Bonita BPM vs SAP Signavio Process Manager comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Ofelia and SAP are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. Ofelia is ranked #16, while SAP is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.8. Ofelia holds a 3.1% mindshare in BPD, compared to SAP’s 6.1% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Ofelia users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Bonita BPM

Read 27 Bonita BPM reviews

6,658 Views
2,597 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Read 63 SAP Signavio Process Manager reviews

15,325 Views
5,670 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Bonita BPM

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 7, 2026

Bonita BPM and SAP Signavio Process Manager compete in the process management software category. Bonita BPM leads with competitive pricing and strong customer support, offering budget-friendly flexibility. SAP Signavio Process Manager has an edge with extensive features and integration capabilities, providing comprehensive solutions for enterprise needs.

Features: Bonita BPM features a customizable workflow design, flexibility through its open-source nature, and strong Java integrations that support seamless process management. SAP Signavio Process Manager offers advanced analytics, process collaboration through its Collaboration Hub, and effective process mining, providing in-depth insights and efficiency.

Room for Improvement: Bonita BPM could enhance real-time collaboration features, improve cloud deployment options, and expand process insight capabilities. SAP Signavio Process Manager can strengthen its user interface customization, offer more detailed integration documentation, and reduce complexity in feature access.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bonita BPM provides straightforward, user-friendly deployment with robust customer support and guidance. SAP Signavio Process Manager offers cloud-based deployment focused on seamless integration, combined with advanced customer service aimed at rapid enterprise scaling and compatibility with existing systems.

Pricing and ROI: Bonita BPM is known for lower initial costs and strong ROI for budget-conscious environments. SAP Signavio Process Manager, while more expensive, justifies its pricing through a comprehensive feature set that supports sustained ROI, especially advantageous for larger enterprises seeking detailed process management and analysis.

To learn more, read our detailed Bonita BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Bonita BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 919,586 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bonita BPM

Ranking in Business Process Design

16th

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

26th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (29th)

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Ranking in Business Process Design

6th

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of Bonita BPM is 3.1%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Signavio Process Manager is 6.1%, down from 9.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SAP Signavio Process Manager	6.1%
Bonita	3.1%
Other	90.8%

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

Mohamed Guermazi

Technical Director / Project Manager at I-way

The user interface is easy to use, and the product performs well, but the dashboard and the monitoring features are limited

We use the product to design workflows. We model and install them on the server. We use the Community edition The modeling features are easy. The performance of the tool is good. The user interface is easy to use. I have used the product for complex processes and sub-processes successfully. The…

Read full review

Sravani Bodanapu

Intelligent Ops Journey Expert at ANZ Banking Group

Process modeling has standardized complex banking workflows and drives data‑driven automation decisions

I would assess the impact of process modeling features on operational transparency as a four. I give it a four because of how well the platform could be utilized if one has a license or would be able to access it via collaborative features, and as well be able to communicate, making it less people dependent and more process dependent. A small gap of one is only because if the map has to be shared or if somebody has to work together on a map, similar to how we have Google Forms where more than two people can make changes simultaneously, the map does not allow that. One has to close it, and the next partner can only access the map after I close it. The existing changes are lost if they click on ignore or if they close the diagram. This is one feature which is sometimes bothersome. The gap of one is something that is personal feedback from my end. If someone is a newbie and they are building a map for the first time, they definitely go through a training module. But if somebody is jumping right in to build a map for the first time, which I did more than a couple of years ago, I felt that given the extent to which we have artificial intelligence capabilities right now, it would be nice if whenever you are saving a diagram and if I build it incorrectly in terms of adhering to BPMN 2.0, errors are shown, which is really nice. There are errors and warnings that need to be corrected to adhere to the standards. It is great that it allows me to save, but in order to correct the errors, if I do not understand what the error is trying to tell me. For example, sometimes it says that the element is named wrong. I understand that; it is a verb and noun that is a requirement. But sometimes it says the edge folding is not clear, and despite trying several times, I still do not get it. SAP could consider having AI capabilities to suggest how it can be done immediately on the screen itself, perhaps in the form of a virtual assistant or something. Today, for larger errors, I go to Google to check it and try to understand. If an assistant tells me that I think the arrow may be placed wrong, I think that would help me. It would save time and help me from looking up multiple dictionaries to understand what it is trying to say. At the moment, we are not integrating SAP Signavio Process Manager with existing ERP systems because internally I think we are using multiple enterprise resource planning tools. Because of that, there is a restraint to connect it with SAP Signavio Process Manager, and there is a lot of concern in terms of how data could be used because we work in a banking environment. We are not leveraging, and we have SAP S/4HANA. It would be great if there is a data lake that connects to the process, but at the moment, we do not do that. Every time we build a process, it is picked up by a different team, and they try to connect it with the data lake. It is a great feature which I think can be leveraged, but with the range of legacy systems that the company is using today, there is not much I can comment about how the ERP can be leveraged internally.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Bonitasoft helped us automate complicated and labor intensive processes"

"In general, Bonita is a very good solution."

