Appian and Boomi AtomSphere Flow compete in the enterprise platforms category offering functionalities for business process management. Appian holds the upper hand due to its rapid application development and robust integration capabilities facilitating agile workflows.
Features: Appian offers rapid application development with a low-code platform, robust integration capabilities, and ease of use in complex business processes. Boomi AtomSphere Flow provides user-friendly design with a drag-and-drop interface, easy deployment, and seamless integration capabilities with pre-built connectors.
Room for Improvement: Appian could enhance the customization of elements and lower costs for large-scale implementations. Additionally, some users find its pricing to be less competitive. Boomi AtomSphere Flow could benefit from expanding its integration capabilities for more complex requirements and offering more straightforward licensing options.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Appian is known for its ease of deployment, rapid ROI, and comprehensive professional support throughout the project lifecycle. Boomi AtomSphere Flow also boasts seamless deployment with a strong focus on usability and customer support during integrations.
Pricing and ROI: Appian is perceived as having competitive pricing, driving rapid ROI for its users, especially in handling complex business processes. Boomi AtomSphere Flow has relatively reasonable pricing, especially for simple use cases, but it can become more expensive for larger-scale implementations compared to alternatives like MuleSoft.
Appian is very efficient, allowing us to build a lot of applications within a financial year, making it cost-effective.
Their customer service is responsive, and the team is very prompt for support.
The technical support is generally good.
Appian has a community where I can put my questions.
It lacks clarity on how to reach out, write emails, or understand responsiveness.
I have not personally dealt with Boomi's customer support, but my team mentions that support is not good.
Appian is scalable, but it depends on how you build your applications.
Initially, without much coding, I can easily handle five thousand records.
In terms of scalability, the tool is quite scalable, and I would rate it eight or nine.
I would rate the scalability as nine out of ten, as it effectively scales to meet our clients’ needs.
It depends on how it has been designed and how it has been configured.
The solution maintains high stability, which makes it reliable.
I would like to see more enhancement in the user interface to allow more freedom in designing the sites and pages.
If there is a very complex process that includes a lot of data transitioning and memory-centric processes, it consumes a lot of memory.
It lacks features like the ESQL scripting language found in IBM's, which makes integration transformations easy.
We are particularly interested in exploring AI features more thoroughly, focusing on next-generation enhancements like ChatGPT.
On the pricier side, both Appian and Pega are enterprise-level solutions, placing them on the slightly higher side.
The pricing of Appian is based on the number of users and generally ranges from 70 to 100 USD per user per month.
The pricing is considered a bit expensive yet not excessively so, particularly when compared to similar solutions like MuleSoft.
The pricing is good for a small-scale company like ours, and the licensing cost is reasonable.
The zero-code integration feature is remarkable, allowing for ease of data transfer and workflow enhancement.
I can create tables, perform database-related activities, and create multiple tables.
It is easy for me to define the process and create configurable workflows.
We use Boomi for various types of integrations, such as SFTP integration, database integration, Snowflake integration, and we also perform transformations using maps and scripts.
The most valuable features include the ease of designing Boomi flows and the significant cost savings and reduced time to market they offer our clients.
Appian is a unified low-code platform and solution used by businesses to build enterprise applications and workflows. This product adapts to the needs of clients and the technologies they are already using to combine their data in a single workflow and maximize resources. The platform has four main components through which it transforms the work process for companies of various sizes. They are:
Appian is utilized across a diverse set of industries, including automotive and manufacturing, energy and utilities, education, financial services, telecom and media, transportation, retail, insurance, healthcare, and life sciences. The most frequent use cases of Appian are customer journey, governance, risk and compliance, operational efficiency, supply chain, distributed order management, and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) management.
Appian Features
Appian has various features that allow users to create solutions for their businesses. These features can be separated into a few groups according to function, including automation, low-code application development, and integrations and data. Some of the most frequently used features of Appian include:
Appian Benefits
The benefits of using Appian include:
Reviews from Real Users
A practice leader - digital process automation at a computer software company values Appian highly because the product is easy to develop, low-code, and has a good user interface.
Alan G., an advisory board member at Codecon VR, Appian offers a clear application life cycle, easy to learn documentation, and comes with a fundamentals course.
Boomi Flow is a modern, cloud-native service for creating customer journeys and automating simple and sophisticated workflows that accelerate your business outcomes.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.