Bizagi vs Bonita comparison

Bizagi and Bonitasoft are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Bizagi is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.4, while Bonitasoft is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.2. Bizagi holds a 6.5% mindshare in BPM, compared to Bonitasoft’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Bizagi users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Bonitasoft users who would recommend it.

Bizagi

Read 80 Bizagi reviews

4,532 Views
4,041 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Bonita

Read 27 Bonita reviews

2,904 Views
2,138 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Bizagi

Bonita

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Bizagi and Bonita compete in the BPM solutions category. While Bizagi is noted for its user-friendly features and integration, Bonita stands out with its flexibility and adaptability, especially in complex process modeling.

Features: Bizagi is known for its ease of use, adherence to BPMN 2.0 standards, and powerful simulation tools, benefiting both simple and complex process modeling. It integrates well with Visual Studio and .NET, enhancing its functionality. Bonita offers strong integration capabilities and a low-code development platform. Its form-building tools and detailed documentation make it efficient for process automation.

Room for Improvement: Bizagi users suggest improvements in performance, cloud support, and automation complexity, alongside better exporting formats and integration with external systems. Bonita users wish for enhanced user interface and mobile support, along with richer BPM interface features and customization options for components.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Bizagi and Bonita support on-premises and cloud deployments. Bizagi provides more flexibility with hybrid cloud options. Users of Bizagi note that technical support varies by subscription level but is generally satisfactory. Bonita's customer service is effective, though users suggest faster response times.

Pricing and ROI: Bizagi offers a free modeler for beginners, but its enterprise solution can be costly, though it yields good ROI. Bonita has a flexible pricing model suitable for various client needs, with its enterprise edition deemed expensive but allowing unlimited users and processes. Both solutions are appreciated for delivering favorable ROI in large-scale deployments.

To learn more, read our detailed Bizagi vs. Bonita Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bizagi vs. Bonita

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,767 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bizagi

Ranking in Business Process Design

6th

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

6th

Ranking in Process Automation

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (15th), Low-Code Development Platforms (11th), No-Code Development Platforms (4th), Process Mining (5th)

Bonita

Ranking in Business Process Design

10th

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

14th

Ranking in Process Automation

12th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Bizagi is 6.5%, up from 5.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bonita is 3.7%, up from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Q&A Highlights

it_user548199

Works at a tech company with 51-200 employees

Nov 29, 2016

ARIS, Bonita, and Bizagi -- Do you have a comparison table between them?

Please find our three comparison pages that compare each of the products you listed with eachother: 1. ARIS BPM vs. Bonita BPM https://www.itcentralstation.com/products/comparisons/aris-bpm_vs_bonita-bpm 2. ARIS BPM vs. Bizagi https://www.itcentralstation.com/products/comparisons/aris-bpm_vs_bizagi 3. Bizagi vs. Bonita BPM https://www.itcentralstation.com/products/comparisons/bizagi_vs_bonita-bpm

See all answers

Featured Reviews

Paparao Nadipineni

Architect at Evoke

Enables budget review efficiency with open source advantages and workflow orchestration

Definitely, right now, it is purely open source, and we don't have much community support. If they add a few more capabilities like AIML and DocGen AI, these features would be good. Reporting capabilities can be improved more, and community support should be increased. Otherwise, people cannot onboard that particular technology easily.

Read full review

Paparao Nadipineni

Architect at Evoke

A simple and lightweight college course automation system with third-party integrations

The initial setup is straightforward and can be completed with the environment within an hour. First, take the latest from the git repository and check the git code to the monitor studio and a bar file, a deployable Bonita archive file. Then, take that process to the Bonita server, running at runtime on another server. Finally, deploy and enable it by selecting the proper organization.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the features I like is that when drawing any task, when putting a task on the process model canvas, I can simply click on it and see the other task icons for that task. It's just one quick, simple, straightforward connectivity from task to task."

"It is quite a stable solution."

"This solution is easy to use and it is a good tool for process modeling."

"Agility, reverse engineering, customized portal web, help desk and user guides, easy deployment, simple to modify."

"It has an easy to use interface which final users accepted with much more enthusiasm than our ERP (SAP)."

"The amount of control that this solution provides is great."

"The natural notation is the best feature of Bizagi because it makes it compatible with other products."

"What I find most valuable is the flexibility, I find it very easy to use and very flexible for my purpose. I can use it without any particular problem, and it's very intuitive and easy to understand."

More Bizagi pros

"It is a great product that is powerful in developing applications."

"Development of forms and flows."

"I find process management and user interface designing the most valuable features."

"The user interface is easy to use."

"The most valuable features of Bonita are the connectors, detailed documentation, and web applications. The documentation was useful because it is how I learned how to use it."

