Top 10 Appian Alternatives

Appian excels in rapid development and flexible deployment. In comparison, Hyland OnBase offers robust security and document control. Appian suits companies needing agile BPM, while Hyland OnBase is ideal for sectors requiring strict compliance, offering strong audit trails and integration flexibility.

Appian excels with rapid deployment and extensive automation, appealing to those seeking comprehensive business process management. In comparison, Nintex offers robust workflows and integration with SharePoint, appealing to tech buyers prioritizing ease of use and integration flexibility.

Appian excels in business process modeling and low-code development, ideal for rapid application creation and seamless case management. In comparison, AWS Step Functions offer strong cloud service integration and task parallelization within the AWS ecosystem, appealing to those prioritizing cloud adaptability and detailed workflow visualization.

Appian excels in rapid application development, integrating seamlessly with existing systems and providing strong automation capabilities. In comparison, ADONIS stands out with comprehensive modeling capabilities and strong analytics features. Appian offers faster deployment and responsive customer service, while ADONIS provides extensive training resources and structured deployment.

Appian's features capitalize on rapid development with low-code, while IBM Business Automation Workflow excels in integrating RPA for complex processes. In comparison, tech buyers benefit from Appian's cloud flexibility and affordability, whereas IBM's comprehensive functionality appeals to enterprises prioritizing extensive infrastructure.

Appian focuses on rapid low-code development and strong process modeling, ideal for agile enterprises. In comparison, ARIS Cloud enhances business process modeling and collaboration. Appian's competitive pricing offers fast ROI, while ARIS Cloud aligns with cloud cost savings due to reduced infrastructure expenses.

Appian offers a low-code environment enhancing rapid deployment and flexible pricing. In comparison, Oracle BPM focuses on robust integration capabilities with established standards. Appian appeals to those seeking cost-effectiveness and speed, while Oracle BPM suits enterprises needing comprehensive features and integration strength.

Appian offers an intuitive design and seamless integration, ideal for rapid application development. In comparison, BIC Platform is preferred for feature richness and robust process modeling. Appian's efficiency supports faster ROI, whereas BIC Platform's in-depth capabilities justify long-term strategic investment.

Appian excels with competitive pricing and powerful automation for quick returns. In comparison, iGrafx Process360 Live Platform offers advanced process insights and specialized support, appealing to those needing comprehensive analysis and governance, despite a higher initial investment.

Appian excels in rapid development with low-code capabilities and robust integration for complex workflows. In comparison, Studio Creatio offers a flexible platform for process automation with no-code options. Appian provides extensive deployment choices, while Studio Creatio stands out for flexibility and reasonable pricing.

Appian provides rapid deployment and robust capabilities suited for enterprise-level use. In comparison, KiSSFLOW offers ease of use and quick setup, ideal for non-technical users. Appian's higher costs bring extensive features, while KiSSFLOW's affordability and simplicity attract smaller organizations.

Appian excels in low-code development speed and ease of use, offering flexibility suitable for diverse business needs. In comparison, Boomi prioritizes integration flexibility, optimal for connecting multiple systems. Appian offers broader deployment options, while Boomi emphasizes cloud-based scalability for smaller businesses.

Appian offers advanced workflow automation and rapid application development. In comparison, Newgen OmniFlow provides robust document management and integration capabilities. Appian is suitable for quick deployment needs, while Newgen excels with flexible, modular solutions. Appian focuses on comprehensive features, whereas Newgen emphasizes scalable customizability.

Appian excels in integration, streamlining processes for businesses needing connectivity. In comparison, AgilePoint's adaptability and customization make it ideal for versatile solutions. AgilePoint emphasizes swift deployment with strong support, while Appian's automation may require longer setup but offers significant integration benefits.

Appian offers a low-code platform for rapid application development and agile workflow management. In comparison, OpenText AppWorks emphasizes strong third-party integration and scalable workflow capabilities, making it suitable for complex business processes that require efficient process monitoring and system integration.

OpenText 360 for SharePoint excels in document management and SharePoint integration, making it ideal for secure workflows. In comparison, Appian's rapid low-code development and adaptability make it suitable for businesses seeking fast application deployment and efficient process modeling.

Appian offers advanced features with AI-driven automation and robust integration capabilities. In comparison, ProcessMaker attracts with cost efficiency and a straightforward approach. Appian's cloud deployment is faster, whereas ProcessMaker offers flexible on-premise and cloud options. Appian provides higher ROI despite higher initial costs.

Appian excels with low-code rapid development and diverse deployment options enhancing ROI. In comparison, TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM offers stable workflow features suitable for complex data management. Tech buyers might prefer Appian for intuitive architecture or TIBCO for workflow stability.

Appian excels in automation and third-party integration. In comparison, AuraQuantic offers advanced process management and customizable workflows. Appian facilitates rapid cloud deployment, while AuraQuantic provides flexible deployment options. Appian involves higher initial costs, whereas AuraQuantic presents a cost-effective, feature-rich solution.

Genpact Cora SeQuence appeals with its straightforward deployment and competitive pricing, ideal for businesses seeking operational efficiency. In comparison, Appian's low-code environment and extensive integrations cater to those valuing rapid development and scalability, justifying its higher investment.

Appian offers flexibility and scalability via intuitive process modeling and strong mobile access, making it suitable for complex processes. In comparison, OpenText MBPM excels in document-centric workflows with robust content management. Appian facilitates faster deployment, while OpenText MBPM provides cost-effective infrastructure options.

Appian focuses on low-code development and quick integration for rapid deployment. In comparison, Agiloft Workflow and BPM prioritizes adaptability with robust customization and contract management tools, attracting businesses with complex needs. Agiloft's comprehensive feature set may justify its higher initial cost.

Appian offers rapid deployment with its low-code platform ensuring scalability. In comparison, Novacura Flow excels in integration, meeting specific customization needs. Appian simplifies deployment with a cloud-native approach, while Novacura Flow provides flexible infrastructure options.

Appian offers robust process automation with superior support, appealing to enterprises focused on efficiency. In comparison, WebRatio's rapid application development and flexibility attract those prioritizing speed and adaptability. Appian's ROI is driven by efficiencies, while WebRatio provides cost-effective solutions for agile projects.

Appian stands out with competitive pricing and quick deployment, making it ideal for companies seeking fast ROI. In comparison, Ultimus offers extensive customization, appealing to businesses needing long-term value and scalability despite its higher initial setup cost and intricate implementation.