Bonita vs SAP Signavio Process Manager comparison

Bonitasoft and SAP are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. Bonitasoft is ranked #17, while SAP is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.8. Bonitasoft holds a 3.0% mindshare in BPD, compared to SAP’s 6.3% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Bonitasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Bonita

Read 27 Bonita reviews

5,908 Views
2,481 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Read 63 SAP Signavio Process Manager reviews

14,405 Views
5,618 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Bonita

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Bonita and SAP Signavio Process Manager compete in business process management. SAP Signavio Process Manager appears superior due to its comprehensive features and robust deployment capabilities, offering long-term value.

Features: Bonita offers intuitive process modeling, flexibility in execution, and integration capabilities. SAP Signavio Process Manager provides collaborative process design, extensive process mining tools, and analytics functionalities.

Room for Improvement: Bonita could enhance its deployment complexity, improve training resources, and expand feature sets. SAP Signavio Process Manager might benefit from simplifying its integration process, improving initial setup, and enhancing cost efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bonita ensures straightforward deployment with quick implementation and supportive customer service. SAP Signavio Process Manager, although more complex, offers strong integration support and extensive training resources.

Pricing and ROI: Bonita offers cost-effectiveness with a lower entry barrier, favoring fast ROI in simpler scenarios. SAP Signavio Process Manager justifies higher setup costs through extensive features and operational efficiencies, translating to strategic long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Bonita vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Bonita vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 910,005 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bonita

Ranking in Business Process Design

17th

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

29th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (28th)

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Ranking in Business Process Design

5th

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of Bonita is 3.0%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Signavio Process Manager is 6.3%, down from 9.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SAP Signavio Process Manager	6.3%
Bonita	3.0%
Other	90.7%

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

Paparao Nadipineni

Architect at Evoke

A simple and lightweight college course automation system with third-party integrations

The initial setup is straightforward and can be completed with the environment within an hour. First, take the latest from the git repository and check the git code to the monitor studio and a bar file, a deployable Bonita archive file. Then, take that process to the Bonita server, running at runtime on another server. Finally, deploy and enable it by selecting the proper organization.

Read full review

Sravani Bodanapu

Intelligent Ops Journey Expert at ANZ Banking Group

Process modeling has standardized complex banking workflows and drives data‑driven automation decisions

I would assess the impact of process modeling features on operational transparency as a four. I give it a four because of how well the platform could be utilized if one has a license or would be able to access it via collaborative features, and as well be able to communicate, making it less people dependent and more process dependent. A small gap of one is only because if the map has to be shared or if somebody has to work together on a map, similar to how we have Google Forms where more than two people can make changes simultaneously, the map does not allow that. One has to close it, and the next partner can only access the map after I close it. The existing changes are lost if they click on ignore or if they close the diagram. This is one feature which is sometimes bothersome. The gap of one is something that is personal feedback from my end. If someone is a newbie and they are building a map for the first time, they definitely go through a training module. But if somebody is jumping right in to build a map for the first time, which I did more than a couple of years ago, I felt that given the extent to which we have artificial intelligence capabilities right now, it would be nice if whenever you are saving a diagram and if I build it incorrectly in terms of adhering to BPMN 2.0, errors are shown, which is really nice. There are errors and warnings that need to be corrected to adhere to the standards. It is great that it allows me to save, but in order to correct the errors, if I do not understand what the error is trying to tell me. For example, sometimes it says that the element is named wrong. I understand that; it is a verb and noun that is a requirement. But sometimes it says the edge folding is not clear, and despite trying several times, I still do not get it. SAP could consider having AI capabilities to suggest how it can be done immediately on the screen itself, perhaps in the form of a virtual assistant or something. Today, for larger errors, I go to Google to check it and try to understand. If an assistant tells me that I think the arrow may be placed wrong, I think that would help me. It would save time and help me from looking up multiple dictionaries to understand what it is trying to say. At the moment, we are not integrating SAP Signavio Process Manager with existing ERP systems because internally I think we are using multiple enterprise resource planning tools. Because of that, there is a restraint to connect it with SAP Signavio Process Manager, and there is a lot of concern in terms of how data could be used because we work in a banking environment. We are not leveraging, and we have SAP S/4HANA. It would be great if there is a data lake that connects to the process, but at the moment, we do not do that. Every time we build a process, it is picked up by a different team, and they try to connect it with the data lake. It is a great feature which I think can be leveraged, but with the range of legacy systems that the company is using today, there is not much I can comment about how the ERP can be leveraged internally.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Its user-friendliness, along with the availability of comprehensive and clear documentation on the website is the most valuable."

"Bonita is user-friendly, and the features are useful."

"It is more than helpful, it is worth the effort of learning to better our company."

"In general, Bonita is a very good solution."

