Bonita BPM vs SAP Signavio Process Manager comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Ofelia and SAP are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. Ofelia is ranked #16, while SAP is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.8. Ofelia holds a 3.1% mindshare in BPD, compared to SAP’s 6.1% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Ofelia users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Bonita BPM

Read 27 Bonita BPM reviews

6,658 Views
2,597 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Read 63 SAP Signavio Process Manager reviews

15,325 Views
5,670 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Bonita BPM

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 7, 2026

Bonita BPM and SAP Signavio Process Manager compete in the process management software category. Bonita BPM leads with competitive pricing and strong customer support, offering budget-friendly flexibility. SAP Signavio Process Manager has an edge with extensive features and integration capabilities, providing comprehensive solutions for enterprise needs.

Features: Bonita BPM features a customizable workflow design, flexibility through its open-source nature, and strong Java integrations that support seamless process management. SAP Signavio Process Manager offers advanced analytics, process collaboration through its Collaboration Hub, and effective process mining, providing in-depth insights and efficiency.

Room for Improvement: Bonita BPM could enhance real-time collaboration features, improve cloud deployment options, and expand process insight capabilities. SAP Signavio Process Manager can strengthen its user interface customization, offer more detailed integration documentation, and reduce complexity in feature access.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bonita BPM provides straightforward, user-friendly deployment with robust customer support and guidance. SAP Signavio Process Manager offers cloud-based deployment focused on seamless integration, combined with advanced customer service aimed at rapid enterprise scaling and compatibility with existing systems.

Pricing and ROI: Bonita BPM is known for lower initial costs and strong ROI for budget-conscious environments. SAP Signavio Process Manager, while more expensive, justifies its pricing through a comprehensive feature set that supports sustained ROI, especially advantageous for larger enterprises seeking detailed process management and analysis.

To learn more, read our detailed Bonita BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Bonita BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 919,003 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bonita BPM

Ranking in Business Process Design

16th

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

26th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (29th)

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Ranking in Business Process Design

6th

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of Bonita BPM is 3.1%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Signavio Process Manager is 6.1%, down from 9.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SAP Signavio Process Manager	6.1%
Bonita	3.1%
Other	90.8%

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

Mohamed Guermazi

Technical Director / Project Manager at I-way

The user interface is easy to use, and the product performs well, but the dashboard and the monitoring features are limited

We use the product to design workflows. We model and install them on the server. We use the Community edition The modeling features are easy. The performance of the tool is good. The user interface is easy to use. I have used the product for complex processes and sub-processes successfully. The…

Read full review

Sravani Bodanapu

Intelligent Ops Journey Expert at ANZ Banking Group

Process modeling has standardized complex banking workflows and drives data‑driven automation decisions

I would assess the impact of process modeling features on operational transparency as a four. I give it a four because of how well the platform could be utilized if one has a license or would be able to access it via collaborative features, and as well be able to communicate, making it less people dependent and more process dependent. A small gap of one is only because if the map has to be shared or if somebody has to work together on a map, similar to how we have Google Forms where more than two people can make changes simultaneously, the map does not allow that. One has to close it, and the next partner can only access the map after I close it. The existing changes are lost if they click on ignore or if they close the diagram. This is one feature which is sometimes bothersome. The gap of one is something that is personal feedback from my end. If someone is a newbie and they are building a map for the first time, they definitely go through a training module. But if somebody is jumping right in to build a map for the first time, which I did more than a couple of years ago, I felt that given the extent to which we have artificial intelligence capabilities right now, it would be nice if whenever you are saving a diagram and if I build it incorrectly in terms of adhering to BPMN 2.0, errors are shown, which is really nice. There are errors and warnings that need to be corrected to adhere to the standards. It is great that it allows me to save, but in order to correct the errors, if I do not understand what the error is trying to tell me. For example, sometimes it says that the element is named wrong. I understand that; it is a verb and noun that is a requirement. But sometimes it says the edge folding is not clear, and despite trying several times, I still do not get it. SAP could consider having AI capabilities to suggest how it can be done immediately on the screen itself, perhaps in the form of a virtual assistant or something. Today, for larger errors, I go to Google to check it and try to understand. If an assistant tells me that I think the arrow may be placed wrong, I think that would help me. It would save time and help me from looking up multiple dictionaries to understand what it is trying to say. At the moment, we are not integrating SAP Signavio Process Manager with existing ERP systems because internally I think we are using multiple enterprise resource planning tools. Because of that, there is a restraint to connect it with SAP Signavio Process Manager, and there is a lot of concern in terms of how data could be used because we work in a banking environment. We are not leveraging, and we have SAP S/4HANA. It would be great if there is a data lake that connects to the process, but at the moment, we do not do that. Every time we build a process, it is picked up by a different team, and they try to connect it with the data lake. It is a great feature which I think can be leveraged, but with the range of legacy systems that the company is using today, there is not much I can comment about how the ERP can be leveraged internally.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Customer Service: Very good, also the commercial team !Technical Support: Perfect ! and the community is a great help also"

