot of automation. So, users don't need to worry about that."

"Bitdefender has shown fantastic stability over the past eight years with no major incidents reported."

"The duplication is the solution's most valuable feature."

"I think the most important feature is the ability of SaaS Backup to cover all modules proposed by Office 365, because competing solutions don't cover the total scope."

"We're comfortable using this kind of technology. It's user-friendly."

"The most valuable features are the ease of administration and the ease of configuration."

"Some of the tool's best features include an enhanced dashboard and strong security features compared to native Veritas. Our environment is entirely automated."

"The solution is stable; I haven't experienced any bugs or glitches on it."

"It's a good solution. It's pretty stable."

"Veritas is loaded with features because the appliance is ready to integrate with the cloud in cases where the customers have a hybrid or cloud environment."

More Veritas Alta SaaS Protection pros

Cons

"We propose the on-premises solution to most of our customers, for which we must provide a license, although no such request accompanies customers who want a cloud-based solution."

"It would be better if there were real-time alerts. The whole suite, unlike most anti-virus consoles that just ping you when there's an infection or something, for some inexplicable reason, Bitdefender doesn't do that. The most you could do is get an hourly email, or maybe if there's an outbreak that affects 30% of our machines, it sends me an email. There's no real-time alert to say, "Hey, so-and-so literally 30 seconds ago just had this happen on their machine." Real-time reporting would be a huge improvement. All in all, it's a pretty nice product, generally speaking. They do a pretty good job. They can pretty much go toe to toe with just about anybody. But it's that kind of real-time nature. I've not had occasion to use the EDR portion to actually try and do any kind of custom scripting to drill into things that are going on at the endpoints. But my understanding from reading comments of others is that it's not particularly flexible in that regard to be able to do things like that."

"It should be more secure. There should be more protection, especially for non-signature-based malware. It works fine for non-signature-based malware, but I expect it to become a bit more advanced to be able to cope with future or upcoming environments."

"We would like to see the time it takes for the sandbox to analyze a file reduced from its ten or fifteen minute duration to five."

"One area that needs improvement in Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer is the addition of an asset management feature."

"It does everything we need. We haven't been able to throw anything at it that it couldn't handle."

"Currently, it isn't possible to use anything other than Veritas cloud to back up to. I think today it's important to cover the three major cloud provider: GCP, Azure and AWS."

"The usability of the solution isn't the best."

"When you finish a project, the client should have the opportunity to browse the files rather than simply ending the contract. Also, it's not possible to recover earlier versions. It should be possible to have a database for recovering files after you finish a contract. There's no solution for this from Veritas."

"The implementation could be improved. The server setup is very easy, but some specific client implementation, for example, Oracle or SQL servers, are a little bit complicated. they should offer a bit more assistance with the setup for these particular items."

"An area for improvement is the product's performance, especially how long it takes to do a job."

"Technical support can be improved."

"The solution does lack a lot of features, and we're considering switching."

"Licensing has been a struggle. It went from bronze, silver to gold. Licensing needs more sophistication. It has features that are sold as separate add-ons."

More Veritas Alta SaaS Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You need a license to a certain extent. You need to pay for advanced features. For corporate accounts, it isn't is really a problem, but pricing is an important thing for many companies."

"I think it's probably less expensive than something like CrowdStrike. We got a really good deal because it was literally their year-end, and they were trying to close all the sales for the week. So we bought a three-year contract from them. It roughly ended up costing me somewhere around $17 for an endpoint per year. It was really quite a nice pricing. I've talked to other folks where they got CrowdStrike, and it's like $60 for an endpoint for a year. It does, and they can be pretty aggressive if you're dealing with them directly, and I have. So no complaints there."

"This solution is not cheap and not expensive but priced in the mid-range."

"The tool is expensive compared to Veeam."

"SaaS Backup isn't the most expensive solution."

"The program is quite expensive."

"I would rate this solution's pricing as five out of five."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

10%

University

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veritas Alto SaaS Protection?

The tool is expensive compared to Veeam.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Veritas Alto SaaS Protection?

The tool can be improved in terms of maintainability and flexibility, especially as companies grow larger. In these aspects, I feel Veeam is better for cloud and operational purposes.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Veritas Alto SaaS Protection?

Veritas Alta SaaS Protection is good for cloud backups and has many integration features. It works well in a hybrid model.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer

Compared 100% of the time

More Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer Competitors

Veritas NetBackup vs Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

Compared 30% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

Compared 20% of the time

Cohesity DataProtect vs Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

Compared 13% of the time

Keepit vs Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

Compared 10% of the time

Azure Backup vs Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

Compared 10% of the time

More Veritas Alta SaaS Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

March 2025

Download Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer product report

Buyer's Guide

SaaS Backup

March 2025

Download Veritas Alta SaaS Protection product report

Also Known As

No data available

SaaS Backup

Overview

Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer is a security solution that enhances the organization posture against sophisticated or targeted attacks through advanced detection and reporting capabilities of elusive, persistent threats that try to penetrate your network.

Bitdefender

Veritas Alta SaaS Protection is a comprehensive cloud-to-cloud backup and recovery solution designed to protect critical data and applications in Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) environments. With the increasing adoption of SaaS applications like Microsoft Office 365 and Salesforce, organizations need a reliable and efficient way to safeguard their data from accidental deletion, malicious attacks, and other data loss scenarios.

This product overview will highlight the key features and benefits of Veritas Alta SaaS Protection. Firstly, it offers automated and continuous backup of SaaS data, ensuring that organizations can easily recover lost or corrupted data with minimal downtime. The solution supports a wide range of SaaS applications, including email, calendars, contacts, files, and collaboration platforms.

Veritas Alta SaaS Protection provides granular recovery options, allowing users to restore individual items, folders, or entire applications as needed. This flexibility ensures that organizations can quickly recover specific data without the need for a full system restore. Additionally, the solution offers point-in-time recovery, enabling users to restore data from a specific date and time, further enhancing data protection and compliance requirements.

Another key feature of Veritas Alta SaaS Protection is its advanced security capabilities. The solution encrypts data both in transit and at rest, ensuring that sensitive information remains secure throughout the backup and recovery process. It also provides multi-factor authentication and role-based access controls, allowing organizations to enforce strict access policies and prevent unauthorized access to their SaaS data.

Furthermore, Veritas Alta SaaS Protection offers a user-friendly interface and intuitive management console, making it easy for organizations to configure and monitor their backup and recovery processes. The solution provides comprehensive reporting and auditing capabilities, allowing administrators to track backup status, monitor storage usage, and generate compliance reports.

Veritas

Sample Customers

Archdiocese, Northstar, SeSa, W&W Informatik, Yamaha Motor Europe

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer vs. Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

March 2025

Free Report: Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer vs. Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer vs. Veritas Alta SaaS Protection and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer vs. Veritas Alta SaaS Protection report.

See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.

We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.