"Flexible and drag-and-drop type of UI is very valuable. The integrations are also very good. You can build workflows very quickly, which is my favorite activity. By using the GUI, you can build the entire mechanism, notifications, and all this kind of stuff."

"Bonita is simple and lightweight and is flexible to integrate with third-party systems. The UI is now flexible, whereas it was previously rigid. Any technology can be used as a frontend, including ReactJS, Angular, and others."

"The most valuable features of Bonita are the connectors, detailed documentation, and web applications. The documentation was useful because it is how I learned how to use it."

"Studio provides an opportunity to get early feedback from real users and quickly change the process and forms."

"Bonita is user-friendly, and the features are useful."

"Of the three BPM vendors I evaluated, Bonita was the best in creating forms, ease of customization of forms, and versatility of supported platforms, and it is the only BPM platform that I've seen so far that allows for versioning of artifacts."

More Bonita BPM pros

"I would say the collaboration features are very useful to us, because we are a European organization, so we are not in one location. This is an easy way to share with other people and ask them for feedback. That is the use case for us."

"There are many valuable features, of course. I would say the main value of Signavio is to have your current process map in a way that is easy to read and derive optimization actions to make it leaner, faster, more user friendly, etc. Another great feature is the visualization, which is easy to see and read. How they map the process is also very user friendly, with drag-and-drop functionality. Also, it's a very self-explanatory, user-friendly solution."

"When comparing my experience with Celonis and Signavio, I can discern the distinctions between these two platforms. However, I'm unable to differentiate between ARAs and add-ons, as that falls outside my scope of familiarity. Regarding Celonis, it comes with its set of advantages and disadvantages. Notably, it boasts robust features like action flows, task mining, and seamless integration with AML programming. Conversely, Signavio lacks action flows and instead relies on action segments and tasks for interaction. This discrepancy is a significant factor setting Selenium and SecureView apart. In the context of Signavio, it offers a combination of BPMN and process discovery, a feature absent in Celonis. This tandem of BPMN and process insight contributes to Signavio’S potency. Meanwhile, Celonis primarily features the process miner tool, setting it apart from Signavio. These variations collectively outline the numerous differences existing between Celonis and Signavio."

"This solution is innovative and simple to use."

"With Signavio, we have a tool that the employees like because it's easy to work with."

"The reason we chose Signavio is it's a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling data tool, with data capture behind it, as well as a collaborative nature. A lot of it comes out of the box and requires less technology involvement. It can be run well by the business users. That's what we really like about it."

"The interface is very intuitive and includes a drag-and-drop function."

"The formatting features are quite good because you can create very complex models, but you can easily clean them up so that they look very nice."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pros

Cons

"There is a need for more components in the library and additional customization options for these components."

"Bonita can improve by offering more flexibility. The developer does not receive the code of the application to modify it. Most of the other solutions I have used allow the developers to change or improve the code that is generated."

"I should be able to park the tasks that are within a process in a kind of container, and dynamically, a super admin should be able to connect these processes. This kind of feature might be helpful."

"That said, creating custom connectors for 3rd party applications and APIs is still a challenging task."

"The main issue with Bonita is that the workspace crashes sometimes."

"Bonita can improve by offering more flexibility."

"It is missing some important features that other products have."

"At times Bonita BPM Studio crashes, intermittently."

More Bonita BPM cons

"The user interface for the collaboration hub is antiquated and should be improved."

"I think where there is always room for improvement is the capability of integration with other solutions."

"For us, it would help a lot if this solution had floating licenses."

"The performance metrics appearing in the collaboration hub needs to be improved."

"It could be more flexible from a customization point of view, where the user is able to display only whatever he needs."

"Two executives cannot work on one modeling process simultaneously."

"The reporting is too slow and there is a limit of 250 processes."

"Customer service/support was great in the beginning but is now extremely poor."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are using the Community Version, which can be used free of charge."

"have installed the image of Bonita BPM on Amazon AWS and there is just one option to use and pay for."