"This product is very easy-to-use and user-friendly."

"I think Bizagi is a powerful software or tool for organization, but Bonita is user-friendly and easy-to-use — easier to use for development."

"The user interface is easy to use."

"Development of forms and flows."

"In general, Bonita is a very good solution."

"One of the most valuable features is you can create without coding, it is a low code platform."

"Our lead generation system involves both automated and human tasks. By centralizing the workflow to our internal Bonita BPM system, we have improved the conversion rate (leads to customers) and lowered the number of leads dropped."

More Bonita BPM pros

"For the collaboration functions, we use the commenting and quick model functions for process owners who don't have specific knowledge about Process Manager."

"The GUI is very easy to use, where you can sit together with your colleagues, discuss the process, and during these discussions you can build up the model."

"I use SAP Signavio Process Manager to model processes to the former operating model."

"The easy-to-use Signavio has significantly helped us to climb to maturity, but we are using other tools to automate our processes."

"The modeling tool of Signavio was particularly nice because it has suggestions of where the best areas of improvement are and analyzes your data to show you where the areas of change for improvement are."

"The interface for Signavio is good, it is easy to use, it is self-explanatory, and the ease of use affected the adoption in our organization massively."

"One of the most important aspects of the product is that it helps us, as a global company, bridge the gap between operational excellence and customer experience management."

"The Signavio tool is very easy to use and it is one of the reasons why I like it."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pros

Cons

"BPMN 2.0 notations are not all supported, would love to see them all coming in (e.g. complex gateway)."

"Scalability of the Bonita BPM Community version is low."

"The price is good, but I do not like the process instance annual quantity pricing base used today."

"That said, creating custom connectors for 3rd party applications and APIs is still a challenging task."

"Bonita can improve by offering more flexibility. The developer does not receive the code of the application to modify it. Most of the other solutions I have used allow the developers to change or improve the code that is generated."

"The community edition has limited module functionality. If they could release some of the functionality that's available in the enterprise edition that would be helpful to those learning to use the solution."

"The support is mandatory to access all features (Subscription), maybe they can have a different business model."

"Bonita can improve by offering more flexibility."

More Bonita BPM cons

"The licensing model could be better."

"After SAP acquired Signavio, the prices increased significantly, making it too expensive for our small company to afford."

"For me, given I've got a lot of experience working with BPMN and other process management tools, in terms of the interface, I think there's a little bit more that can be improved to match what the conventional BPMN offers. I've been constantly trying to give this feedback to Signavio, to let them know that it needs to be more coherent with the original BPMN version of the stencil."

"I would like to see more integration with the process manager in terms of the workflow accelerator."

"Typically, a business process management suite would cover the whole lifecycle, from discovery to optimization and operations. This is running on the process server and providing some kind of low-code environment for developing business solutions. I think the latter part is missing, where SAP Connector comes in. Specifically, the execution of processes is missing, where you would design forms to take orders. This is typically part of some development environment for the process server to run processes from out of the models."

"I would like to see the inclusion of some document management functionality so that we don't need to integrate with a second solution to accommodate this."

"The only problem is that it's online-only, and there's nothing like an offline feature, which means that it is only as stable as your internet connection."

"There are a lot of challenges with Process Manager. For example, we wanted to create a process map from an Excel sheet, but Signavio doesn't have that capability. I have raised this issue with Signavio support, but it is one of the bottlenecks we are currently facing."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I am using the free version of Bonita."

"The price is fair for what we are using the solution for."

"The Enterprise edition is very expensive."

"The Community Edition comes free of charge."

"I believe this is a very good financial choice."

"The product is not cheaper, not costlier; it is reasonable. Bonita’s license is very flexible, with options to meet the needs of different customers and clients. Previously, it was less flexible, but now, many different licensing options are available."

