BlazeMeter and Qt Squish are competitive products in the testing domain, each with unique strengths. BlazeMeter often has the upper hand due to its superior integration capabilities, while Qt Squish is recognized for its comprehensive testing features.
Features: BlazeMeter excels with seamless CI/CD pipeline integration, load testing capabilities, and scalability, accommodating performance testing needs efficiently. Qt Squish is noteworthy for its cross-platform GUI testing, scripting flexibility, and integrated development environment (IDE), supporting diverse automation requirements.
Room for Improvement: BlazeMeter could enhance its user interface to be more intuitive and improve advanced reporting features for less technical users, alongside expanding integration options with other third-party tools. Qt Squish may benefit from better support for legacy systems, reducing the high upfront costs of licensing, and a more streamlined deployment process to simplify initial setup.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlazeMeter offers a cloud-based deployment model, simplifying setup processes and providing extensive support options. In contrast, Qt Squish requires installation but is praised for its robust technical support and comprehensive documentation.
Pricing and ROI: BlazeMeter uses a usage-based pricing model offering scalable investment options and often quick returns through increased testing efficiency. Qt Squish, while having higher upfront licensing costs, offers an extensive feature set that contributes to a strong long-term ROI.
For the part that has been automated in Qt, not everything is suitable for automation.
BlazeMeter has the capability to simulate a higher number of users compared to JMeter standalone.
With one license, just one user or one test scenario can be run at a time.
The licensing cost is also a concern since BlazeMeter is not free like JMeter, which limits its use.
If you want to run it for different versions of the software, then you need the Qt version of Java.
BlazeMeter requires licensing, which means it is not free like JMeter, adding to the setup cost considerations.
For the developer license, it is about $5200 a year.
BlazeMeter offers a higher limit on load simulation compared to standalone JMeter.
For the parts that have been automated in Qt, not everything is suitable for automation.
BlazeMeter ensures delivery of high-performance software by enabling DevOps teams to quickly and easily run open-source-based performance tests against any mobile app, website or API at massive scale to validate performance at every stage of software delivery.
The rapidly growing BlazeMeter community has more than 100,000 developers and includes prominent global brands such as Adobe, Atlassian, Gap, NBC Universal, Pfizer and Walmart as customers. Founded in 2011, the company is headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif., with its research and development in Tel Aviv.
Take the complexity out of testing graphical user interfaces (GUIs) and human-machine interfaces (HMIs) – even in the face of product evolution and safety-critical applications.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.