Camunda vs Oracle BPEL comparison

Camunda and Oracle are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Camunda is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4, while Oracle is ranked #33 with an average rating of 7.0. Camunda holds a 15.8% mindshare in PA, compared to Oracle’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Camunda users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Camunda

Read 78 Camunda reviews

20,866 Views
11,894 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Oracle BPEL

Read 4 Oracle BPEL reviews

814 Views
814 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Camunda

Oracle BPEL

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Oracle BPEL and Camunda are both key players in business process management, aiming to enhance organizational efficiency. While Oracle BPEL is appreciated for its pricing and support, Camunda is preferred for its superior features, which justify its overall cost.

Features: Oracle BPEL offers enterprise application integration, strong BPEL standards support, and extensive monitoring capabilities. Camunda stands out with strong BPMN support, user-friendly design, and deployment flexibility across environments, making it adaptable to various business processes.

Room for Improvement: Oracle BPEL can improve its ease of deployment and streamline its setup process. Additionally, enhancing its user interface would make it more accessible. Expanding its range of integration options could also be beneficial. Camunda could enhance its reporting capabilities, simplify setup for users less familiar with BPMN, and provide more advanced customization options to meet diverse enterprise needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Oracle BPEL and Camunda offer comprehensive deployment options. Oracle BPEL's setup is more complex, presenting challenges but is supported by extensive assistance. Camunda's lightweight architecture enables faster deployment and adaptability, with satisfactory customer service solutions supporting its ease and speed of deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle BPEL involves a higher setup cost, suitable for large enterprise environments, leading to a strong ROI. Camunda's lower initial cost and scalable pricing align with usage, improving process efficiency and reducing operational costs, making its ROI potential appealing for flexible budgets.

To learn more, read our detailed Camunda vs. Oracle BPEL Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. Oracle BPEL

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 883,011 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Camunda

Ranking in Process Automation

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (1st), Business Process Management (BPM) (1st), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (3rd), AI Software Development (3rd), AI Customer Support (48th), AI IT Support (5th)

Oracle BPEL

Ranking in Process Automation

33rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Camunda is 15.8%, down from 27.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle BPEL is 1.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Camunda	15.8%
Oracle BPEL	1.0%
Other	83.2%

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

CristianoGomes

Owner at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

Supports long-running asynchronous processes effectively but has not evolved much in recent years

I think Camunda is focusing too much on the SaaS offering right now and not much on improving and developing the product itself. I did not see any innovations on that aspect, especially for the open-source version. I was making some tests recently and the tool seemed pretty much the same as it was three or four years ago. Since they made the move to cloud deployment in a more SaaS-oriented way, they do not invest too much in the community version. To be honest, it did not change much from the Activiti initial version. Activiti was pretty much what Camunda is today. They invested a lot on Zeebe and made it the engine for their SaaS cloud version. Camunda itself, the embedded engine, did not evolve too much. They could invest more on that.

Read full review

Posham Nampelli

Architecture and Consulting at Synaptics Inc

A highly scalable solution that provides various features for the execution of business processes

I'm a consultant. I do architecting, designing, and development. I have used two versions, 1.1 and 2.0. I’m unsure about the prices because I oversee the development and implementation. I'll highly recommend the product depending on an organization’s requirements. As someone who has worked with BPEL for 13 years, I highly recommend the product for an on-premise or hybrid integration. Multiple products or alternate solutions have come into the integration domain. However, the product has been in the industry from SOA 11g to SOA 12c and OIC. Though there are multiple competitors, the product has been here for a long time and has been helping multiple customers improve their business. Overall, I rate the solution a nine or nine and a half out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The visibility – the diagrams you create – and then being able to automate based on them are valuable features. It's easy to explain and comprehend, and the integration aspects are valuable."

"We are using the BPMN engine of Camunda; we are not using the user interface. We are using just the engine, the back end of this. For us, it is working quite well."

"The product is stable."

"It is a scalable product. I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten."

"Camunda's support for BPMN 2.0 is a great advantage because it allows us to have a common language to discuss technology and business in the same perspective."

"I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features."

"When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version."

"The UI is very user-friendly compared to other products. The native, vanilla UI is very interesting and intuitive to use. It's user-friendly when it comes to modernizing a business process."

More Camunda pros

"The product has everything we need."

"What I find the most valuable about Oracle BPEL is that it saves me time."

"The solution is very seamless and fast."

"The most valuable feature is the support for human tasks."

Cons

"It would be better if the tool were made less reliant on Java."

"We're trying to put the people from the business to do it. We are using APIs, and we have open APIs to define our APIs and the request-response that each call requires and sends. So, to base the mapping on that, there was nothing to help. I know that with some tools, such as Oracle tools, you can see the input and expected output. With drag and drop, you can take one property from the left and drag it to the right, and it does all the mapping itself, but that's not the case with Camunda. So, for me, this is something that can be improved."

"I think it would be important to internationalize the Cockpit and the Admin as well as with the Tasklist."