"Licensing cost for the Enterprise edition comes out to be around 40,000 a year. There is also a Community edition, which is free. Some customers can go for the Community edition, but some of them require the Enterprise edition. Big companies go for the Enterprise edition, which comes with a lot of additional features such as a mobile app."

"The product's pricing is acceptable. Pricing is yearly."

More Bonita BPM pricing and cost advice

"Lower than the competition with highly flexible licensing plans."

"I found the pricing of the solution to be moderate compared to other choices."

"I think we're spending about $150,000 a year on licensing costs."

"It is expensive. The license is monthly."

"We are using the free trial version."

"This solution provides really great value for the money."

"SAP is always more expensive. The per-user cost is hard to calculate and forecast for a big company."

"The solution is quite expensive compared to other vendors."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

919,003 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	45

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which is better - Signavio Process Manager or Celonis?

SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and does not require too much technological involvement. This solution has a collabo...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Signavio Process Manager?

I am not aware of the pricing and licensing of SAP Signavio Process Manager in the current firm I am working for. However, in my last company, Fidelity International, I was introduced to SAP Signav...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Signavio Process Manager?

I do use the collaborative workspace feature of SAP Signavio Process Manager. Our stakeholders who are outside of SAP Signavio Process Manager environment do use the collaborative feature because t...

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Bonita BPM

Compared 6% of the time

Bizagi vs Bonita BPM

Compared 6% of the time

AuraQuantic vs Bonita BPM

Compared 3% of the time

IBM BPM vs Bonita BPM

Compared 3% of the time

WebRatio vs Bonita BPM

Compared 3% of the time

More Bonita BPM Competitors

Celonis vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 32% of the time

ARIS BPA vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 5% of the time

Camunda vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 4% of the time

Bizagi vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 4% of the time

ADONIS vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 3% of the time

More SAP Signavio Process Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bonita BPM

October 2026

Download Bonita BPM product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Signavio Process Manager

October 2026

Download SAP Signavio Process Manager product report

Also Known As

Bonita BPM

Signavio Process Editor

Overview

Bonita BPM is the business process automation platform from Ofelia, formerly Bonitasoft. Model, automate and optimise processes with BPMN notation, a clear separation between visual design and code, and full extensibility. Available in an open source edition and an enterprise edition.

Ofelia

SAP Signavio Process Manager offers an intuitive interface focused on ease of use, facilitating collaboration and governance. It's ideal for quick adoption within organizations, supporting process mining and intelligence to drive continuous optimization.

Offering a comprehensive web-based repository, SAP Signavio Process Manager excels in governance with its intuitive drag-and-drop modeling capabilities. The Collaboration Hub fosters transparency and discussion, crucial for organizations focusing on compliance and process optimization. Users find it efficient for internal training without requiring external resources. Despite its strengths, enhancements like simultaneous editing, improved integration with non-SAP systems, and advanced reporting are desired. Organizations often use it to capture and document business processes, facilitating compliance, audits, and digital transformation efforts.

What are the key features of SAP Signavio Process Manager?

Intuitive Interface: Ensures ease of use and quick adoption within teams.
Governance and Version Control: Provides effective management and version tracking.
Drag-and-Drop Modeling: Allows seamless process modeling.
Collaboration Hub: Enhances transparency and team discussions.
Process Mining and Intelligence: Identifies inefficiencies supporting continuous improvement.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Quick Adoption: Facilitates easy learning and collaboration.
Process Optimization: Supports identifying inefficiencies for continuous improvement.
Compliance Support: Useful for audits and standardization.
Workflow Management: Efficient portal for distribution and management.
Enhanced Training: Simplifies onboarding of new staff.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and logistics, SAP Signavio Process Manager is used for optimizing workflows, facilitating digital transformation, and supporting strategic planning. It aids in resource management and enhances process understanding for better training and onboarding.

SAP

Sample Customers

Ofelia, the company formerly named Bonitasoft, was founded in 2009 and serves more than 130 organisations across 40 countries. It has two products, Ofelia Agentic and Bonita BPM. Bonita BPM is available in an open source community edition and in a commercial subscription edition.

DHL, Coca Cola EP, Prudential, Zalando, T-Systems, Jabil, Endress+Hauser, Rakuten

Buyer's Guide

Bonita BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

September 2026

Free Report: Bonita BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Bonita BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

919,003 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bonita BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors and best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.