"Bonita is simple and lightweight and is flexible to integrate with third-party systems. The UI is now flexible, whereas it was previously rigid. Any technology can be used as a frontend, including ReactJS, Angular, and others."

"The most valuable features of Bonita are the connectors, detailed documentation, and web applications. The documentation was useful because it is how I learned how to use it."

"The Connector implementation is a great addition to an out-of-box solution providing robust features for the developer to build hassle-free integrations."

"The solution is easy to use."

More Bonita pros

"The feature that I like the most is the collaboration hub, where every user or every employee can see the process in the overview."

"With Signavio, we have a tool that the employees like because it's easy to work with."

"I love the collaboration function, especially the option to invite people who don't have any users on the licenses."

"When comparing my experience with Celonis and Signavio, I can discern the distinctions between these two platforms. However, I'm unable to differentiate between ARAs and add-ons, as that falls outside my scope of familiarity. Regarding Celonis, it comes with its set of advantages and disadvantages. Notably, it boasts robust features like action flows, task mining, and seamless integration with AML programming. Conversely, Signavio lacks action flows and instead relies on action segments and tasks for interaction. This discrepancy is a significant factor setting Selenium and SecureView apart. In the context of Signavio, it offers a combination of BPMN and process discovery, a feature absent in Celonis. This tandem of BPMN and process insight contributes to Signavio’S potency. Meanwhile, Celonis primarily features the process miner tool, setting it apart from Signavio. These variations collectively outline the numerous differences existing between Celonis and Signavio."

"We could increase the transparency and speed for the new ERP introduction. The status and changes by the new system are now clear to everybody and it is a great tool to train the people."

"I would say the collaboration features are very useful to us, because we are a European organization, so we are not in one location. This is an easy way to share with other people and ask them for feedback. That is the use case for us."

"It's way of handling is really an advantage. It's quite easy to use, without too much training . That's the main point for me."

"The drag-and-drop functionality in Signavio is impressive and user-friendly, allowing easy connection to other elements without the need for excessive back-and-forth."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pros

Cons

"At times Bonita BPM Studio crashes, intermittently."

"Bonita can improve by offering more flexibility. The developer does not receive the code of the application to modify it. Most of the other solutions I have used allow the developers to change or improve the code that is generated."

"BPMN 2.0 notations are not all supported, would love to see them all coming in (e.g. complex gateway)."

"Bonita must add a rule engine. We are a 360-degree partner of Bonita. We can integrate with any kind of rule engine. We have a dashboard related to engine performance, but getting a configurable dashboard for the Buildium or transactional data will add value."

"I should be able to park the tasks that are within a process in a kind of container, and dynamically, a super admin should be able to connect these processes. This kind of feature might be helpful."

"The community edition has limited module functionality."

"It would be nice to have a wizard to help walk through the development process and create a backbone."

"The initial setup is not easy compared to other products."

More Bonita cons

"Customized reporting can be improved to make this a more versatile tool."

"Signavio already offers a wonderful range of functions. If variant management and customer journeys are optimized, Signavio can definitely bask in the glory of BPM tools. We also see optimization potential in the management of licenses, e.g. no named users but rather floating licenses and integration into the company's active directory."

"Signavio Process Manager needs to have an integrated document management system to better work with processes that rely heavily on documents and document flows."

"SAP Signavio Process Manager's UI is not user-friendly. Its pricing is also high."

"I think the interface itself can improve a bit. I think the interface is still stuck about a decade in the past, if I may be so brutal about it. Some of the buttons are really small, so you can't even see them. I think it needs upgrading to the 21st century with apps and the way we use mobile phones."

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

"We would like to have a difference between a designer from the business and somebody from my team because they now have access to everything with the designer license, and that does not work if you are in a large organization."

"There is room for improvement in analytics. People don't realize it, but the world has changed in the last six to eight months. Customers want to see AI like ChatGPT and ML capabilities in all aspects of business processes and reporting."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing cost for the Enterprise edition comes out to be around 40,000 a year. There is also a Community edition, which is free. Some customers can go for the Community edition, but some of them require the Enterprise edition. Big companies go for the Enterprise edition, which comes with a lot of additional features such as a mobile app."

"We are using the Community Version, which can be used free of charge."

"Price to service ratio with Bonita BPM is good."

"I believe this is a very good financial choice."

"The Community Edition comes free of charge."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"The price is fair for what we are using the solution for."

"The Enterprise edition is very expensive."

More Bonita pricing and cost advice

"The solution is expensive."

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"I found the pricing of the solution to be moderate compared to other choices."

"The solution is quite expensive compared to other vendors."

"SAP Signavio charges a lot of money."

"SaaS has no setup cost, just licensing fees."

"I rate the tool's pricing a nine out of ten."

"The customer Journey Modeler is more than twice the price of Process Manager, which is a lot."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

910,005 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	45

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which is better - Signavio Process Manager or Celonis?

SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and does not require too much technological involvement. This solution has a collabo...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Signavio Process Manager?

I am not aware of the pricing and licensing of SAP Signavio Process Manager in the current firm I am working for. However, in my last company, Fidelity International, I was introduced to SAP Signav...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Signavio Process Manager?

I do use the collaborative workspace feature of SAP Signavio Process Manager. Our stakeholders who are outside of SAP Signavio Process Manager environment do use the collaborative feature because t...

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Bonita

Compared 9% of the time

Bizagi vs Bonita

Compared 7% of the time

AuraQuantic vs Bonita

Compared 4% of the time

ProcessMaker vs Bonita

Compared 4% of the time

IBM BPM vs Bonita

Compared 4% of the time

More Bonita Competitors

Celonis vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 31% of the time

ARIS BPA vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 6% of the time

Camunda vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 4% of the time

Bizagi vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 4% of the time

ADONIS vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 4% of the time

More SAP Signavio Process Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bonita

August 2026

Download Bonita product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Signavio Process Manager

July 2026

Download SAP Signavio Process Manager product report

Also Known As

Bonita BPM

Signavio Process Editor

Overview

Bonita offers a low-code platform with user-friendly implementation, drag-and-drop capabilities, and robust connectors, making it suitable for integration, form customization, and process modeling. Its compatibility with multiple platforms supports workflow management.

Bonita stands out for its rapid cycle times, comprehensive documentation, and extensive integration capabilities. Its flexible UI supports Java modules and offers valuable process modeling and application development features. Users find it particularly efficient for business process management and workflow automation, allowing them to design, develop, and deploy processes seamlessly while leveraging its open-source nature. Despite these strengths, improvements in code flexibility, debugging, and mobile version access can enhance its performance. Better BPM and IoT connectivity, coupled with a refined cloud billing model, could add further value.

What are Bonita's most important features?

Drag-and-drop capabilities: Simplify process modeling and design.
Robust connectors: Facilitate smooth integration with third-party systems.
Flexible UI: Allows easy form customization and adaptability.
Comprehensive documentation: Supports efficient implementation and learning.
Multi-platform compatibility: Enhances flexibility by supporting diverse environments.
Open-source nature: Encourages customization and community-driven enhancements.

What benefits should users consider?

Ease of integration: Simplifies connecting with existing systems.
Accelerated development: Streamlines the application development cycle.
Workflow automation: Enhances operational efficiency and process management.
Customizability: Allows tailored solutions to meet specific needs.

Bonita is frequently implemented across sectors like manufacturing, pharmaceuticals, and finance for web application creation, testing, and user access management. Organizations utilize it in development and pre-production environments as well as educational settings for course automation and validation, adapting its features to meet sector-specific requirements seamlessly.

Bonitasoft

SAP Signavio Process Manager offers an intuitive interface focused on ease of use, facilitating collaboration and governance. It's ideal for quick adoption within organizations, supporting process mining and intelligence to drive continuous optimization.

Offering a comprehensive web-based repository, SAP Signavio Process Manager excels in governance with its intuitive drag-and-drop modeling capabilities. The Collaboration Hub fosters transparency and discussion, crucial for organizations focusing on compliance and process optimization. Users find it efficient for internal training without requiring external resources. Despite its strengths, enhancements like simultaneous editing, improved integration with non-SAP systems, and advanced reporting are desired. Organizations often use it to capture and document business processes, facilitating compliance, audits, and digital transformation efforts.

What are the key features of SAP Signavio Process Manager?

Intuitive Interface: Ensures ease of use and quick adoption within teams.
Governance and Version Control: Provides effective management and version tracking.
Drag-and-Drop Modeling: Allows seamless process modeling.
Collaboration Hub: Enhances transparency and team discussions.
Process Mining and Intelligence: Identifies inefficiencies supporting continuous improvement.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Quick Adoption: Facilitates easy learning and collaboration.
Process Optimization: Supports identifying inefficiencies for continuous improvement.
Compliance Support: Useful for audits and standardization.
Workflow Management: Efficient portal for distribution and management.
Enhanced Training: Simplifies onboarding of new staff.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and logistics, SAP Signavio Process Manager is used for optimizing workflows, facilitating digital transformation, and supporting strategic planning. It aids in resource management and enhances process understanding for better training and onboarding.

SAP

Sample Customers

With more than 1000 customers in 75 countries, and its ecosystem of more than 120,000 members, Bonitasoft is the largest provider of open-source Business Process Management, Low-code and Digital Transformation software worldwide.

DHL, Coca Cola EP, Prudential, Zalando, T-Systems, Jabil, Endress+Hauser, Rakuten

Buyer's Guide

Bonita vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

August 2026

Free Report: Bonita vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Bonita vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

910,005 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bonita vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors and best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.