Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Appian Logo

Top 10 Appian Alternatives

Vendor: Appian
4.2 out of 5
3,099 followers
Post review

Top Appian Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Appian based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC), Camunda, and Pega Platform. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Appian Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Appian, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Appian Logo
Appian Logo
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)
4.0 out of 5
Informatica IDMC excels in comprehensive data integration, offering superior data transformation capabilities and extensive connectors. In comparison, Appian shines in workflow automation and business process management, providing ease of configuration and extensive BPM capabilities. A tech buyer might choose Informatica IDMC for robust data integration and Appian for effective workflow automation.
Download Appian vs. Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) Report
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) is known for higher setup costs compared to Appian, which offers relatively lower initial setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) is known for higher setup costs compared to Appian, which offers relatively lower initial setup expenses.
Appian Logo
Camunda
4.1 out of 5
Appian Logo
Camunda
4.1 out of 5
Appian and Camunda offer robust business process management solutions, yet differences exist in user experiences and capabilities. Appian is favored for quicker deployment times and efficient customer support. In comparison, Camunda provides powerful BPMN execution and extensive customization opportunities for long-term value.
Download Appian vs. Camunda Report
Appian's setup costs are relatively high, focusing on rapid deployment and comprehensive support, while Camunda offers lower initial expenses, appealing to cost-sensitive businesses with a preference for open-source flexibility.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian's setup costs are relatively high, focusing on rapid deployment and comprehensive support, while Camunda offers lower initial expenses, appealing to cost-sensitive businesses with a preference for open-source flexibility.
Appian Logo
Pega Platform
4.1 out of 5
Appian Logo
Pega Platform
4.1 out of 5
Pega Platform is ideal for those seeking competitive pricing and robust features, though it requires skilled users for full optimization. In comparison, Appian attracts buyers with its superior ease of use and deployment efficiency, despite its higher pricing.
Download Appian vs. Pega Platform Report
Pega Platform has a higher setup cost compared to Appian, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment between the two platforms.
View comparison
Pricing
Pega Platform has a higher setup cost compared to Appian, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment between the two platforms.
Appian Logo
Appian Logo
SAP Signavio Process Manager
4.1 out of 5
Appian offers flexibility and rapid deployment with its low-code environment, appealing to those seeking efficiency. In comparison, SAP Signavio Process Manager excels in advanced analytics and integration, ideal for businesses needing detailed insights. Appian's key strength is speed, while SAP Signavio offers comprehensive analysis.
Download Appian vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager Report
Appian setup costs are generally high with additional customization fees, whereas SAP Signavio Process Manager offers a more flexible and affordable setup with lower initial costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian setup costs are generally high with additional customization fees, whereas SAP Signavio Process Manager offers a more flexible and affordable setup with lower initial costs.
Appian Logo
IBM BPM
3.9 out of 5
Appian Logo
IBM BPM
3.9 out of 5
Appian excels in ease of use and customer support. In comparison, IBM BPM stands out with a more robust feature set. Appian offers a user-friendly experience, whereas IBM BPM provides complex functionalities. Appian is cost-effective; IBM BPM justifies its higher cost with superior capabilities.
Download Appian vs. IBM BPM Report
Appian users report a higher initial setup cost compared to IBM BPM users, who mention lower upfront expenses. The difference in setup fees highlights variations in cost structures between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian users report a higher initial setup cost compared to IBM BPM users, who mention lower upfront expenses. The difference in setup fees highlights variations in cost structures between the two solutions.
Appian Logo
Bizagi
4.2 out of 5
Appian Logo
Bizagi
4.2 out of 5
