Bizagi vs Bonita comparison

Bizagi and Bonitasoft are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Bizagi is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.3, while Bonitasoft is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.5. Bizagi holds a 5.6% mindshare in BPM, compared to Bonitasoft’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Bizagi users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Bonitasoft users who would recommend it.

Bizagi

Read 84 Bizagi reviews

7,185 Views
4,024 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Bonita

Read 27 Bonita reviews

3,091 Views
2,504 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Bizagi

Bonita

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Bizagi and Bonita compete in the BPM solutions category. While Bizagi is noted for its user-friendly features and integration, Bonita stands out with its flexibility and adaptability, especially in complex process modeling.

Features: Bizagi is known for its ease of use, adherence to BPMN 2.0 standards, and powerful simulation tools, benefiting both simple and complex process modeling. It integrates well with Visual Studio and .NET, enhancing its functionality. Bonita offers strong integration capabilities and a low-code development platform. Its form-building tools and detailed documentation make it efficient for process automation.

Room for Improvement: Bizagi users suggest improvements in performance, cloud support, and automation complexity, alongside better exporting formats and integration with external systems. Bonita users wish for enhanced user interface and mobile support, along with richer BPM interface features and customization options for components.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Bizagi and Bonita support on-premises and cloud deployments. Bizagi provides more flexibility with hybrid cloud options. Users of Bizagi note that technical support varies by subscription level but is generally satisfactory. Bonita's customer service is effective, though users suggest faster response times.

Pricing and ROI: Bizagi offers a free modeler for beginners, but its enterprise solution can be costly, though it yields good ROI. Bonita has a flexible pricing model suitable for various client needs, with its enterprise edition deemed expensive but allowing unlimited users and processes. Both solutions are appreciated for delivering favorable ROI in large-scale deployments.

To learn more, read our detailed Bizagi vs. Bonita Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bizagi vs. Bonita

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,098 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bizagi

Ranking in Business Process Design

3rd

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

5th

Ranking in Process Automation

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (15th), Low-Code Development Platforms (10th), No-Code Development Platforms (5th), Process Mining (6th)

Bonita

Ranking in Business Process Design

11th

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

20th

Ranking in Process Automation

16th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Bizagi is 5.6%, down from 6.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bonita is 3.0%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Bizagi	5.6%
Bonita	3.0%
Other	91.4%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Q&A Highlights

it_user548199

Works at a tech company with 51-200 employees

Nov 29, 2016

ARIS, Bonita, and Bizagi -- Do you have a comparison table between them?

Please find our three comparison pages that compare each of the products you listed with eachother: 1. ARIS BPM vs. Bonita BPM https://www.itcentralstation.com/products/comparisons/aris-bpm_vs_bonita-bpm 2. ARIS BPM vs. Bizagi https://www.itcentralstation.com/products/comparisons/aris-bpm_vs_bizagi 3. Bizagi vs. Bonita BPM https://www.itcentralstation.com/products/comparisons/bizagi_vs_bonita-bpm

See all answers

Featured Reviews

Paparao Nadipineni

Architect at Evoke

Enables budget review efficiency with open source advantages and workflow orchestration

Definitely, right now, it is purely open source, and we don't have much community support. If they add a few more capabilities like AIML and DocGen AI, these features would be good. Reporting capabilities can be improved more, and community support should be increased. Otherwise, people cannot onboard that particular technology easily.

Read full review

Mohamed Guermazi

Technical Director / Project Manager at I-way

The user interface is easy to use, and the product performs well, but the dashboard and the monitoring features are limited

We use the product to design workflows. We model and install them on the server. We use the Community edition The modeling features are easy. The performance of the tool is good. The user interface is easy to use. I have used the product for complex processes and sub-processes successfully. The…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Its cost is the most valuable. It is not as expensive. It is also easy to make different types of processes for the users."

"It improves visibility and quality, and basically, it avoids human errors."

