Bonita vs SAP Signavio Process Manager comparison

Bonitasoft and SAP are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. Bonitasoft is ranked #17, while SAP is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3. Bonitasoft holds a 3.0% mindshare in BPD, compared to SAP’s 7.2% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Bonitasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Bonita

Read 27 Bonita reviews

4,287 Views
2,186 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Read 63 SAP Signavio Process Manager reviews

11,930 Views
4,891 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Bonita

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Bonita and SAP Signavio Process Manager compete in business process management. SAP Signavio Process Manager appears superior due to its comprehensive features and robust deployment capabilities, offering long-term value.

Features: Bonita offers intuitive process modeling, flexibility in execution, and integration capabilities. SAP Signavio Process Manager provides collaborative process design, extensive process mining tools, and analytics functionalities.

Room for Improvement: Bonita could enhance its deployment complexity, improve training resources, and expand feature sets. SAP Signavio Process Manager might benefit from simplifying its integration process, improving initial setup, and enhancing cost efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bonita ensures straightforward deployment with quick implementation and supportive customer service. SAP Signavio Process Manager, although more complex, offers strong integration support and extensive training resources.

Pricing and ROI: Bonita offers cost-effectiveness with a lower entry barrier, favoring fast ROI in simpler scenarios. SAP Signavio Process Manager justifies higher setup costs through extensive features and operational efficiencies, translating to strategic long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Bonita vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Bonita vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 889,855 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bonita

Ranking in Business Process Design

17th

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

30th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (28th)

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Ranking in Business Process Design

4th

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of Bonita is 3.0%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Signavio Process Manager is 7.2%, down from 9.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SAP Signavio Process Manager	7.2%
Bonita	3.0%
Other	89.8%

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

Paparao Nadipineni

Architect at Evoke

A simple and lightweight college course automation system with third-party integrations

The initial setup is straightforward and can be completed with the environment within an hour. First, take the latest from the git repository and check the git code to the monitor studio and a bar file, a deployable Bonita archive file. Then, take that process to the Bonita server, running at runtime on another server. Finally, deploy and enable it by selecting the proper organization.

Read full review

Sravani Bodanapu

Intelligent Ops Journey Expert at ANZ Banking Group

Process modeling has standardized complex banking workflows and drives data‑driven automation decisions

I would assess the impact of process modeling features on operational transparency as a four. I give it a four because of how well the platform could be utilized if one has a license or would be able to access it via collaborative features, and as well be able to communicate, making it less people dependent and more process dependent. A small gap of one is only because if the map has to be shared or if somebody has to work together on a map, similar to how we have Google Forms where more than two people can make changes simultaneously, the map does not allow that. One has to close it, and the next partner can only access the map after I close it. The existing changes are lost if they click on ignore or if they close the diagram. This is one feature which is sometimes bothersome. The gap of one is something that is personal feedback from my end. If someone is a newbie and they are building a map for the first time, they definitely go through a training module. But if somebody is jumping right in to build a map for the first time, which I did more than a couple of years ago, I felt that given the extent to which we have artificial intelligence capabilities right now, it would be nice if whenever you are saving a diagram and if I build it incorrectly in terms of adhering to BPMN 2.0, errors are shown, which is really nice. There are errors and warnings that need to be corrected to adhere to the standards. It is great that it allows me to save, but in order to correct the errors, if I do not understand what the error is trying to tell me. For example, sometimes it says that the element is named wrong. I understand that; it is a verb and noun that is a requirement. But sometimes it says the edge folding is not clear, and despite trying several times, I still do not get it. SAP could consider having AI capabilities to suggest how it can be done immediately on the screen itself, perhaps in the form of a virtual assistant or something. Today, for larger errors, I go to Google to check it and try to understand. If an assistant tells me that I think the arrow may be placed wrong, I think that would help me. It would save time and help me from looking up multiple dictionaries to understand what it is trying to say. At the moment, we are not integrating SAP Signavio Process Manager with existing ERP systems because internally I think we are using multiple enterprise resource planning tools. Because of that, there is a restraint to connect it with SAP Signavio Process Manager, and there is a lot of concern in terms of how data could be used because we work in a banking environment. We are not leveraging, and we have SAP S/4HANA. It would be great if there is a data lake that connects to the process, but at the moment, we do not do that. Every time we build a process, it is picked up by a different team, and they try to connect it with the data lake. It is a great feature which I think can be leveraged, but with the range of legacy systems that the company is using today, there is not much I can comment about how the ERP can be leveraged internally.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Bonita is user-friendly, and the features are useful."

"Flexible and drag-and-drop type of UI is very valuable. The integrations are also very good. You can build workflows very quickly, which is my favorite activity. By using the GUI, you can build the entire mechanism, notifications, and all this kind of stuff."

"Compared to other products on the market, Bonita presents a pretty acceptable level of robustness."

"I find process management and user interface designing the most valuable features."

"The most valuable features of Bonita are the connectors, detailed documentation, and web applications."

"Compared to other products on the market, Bonita presents a pretty acceptable level of robustness."

"I think Bizagi is a powerful software or tool for organization, but Bonita is user-friendly and easy-to-use — easier to use for development."

"Bonita is simple and lightweight and is flexible to integrate with third-party systems. The UI is now flexible, whereas it was previously rigid. Any technology can be used as a frontend, including ReactJS, Angular, and others."

More Bonita pros

"This is a leading-edge product, and it is my first choice of BPM."

"I love the collaboration function, especially the option to invite people who don't have any users on the licenses."

"The collaboration hub, which helps us in terms of being able to communicate with our customers, brings everybody into the tool and close to the process, allowing them to comment and to implement their own processes."