"There are a few things that I'm missing. For instance, the user interface creator, which I know other systems have, like Aurea or Lombardi, which are IBM solutions. The interface creator, including the data model creator or some module which would allow the users who are not programmers or business consultants and who are not technically skilled in database and Java programming, to create data models and user interfaces."

"The setup process is a drawback as it has many dependencies, which affects our ability to migrate to Windows eleven due to security concerns."

"Lacking in forms visualization."

"Initially, installation was challenging, but recent improvements have made it much easier."

"Without a proper frontend, the business cannot effectively use the platform."

More Camunda cons

"They need to have support for new protocols like GraphQL and possibly some out-of-the-box adapters for SAP and other big systems."

"Some user-defined functions for transformation must be added to the next release of the solution."

"The solution's integration with SAP should be seamless because some formats are not accepted in SAP but are accepted in Oracle BPEL."

"In the next release, I would like to see REST improved and new technologies for microservices. I'd like to see more containers for separating containers."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I use the open-source free version."

"The license is quite expensive, which is why we went with the community version."

"It is less cost-prohibitive than other solutions on the market. This solution was in our price range."

"Generally, the price could be better, as well as the licensing fees."

"The product is expensive for a small or medium-sized company."

"We use the free version."

"We use a community version."

"We're using the free version. We used the Enterprise version for some time. If I compare free versus what we paid at that time, the Enterprise version costs a lot. For the additional functionality that we got with the Enterprise version, it was too costly."

More Camunda pricing and cost advice

"The product is moderately priced."

"The solution's pricing is moderate and not expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

883,011 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

12%

Insurance Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

16%

Performing Arts

14%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	43
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	29

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle BPEL?

They need to have support for new protocols like GraphQL and possibly some out-of-the-box adapters for SAP and other big systems. It should be better if the SAP adapter were included in the bundle.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle BPEL?

We primarily use Oracle BPEL for process automation. It is used for workflows for documents, data transfers, and other processes implemented for our customers.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle BPEL?

It depends on your needs. Oracle BPEL is suitable for enterprise-wide systems. However, if you're building something smaller or don't know precisely what you need, it's better to start with somethi...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM BPM vs Camunda

Compared 11% of the time

Temporal vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

Flowable vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

Pega Platform vs Camunda

Compared 6% of the time

More Camunda Competitors

Flowable vs Oracle BPEL

Compared 20% of the time

Control-M vs Oracle BPEL

Compared 15% of the time

Pega Platform vs Oracle BPEL

Compared 13% of the time

BMC TrueSight Orchestration vs Oracle BPEL

Compared 10% of the time

BizTalk Server vs Oracle BPEL

Compared 10% of the time

More Oracle BPEL Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Camunda

February 2026

Download Camunda product report

Buyer's Guide

Process Automation

January 2026

Download Oracle BPEL product report

Also Known As

Camunda BPM

BPEL Process Manager

Interactive Demo

Camunda

Demo not available

Oracle

Overview

Camunda revolutionizes process orchestration by enabling seamless automation and integration with AI, human tasks, and existing systems while ensuring security and governance.

Built for collaboration between business and IT, Camunda empowers organizations to manage complexity, boost efficiency, and maintain competitive advantage. With a clientele of over 700 top organizations like Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone, Camunda is a trusted partner in designing, orchestrating, automating, and refining critical business processes to accelerate digital transformation. Its open-source nature, ease of use, and REST API integration make it a versatile choice for various needs.

What are Camunda's key features?

Lightweight Architecture: Offers streamlined and efficient process management.
Scalability: Supports growth and complexity in operations.
Flexibility with BPMN, CMMN, and DMN Standards: Ensures adaptability to different process modeling needs.
Open-Source: Encourages customization and user-specific enhancements.
Graphical Process Modeling: Intuitive interface for designing and automating processes.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamlines processes for optimized performance.
Seamless Integration: Ensures smooth workflow across different systems.
Improved Collaboration: Facilitates effective cooperation between business and IT.
Customizability: Adapts to specific user requirements and system environments.

In banking, Camunda automates processes and manages transactions, while in telecommunications, it optimizes service orders. Governmental and public sectors benefit from workflow automation. Organizations often use either the enterprise edition or the open-source version to create APIs and manage business rules effectively.

Camunda

Oracle BPEL (Business Process Execution Language) Process Manager is a tool for designing and running business processes. This product provides a comprehensive, standardsÂbased and easy to use solution for creating, deploying and managing crossÂapplication business processes with both automated and human workflow steps â all in a serviceÂoriented architecture. Oracle BPEL Process Manager is a powerful integration tool for the enterprise. Its ability to connect to external systems and process, mixed with its support for a variety of presentation technologies makes it an ideal tool for defining and implementing business process logic.

Oracle

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando

Nacional Monte de Piedad IAP, Bimbo S.A. de C.V., Intelligent Pathways, DVZ Datenverarbeitungszentrum Mecklenburg-Vorpommern GmbH, Arqiva

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. Oracle BPEL

February 2026

Free Report: Camunda vs. Oracle BPEL

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. Oracle BPEL and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

883,011 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Camunda vs. Oracle BPEL report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.