Bonita BPM vs SAP Signavio Process Manager comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Ofelia and SAP are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. Ofelia is ranked #16, while SAP is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.8. Ofelia holds a 3.1% mindshare in BPD, compared to SAP’s 6.1% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Ofelia users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Bonita BPM

Read 27 Bonita BPM reviews

6,658 Views
2,597 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Read 63 SAP Signavio Process Manager reviews

15,325 Views
5,670 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Bonita BPM

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 7, 2026

Bonita BPM and SAP Signavio Process Manager compete in the process management software category. Bonita BPM leads with competitive pricing and strong customer support, offering budget-friendly flexibility. SAP Signavio Process Manager has an edge with extensive features and integration capabilities, providing comprehensive solutions for enterprise needs.

Features: Bonita BPM features a customizable workflow design, flexibility through its open-source nature, and strong Java integrations that support seamless process management. SAP Signavio Process Manager offers advanced analytics, process collaboration through its Collaboration Hub, and effective process mining, providing in-depth insights and efficiency.

Room for Improvement: Bonita BPM could enhance real-time collaboration features, improve cloud deployment options, and expand process insight capabilities. SAP Signavio Process Manager can strengthen its user interface customization, offer more detailed integration documentation, and reduce complexity in feature access.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bonita BPM provides straightforward, user-friendly deployment with robust customer support and guidance. SAP Signavio Process Manager offers cloud-based deployment focused on seamless integration, combined with advanced customer service aimed at rapid enterprise scaling and compatibility with existing systems.

Pricing and ROI: Bonita BPM is known for lower initial costs and strong ROI for budget-conscious environments. SAP Signavio Process Manager, while more expensive, justifies its pricing through a comprehensive feature set that supports sustained ROI, especially advantageous for larger enterprises seeking detailed process management and analysis.

To learn more, read our detailed Bonita BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Bonita BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,884 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bonita BPM

Ranking in Business Process Design

16th

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

26th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (29th)

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Ranking in Business Process Design

6th

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of Bonita BPM is 3.1%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Signavio Process Manager is 6.1%, down from 9.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SAP Signavio Process Manager	6.1%
Bonita	3.1%
Other	90.8%

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

Mohamed Guermazi

Technical Director / Project Manager at I-way

The user interface is easy to use, and the product performs well, but the dashboard and the monitoring features are limited

We use the product to design workflows. We model and install them on the server. We use the Community edition The modeling features are easy. The performance of the tool is good. The user interface is easy to use. I have used the product for complex processes and sub-processes successfully. The…

Read full review

Sravani Bodanapu

Intelligent Ops Journey Expert at ANZ Banking Group

Process modeling has standardized complex banking workflows and drives data‑driven automation decisions

I would assess the impact of process modeling features on operational transparency as a four. I give it a four because of how well the platform could be utilized if one has a license or would be able to access it via collaborative features, and as well be able to communicate, making it less people dependent and more process dependent. A small gap of one is only because if the map has to be shared or if somebody has to work together on a map, similar to how we have Google Forms where more than two people can make changes simultaneously, the map does not allow that. One has to close it, and the next partner can only access the map after I close it. The existing changes are lost if they click on ignore or if they close the diagram. This is one feature which is sometimes bothersome. The gap of one is something that is personal feedback from my end. If someone is a newbie and they are building a map for the first time, they definitely go through a training module. But if somebody is jumping right in to build a map for the first time, which I did more than a couple of years ago, I felt that given the extent to which we have artificial intelligence capabilities right now, it would be nice if whenever you are saving a diagram and if I build it incorrectly in terms of adhering to BPMN 2.0, errors are shown, which is really nice. There are errors and warnings that need to be corrected to adhere to the standards. It is great that it allows me to save, but in order to correct the errors, if I do not understand what the error is trying to tell me. For example, sometimes it says that the element is named wrong. I understand that; it is a verb and noun that is a requirement. But sometimes it says the edge folding is not clear, and despite trying several times, I still do not get it. SAP could consider having AI capabilities to suggest how it can be done immediately on the screen itself, perhaps in the form of a virtual assistant or something. Today, for larger errors, I go to Google to check it and try to understand. If an assistant tells me that I think the arrow may be placed wrong, I think that would help me. It would save time and help me from looking up multiple dictionaries to understand what it is trying to say. At the moment, we are not integrating SAP Signavio Process Manager with existing ERP systems because internally I think we are using multiple enterprise resource planning tools. Because of that, there is a restraint to connect it with SAP Signavio Process Manager, and there is a lot of concern in terms of how data could be used because we work in a banking environment. We are not leveraging, and we have SAP S/4HANA. It would be great if there is a data lake that connects to the process, but at the moment, we do not do that. Every time we build a process, it is picked up by a different team, and they try to connect it with the data lake. It is a great feature which I think can be leveraged, but with the range of legacy systems that the company is using today, there is not much I can comment about how the ERP can be leveraged internally.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Bonita is user-friendly, and the features are useful."

