Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Appian vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 5, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.9
Companies using Appian see increased profits, reduced process time, early break-even, and high user satisfaction across applications.
Sentiment score
7.8
Boomi AtomSphere Flow streamlines processes, reduces errors, improves productivity, and enhances integration, automation, data visibility, and decision-making.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.4
Appian's customer service is mostly positive, with responsive support, valued community resources, and excellent expert involvement for issues.
Sentiment score
7.2
Boomi AtomSphere Flow's support is fast and knowledgeable, with some communication issues and varying responsiveness; resources aid users effectively.
Their customer service is responsive, and the team is very prompt for support.
It lacks clarity on how to reach out, write emails, or understand responsiveness.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
Appian's scalability suits medium and large enterprises but requires expertise for optimal performance and handles varying data challenges.
Sentiment score
7.3
Boomi AtomSphere Flow is adaptable and scalable with manual adjustments, appreciated by teams for meeting expansion needs effectively.
I would rate the scalability as nine out of ten, as it effectively scales to meet our clients’ needs.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
Appian ensures 99.99% uptime and high stability; issues arise mainly from improper design or database handling and connectivity errors.
Sentiment score
6.9
Boomi AtomSphere Flow is reliable for typical use but struggles with large data volumes and has some bug issues.
It depends on how it has been designed and how it has been configured.
The solution maintains high stability, which makes it reliable.
 

Room For Improvement

Appian users seek improved UI customization, scalability, integration, DevOps, documentation, and better pricing for enhanced accessibility and flexibility.
Boomi AtomSphere Flow needs a user-friendly interface, better stability, enhanced AI, and improved support for government sector suitability.
If there is a very complex process that includes a lot of data transitioning and memory-centric processes, it consumes a lot of memory.
We are particularly interested in exploring AI features more thoroughly, focusing on next-generation enhancements like ChatGPT.
 

Setup Cost

Appian provides competitive, flexible pricing for on-premise and cloud solutions, offering value despite higher initial costs.
Boomi AtomSphere Flow provides cost-effective, flexible pricing based on user count and features, appealing to enterprise integration leaders.
On the pricier side, both Appian and Pega are enterprise-level solutions, placing them on the slightly higher side.
The pricing is considered a bit expensive yet not excessively so, particularly when compared to similar solutions like MuleSoft.
 

Valuable Features

Appian excels in rapid low-code development, user-friendly interface, robust automation, seamless integration, scalability, and comprehensive support.
Boomi AtomSphere Flow is praised for its ease of integration, low-code development, and cost-effective, scalable deployment.
It is easy for me to define the process and create configurable workflows.
The most valuable features include the ease of designing Boomi flows and the significant cost savings and reduced time to market they offer our clients.
 

Categories and Ranking

Appian
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
4th
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
60
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (4th), Rapid Application Development Software (5th), Process Mining (5th)
Boomi AtomSphere Flow
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
22nd
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
21st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Appian is 6.2%, down from 6.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Boomi AtomSphere Flow is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM)
 

Featured Reviews

Srimanta Pandit - PeerSpot reviewer
Flexible, improves operational efficiency, and reduces the time taken to complete processes
The solution’s turnaround time for development is better compared to other tools. The solution enables fast development. The traceability of the processor is good. There is much more governance and regulations on the processers. The tool reduces the time of the processes by 30% to 40%. The solution’s low-code aspect has greatly impacted the development and deployment speed. One of the major reasons we are using the product is that we can reuse the modules. The developers can reuse all the modules. It enables us to make subsequent developments in less time. The prebuilt modules can be deployed within two to three weeks. The tool is very flexible. Compared to other platforms, the Appian product team was agile in quickly customizing things for us.
NarendraThota - PeerSpot reviewer
A tool that helps save money in the long run with a need to offer users the ability to deal with large datasets
From an improvement perspective, Boomi AtomSphere Flow should come up with the ability to deal with large datasets. The data integration part is a concern when you try to connect to an on-premises environment since the latency is high, making it an aspect where improvements are required to reduce the latency. Whenever Boomi AtomSphere Flow gets integrated with applications like SAP, it is important to ensure that what you develop is user-friendly, which is a process that takes time, especially when compared with webMethods.io or TIBCO. The development effort with Boomi AtomSphere Flow is more when you compare it with other tools, which is a drawback and an area of improvement.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
30%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
23%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?
Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...
Is Appian a suitable solution for beginners who have no additional preparation?
Appian is actually pretty big on educating its users, including with courses that reward you with certifications. There is a whole section on their company’s website where you can check out the edu...
Is it easy to set up Appian or did you have to resort to professional help?
We had some issues when we were setting up Appian. It was quite surprising, since this is a low-code tool which, in its essence, means it is meant for business users and inexperienced beginners. So...
What do you like most about Boomi AtomSphere Flow?
The solution's most valuable feature is its core integration with Boomi AtomSphere because it's extremely easy to tap into any informational system of a company.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Flow?
The pricing is considered a bit expensive yet not excessively so, particularly when compared to similar solutions like MuleSoft. I would rate the pricing at 6.5 to seven out of ten.
What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Flow?
There is room for improvement in Boomi's AI capabilities. We are particularly interested in exploring AI features more thoroughly, focusing on next-generation enhancements like ChatGPT. Additionall...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Appian BPM, Appian AnyWhere, Appian Enterprise BPMS
Boomi Flow
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Hansard Global plc, Punch Taverns, Pirelli, Crawford & Company, EDP Renewables, Queensland Government Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning (, Bank of Tennessee
bioventus, AM Transport Services
Find out what your peers are saying about Appian vs. Boomi AtomSphere Flow and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.