Bonita vs Oracle BPEL comparison

Bonitasoft and Oracle are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Bonitasoft is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.2, while Oracle is ranked #25 with an average rating of 7.7. Bonitasoft holds a 5.4% mindshare in PA, compared to Oracle’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Bonitasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Bonita

Read 27 Bonita reviews

2,731 Views
2,024 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Oracle BPEL

Read 4 Oracle BPEL reviews

511 Views
216 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Bonita

Oracle BPEL

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Bonita and Oracle BPEL are competitors in the BPM category. Bonita is preferred for its ease-of-use and cost-effectiveness, while Oracle BPEL is favored for its extensive functionality.

Features: Bonita offers flexibility and ease of use with its visual process design, integration capabilities, and adaptability for quick setup. Oracle BPEL provides high-end process orchestration, superior integration features, and is suited for enterprises with complex workflow requirements.

Room for Improvement: Bonita could enhance its capabilities for managing complex workflows, provide more robust handling of intricate tasks, and improve scalability for large enterprises. Oracle BPEL could streamline its deployment process, simplify user experience, and offer more intuitive features for non-expert users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bonita is known for quick and straightforward deployment, supported by efficient services. Oracle BPEL requires more time and expertise due to its complexity but offers comprehensive support for troubleshooting and optimization.

Pricing and ROI: Bonita is attractive to small to medium enterprises for its cost-effectiveness and scalable pricing, leading to a faster ROI. Oracle BPEL, though more expensive initially, is cost-effective for large-scale applications that utilize its full capabilities, offering extensive value in the long term.

To learn more, read our detailed Bonita vs. Oracle BPEL Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bonita vs. Oracle BPEL

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bonita

Ranking in Process Automation

12th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (10th), Business Process Management (BPM) (14th)

Oracle BPEL

Ranking in Process Automation

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Bonita is 5.4%, down from 5.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle BPEL is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Paparao Nadipineni

Architect at Evoke

A simple and lightweight college course automation system with third-party integrations

The initial setup is straightforward and can be completed with the environment within an hour. First, take the latest from the git repository and check the git code to the monitor studio and a bar file, a deployable Bonita archive file. Then, take that process to the Bonita server, running at runtime on another server. Finally, deploy and enable it by selecting the proper organization.

Read full review

Posham Nampelli

Architecture and Consulting at Synaptics Inc

A highly scalable solution that provides various features for the execution of business processes

I'm a consultant. I do architecting, designing, and development. I have used two versions, 1.1 and 2.0. I’m unsure about the prices because I oversee the development and implementation. I'll highly recommend the product depending on an organization’s requirements. As someone who has worked with BPEL for 13 years, I highly recommend the product for an on-premise or hybrid integration. Multiple products or alternate solutions have come into the integration domain. However, the product has been in the industry from SOA 11g to SOA 12c and OIC. Though there are multiple competitors, the product has been here for a long time and has been helping multiple customers improve their business. Overall, I rate the solution a nine or nine and a half out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I really enjoy using the workflow management."

"We use the tool to validate and give access to the users. It is for access management."

"Flexible and drag-and-drop type of UI is very valuable. The integrations are also very good. You can build workflows very quickly, which is my favorite activity. By using the GUI, you can build the entire mechanism, notifications, and all this kind of stuff."

"The most valuable features of Bonita are the connectors, detailed documentation, and web applications. The documentation was useful because it is how I learned how to use it."

"One of the most valuable features is you can create without coding, it is a low code platform."

"I find process management and user interface designing the most valuable features."

"It is a great product that is powerful in developing applications."

"The solution is stable. Even the older versions are stable."

More Bonita pros

"The solution is very seamless and fast."

"The most valuable feature is the support for human tasks."

"The product has everything we need."

"What I find the most valuable about Oracle BPEL is that it saves me time."

Cons

"There is a need for more components in the library and additional customization options for these components."