Appian excels in deployment speed and automation, whereas Bizagi emphasizes a feature-rich platform and customization. In comparison, Bizagi offers vibrant process modeling but faces integration issues. Appian provides straightforward deployment and robust support. Bizagi's competitive pricing appeals to cost-sensitive buyers.
Download Appian vs. Bizagi Report
Appian has a higher setup cost compared to Bizagi. Bizagi offers a more affordable setup cost than Appian.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian has a higher setup cost compared to Bizagi. Bizagi offers a more affordable setup cost than Appian.
Appian Logo
Apache Airflow
4.0 out of 5
Appian Logo
Apache Airflow
4.0 out of 5
Appian excels in ease of use and customer support, simplifying business processes with workflow automation. In comparison, Apache Airflow is praised for its powerful orchestration of data workflows, offering scalability and flexibility. While Appian is user-friendly, Apache Airflow stands out with its extensibility.
Download Apache Airflow vs. Appian Report
Appian's setup cost is generally higher, reflecting its robust enterprise features, while Apache Airflow offers a more budget-friendly setup without compromising on essential functionalities for workflow automation and orchestration.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian's setup cost is generally higher, reflecting its robust enterprise features, while Apache Airflow offers a more budget-friendly setup without compromising on essential functionalities for workflow automation and orchestration.
Appian Logo
ARIS BPA
4.2 out of 5
Appian Logo
ARIS BPA
4.2 out of 5
Appian excels in ease of use and agile, low-code development, enhancing rapid application creation and adaptability. In comparison, ARIS BPA stands out for comprehensive process mapping and robust analytics, making it ideal for detailed process visualization and complex analysis. Appian ensures quicker deployment, while ARIS BPA requires more initial training.
Download ARIS BPA vs. Appian Report
Appian's setup cost is described as budget-friendly, while ARIS BPA's setup cost is noted to be significantly higher.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian's setup cost is described as budget-friendly, while ARIS BPA's setup cost is noted to be significantly higher.
Appian Logo
Bonita
4.1 out of 5
Appian Logo
Bonita
4.1 out of 5
Appian is praised for seamless integration and automation, appealing to those prioritizing scalability. In comparison, Bonita excels in customizable workflows and advanced analytics, attracting users needing high flexibility. Appian offers ease of deployment, while Bonita provides cost-effective solutions with substantial ROI.
Download Appian vs. Bonita Report
Appian has a high setup cost, while Bonita offers a more affordable alternative. The significant difference in initial expenses makes Bonita an attractive option for cost-conscious users compared to Appian.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian has a high setup cost, while Bonita offers a more affordable alternative. The significant difference in initial expenses makes Bonita an attractive option for cost-conscious users compared to Appian.
Appian Logo
Appian Logo
Nintex Process Platform
3.9 out of 5
Appian excels in support and flexibility, with powerful automation and seamless integration. In comparison, Nintex provides extensive workflow options and customization, ideal for intricate processes. Appian's deployment is straightforward, whereas Nintex offers robust features justifying its price despite a complex setup.
Download Appian vs. Nintex Process Platform Report
Appian's setup cost is perceived as costly by some users, while the Nintex Process Platform is often noted for its more competitive pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian's setup cost is perceived as costly by some users, while the Nintex Process Platform is often noted for its more competitive pricing.
Appian Logo
AWS Step Functions
4.1 out of 5
Appian Logo
AWS Step Functions
4.1 out of 5
Appian's low-code development accelerates application creation, making it ideal for rapid deployment. In comparison, AWS Step Functions excels in orchestrating microservices, offering superior management of complex workflows. Appian offers cost-effective, quick ROI, while AWS Step Functions delivers high long-term value despite higher setup costs.
Download AWS Step Functions vs. Appian Report
Appian's setup costs are higher compared to AWS Step Functions, which offers lower initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian's setup costs are higher compared to AWS Step Functions, which offers lower initial expenses.
Appian Logo
Hyland OnBase
4.0 out of 5
Appian Logo
Hyland OnBase
4.0 out of 5