"Your team can work on it having basic training about databases and BPM modeling."

"The most valuable feature is that it is compatible with Visual Studio and .NET, and we can program it. Its speed is very good, and it is also stable and easy to deploy."

"I like the ease of use and the fact that you can download and use their free version, which is unlimited. However, while it's unlimited use, some features aren't available."

"The natural notation is the best feature of Bizagi because it makes it compatible with other products."

"BPMN 2.0 compliance, while you model the processes, the system can detect your notation errors."

"The tool helps to improve business processes and have better KPIs. Also, it is easy to use. Our developers find it easy to learn."

More Bizagi pros

"The user interface is easy to use."

"Process automation with Bonita BPM is really easy."

"I find process management and user interface designing the most valuable features."

"The solution is stable. Even the older versions are stable."

"Its user-friendliness, along with the availability of comprehensive and clear documentation on the website is the most valuable."

"One of the most valuable features is you can create without coding, it is a low code platform."

"The solution is easy to use."

"Bonita is user-friendly."

More Bonita pros

Cons

"From a developer's point of view, an improvement in the layout would make the UI better."

"They should improve the migration process between major versions, from version 9 to 10, we had to redo our implementation."

"I think that they could improve their update process. Some of the process mining techniques could be added to Bizagi. I think that they can improve their simulation abilities to include more elements of the BPMN."

"It would be useful if we can connect Bizagi to other solutions, such as a local financial solution or Power BI. It would also be good and helpful to be able to connect Bizagi to some services solutions. It should also support right-to-left languages, such as Arabic."

"Sometimes, when your process is big with multiple lanes, the product will freeze the issue noticed on multiple laptops, not a single PC."

"Bizagi doesn't have integrations with other solutions, such as ERP systems. In the industry and your company, you have a lot of systems with which you need to integrate, but Bizagi doesn't have such integrations, which makes it very difficult. Its scalability can also be improved. It is good for a startup, but when you need something more complex, it is not good."

"Its performance needs to be improved. The main thing is that it is limited, especially in terms of the response times. When the processes become a bit large, it is very awkward to work with the Bizagi modeler. When you have already modeled but start to rearrange, it is quite a bit of an effort to change the stuff. When you rearrange lanes or have new structures, it goes rather squiggly up and down and so on, which could be improved. The visual outputs of the DIREPs of the process models are pixelated and have a bad image quality. It is a PNG or JPEG, and you cannot export it as a PDF. When you have rather large processes, you should be able to arrange them hierarchically. Currently, it is not supported. If you use sub-processes and inflate a process, suddenly the arrangement is totally different, and although you know the process, you have to look where is it now. You need a good understanding of the levels of your processes before you start in Bizagi. It can have automatic support for optimal presentation. In BPM, you should have it from the top left to the bottom right. However, in most cases, people don't know how they should arrange it. Therefore, it would be nice to have a suggestion system for different arrangements to be able to better present the process."

"Can be difficult for new users."

More Bizagi cons

"The main issue with Bonita is that the workspace crashes sometimes."

"There could be an improvement in IoT connectivity."

"The community edition has limited module functionality. If they could release some of the functionality that's available in the enterprise edition that would be helpful to those learning to use the solution."

"There is a need for more components in the library and additional customization options for these components."

"Installation could be made easier."

"Automation in vacation of a human resources replacement would be a good improvement in the product."

"I would like to improve the product's load balancing."

"The interface is advanced and quite good, but it could improve."

More Bonita cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The Bizagi modeler can be downloaded free of charge."

"This solution would be expensive for a company that has a lot of users."

"The pricing model is good; I believe it's free for up to 20 users, and then they start charging. I hear the solution can get quite expensive, however."

"The modeling part of the software is free. Most of the time, it is used for this purpose."

"It has a very high price. Many clients complain about the price for maintaining the application on Bizagi."