"With Bonita BPM, you can run the process (as it will in the final stage) immediately after the design stage, giving you 100% control over the quality of your processes and flows."

"Of the three BPM vendors I evaluated, Bonita was the best in creating forms, ease of customization of forms, and versatility of supported platforms, and it is the only BPM platform that I've seen so far that allows for versioning of artifacts."

"The user interface is easy to use."

"It is a great product that is powerful in developing applications."

"Process automation with Bonita BPM is really easy."

"The solution is stable. Even the older versions are stable."

"Bonita is simple and lightweight and is flexible to integrate with third-party systems. The UI is now flexible, whereas it was previously rigid. Any technology can be used as a frontend, including ReactJS, Angular, and others."

More Bonita BPM pros

"The product's most valuable feature is the transformation process."

"As a business transformation suite, Signavio offers a number of integrated helpful tools. The Process Modeler helps with the conceptual work, but is directly integrated with the components of the Workflow Accelerator (Automation) and the Process Intelligence (Mining). This makes Signavio an indispensable service package."

"When comparing my experience with Celonis and Signavio, I can discern the distinctions between these two platforms. However, I'm unable to differentiate between ARAs and add-ons, as that falls outside my scope of familiarity. Regarding Celonis, it comes with its set of advantages and disadvantages. Notably, it boasts robust features like action flows, task mining, and seamless integration with AML programming. Conversely, Signavio lacks action flows and instead relies on action segments and tasks for interaction. This discrepancy is a significant factor setting Selenium and SecureView apart. In the context of Signavio, it offers a combination of BPMN and process discovery, a feature absent in Celonis. This tandem of BPMN and process insight contributes to Signavio’S potency. Meanwhile, Celonis primarily features the process miner tool, setting it apart from Signavio. These variations collectively outline the numerous differences existing between Celonis and Signavio."

"Using this solution has helped make the business transformation easier because you can take an existing process and improve on it as everybody collaborates on it."

"Process Manager supports end-to-end transformation. Students can better understand end-to-end activity and processes as well as how they are run. For teaching, it's process discovery, then modeling, and finally optimization and simulation, partly. Typically, we showcase some simulation of the processes, and this is where we finish. That is why we validate that it's properly designed, but also what are the outcomes of modeled processes. There are also options for discussion on process optimization."

"The collaboration function in the project views is valuable because people can comment on the processes and we can respond."

"The solution is user-friendly."

"I have seen some other tools, and Signavio is the whole package."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pros

Cons

"Bonita can improve by offering more flexibility."

"Bonita must add a rule engine. We are a 360-degree partner of Bonita. We can integrate with any kind of rule engine. We have a dashboard related to engine performance, but getting a configurable dashboard for the Buildium or transactional data will add value."

"The price is good, but I do not like the process instance annual quantity pricing base used today."

"The solution is stable. However, we have experienced a few bugs."

"It would be nice to have a wizard to help walk through the development process and create a backbone."

"The menus likely would be more intuitive if read in French. Things seem to be under strange headings at times."

"Automation in vacation of a human resources replacement would be a good improvement in the product."

"Bonita can improve by offering more flexibility. The developer does not receive the code of the application to modify it. Most of the other solutions I have used allow the developers to change or improve the code that is generated."

More Bonita BPM cons

"I would like to see more predictive analytics."

"I would like to see the inclusion of some document management functionality so that we don't need to integrate with a second solution to accommodate this."

"Moreover, the functionality to show different process variations with "views" could be improved to allow more customization of these views. I believe this would increase the user experience and administrative efforts maintaining these process variations."

"From what I have experienced when I worked with a process team, we would like to work with dummy process diagrams."

"Its reporting feature could have customization options."

"The free trial needs to have more options for end users, such as including Process Intelligence as a trial version."

"It is sometimes difficult to find the match between what is possible and what is wanted, or what is helpful with the product, so better documentation may assist in this regard."

"The tool's navigation could be improved."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The Community Edition comes free of charge."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"I believe this is a very good financial choice."

