Top 10 Appian Alternatives

Appian accelerates time-to-market with low-code application development, ideal for agile projects. In comparison, Hyland OnBase offers strong document management and security, favored by industries requiring data control, making it suitable for information-intensive sectors focused on comprehensive enterprise content management.

Appian excels with rapid low-code development, ideal for fast deployments and broad enterprise needs. In comparison, Nintex's strength lies in its intuitive workflow design, benefiting Microsoft ecosystem users with ease of integration and strong mobile automation tools, enhancing user accessibility.

Appian offers a low-code platform with extensive cross-platform integration and automation capabilities. In comparison, AWS Step Functions excels in AWS ecosystem integration and parallel task execution. Buyers may choose Appian for broader applicability or AWS Step Functions for tight AWS connectivity.

Appian excels in scalability and customer support, making it ideal for organizations needing robust automation and integration. In comparison, ADONIS focuses on detailed process analysis and offers a cost-effective solution with powerful modeling features, appealing to businesses seeking comprehensive insights and straightforward deployment.

Appian's low-code platform enables rapid app development and easy adaptability for non-technical users, offering competitive pricing and flexible cloud deployment. In comparison, IBM Business Automation Workflow provides a comprehensive feature set, though often at higher costs, and favors on-premises deployment.

Appian accelerates application development with robust low-code features and agile integration, suited for diverse environments. In comparison, ARIS Cloud excels in process modeling and collaboration, supporting methodologies like UML and BPMN, ideal for enterprises seeking architectural flexibility. Both platforms offer significant ROI.

Appian excels in rapid low-code development and deployment flexibility, appealing to those prioritizing speed and cost-efficiency. In comparison, Oracle BPM offers robust process modeling and comprehensive integration for complex needs, despite its higher cost and complexity.

Appian excels in deployment efficiency and integration, appealing to those prioritizing rapid automation. In comparison, BIC Platform offers advanced modeling tools ideal for detailed process management. Appian's clear ROI suits streamlined needs, while BIC Platform's comprehensive features justify its higher cost.

Appian is favored for its low-code development and rapid ROI. In comparison, iGrafx Process360 Live Platform attracts those prioritizing in-depth process optimization. Organizations choosing Appian enjoy seamless integration, while those selecting iGrafx value comprehensive customization and strategic enhancements despite higher costs.

Appian excels in rapid low-code deployment and robust integration capabilities. In comparison, Studio Creatio offers strong no-code functionalities and comprehensive CRM features, ideal for budget-conscious buyers seeking flexibility.

Appian's low-code capabilities enable rapid enterprise-level integration, appealing to tech buyers needing complex solutions. In comparison, KiSSFLOW's drag-and-drop interface suits non-technical teams seeking user-friendly tools with seamless integrations, making it ideal for straightforward workflow configurations with easier deployment and cost-effective options.

Appian offers competitive pricing and customer support, excelling in process modeling and low-code development for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Boomi AtomSphere Flow provides valuable features like scalability and cloud-native capabilities, appealing to enterprises seeking broader integration options and long-term growth.

Appian provides enterprise-grade scalability and seamless integrations, ideal for large-scale operations. In comparison, AgilePoint offers comprehensive features and cost-effective pricing, appealing to small to medium enterprises. Appian's business process management excels, while AgilePoint enhances speed with workflow templates and flexible deployments.

Appian appeals with user-friendly low-code tools and quick deployment, attracting tech buyers seeking rapid results. In comparison, Newgen OmniFlow offers advanced features with robust document management, appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive capabilities and long-term returns despite more complex deployment.

Appian offers rapid development and quick integration through a low-code platform, ideal for agile environments. In comparison, OpenText AppWorks provides extensive integration capabilities, benefiting large-scale applications with broad tool integration and effective system streamlining for comprehensive business environments.

OpenText 360 for SharePoint attracts tech buyers with its superior Microsoft integration and strong document management, benefiting businesses committed to Microsoft infrastructure. In comparison, Appian offers flexibility and scalability, with low-code development and extensive automation, ideal for process-focused organizations seeking growth.

Appian's design is ideal for complex integrations, while ProcessMaker's simplicity benefits those seeking ease of use. In comparison, ProcessMaker stands out for quick deployment and support, whereas Appian's customized approach might suit those wanting adaptable, long-term solutions despite higher initial costs.

Appian stands out for its low-code capabilities, offering flexibility and simplicity for tech buyers seeking rapid deployment and process automation. In comparison, TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM provides robust options for complex integrations, appealing to enterprises with intricate architectural needs and advanced process requirements.

Appian offers robust low-code development and quick integration, ideal for rapid deployment seeking quick ROI. In comparison, AuraQuantic's versatility and comprehensive customization cater to complex processes with a cost-efficient model, appealing to those prioritizing long-term value and detailed implementation support.

Genpact Cora SeQuence offers robust automation and detailed customization, ideal for complex workflows but with potentially higher setup costs. In comparison, Appian provides intuitive design and quick deployment, appealing to those valuing ease of integration and a competitive pricing model.

Appian attracts tech buyers with ease of deployment and cost-effectiveness, ideal for rapid implementations. In comparison, OpenText MBPM appeals to those needing feature-rich capabilities and complex process automation, offering value through its extensive toolset and adaptability despite higher initial costs.

Appian offers affordable pricing and strong support, ideal for budget-conscious buyers, with excellent mobile and security features. In comparison, Agiloft Workflow and BPM excels in customization and no-code flexibility, appealing to businesses seeking tailored solutions with a budget-friendly setup.

Appian offers strong automation and low-code development for diverse business needs. In comparison, Novacura Flow emphasizes flexible integration and workflow customization, appealing to businesses needing tailored solutions. Appian's comprehensive resources aid deployment, while Novacura Flow's adaptability justifies higher initial investments for better long-term value.

Appian excels in automation and integration, offering cloud deployment and strong customer service. In comparison, WebRatio stands out with its model-driven, low-code features and flexibility, supporting complex architectures and offering cloud and on-premise deployment options despite higher initial costs.

Appian excels in low-code development and integration, appealing to those seeking quick deployment. In comparison, Ultimus offers advanced features for complex workflows, attracting businesses needing customization. Appian's budget-friendly pricing contrasts with Ultimus's higher long-term ROI potential through enhanced operations.