"We are struggling a bit with integrations."

"The interface is advanced and quite good, but it could improve."

"Bonita can improve by offering more flexibility. The developer does not receive the code of the application to modify it. Most of the other solutions I have used allow the developers to change or improve the code that is generated."

"I should be able to park the tasks that are within a process in a kind of container, and dynamically, a super admin should be able to connect these processes. This kind of feature might be helpful."

"Automation in vacation of a human resources replacement would be a good improvement in the product."

"I would like to improve the product's load balancing."

"The dashboard has limited features."

More Bonita cons

"They need to have support for new protocols like GraphQL and possibly some out-of-the-box adapters for SAP and other big systems."

"In the next release, I would like to see REST improved and new technologies for microservices. I'd like to see more containers for separating containers."

"Some user-defined functions for transformation must be added to the next release of the solution."

"The solution's integration with SAP should be seamless because some formats are not accepted in SAP but are accepted in Oracle BPEL."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You pay an annual fee and can have an unlimited number of processes and users."

"I am using the free version of Bonita."

"The product's pricing is acceptable. Pricing is yearly."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"Price to service ratio with Bonita BPM is good."

"I believe this is a very good financial choice."

"The price is fair for what we are using the solution for."

"The Enterprise edition is very expensive."

More Bonita pricing and cost advice

"The product is moderately priced."

"The solution's pricing is moderate and not expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

What do you like most about Bonita?

The user interface is easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bonita?

The Enterprise edition is very expensive.

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle BPEL?

The product has everything we need.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle BPEL?

They need to have support for new protocols like GraphQL and possibly some out-of-the-box adapters for SAP and other big systems. It should be better if the SAP adapter were included in the bundle.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle BPEL?

We primarily use Oracle BPEL for process automation. It is used for workflows for documents, data transfers, and other processes implemented for our customers.

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Bonita

Compared 56% of the time

Bizagi vs Bonita

Compared 18% of the time

Flowable vs Bonita

Compared 7% of the time

IBM BPM vs Bonita

Compared 3% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Bonita

Compared 1% of the time

More Bonita Competitors

Camunda vs Oracle BPEL

Compared 48% of the time

Flowable vs Oracle BPEL

Compared 31% of the time

More Oracle BPEL Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bonita

March 2025

Download Bonita product report

Buyer's Guide

Process Automation

March 2025

Download Oracle BPEL product report

Also Known As

Bonita BPM

BPEL Process Manager

Overview

Bonitasoft helps innovative companies worldwide deliver better digital user experiences for customers and employees. The extensible and open Bonita application platform unleashes the full potential of multidisciplinary development teams to create Living Apps: applications that allow continuous and incremental improvement, connecting tailored user interfaces with reliable back-office operations.

Bonitasoft

Oracle BPEL (Business Process Execution Language) Process Manager is a tool for designing and running business processes. This product provides a comprehensive, standardsÂbased and easy to use solution for creating, deploying and managing crossÂapplication business processes with both automated and human workflow steps â all in a serviceÂoriented architecture. Oracle BPEL Process Manager is a powerful integration tool for the enterprise. Its ability to connect to external systems and process, mixed with its support for a variety of presentation technologies makes it an ideal tool for defining and implementing business process logic.

Oracle

Sample Customers

With more than 1000 customers in 75 countries, and its ecosystem of more than 120,000 members, Bonitasoft is the largest provider of open-source Business Process Management, Low-code and Digital Transformation software worldwide.

Nacional Monte de Piedad IAP, Bimbo S.A. de C.V., Intelligent Pathways, DVZ Datenverarbeitungszentrum Mecklenburg-Vorpommern GmbH, Arqiva

Buyer's Guide

Bonita vs. Oracle BPEL

March 2025

Free Report: Bonita vs. Oracle BPEL

Find out what your peers are saying about Bonita vs. Oracle BPEL and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bonita vs. Oracle BPEL report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.