"Licensing cost for the Enterprise edition comes out to be around 40,000 a year. There is also a Community edition, which is free. Some customers can go for the Community edition, but some of them require the Enterprise edition. Big companies go for the Enterprise edition, which comes with a lot of additional features such as a mobile app."

"The Enterprise edition is very expensive."

"Price to service ratio with Bonita BPM is good."

"have installed the image of Bonita BPM on Amazon AWS and there is just one option to use and pay for."

"The price is fair for what we are using the solution for."

More Bonita BPM pricing and cost advice

"SAP Signavio charges a lot of money."

"Lower than the competition with highly flexible licensing plans."

"We are using the free trial version."

"The customer Journey Modeler is more than twice the price of Process Manager, which is a lot."

"SaaS has no setup cost, just licensing fees."

"The product is expensive."

"Comparatively, it is a bit costly when you look at similar tools with similar features."

"I think we're spending about $150,000 a year on licensing costs."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,884 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	45

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which is better - Signavio Process Manager or Celonis?

SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and does not require too much technological involvement. This solution has a collabo...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Signavio Process Manager?

I am not aware of the pricing and licensing of SAP Signavio Process Manager in the current firm I am working for. However, in my last company, Fidelity International, I was introduced to SAP Signav...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Signavio Process Manager?

I do use the collaborative workspace feature of SAP Signavio Process Manager. Our stakeholders who are outside of SAP Signavio Process Manager environment do use the collaborative feature because t...

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Bonita BPM

Compared 7% of the time

Bizagi vs Bonita BPM

Compared 6% of the time

AuraQuantic vs Bonita BPM

Compared 4% of the time

IBM BPM vs Bonita BPM

Compared 3% of the time

WebRatio vs Bonita BPM

Compared 3% of the time

More Bonita BPM Competitors

Celonis vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 32% of the time

ARIS BPA vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 5% of the time

Camunda vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 4% of the time

Bizagi vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 4% of the time

ADONIS vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 3% of the time

More SAP Signavio Process Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bonita BPM

October 2026

Download Bonita BPM product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Signavio Process Manager

September 2026

Download SAP Signavio Process Manager product report

Also Known As

Bonita BPM

Signavio Process Editor

Overview

Bonita BPM is the business process automation platform from Ofelia, formerly Bonitasoft. Model, automate and optimise processes with BPMN notation, a clear separation between visual design and code, and full extensibility. Available in an open source edition and an enterprise edition.

Ofelia

SAP Signavio Process Manager offers an intuitive interface focused on ease of use, facilitating collaboration and governance. It's ideal for quick adoption within organizations, supporting process mining and intelligence to drive continuous optimization.

Offering a comprehensive web-based repository, SAP Signavio Process Manager excels in governance with its intuitive drag-and-drop modeling capabilities. The Collaboration Hub fosters transparency and discussion, crucial for organizations focusing on compliance and process optimization. Users find it efficient for internal training without requiring external resources. Despite its strengths, enhancements like simultaneous editing, improved integration with non-SAP systems, and advanced reporting are desired. Organizations often use it to capture and document business processes, facilitating compliance, audits, and digital transformation efforts.

What are the key features of SAP Signavio Process Manager?

Intuitive Interface: Ensures ease of use and quick adoption within teams.
Governance and Version Control: Provides effective management and version tracking.
Drag-and-Drop Modeling: Allows seamless process modeling.
Collaboration Hub: Enhances transparency and team discussions.
Process Mining and Intelligence: Identifies inefficiencies supporting continuous improvement.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Quick Adoption: Facilitates easy learning and collaboration.
Process Optimization: Supports identifying inefficiencies for continuous improvement.
Compliance Support: Useful for audits and standardization.
Workflow Management: Efficient portal for distribution and management.
Enhanced Training: Simplifies onboarding of new staff.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and logistics, SAP Signavio Process Manager is used for optimizing workflows, facilitating digital transformation, and supporting strategic planning. It aids in resource management and enhances process understanding for better training and onboarding.

SAP

Sample Customers

Ofelia, the company formerly named Bonitasoft, was founded in 2009 and serves more than 130 organisations across 40 countries. It has two products, Ofelia Agentic and Bonita BPM. Bonita BPM is available in an open source community edition and in a commercial subscription edition.

DHL, Coca Cola EP, Prudential, Zalando, T-Systems, Jabil, Endress+Hauser, Rakuten

Buyer's Guide

Bonita BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

September 2026

Free Report: Bonita BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Bonita BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,884 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bonita BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors and best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.