Appian excels in automation and integration features that boost productivity. In comparison, Hyland OnBase is valued for its strong document management and workflow capabilities. Appian is easier to tailor, while Hyland OnBase offers broader functionality out of the box.
Download Appian vs. Hyland OnBase Report
Appian has higher setup costs compared to Hyland OnBase, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian has higher setup costs compared to Hyland OnBase, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
Appian Logo
ADONIS
3.9 out of 5
Appian Logo
ADONIS
3.9 out of 5
Appian's customers praise its integration capabilities and customer support, making it a preferred choice for process automation. In comparison, ADONIS excels with powerful modeling options and documentation support. Both products offer valuable features, but ADONIS's advanced functionalities and higher ROI favor tech buyers looking for comprehensive solutions.
Download ADONIS vs. Appian Report
Appian has a higher setup cost compared to ADONIS, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian has a higher setup cost compared to ADONIS, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
Appian Logo
Appian Logo
IBM Business Automation Workflow
3.9 out of 5
Appian excels in user-friendliness, fast application development, and intuitive design. In comparison, IBM Business Automation Workflow offers comprehensive features, robust integrations, and scalability, making it ideal for complex needs. Appian is cost-effective with rapid ROI, while IBM's advanced features justify its higher pricing over time.
Download Appian vs. IBM Business Automation Workflow Report
Appian has a significantly lower setup cost compared to IBM Business Automation Workflow, which tends to be on the higher side.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian has a significantly lower setup cost compared to IBM Business Automation Workflow, which tends to be on the higher side.
Appian Logo
ARIS Cloud
4.1 out of 5
Appian Logo
ARIS Cloud
4.1 out of 5
Appian offers easier customizability and integration, appealing to those needing flexibility and low-code development. In comparison, ARIS Cloud excels in detailed process modeling and analysis. Tech buyers might choose Appian for integration, while ARIS Cloud's analytical features attract those needing comprehensive modeling.
Download ARIS Cloud vs. Appian Report
Appian generally has higher setup costs, while ARIS Cloud tends to be more affordable initially.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian generally has higher setup costs, while ARIS Cloud tends to be more affordable initially.
Appian Logo
Oracle BPM
3.7 out of 5
Appian Logo
Oracle BPM
3.7 out of 5
Appian and Oracle BPM are robust business process management solutions. Appian wins in user satisfaction for affordability and support, while Oracle BPM is favored for its extensive feature set. In comparison, Appian is easier to use, but Oracle BPM's advanced capabilities suit complex workflows.
Download Appian vs. Oracle BPM Report
Appian has a straightforward and lower initial setup cost compared to Oracle BPM, which involves more comprehensive setup and higher costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian has a straightforward and lower initial setup cost compared to Oracle BPM, which involves more comprehensive setup and higher costs.
Appian Logo
BIC Platform
4.1 out of 5
Appian Logo
BIC Platform
4.1 out of 5
Appian excels in quick deployment and robust customer support, featuring a low-code development environment and seamless integration. In comparison, BIC Platform offers a comprehensive feature set with extensive process modeling and customization. Appian focuses on intuitive configuration, while BIC Platform targets scalability and long-term value.
Download Appian vs. BIC Platform Report
Appian has higher setup costs compared to BIC Platform, making BIC Platform a more cost-effective solution initially.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian has higher setup costs compared to BIC Platform, making BIC Platform a more cost-effective solution initially.
Appian Logo
Appian Logo
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform
4.2 out of 5
Appian is noted for its ease of deployment and comprehensive customer service support. In comparison, iGrafx Process360 Live Platform stands out for its advanced features offering robust capabilities. Appian provides competitive pricing with quick ROI, while iGrafx justifies its higher price through extensive features.
Download Appian vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Report
Appian has a higher setup cost compared to iGrafx Process360 Live Platform, making iGrafx a more affordable initial investment option.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian has a higher setup cost compared to iGrafx Process360 Live Platform, making iGrafx a more affordable initial investment option.
Appian Logo
