We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Flow and Microsoft Power Apps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Low-Code Development Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Boomi AtomSphere Flow is very easy to develop and maintain compared to other tools like SAP HANA Cloud Integration or Cloud Platform."
"Boomi AtomSphere Flow is integrated through APIs, it exposes the API and any product can call the APIs in the queue. Additionally, it is secure."
"In the long run, if you have a good team, solution architect, and an architect from Boomi's side, then it is a good tool from an ROI perspective since it can help save money."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its core integration with Boomi AtomSphere because it's extremely easy to tap into any informational system of a company."
"The scalability is good."
"The features I find the most valuable are the 365 and Microsoft applications integrations and the automation."
"It's a very workable solution because it's an automated way of making applications. You have a template, you have the application know-how,"
"The product has good usability, in terms of low-code applications."
"It is stable and reliable."
"We particularly like the workflow connectors in the forms, for information introduction purposes."
"The solution allows you to use data to create excellent UI and quickly deliver an app. It speeds up production time."
"The most valuable feature is the time-to-market because you can make apps pretty fast."
"Its stability could be improved."
"The development effort with Boomi AtomSphere Flow is more when you compare it with other tools, which is a drawback and an area of improvement."
"The solution could improve by being more user-friendly. The whole solution is used through an interface and it could always be improved."
"The solution's user interface building needs improvement."
"The portal and canvas apps need to be improved and brought up to speed."
"One of the major problems with it is what PowerApps calls the delegation warning. Regardless of what platform, data source, et cetera, that you're using, you can't retrieve more than 2000 records."
"I have heard from developers that there is documentation missing in the reporting."
"We're not in production yet, so we're still working through some issues."
"I’d need more time with it. As of now, I can’t think of an area for improvement."
"The editor in the Web browser could be improved because it can be difficult to implement the commands in the buttons."
"We'd like to see more integration capabilities in the future."
"You can't add too many filters onto anything you build, otherwise, it will be very slow and it will affect your performance."
Boomi AtomSphere Flow is ranked 20th in Low-Code Development Platforms with 4 reviews while Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Low-Code Development Platforms with 78 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Flow is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Flow writes "A competent solution for integrating enterprise-grade software". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". Boomi AtomSphere Flow is most compared with Camunda, Apache Airflow, Pega BPM, Mendix and AWS Step Functions, whereas Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Mendix, ServiceNow, Appian and Microsoft Azure App Service. See our Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. Microsoft Power Apps report.
See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.