Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs FlutterFlow comparison

Boomi and FlutterFlow are both solutions in the Low-Code Development Platforms category. Boomi is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.8, while FlutterFlow is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.3. Boomi holds a 0.7% mindshare in LCDP, compared to FlutterFlow’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Boomi users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of FlutterFlow users who would recommend it.

Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Read 6 Boomi AtomSphere Flow reviews

374 Views
310 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

FlutterFlow

Read 3 FlutterFlow reviews

514 Views
449 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Boomi AtomSphere Flow

FlutterFlow

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Boomi AtomSphere Flow and FlutterFlow are tools for application development with differing strengths. Boomi AtomSphere Flow seems to have the upper hand in enterprise integrations, while FlutterFlow is preferred for rapid mobile app development.

Features: Boomi AtomSphere Flow offers robust enterprise integration, extensive connectors, and a strong automation platform. FlutterFlow provides a rich set of visual development tools, allowing for quick design and deployment of mobile apps. Users appreciate Boomi’s comprehensive integration features but prefer FlutterFlow for mobile-specific development and faster iterations.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest Boomi AtomSphere Flow could enhance its UI complexity and documentation. FlutterFlow, while praised for ease of use, needs more advanced customization options and better performance optimization. Both products have areas to refine based on user feedback, but Boomi’s focus is on better documentation, whereas FlutterFlow requires more performance tweaks.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Boomi AtomSphere Flow’s deployment is noted for its complexity but benefits from robust support. FlutterFlow is favored for its straightforward deployment, but its customer service could improve in responsiveness and depth. Boomi’s stronger support infrastructure contrasts with FlutterFlow’s ease of deployment, reflecting differing user priorities.

Pricing and ROI: Boomi AtomSphere Flow has a higher setup cost but delivers significant ROI through its enterprise capabilities. FlutterFlow offers competitive pricing and quick ROI for mobile app development. User reviews indicate that while Boomi is costlier, it’s justified for enterprise needs, whereas FlutterFlow’s pricing and ROI are more aligned with small to mid-sized app development projects.

To learn more, read our detailed Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. FlutterFlow Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. FlutterFlow

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (17th)

FlutterFlow

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

18th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Boomi AtomSphere Flow is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of FlutterFlow is 2.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Low-Code Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

NarendraThota

Vice President of Technology Services at SAge IT inc

A tool that helps save money in the long run with a need to offer users the ability to deal with large datasets

From an improvement perspective, Boomi AtomSphere Flow should come up with the ability to deal with large datasets. The data integration part is a concern when you try to connect to an on-premises environment since the latency is high, making it an aspect where improvements are required to reduce the latency. Whenever Boomi AtomSphere Flow gets integrated with applications like SAP, it is important to ensure that what you develop is user-friendly, which is a process that takes time, especially when compared with webMethods.io or TIBCO. The development effort with Boomi AtomSphere Flow is more when you compare it with other tools, which is a drawback and an area of improvement.

Read full review

Luis Gerardo Meneses Hernandez

Software developer at Apps2Go TECH

Creates versatile applications seamlessly across platforms

I like the simplicity of making panels with Flutter. It is easy to use when you understand the code, know how to use Docs, and understand the components of Flutter. It allows you to create fragments that look good and work on both mobile and web environments. Additionally, it works for both PC and iOS devices.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Boomi AtomSphere Flow is very easy to develop and maintain compared to other tools like SAP HANA Cloud Integration or Cloud Platform."

"In the long run, if you have a good team, solution architect, and an architect from Boomi's side, then it is a good tool from an ROI perspective since it can help save money."

"Boomi AtomSphere Flow is integrated through APIs, it exposes the API and any product can call the APIs in the queue. Additionally, it is secure."

"Boomi enhances application integration with scalability, reliability, and security."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its core integration with Boomi AtomSphere because it's extremely easy to tap into any informational system of a company."

"The most valuable features include the ease of designing Boomi flows and the significant cost savings and reduced time to market they offer our clients."

"Boomi AtomSphere Flow gives us flexibility."

"It allows you to create fragments that look good and work on both mobile and web environments."

"The most valuable features of FlutterFlow are the integrations and workflows."

"I like the simplicity of making panels with Flutter."

"FlutterFlow offers a lot, but one feature that really helps me is the debugging features that allow me to test everything on the spot. This is really helpful."

Cons

"The development effort with Boomi AtomSphere Flow is more when you compare it with other tools, which is a drawback and an area of improvement."

"The solution's user interface building needs improvement."

"Boomi is not as flexible compared to other integration products like IBM's. For complex integration scenarios, Boomi could improve its flexibility."