Studio Creatio
4.3 out of 5
Appian Logo
Studio Creatio
4.3 out of 5
Appian is favored for its faster deployment and responsive customer service. In comparison, Studio Creatio excels in feature richness and overall value proposition. Tech buyers may choose Appian for its automation and support, while Studio Creatio appeals with customization and cost-effectiveness.
Download Appian vs. Studio Creatio Report
Appian has higher initial setup costs compared to Studio Creatio, which offers a more cost-effective onboarding solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian has higher initial setup costs compared to Studio Creatio, which offers a more cost-effective onboarding solution.
Appian Logo
KiSSFLOW
4.3 out of 5
Appian Logo
KiSSFLOW
4.3 out of 5
Appian excels in integration, advanced automation, and low-code, ideal for complex projects. In comparison, KiSSFLOW offers simplicity, easy customization, and user-friendliness, suiting straightforward workflows. Appian users note a learning curve, while KiSSFLOW users highlight integration challenges. Pricing favors KiSSFLOW initially, but Appian offers long-term ROI.
Download Appian vs. KiSSFLOW Report
Appian has a higher setup cost compared to KiSSFLOW. KiSSFLOW offers a more cost-effective setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian has a higher setup cost compared to KiSSFLOW. KiSSFLOW offers a more cost-effective setup option.
Appian Logo
Appian Logo
Boomi AtomSphere Flow
4.0 out of 5
Appian excels in process modeling and automation for efficient workflow management. In comparison, Boomi AtomSphere Flow offers powerful integration and seamless data connectivity across multiple systems, making it a valuable investment despite its higher cost due to its superior integration capabilities.
Download Appian vs. Boomi AtomSphere Flow Report
Appian requires a higher setup cost, whereas Boomi AtomSphere Flow offers a more cost-effective setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian requires a higher setup cost, whereas Boomi AtomSphere Flow offers a more cost-effective setup.
Appian Logo
AgilePoint
4.0 out of 5
Appian Logo
AgilePoint
4.0 out of 5
Appian offers robust workflow automation and integration capabilities. In comparison, AgilePoint's extensive customization options and flexibility make it appealing. Appian needs enhancements in scalability, while AgilePoint requires a more intuitive design. Appian's customer service lacks responsiveness; AgilePoint is praised for proactive support.
Download AgilePoint vs. Appian Report
Appian's setup cost is generally higher compared to AgilePoint, which offers a more affordable initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian's setup cost is generally higher compared to AgilePoint, which offers a more affordable initial investment.
Appian Logo
Newgen OmniFlow
3.9 out of 5
Appian Logo
Newgen OmniFlow
3.9 out of 5
Appian excels in deployment speed and support. In comparison, Newgen OmniFlow offers stronger features. Appian emphasizes low-code development and integration. In comparison, Newgen OmniFlow provides comprehensive process automation tools. Appian's pricing is higher. In comparison, Newgen OmniFlow offers better value for money.
Download Appian vs. Newgen OmniFlow Report
Appian has higher setup costs, while Newgen OmniFlow offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. Appian's pricing reflects its advanced features, contrasting with Newgen OmniFlow's streamlined deployment cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian has higher setup costs, while Newgen OmniFlow offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. Appian's pricing reflects its advanced features, contrasting with Newgen OmniFlow's streamlined deployment cost.
Appian Logo
OpenText AppWorks
3.9 out of 5
Appian Logo
OpenText AppWorks
3.9 out of 5
Appian is valued for its low-code development and integration, ideal for rapid development needs. In comparison, OpenText AppWorks offers comprehensive document management and workflow capabilities. Appian needs better scalability and training, while OpenText AppWorks requires improved customization and mobile performance.
Download Appian vs. OpenText AppWorks Report
Appian's setup cost is perceived as higher yet provides more comprehensive support, while OpenText AppWorks offers a more cost-effective setup option with a self-service approach. This highlights a significant difference in initial investment and support level.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian's setup cost is perceived as higher yet provides more comprehensive support, while OpenText AppWorks offers a more cost-effective setup option with a self-service approach. This highlights a significant difference in initial investment and support level.
Appian Logo
Appian Logo
OpenText 360 for SharePoint
4.2 out of 5