"I use SAP Signavio Process Manager to model processes to the former operating model."

"I have seen some other tools, and Signavio is the whole package."

"Using this solution has helped make the business transformation easier because you can take an existing process and improve on it as everybody collaborates on it."

"The visual representation is extremely powerful and easy to use in process modeling and analysis. I can show it to someone who doesn't know business process mapping, and they still understand because it's visually presented. It becomes easy to explain variants and what needs to change."

"The reason we chose Signavio is it's a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling data tool, with data capture behind it, as well as a collaborative nature. A lot of it comes out of the box and requires less technology involvement. It can be run well by the business users. That's what we really like about it."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pros

Cons

"It is missing some important features that other products have."

"The documentation and examples definitely could be enhanced."

"Bonita can improve by offering more flexibility. The developer does not receive the code of the application to modify it. Most of the other solutions I have used allow the developers to change or improve the code that is generated."

"There is a need for more components in the library and additional customization options for these components."

"It would be nice to have a wizard to help walk through the development process and create a backbone."

"The dashboard has limited features."

"At times Bonita BPM Studio crashes, intermittently."

"The community edition has limited module functionality."

More Bonita cons

"The performance metrics appearing in the collaboration hub needs to be improved."

"Part of the product that I think can improve is document control. That's currently not even possible. To work with documents we have something of a workaround using SharePoint."

"There are a few bugs when you use the Microsoft Surface Hub with the big screen."

"Typically, a business process management suite would cover the whole lifecycle, from discovery to optimization and operations. This is running on the process server and providing some kind of low-code environment for developing business solutions. I think the latter part is missing, where SAP Connector comes in. Specifically, the execution of processes is missing, where you would design forms to take orders. This is typically part of some development environment for the process server to run processes from out of the models."

"If you start from scratch then I think this product would be ideal, but if you already have something then it may or may not suit you."

"Customer service/support was great in the beginning but is now extremely poor."

"The tool's navigation could be improved."

"I find it difficult to figure out how I can better align this solution with my KPIs."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You pay an annual fee and can have an unlimited number of processes and users."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"Licensing cost for the Enterprise edition comes out to be around 40,000 a year. There is also a Community edition, which is free. Some customers can go for the Community edition, but some of them require the Enterprise edition. Big companies go for the Enterprise edition, which comes with a lot of additional features such as a mobile app."

"The price is fair for what we are using the solution for."

"The product's pricing is acceptable. Pricing is yearly."

"I am using the free version of Bonita."

"The Enterprise edition is very expensive."

"have installed the image of Bonita BPM on Amazon AWS and there is just one option to use and pay for."

More Bonita pricing and cost advice

"My client purchased one editor license and the collaboration hub, which covers up to a hundred people."

"The product is expensive."

"I think we're spending about $150,000 a year on licensing costs."

"We are only able to use the free academic licenses because we have a financial constraint. We are not able to pay for commercial licenses to use this kind of tool."

"SAP is always more expensive. The per-user cost is hard to calculate and forecast for a big company."

"This solution provides really great value for the money."

"The solution is expensive."

"It is expensive. The license is monthly."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

889,855 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	45

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which is better - Signavio Process Manager or Celonis?

SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and does not require too much technological involvement. This solution has a collabo...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Signavio Process Manager?

The price of SAP Signavio Process Manager was quite high but could be afforded by an organization with a sensitive data scale.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Signavio Process Manager?

I have worked with SAP Signavio and SAP platforms including SAP SD, SAP CC, and SAP FI, but I haven't worked with any other SAP tools. I would rate SAP Signavio Process Manager 10 out of 10.

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Bonita

Compared 13% of the time

Bizagi vs Bonita

Compared 7% of the time

IBM BPM vs Bonita

Compared 4% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Bonita

Compared 3% of the time

Flowable vs Bonita

Compared 3% of the time

More Bonita Competitors

Celonis vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 27% of the time

ARIS BPA vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 7% of the time

Camunda vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 5% of the time

ADONIS vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 5% of the time

Visio vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More SAP Signavio Process Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bonita

April 2026

Download Bonita product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Signavio Process Manager

March 2026

Download SAP Signavio Process Manager product report

Also Known As

Bonita BPM

Signavio Process Editor

Overview

Bonitasoft helps innovative companies worldwide deliver better digital user experiences for customers and employees. The extensible and open Bonita application platform unleashes the full potential of multidisciplinary development teams to create Living Apps: applications that allow continuous and incremental improvement, connecting tailored user interfaces with reliable back-office operations.

Bonitasoft

The Signavio portfolio of web-based business transformation solutions helps companies to understand and optimize all of their business processes quickly and at scale, providing instant insights for informed decision-making. Signavio’s intuitive analysis, change management and execution solutions around process excellence include use cases like digital transformation, operational excellence and customer-centricity, placing them at the heart of global organizations.

Over 1 million users in more than 1,500 organizations worldwide rely on Signavio products to make processes part of their company’s DNA. Headquartered in Berlin, Germany, Signavio was founded in 2009 to address the need for a collaborative approach to process management.

Signavio was acquired by SAP in the first quarter of 2021. For more information, visit www.signavio.com

SAP

Sample Customers

With more than 1000 customers in 75 countries, and its ecosystem of more than 120,000 members, Bonitasoft is the largest provider of open-source Business Process Management, Low-code and Digital Transformation software worldwide.

DHL, Coca Cola EP, Prudential, Zalando, T-Systems, Jabil, Endress+Hauser, Rakuten

Buyer's Guide

Bonita vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

April 2026

Free Report: Bonita vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Bonita vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

889,855 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bonita vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors and best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.