Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Appian vs GitHub CoPilot comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 5, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.9
Calculating ROI from Appian is challenging, but many report significant benefits, improved satisfaction, and increased adoption across organizations.
Sentiment score
7.3
GitHub CoPilot offers significant ROI with cost savings and productivity boosts, though perceptions vary by project and user.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.4
Appian's customer service is generally effective, with quick responses for critical issues but needs improved response times for complex problems.
Sentiment score
6.5
GitHub CoPilot support varies, with mixed user experiences; documentation and community assistance are often used over direct contact.
Their customer service is responsive, and the team is very prompt for support.
With a large user base, it covers a wide range of questions, from simple to complex, ensuring that answers are available.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
Appian effectively scales for medium to large enterprises, managing various user sizes despite occasional hardware and integration challenges.
Sentiment score
7.3
GitHub CoPilot is praised for high scalability, supporting hundreds of users, though sometimes faces performance issues under heavy traffic.
With an enterprise plan, there are no limitations, so scalability is not an issue.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
Appian is stable with high uptime, but performance relies on best practices, especially under heavy data processing loads.
Sentiment score
7.6
GitHub CoPilot is praised for functionality despite stability issues, with reliability improving and suggestions for proxy handling improvements.
It depends on how it has been designed and how it has been configured.
In most cases, it does not generate irrelevant code.
 

Room For Improvement

Appian users seek improvements in UI customization, integration flexibility, efficiency, mobile features, pricing, and enhanced training materials.
GitHub CoPilot needs accuracy, integration, stability, and affordability, plus broader language support and improved user control for better engagement.
If there is a very complex process that includes a lot of data transitioning and memory-centric processes, it consumes a lot of memory.
There is excellent support across various code editors like JetBrains, VS Code, and NeoGen.
 

Setup Cost

Appian's pricing offers flexibility but is often seen as costly, yet competitive with IBM and Oracle for licensing options.
GitHub Copilot offers free and paid versions with flexible pricing starting at $10, rated affordable by users.
On the pricier side, both Appian and Pega are enterprise-level solutions, placing them on the slightly higher side.
They recently made Copilot free to use up to a certain limit, which is a positive change.
 

Valuable Features

Appian offers low-code development, intuitive modeling, seamless integration, and scalable deployment for streamlined business process automation.
GitHub CoPilot boosts productivity with code suggestions, auto-completion, and multi-language support, enhancing efficiency and rapid development.
It is easy for me to define the process and create configurable workflows.
Copilot is integrated into my environment, providing the context and the bigger picture of how the code is used throughout the project.
 

Categories and Ranking

Appian
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
5th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
60
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (5th), Process Automation (4th), Low-Code Development Platforms (4th), Process Mining (6th)
GitHub CoPilot
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
9th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
AI Code Assistants (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of Appian is 9.8%, up from 8.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub CoPilot is 5.0%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Rapid Application Development Software
 

Featured Reviews

Srimanta Pandit - PeerSpot reviewer
Flexible, improves operational efficiency, and reduces the time taken to complete processes
The solution’s turnaround time for development is better compared to other tools. The solution enables fast development. The traceability of the processor is good. There is much more governance and regulations on the processers. The tool reduces the time of the processes by 30% to 40%. The solution’s low-code aspect has greatly impacted the development and deployment speed. One of the major reasons we are using the product is that we can reuse the modules. The developers can reuse all the modules. It enables us to make subsequent developments in less time. The prebuilt modules can be deployed within two to three weeks. The tool is very flexible. Compared to other platforms, the Appian product team was agile in quickly customizing things for us.
TarunRevalla - PeerSpot reviewer
Saves time with context-aware code suggestions and seamless integration
In terms of improvements for Copilot, I haven't considered much since it offers many useful interactions. It integrates well with GitHub repositories, tracks changes on PRs, and provides valuable suggestions where applicable. There is excellent support across various code editors like JetBrains, VS Code, and NeoGen. I also run many automations within GitHub. When an NPR is raised, it automatically provides suggestions, which is part of the enterprise edition without limitations. While I don't see immediate room for improvement, one suggestion is for Copilot to provide specific suggestions for certain lines of code instead of rewriting entire sections. If the tool could focus on specific lines where changes are suggested, it would save time and reduce server load.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
30%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
10%
Healthcare Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?
Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...
Is Appian a suitable solution for beginners who have no additional preparation?
Appian is actually pretty big on educating its users, including with courses that reward you with certifications. There is a whole section on their company’s website where you can check out the edu...
Is it easy to set up Appian or did you have to resort to professional help?
We had some issues when we were setting up Appian. It was quite surprising, since this is a low-code tool which, in its essence, means it is meant for business users and inexperienced beginners. So...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?
They recently made Copilot free to use up to a certain limit, which is a positive change. The pricing aligns with other AI agents like Chargebee and Anthropic Cloud. The ability to switch between m...
What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?
In terms of improvements for Copilot, I haven't considered much since it offers many useful interactions. It integrates well with GitHub repositories, tracks changes on PRs, and provides valuable s...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Appian BPM, Appian AnyWhere, Appian Enterprise BPMS
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Hansard Global plc, Punch Taverns, Pirelli, Crawford & Company, EDP Renewables, Queensland Government Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning (, Bank of Tennessee
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Appian vs. GitHub CoPilot and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.