"Licensing cost for the Enterprise edition comes out to be around 40,000 a year. There is also a Community edition, which is free. Some customers can go for the Community edition, but some of them require the Enterprise edition. Big companies go for the Enterprise edition, which comes with a lot of additional features such as a mobile app."

"The price is fair for what we are using the solution for."

"The Community Edition comes free of charge."

"I am using the free version of Bonita."

"I believe this is a very good financial choice."

"You pay an annual fee and can have an unlimited number of processes and users."

More Bonita BPM pricing and cost advice

"SAP Signavio charges a lot of money."

"I think that the price of the licenses is between $2,000 USD and $3,000 USD per license per year, plus the hub usage. I cannot remember the exact cost, but it is affordable."

"The customer Journey Modeler is more than twice the price of Process Manager, which is a lot."

"The solution is quite expensive compared to other vendors."

"SaaS has no setup cost, just licensing fees."

"It is expensive. The license is monthly."

"My client purchased one editor license and the collaboration hub, which covers up to a hundred people."

"The solution is expensive."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

919,586 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	45

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which is better - Signavio Process Manager or Celonis?

SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and does not require too much technological involvement. This solution has a collabo...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Signavio Process Manager?

I am not aware of the pricing and licensing of SAP Signavio Process Manager in the current firm I am working for. However, in my last company, Fidelity International, I was introduced to SAP Signav...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Signavio Process Manager?

I do use the collaborative workspace feature of SAP Signavio Process Manager. Our stakeholders who are outside of SAP Signavio Process Manager environment do use the collaborative feature because t...

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Bonita BPM

Compared 6% of the time

Bizagi vs Bonita BPM

Compared 6% of the time

AuraQuantic vs Bonita BPM

Compared 3% of the time

IBM BPM vs Bonita BPM

Compared 3% of the time

WebRatio vs Bonita BPM

Compared 3% of the time

More Bonita BPM Competitors

Celonis vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 32% of the time

ARIS BPA vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 5% of the time

Camunda vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 4% of the time

Bizagi vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 4% of the time

ADONIS vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 3% of the time

More SAP Signavio Process Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bonita BPM

October 2026

Download Bonita BPM product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Signavio Process Manager

October 2026

Download SAP Signavio Process Manager product report

Also Known As

Bonita BPM

Signavio Process Editor

Overview

Bonita BPM is the business process automation platform from Ofelia, formerly Bonitasoft. Model, automate and optimise processes with BPMN notation, a clear separation between visual design and code, and full extensibility. Available in an open source edition and an enterprise edition.

Ofelia

SAP Signavio Process Manager offers an intuitive interface focused on ease of use, facilitating collaboration and governance. It's ideal for quick adoption within organizations, supporting process mining and intelligence to drive continuous optimization.

Offering a comprehensive web-based repository, SAP Signavio Process Manager excels in governance with its intuitive drag-and-drop modeling capabilities. The Collaboration Hub fosters transparency and discussion, crucial for organizations focusing on compliance and process optimization. Users find it efficient for internal training without requiring external resources. Despite its strengths, enhancements like simultaneous editing, improved integration with non-SAP systems, and advanced reporting are desired. Organizations often use it to capture and document business processes, facilitating compliance, audits, and digital transformation efforts.

What are the key features of SAP Signavio Process Manager?

Intuitive Interface: Ensures ease of use and quick adoption within teams.
Governance and Version Control: Provides effective management and version tracking.
Drag-and-Drop Modeling: Allows seamless process modeling.
Collaboration Hub: Enhances transparency and team discussions.
Process Mining and Intelligence: Identifies inefficiencies supporting continuous improvement.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Quick Adoption: Facilitates easy learning and collaboration.
Process Optimization: Supports identifying inefficiencies for continuous improvement.
Compliance Support: Useful for audits and standardization.
Workflow Management: Efficient portal for distribution and management.
Enhanced Training: Simplifies onboarding of new staff.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and logistics, SAP Signavio Process Manager is used for optimizing workflows, facilitating digital transformation, and supporting strategic planning. It aids in resource management and enhances process understanding for better training and onboarding.

SAP

Sample Customers

Ofelia, the company formerly named Bonitasoft, was founded in 2009 and serves more than 130 organisations across 40 countries. It has two products, Ofelia Agentic and Bonita BPM. Bonita BPM is available in an open source community edition and in a commercial subscription edition.

DHL, Coca Cola EP, Prudential, Zalando, T-Systems, Jabil, Endress+Hauser, Rakuten

Buyer's Guide

Bonita BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

September 2026

Free Report: Bonita BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Bonita BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

919,586 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bonita BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors and best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.