BizFlow vs Camunda comparison

BizFlow and Camunda are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. BizFlow is ranked #29 with an average rating of 8.0, while Camunda is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3. BizFlow holds a 0.1% mindshare in BPM, compared to Camunda’s 21.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BizFlow users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Camunda users who would recommend it.

BizFlow

Read 3 BizFlow reviews

160 Views
78 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Camunda

Read 77 Camunda reviews

21,240 Views
14,235 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

BizFlow

Camunda

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

BizFlow and Camunda serve as competing business workflow automation tools. Camunda appears to have a competitive edge due to its advanced features and robust integration capabilities, which justify its higher price point.

Features: Camunda is recognized for its open architecture, seamless integration with other enterprise systems, and granular control over workflow processes. BizFlow focuses on ease of use, strong configuration options, and adaptive case management for less technically demanding implementations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Camunda follows a developer-focused deployment model requiring significant technical expertise, supported by extensive documentation and community support. BizFlow offers a straightforward setup experience with comprehensive support services and customer assistance for a smoother transition.

Pricing and ROI: Camunda’s higher licensing fees align with its comprehensive features and scalability, offering greater ROI for complex workflow needs. BizFlow's lower setup costs and efficient deployment make it a cost-effective option for straightforward automation.

To learn more, read our detailed BizFlow vs. Camunda Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BizFlow vs. Camunda

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BizFlow

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

29th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Camunda

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (1st), Process Automation (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of BizFlow is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Camunda is 21.3%, up from 21.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Satya Singh

Human Resource Executive at MetLife

Seamless automation for workflows, customizable and UI friendly

I would rate the stability a seven out of ten because other tools in the market have extra capabilities that BizFlow doesn't have yet. They have some built-in capabilities and AI features, and everyone is thinking about how to implement AI in their area. I haven't seen any updates from BizFlow on this, but they might plan to implement it soon. However, we don't have this capability right now. This could be one reason why people might move from BizFlow to another tool. For example, with Nintex, we can integrate Google Cloud and achieve some functionality from Google Cloud as well. IBM also introduced some free tests in their DPM services with AI. These are good things in the market right now.

Read full review

FABIO NAGAO

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

Reduces costs with hardware abstraction and simplifies scaling

There is an issue where, in some situations, I need to scale up by observing both CPU and memory usage of containers, yet under the current options available at Amazon, this is not possible. I have to choose between monitoring CPU or memory to scale my solution. Not every software is built for deployment as a container service, although the current architecture trend is changing this.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"There are so many advantages. First things, like we have a seamless automation capability available here in BizFlow. Totally customizable, UI we can create, and the third-party integration is also achievable. Not with the in-built functionality, but with custom code and all, we can achieve that thing also."

"We are using the BPMN engine of Camunda; we are not using the user interface. We are using just the engine, the back end of this. For us, it is working quite well."

"Camunda seems to have a lot of traction, maturity, and stability. It also matches the need for agile development."

"The Camunda BPMN Platform is very flexible and gives several options to deploy and scale it."

"I like everything about the entire BPM that comes with the BPM suite."

"Easy to use and easy to integrate into the products and applications we provide for our customers."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read."

"The headless nature of the Camunda Platform is something that has helped us to build our own logic and platforms on it."

"The use of Java is a big plus for our intern developers, and Camunda scales well, as many of our departments are already using it in production with dedicated teams."

More Camunda pros

Cons

"Nintex provided an in-built functionality. Like integration-related things, so many service types are available. You just have to configure it. So, such kinds of things decrease the timing of development. So, it is missing in Bizflow."

"Camunda Platform's customer support could be improved because their response is quite slow."

"The solution could use some enhancements like adding connectors, improving forms and having a mobile app, but everything is an enhancement rather than a flaw."

"The Camunda Modeler installation poses a challenge, requiring local installation, which doesn't help collaboration like other online tools, for instance."

"It's costly and not accessible for small enterprises or startups. It would be great if Camunda offered a tier plan for smaller companies."

"I think that Camunda can try to do better when it comes to solving the complexities of all the products in its software stack."

"There are a few things that I'm missing. For instance, the user interface creator, which I know other systems have, like Aurea or Lombardi, which are IBM solutions. The interface creator, including the data model creator or some module which would allow the users who are not programmers or business consultants and who are not technically skilled in database and Java programming, to create data models and user interfaces."

"In the future, I would like to see better transactional integrity."

"The cockpit features of the Camunda Platform can be improved to make it a bit more user-friendly, in terms of providing a bit more user experience for non-technical users. There could be some additional documentation added."

More Camunda cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is a main concern for any organization, but some big organizations may find it affordable. For example, in Indian currency, it would be around 1,000 per license for a BizFlow license."

"It is good for a startup. When we started, its price was fair, but the way we are using it to orchestrate microservices makes it expensive. When you are growing as a company, you would have more microservices, and you would have more users. There is an exponential effect when you are growing in terms of the number of conditions, processes, and users because they bill you per process. So, the price was increasing very quickly for us, and it was very difficult."

"We pay for the license of this solution annually."

"Camunda Platform is an open-source product."

"I tried to get some information about buying the license for the solution, but I found it kind of hard to understand the business model."

"There is a bit of scope for improvement in how the licensing and pricing are done. They are based on the number of processing instances you execute on the cluster... but on the self-hosted mode, the pricing model should be customized."

"The product is expensive for a small or medium-sized company."

"We have an annual subscription to this solution."

"We use Camunda's community edition, which is free."

More Camunda pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BizFlow?

There are so many advantages. First things, like we have a seamless automation capability available here in BizFlow. Totally customizable, UI we can create, and the third-party integration is also ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BizFlow?

Pricing is a main concern for any organization, but some big organizations may find it affordable. For example, in Indian currency, it would be around 1,000 per license for a BizFlow license. Where...

See all answers

What needs improvement with BizFlow?

Nintex provided an in-built functionality. Like integration-related things, so many service types are available. You just have to configure it. So, such kinds of things decrease the timing of devel...

See all answers

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Apache Airflow vs Camunda

Compared 12% of the time

Flowable vs Camunda

Compared 9% of the time

Bizagi vs Camunda

Compared 9% of the time

Temporal vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

IBM BPM vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

More Camunda Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BizFlow

March 2025

Download BizFlow product report

Buyer's Guide

Camunda

March 2025

Download Camunda product report

Also Known As

No data available

Camunda BPM

Overview

Business process management & workflow automation software; designed to work with people and with existing systems.

BizFlow

Camunda enables organizations to orchestrate processes across people, systems, and devices to continuously overcome complexity and increase efficiency. A common visual language enables seamless collaboration between business and IT teams to design, automate, and improve end-to-end processes with the required speed, scale, and resilience to remain competitive. Hundreds of enterprises such as Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone orchestrate business-critical processes with Camunda to accelerate digital transformation. To learn more visit camunda.com.

Camunda

Sample Customers

The Immigration and Custom Enforcement, The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, Naval Special Warfare, Jardine Lloyd Thompson, Premier Pensions Management Ltd, Continental AG, Samsung Heavy Industries, Brazos Higher Education Service Corporation

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando

Buyer's Guide

BizFlow vs. Camunda

March 2025

Free Report: BizFlow vs. Camunda

Find out what your peers are saying about BizFlow vs. Camunda and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BizFlow vs. Camunda report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.