OpenText 360 for SharePoint offers strong document management and collaboration tools. In comparison, Appian excels in process automation and integration with other systems. A tech buyer might choose OpenText 360 for document handling efficiency, while Appian is ideal for automation and integration needs.

Download Appian vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint Report
OpenText 360 for SharePoint has a lower setup cost than Appian. Comparative conclusions highlight that OpenText 360 requires less initial investment, whereas Appian's higher setup fee might reflect additional features or support.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText 360 for SharePoint has a lower setup cost than Appian. Comparative conclusions highlight that OpenText 360 requires less initial investment, whereas Appian's higher setup fee might reflect additional features or support.
Appian Logo
SS&C Blue Prism
4.5 out of 5
Appian Logo
SS&C Blue Prism
4.5 out of 5

Appian excels in ease of deployment and customer service, suitable for rapid solutions with cost-effective pricing. In comparison, SS&C Blue Prism offers extensive automation features and scalability, appealing to enterprises with complex needs and justifying its higher initial investment for advanced capabilities.

Appian typically involves higher initial setup costs compared to SS&C Blue Prism, which is often considered more budget-friendly for businesses seeking cost-effective automation solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian typically involves higher initial setup costs compared to SS&C Blue Prism, which is often considered more budget-friendly for businesses seeking cost-effective automation solutions.
Appian Logo
ProcessMaker
3.8 out of 5
Appian Logo
ProcessMaker
3.8 out of 5

Appian offers advanced automation and integration options, benefiting users needing complex solutions. In comparison, ProcessMaker excels in ease of use and pricing, attracting those seeking simplicity and cost-efficiency. Appian requires more intuitive design, while ProcessMaker needs better customization and integration capabilities.