"From what I know of the market, I think Bizagi is a cheap solution for process engineering. Out of the solutions I've tried, from cheapest to most expensive, would be Vizor, Bizagi, Signavio, and then Siemens. I used a version of Bizagi that my university provided for free, so I have never paid for a license."

"We have no issues with the pricing."

"It is on par with other BPM tools, but not as expensive as Pega nor Appian."

More Bizagi pricing and cost advice

"The product is not cheaper, not costlier; it is reasonable. Bonita’s license is very flexible, with options to meet the needs of different customers and clients. Previously, it was less flexible, but now, many different licensing options are available."

"have installed the image of Bonita BPM on Amazon AWS and there is just one option to use and pay for."

"The product's pricing is acceptable. Pricing is yearly."

"Price to service ratio with Bonita BPM is good."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"The Community Edition comes free of charge."

"Licensing cost for the Enterprise edition comes out to be around 40,000 a year. There is also a Community edition, which is free. Some customers can go for the Community edition, but some of them require the Enterprise edition. Big companies go for the Enterprise edition, which comes with a lot of additional features such as a mobile app."

"The price is fair for what we are using the solution for."

More Bonita pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,098 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Answers from the Community

it_user548199

Works at a tech company with 51-200 employees

Nov 29, 2016

ARIS, Bonita, and Bizagi -- Do you have a comparison table between them?

See 2 answers

it_user326337

Customer Success Manager at PeerSpot

Nov 15, 2016

Read full answer

it_user548199

Works at a tech company with 51-200 employees

Nov 29, 2016

Esperaba algo mas de este estilo, sin embargo desarrollé esta tabla de comparación de Suites BPM, la cuál no puedo anexar por lo que dejo en formato de texto en caso deque alguien requiera este conocimiento. Esta tabla fue desarrollada basandome en textos acádemicos de fuentes confiables. Sin embargo no pude encontrar el numero aproximado de clientes que usan ARIS, por lo que si alguien cuenta con esta información se lo agradecería mucho, ya que es el último dato que requiero para completar esta tabla comparativa. BizAgi Suite, Bonita BPM, IBM Suite, ARIS + Webmethods, AuraPortal, Oracle Suite, Appian eBPM HOPEX Requiere pago Software licenciado (anual o perpetuo), freeware en versiones académicas Versión pagada (licenciamiento anual) y versión gratuita Software licenciado Software licenciado Software licenciado Versión pagada y versión gratuita Software licenciado Versión pagada y versión gratuita Código abierto No Si (GPL) No No No No No No Diseño intuitivo Bastante Intuitivo Bastante Intuitivo Medianamente intuitivo Bastante Intuitivo Bastante Intuitivo Requiere tiempo de adaptación Medianamente intuitivo Bastante Intuitivo Acceso a licencia de prueba. Si No No Si Si No Si Si Tutoriales y Soporte técnico Si Si Si Si Si Si Si Si Notación para diagramar BPMN 2.0 BPMN 2.0 BPMN 2.0, BPEL BPMN 2.0, EPC BPMN 2.0 BPMN 2.0, BPEL BPMN 2.0, EPC BPMN 2.0 Compatibilidad con base de datos SQL Server, Oracle, MySQL SQL Server, PostgreSQL, MySQL, Oracle, HSQL SQL Server SQL Server, Oracle SQL Server Oracle SQL Server, Oracle, MySQL SQL Server, Oracle Sistema operativo Windows, Linux Multi-plataforma Multi-plataforma Windows, Linux, Mac Windows Multi-plataforma Windows, Linux, Solaris Windows Monitoreo en tiempo real Si Si Si No Si Si Si Regular Servicio en la nube Si Si Si Si Si Si Si Si Requiere programación No No Poco Poco No Si Poco No Número de clientes >500 >1000 >3500 >800 >2000 >2000 >2700 Principales clientes Adidas Group, BBVA, Telefónica, BNP Paribas Xerox, Stanford University, CSC Barclays, Emericon, Banca popolare di Milano, Saperion Fujitsu, Coca Cola, Electrolux, ING, Credit Suisse Toyota, RSA Chile, Coprusa Group, Refinery of the Pacific REDISA, Panduit, Total E&P Indonesie Amazon, M&T Bank, Nissan, Ford, Baxter Credit Union GNP, P&G, EuroControl, British American Tobacco Permite importar/exportar archivos BPMN Si Si Si Si Si Solo importación Si Si Nivel de documentación Medio Alto Medio Alto Alto Medio Bajo Alto Considera reglas de Negocio Si Si No Si Si No Si Si Validación de Modelo (diagramas) Si Si Si Si No Si Si Permite simulación Si Si Si Si Si Si Si No Requiere conocimiento del producto Poco Poco Normal Poco Poco Normal Normal Poco Año primera versión lanzada 1989 2001 1998 2009 2001 1997 1999 1994 Accesibilidad móvil Si Si Si Si Si Si Si No Nivel de seguridad Regular Regular Regular Alto Alto Alto Facilidad de instalación Sencilla Sencilla Sencilla Sencilla Sencilla Media Sencilla Media Versión en español SI Si Si No Si Si No Si Saludos.