"The solution is easy to use."

"This product is very easy-to-use and user-friendly."

"I really enjoy using the workflow management."

More Bonita pros

Cons

"I think that they could improve their update process. Some of the process mining techniques could be added to Bizagi. I think that they can improve their simulation abilities to include more elements of the BPMN."

"It would be helpful if they added some extra features in the next update."

"I would like to see more in terms of analytics and better reporting."

"The solution needs to make it easier to use RPA products on it. They may need an RPA specific interface. It would be better than having to make an RPA tool to use for viewing. Most of our work is about making RPA tools with the Bizagi, not using Bizagi itself."

"The solution's interface could be a bit more user-friendly and I would like to see more integrations with other Office products, not just Office 365."

"Difficult to export in formats other than PDF."

"It needs an easier setup for the Bizagi Engine."

"I would like to see simulation as a free feature again. In version 3.3 it was free, but in 4.0 it isn't."

More Bizagi cons

"The main issue with Bonita is that the workspace crashes sometimes."

"There is a need for more components in the library and additional customization options for these components."

"We are struggling a bit with integrations."

"Automation in vacation of a human resources replacement would be a good improvement in the product."

"I should be able to park the tasks that are within a process in a kind of container, and dynamically, a super admin should be able to connect these processes. This kind of feature might be helpful."

"It is missing some important features that other products have."

"The interface is advanced and quite good, but it could improve."

"I would like to improve the product's load balancing."

More Bonita cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is not expensive."

"It is only necessary to pay for licenses when ready to deploy applications to production."

"Make sure that your requirements are explicitly defined from the outset. This will help you choose the right setup and licensing for your needs."

"The paid version costs us about $20,000 for 100 users annually."

"This is a free solution."

"We didn't use the licensed versions where you could exactly go into automatization. However, we looked at the pricing in the beginning, and the only thing that I remember is that it was too expensive for the things we were using because our clients would also have to license the product. One client said that it was too expensive for the benefit they get out of it."

"The pricing model is good; I believe it's free for up to 20 users, and then they start charging. I hear the solution can get quite expensive, however."

"I was using the free version."

More Bizagi pricing and cost advice

"The price is fair for what we are using the solution for."

"The Community Edition comes free of charge."

"have installed the image of Bonita BPM on Amazon AWS and there is just one option to use and pay for."

"The product is not cheaper, not costlier; it is reasonable. Bonita’s license is very flexible, with options to meet the needs of different customers and clients. Previously, it was less flexible, but now, many different licensing options are available."

"I am using the free version of Bonita."

"We are using the Community Version, which can be used free of charge."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"Price to service ratio with Bonita BPM is good."

More Bonita pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Answers from the Community

it_user548199

Works at a tech company with 51-200 employees

Nov 29, 2016

ARIS, Bonita, and Bizagi -- Do you have a comparison table between them?