"The technical support is rated around 6.5 to seven out of ten. It lacks clarity on how to reach out, write emails, or understand responsiveness."

"There is room for improvement in Boomi's AI capabilities."

"The solution could improve by being more user-friendly. The whole solution is used through an interface and it could always be improved."

"Its stability could be improved."

"I am trying to see how it can be integrated with the backend. That said, I haven't gotten there yet."

"The UI components could be more standardized. Sometimes, for certain properties, I have to search more than I do with other platforms. With other platforms, once you know one, you know all. But with FlutterFlow, sometimes you have to look around for what you need."

"Scaling depends on project requirements."

"There is room for improvement in advanced functionality so it could cater to more complex app development needs."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When you use Boomi AtomSphere Flow in production, you have to pay for licenses. The solution is not expensive but it could be cheaper."

"Since its pricing positioning has a different construction with respect to its competitors, the solution is sometimes way more expensive and sometimes less expensive."

"I would rate the licensing costs a three out of ten, with ten being expensive and one being cheap. Currently, I use the free version."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Non Profit

Financial Services Firm

11%

Educational Organization

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Media Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Boomi AtomSphere Flow?

The solution's most valuable feature is its core integration with Boomi AtomSphere because it's extremely easy to tap into any informational system of a company.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Flow?

The pricing is good for a small-scale company like ours, and the licensing cost is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Flow?

Boomi is not as flexible compared to other integration products like IBM's. For complex integration scenarios, Boomi could improve its flexibility. Moreover, it lacks features like the ESQL scripti...

See all answers

What do you like most about FlutterFlow?

FlutterFlow offers a lot, but one feature that really helps me is the debugging features that allow me to test everything on the spot. This is really helpful.

See all answers

What needs improvement with FlutterFlow?

Right now, I think it's a good tool. It's easy to understand when you know Dart. It helps create applications, and I am trying to see how it can be integrated with the backend. That said, I haven't...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for FlutterFlow?

Currently, I am using Flutter to make a dashboard.

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Compared 26% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Compared 18% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Compared 16% of the time

Pega Platform vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Compared 14% of the time

Appian vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Compared 14% of the time

More Boomi AtomSphere Flow Competitors

Microsoft Power Apps vs FlutterFlow

Compared 48% of the time

Lovable vs FlutterFlow

Compared 16% of the time

Mendix vs FlutterFlow

Compared 13% of the time

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs FlutterFlow

Compared 10% of the time

OutSystems vs FlutterFlow

Compared 6% of the time

More FlutterFlow Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

April 2025

Download Boomi AtomSphere Flow product report

Buyer's Guide

Low-Code Development Platforms

March 2025

Download FlutterFlow product report

Also Known As

Boomi Flow

No data available

Overview

Boomi Flow is a modern, cloud-native service for creating customer journeys and automating simple and sophisticated workflows that accelerate your business outcomes.

Boomi

FlutterFlow is used for developing mobile applications quickly and efficiently, ideal for building prototypes, MVPs, and full-fledged applications without extensive coding experience. It supports cross-platform development, enabling simultaneous deployment on Android and iOS.

FlutterFlow's visual development tools and integrations streamline the app creation process, making it perfect for startups and developers looking to launch their apps faster. Its comprehensive drag-and-drop interface, pre-built components, and templates facilitate rapid app development. Integration with Firebase simplifies backend connections, and the robust documentation and tutorials support quick learning. Real-time collaboration features improve teamwork, enhancing the development experience.

What are the most important features of FlutterFlow?

Comprehensive drag-and-drop interface accelerates app development.
Pre-built components and templates streamline design processes.
Integration with Firebase simplifies backend connections.
Robust documentation and tutorials support rapid learning.
Real-time collaboration enhances teamwork.

What benefits or ROI should be looked for when evaluating FlutterFlow?

Quick app development with a visual interface.
Reduction in development costs and timelines.
Ease of integrating backend services.
Enhanced team collaboration during development.

FlutterFlow can be particularly useful in industries that require fast app iterations, such as startups and tech companies. Its support for cross-platform development is beneficial for companies targeting both Android and iOS markets. The ease of use and comprehensive support make it an appealing choice for businesses looking to launch functional apps quickly, without extensive coding knowledge. Though improvements in stability, performance, customization, debugging, and customer support are needed, FlutterFlow's overall features present a strong front for efficient app development.

FlutterFlow

Sample Customers

bioventus, AM Transport Services

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. FlutterFlow

March 2025

Free Report: Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. FlutterFlow

Find out what your peers are saying about Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. FlutterFlow and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. FlutterFlow report.

See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.