Read full answer

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	16
Large Enterprise	36

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

How easy is it to migrate process flow charts (modeled using tools like Visio) into Bizagi?

I have been using Bizagi with a major project for a state government agency for about four years now. It is pretty straightforward to load in files that are BPMN 2.0 compliant. The option to load V...

See all answers

What do you like most about Bizagi?

The natural notation is the best feature of Bizagi because it makes it compatible with other products.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bizagi?

Bizagi's pricing is very aggressive, and it was one of the reasons we chose it. It was less expensive than some of the other tools.

See all answers

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

What do you like most about Bonita?

The user interface is easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bonita?

The Enterprise edition is very expensive.

See all answers

Comparisons

Visio vs Bizagi

Compared 28% of the time

Camunda vs Bizagi

Compared 20% of the time

Lucidchart vs Bizagi

Compared 5% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Bizagi

Compared 4% of the time

Appian vs Bizagi

Compared 4% of the time

More Bizagi Competitors

Camunda vs Bonita

Compared 43% of the time

Flowable vs Bonita

Compared 8% of the time

IBM BPM vs Bonita

Compared 5% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Bonita

Compared 4% of the time

ProcessMaker vs Bonita

Compared 4% of the time

More Bonita Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bizagi

October 2025

Download Bizagi product report

Buyer's Guide

Bonita

October 2025

Download Bonita product report

Also Known As

No data available

Bonita BPM

Overview

Bizagi’s industry-leading low-code process automation platform connects people, applications, robots, and information. As the most business-friendly and flexible solution on the market, Bizagi enables true collaboration between business and IT, delivering faster adoption and success. Fuelled by a community of 1 million users, Bizagi powers over 1,000 organizations worldwide including Adidas, BAE Systems, and Old Mutual. For more information visit www.bizagi.com

Bizagi

Bonitasoft helps innovative companies worldwide deliver better digital user experiences for customers and employees. The extensible and open Bonita application platform unleashes the full potential of multidisciplinary development teams to create Living Apps: applications that allow continuous and incremental improvement, connecting tailored user interfaces with reliable back-office operations.

Bonitasoft

Sample Customers

adidas, Audi, BNP Paribas, Deutsche Post DHL & many more - 500+ customer globally.

With more than 1000 customers in 75 countries, and its ecosystem of more than 120,000 members, Bonitasoft is the largest provider of open-source Business Process Management, Low-code and Digital Transformation software worldwide.

Buyer's Guide

Bizagi vs. Bonita

September 2025

Free Report: Bizagi vs. Bonita

Find out what your peers are saying about Bizagi vs. Bonita and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,098 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bizagi vs. Bonita report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors, best Business Process Design vendors, and best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.