See 2 answers

it_user326337

Customer Success Manager at PeerSpot

Nov 15, 2016

Read full answer

it_user548199

Works at a tech company with 51-200 employees

Nov 29, 2016

Esperaba algo mas de este estilo, sin embargo desarrollé esta tabla de comparación de Suites BPM, la cuál no puedo anexar por lo que dejo en formato de texto en caso deque alguien requiera este conocimiento. Esta tabla fue desarrollada basandome en textos acádemicos de fuentes confiables. Sin embargo no pude encontrar el numero aproximado de clientes que usan ARIS, por lo que si alguien cuenta con esta información se lo agradecería mucho, ya que es el último dato que requiero para completar esta tabla comparativa. BizAgi Suite, Bonita BPM, IBM Suite, ARIS + Webmethods, AuraPortal, Oracle Suite, Appian eBPM HOPEX Requiere pago Software licenciado (anual o perpetuo), freeware en versiones académicas Versión pagada (licenciamiento anual) y versión gratuita Software licenciado Software licenciado Software licenciado Versión pagada y versión gratuita Software licenciado Versión pagada y versión gratuita Código abierto No Si (GPL) No No No No No No Diseño intuitivo Bastante Intuitivo Bastante Intuitivo Medianamente intuitivo Bastante Intuitivo Bastante Intuitivo Requiere tiempo de adaptación Medianamente intuitivo Bastante Intuitivo Acceso a licencia de prueba. Si No No Si Si No Si Si Tutoriales y Soporte técnico Si Si Si Si Si Si Si Si Notación para diagramar BPMN 2.0 BPMN 2.0 BPMN 2.0, BPEL BPMN 2.0, EPC BPMN 2.0 BPMN 2.0, BPEL BPMN 2.0, EPC BPMN 2.0 Compatibilidad con base de datos SQL Server, Oracle, MySQL SQL Server, PostgreSQL, MySQL, Oracle, HSQL SQL Server SQL Server, Oracle SQL Server Oracle SQL Server, Oracle, MySQL SQL Server, Oracle Sistema operativo Windows, Linux Multi-plataforma Multi-plataforma Windows, Linux, Mac Windows Multi-plataforma Windows, Linux, Solaris Windows Monitoreo en tiempo real Si Si Si No Si Si Si Regular Servicio en la nube Si Si Si Si Si Si Si Si Requiere programación No No Poco Poco No Si Poco No Número de clientes >500 >1000 >3500 >800 >2000 >2000 >2700 Principales clientes Adidas Group, BBVA, Telefónica, BNP Paribas Xerox, Stanford University, CSC Barclays, Emericon, Banca popolare di Milano, Saperion Fujitsu, Coca Cola, Electrolux, ING, Credit Suisse Toyota, RSA Chile, Coprusa Group, Refinery of the Pacific REDISA, Panduit, Total E&P Indonesie Amazon, M&T Bank, Nissan, Ford, Baxter Credit Union GNP, P&G, EuroControl, British American Tobacco Permite importar/exportar archivos BPMN Si Si Si Si Si Solo importación Si Si Nivel de documentación Medio Alto Medio Alto Alto Medio Bajo Alto Considera reglas de Negocio Si Si No Si Si No Si Si Validación de Modelo (diagramas) Si Si Si Si No Si Si Permite simulación Si Si Si Si Si Si Si No Requiere conocimiento del producto Poco Poco Normal Poco Poco Normal Normal Poco Año primera versión lanzada 1989 2001 1998 2009 2001 1997 1999 1994 Accesibilidad móvil Si Si Si Si Si Si Si No Nivel de seguridad Regular Regular Regular Alto Alto Alto Facilidad de instalación Sencilla Sencilla Sencilla Sencilla Sencilla Media Sencilla Media Versión en español SI Si Si No Si Si No Si Saludos.

Read full answer

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How easy is it to migrate process flow charts (modeled using tools like Visio) into Bizagi?

I have been using Bizagi with a major project for a state government agency for about four years now. It is pretty straightforward to load in files that are BPMN 2.0 compliant. The option to load V...

See all answers

What do you like most about Bizagi?

The natural notation is the best feature of Bizagi because it makes it compatible with other products.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bizagi?

My company uses the free version of the product. In our company, we are doing documentation and modeling. When we reach that point of automating the processes, then maybe we shall acquire the paid ...

See all answers

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

What do you like most about Bonita?

The user interface is easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bonita?

The Enterprise edition is very expensive.

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Bizagi

Compared 26% of the time

Visio vs Bizagi

Compared 19% of the time

Lucidchart vs Bizagi

Compared 6% of the time

Appian vs Bizagi

Compared 5% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Bizagi

Compared 5% of the time

More Bizagi Competitors

Camunda vs Bonita

Compared 58% of the time

Flowable vs Bonita

Compared 8% of the time

IBM BPM vs Bonita

Compared 4% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Bonita

Compared 2% of the time

ProcessMaker vs Bonita

Compared 2% of the time

More Bonita Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bizagi

March 2025

Download Bizagi product report

Buyer's Guide

Bonita

March 2025

Download Bonita product report

Also Known As

No data available

Bonita BPM

Overview

Bizagi’s industry-leading low-code process automation platform connects people, applications, robots, and information. As the most business-friendly and flexible solution on the market, Bizagi enables true collaboration between business and IT, delivering faster adoption and success. Fuelled by a community of 1 million users, Bizagi powers over 1,000 organizations worldwide including Adidas, BAE Systems, and Old Mutual. For more information visit www.bizagi.com

Bizagi

Bonitasoft helps innovative companies worldwide deliver better digital user experiences for customers and employees. The extensible and open Bonita application platform unleashes the full potential of multidisciplinary development teams to create Living Apps: applications that allow continuous and incremental improvement, connecting tailored user interfaces with reliable back-office operations.

Bonitasoft

Sample Customers

adidas, Audi, BNP Paribas, Deutsche Post DHL & many more - 500+ customer globally.

With more than 1000 customers in 75 countries, and its ecosystem of more than 120,000 members, Bonitasoft is the largest provider of open-source Business Process Management, Low-code and Digital Transformation software worldwide.

Buyer's Guide

Bizagi vs. Bonita

March 2025

Free Report: Bizagi vs. Bonita

Find out what your peers are saying about Bizagi vs. Bonita and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bizagi vs. Bonita report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors, best Business Process Design vendors, and best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.