Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bonita vs Flowable comparison

Bonitasoft and Flowable are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Bonitasoft is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.2, while Flowable is ranked #26 with an average rating of 7.0. Additionally, 96% of Bonitasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Flowable users who would recommend it.
Bonita
Read 27 Bonita reviews
  • 3,061 Views
  • 2,253 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
Flowable
Read 1 Flowable review
  • 681 Views
  • 606 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Bonita and Flowable based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, BMC and others in Process Automation.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Process Automation Report (Updated: November 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Process Automation
November 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
Bonita is generally considered scalable, with benefits like clustering and robust architecture, suitable for extensive user bases.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.4
Bonita provides a customizable, low-code BPM platform with strong integration, process modeling, and automation tools compatible with various technologies.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.4
Bonita needs better documentation, user interface, and features like form builder, library components, integration, and BPMN 2.0 support.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.4
Bonita is generally stable, with occasional crashes; using the latest version enhances performance in production environments.
No sentiment score available
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Bonita's customer service is praised for responsiveness, with premium users noting effective support; open-source users plan for less.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Bonita offers flexible, reasonably priced plans with unlimited access favors larger firms, costs-free Community edition suits smaller entities.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

Bonita
Ranking in Process Automation
11th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Design (11th), Business Process Management (BPM) (13th)
Flowable
Ranking in Process Automation
26th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Paparao Nadipineni - PeerSpot reviewer
A simple and lightweight college course automation system with third-party integrations
The initial setup is straightforward and can be completed with the environment within an hour. First, take the latest from the git repository and check the git code to the monitor studio and a bar file, a deployable Bonita archive file. Then, take that process to the Bonita server, running at runtime on another server. Finally, deploy and enable it by selecting the proper organization.
Read full review
Simon Greener - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps to control the workflow and business process components of customers' operations but OSGi integration can be challenging
I'd rate my experience with the initial setup of Flowable at about a three out of ten, but for our developers, it's probably closer to a six. I found it challenging due to the complexity of the user and help documents and the fact that much of the Flowable documentation and tutorials are focused on cloud-based implementations. Since we're primarily interested in basic components like BPMN models and form design, which aren't included in the product, the learning process was more difficult for me. In contrast, our developers are more comfortable diving into the code and technology stack, which allows them to be more proactive in their approach. The deployment took three months to complete. We're still in the deployment process. Our main challenge is integrating the Flowable process engine into our product, which uses OSGi. This has led to complexity in managing the Java versions and dependencies, as the tool has around 150 Java files. We could have chosen to interact with Flowable via a Docker container and the REST API, which would have isolated the OSGi Java dependencies, but we decided to integrate it directly. This has required resolving Java version control issues and upgrades, leading to various development challenges that must be addressed. It is a learning process for all of us. As an integrated solutions architect, I would have probably opted for the Docker route rather than the direct OSGi integration chosen by the developers. However, since they went with the OSGi integration, it's taking us longer to complete the deployment. Currently, we have one full-time developer dedicated to deployment, along with one part-time developer, and my involvement at about a quarter of my time. So, we have about two people working on deployment. As for maintenance, we're not entirely sure yet. Given our direct OSGi integration choice instead of Docker and REST, maintenance may be more challenging. However, we'll have a clearer picture once deployment is complete.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Educational Organization
8%
University
7%
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
20%
Manufacturing Company
11%
University
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?
One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...
See all answers
What do you like most about Bonita?
The user interface is easy to use.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bonita?
The Enterprise edition is very expensive.
See all answers
What do you like most about Flowable?
The tool's most valuable feature is the process engine. It allows us to define BPM-based workflows, deploy them into our process engine, and interact with them within our product.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Flowable?
Since the tool is open-source, we don't have to pay anything for it. It's free to download and use, which is great for us. If Flowable hadn't been available as open source and required a license fe...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Flowable?
In my opinion, areas of improvement for Flowable include the management and creation of forms within the open-source components and the documentation and examples provided. While the cloud-based Fl...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Camunda vs Bonita Logo
Camunda vs Bonita
Compared 57% of the time
Bizagi vs Bonita Logo
Bizagi vs Bonita
Compared 18% of the time
IBM BPM vs Bonita Logo
IBM BPM vs Bonita
Compared 3% of the time
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs Bonita Logo
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs Bonita
Compared 3% of the time
ProcessMaker vs Bonita Logo
ProcessMaker vs Bonita
Compared 2% of the time
More Bonita Competitors
Camunda vs Flowable Logo
Camunda vs Flowable
Compared 75% of the time
Temporal vs Flowable Logo
Temporal vs Flowable
Compared 13% of the time
Pega Platform vs Flowable Logo
Pega Platform vs Flowable
Compared 3% of the time
Oracle BPEL vs Flowable Logo
Oracle BPEL vs Flowable
Compared 2% of the time
More Flowable Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Bonita
November 2024
Bonita reportDownload Bonita product report
Buyer's Guide
Process Automation
November 2024
Flowable reportDownload Flowable product report
 

Also Known As

Bonita BPM
No data available
 

Learn More

Bonitasoft
Flowable
 

Overview

Bonitasoft helps innovative companies worldwide deliver better digital user experiences for customers and employees. The extensible and open Bonita application platform unleashes the full potential of multidisciplinary development teams to create Living Apps: applications that allow continuous and incremental improvement, connecting tailored user interfaces with reliable back-office operations.

Flowable is a versatile software that streamlines and automates business processes. It is commonly used for workflow management, task automation, and digital transformation initiatives. 

Users also utilize Flowable for document management, case management, and customer journey mapping. Its valuable features include efficient workflow management, seamless integration capabilities, and a user-friendly interface. 

Flowable allows for smooth collaboration and task automation, and its ability to integrate with other systems and applications enables a seamless flow of information. 

The intuitive and easy-to-use interface makes it accessible to users of all technical backgrounds.

 

Sample Customers

With more than 1000 customers in 75 countries, and its ecosystem of more than 120,000 members, Bonitasoft is the largest provider of open-source Business Process Management, Low-code and Digital Transformation software worldwide.
1. Adobe 2. BMW 3. Cisco 4. Dell 5. Ericsson 6. Ford 7. General Electric 8. Honda 9. IBM 10. Johnson & Johnson 11. Kia Motors 12. LG Electronics 13. Microsoft 14. Nike 15. Oracle 16. PepsiCo 17. Qualcomm 18. Red Bull 19. Samsung 20. Toyota 21. Uber 22. Visa 23. Walmart 24. Xerox 25. Yahoo 26. Zara 27. Accenture 28. Bank of America 29. Citigroup 30. Deutsche Bank 31. ExxonMobil 32. Facebook
Buyer's Guide
Process Automation
November 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, BMC and others in Process Automation. Updated: November 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.