Download Appian vs. ProcessMaker Report
Appian's setup cost is higher, reflecting its robust features, while ProcessMaker offers a more affordable setup cost, catering to budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian's setup cost is higher, reflecting its robust features, while ProcessMaker offers a more affordable setup cost, catering to budget-conscious users.
Appian Logo
Appian Logo
TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM
3.7 out of 5
Appian excels in agile development and ease of use, making it ideal for rapid deployment. In comparison, TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM offers extensive integration capabilities and superior scalability. Appian's customer service and straightforward deployment attract users, while TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM's robust features justify higher costs.
Download Appian vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Report
Appian has a lower setup cost, making it more accessible for smaller businesses, while TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian has a lower setup cost, making it more accessible for smaller businesses, while TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM requires a higher initial investment.
Appian Logo
AuraQuantic
4.4 out of 5
Appian Logo
AuraQuantic
4.4 out of 5
Appian excels in pricing and customer support, while AuraQuantic shines with advanced features. In comparison, AuraQuantic offers flexible user permissions and automation, ideal for complex workflows. Tech buyers might choose Appian for integration and responsiveness, whereas AuraQuantic appeals for long-term ROI and advanced capabilities.
Download Appian vs. AuraQuantic Report
Appian has higher setup costs compared to AuraQuantic, which offers a more affordable setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian has higher setup costs compared to AuraQuantic, which offers a more affordable setup.
Appian Logo
Appian Logo
Genpact Cora SeQuence
4.3 out of 5
Genpact Cora SeQuence offers robust process automation, deep integration capabilities, and advanced analytics tools. In comparison, Appian is appreciated for its low-code development and efficient task management. Genpact Cora SeQuence favors cost-effective solutions, while Appian provides extensive capabilities for higher long-term ROI.
Download Appian vs. Genpact Cora SeQuence Report
Genpact Cora SeQuence has a higher setup cost compared to Appian, making Appian a more cost-effective option for initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Genpact Cora SeQuence has a higher setup cost compared to Appian, making Appian a more cost-effective option for initial implementation.
Appian Logo
OpenText MBPM
3.5 out of 5
Appian Logo
OpenText MBPM
3.5 out of 5
Appian is praised for its low-code development and scalability. In comparison, OpenText MBPM often impresses with its comprehensive features and workflow automation. Appian offers straightforward deployment, whereas OpenText MBPM provides extensive post-deployment support. Appian is cost-effective, while OpenText MBPM justifies a higher price through powerful features.
Download Appian vs. OpenText MBPM Report
Appian has a lower setup cost compared to OpenText MBPM, making it a more budget-friendly option. However, OpenText MBPM offers a more comprehensive setup package, adding value to its higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian has a lower setup cost compared to OpenText MBPM, making it a more budget-friendly option. However, OpenText MBPM offers a more comprehensive setup package, adding value to its higher initial investment.
Appian Logo
Appian Logo
IBM Case Foundation
3.9 out of 5
Appian offers a low-code platform with ease of integration and fast deployment. In comparison, IBM Case Foundation provides extensive customization and scalability. Appian users seek more integrations, while IBM needs better updates. Appian's deployment is straightforward; IBM's higher cost yields strong ROI due to advanced features.
Download Appian vs. IBM Case Foundation Report
Appian is often praised for its lower initial setup costs, while IBM Case Foundation tends to have higher initial expenditures.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian is often praised for its lower initial setup costs, while IBM Case Foundation tends to have higher initial expenditures.
Appian Logo
Bosch inubit
4.0 out of 5
Appian Logo
Bosch inubit
4.0 out of 5
Appian's features include low-code development and robust mobile support, whereas Bosch inubit excels in integration capabilities and advanced analytics. In comparison, Appian is praised for ease of deployment, while Bosch inubit is noted for comprehensive support. Appian has a higher cost but significant ROI, while Bosch inubit provides competitive pricing and strong returns.
Appian has a significantly lower setup cost compared to Bosch inubit, which requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian has a significantly lower setup cost compared to Bosch inubit, which requires a higher initial investment.
Appian Logo
Appian Logo
Agiloft Workflow and BPM
4.5 out of 5
Appian is favored for its low-code development and quick deployment. In comparison, Agiloft's extensive customization and contract management features stand out. Appian excels with powerful integrations, while Agiloft's higher price point reflects its extensive feature set. Appian provides rapid ROI, whereas Agiloft's comprehensive features justify the investment.
Appian's setup cost is relatively high but offers robust features, while Agiloft Workflow and BPM has a lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly. The notable difference is in the initial investment required.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian's setup cost is relatively high but offers robust features, while Agiloft Workflow and BPM has a lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly. The notable difference is in the initial investment required.
Appian Logo
WebRatio
3.5 out of 5
Appian Logo
WebRatio
3.5 out of 5
Appian excels in ease of use and integration, enabling rapid application development. In comparison, WebRatio offers detailed configurability, ideal for complex scenarios with extensive customization options. Appian is straightforward to deploy with effective support, while WebRatio's advanced features justify higher costs.
Download Appian vs. WebRatio Report
Appian features a lower setup cost, making it more affordable for initial implementation. WebRatio, however, requires a higher setup investment, which might be justified by different feature sets and capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian features a lower setup cost, making it more affordable for initial implementation. WebRatio, however, requires a higher setup investment, which might be justified by different feature sets and capabilities.
Appian Logo
Appian Logo
Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management
3.8 out of 5
Appian scores higher for ease of use and customer support due to its intuitive design and low-code environment. In comparison, Ultimus Adaptive BPM's significant customization options appeal to users with complex workflows, justifying its cost. Tech buyers might prefer Appian for rapid deployment, while others might choose Ultimus for extensive customization.
Download Appian vs. Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management Report
Appian's setup cost is generally lower compared to Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management, making it potentially more budget-friendly for organizations with limited initial investments. However, Ultimus offers a more comprehensive onboarding process justifying its higher setup costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian's setup cost is generally lower compared to Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management, making it potentially more budget-friendly for organizations with limited initial investments. However, Ultimus offers a more comprehensive onboarding process justifying its higher setup costs.
Appian Logo
Novacura Flow
1 out of 5
Appian Logo
Novacura Flow
1 out of 5
Appian is favored for pricing, support, process automation, and easy deployment, making it suitable for cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Novacura Flow offers flexibility, robust features, and adaptability, despite higher prices and a need for better training and support, appealing to feature-focused buyers.
Appian has a higher setup cost compared to the more budget-friendly Novacura Flow, making them stand out in terms of initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian has a higher setup cost compared to the more budget-friendly Novacura Flow, making them stand out in terms of initial investment.

Related categories

Business Process Management (BPM)
Process Automation
Rapid Application Development Software