Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Appian vs Control-M comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 29, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.4
Appian's technical support is responsive and helpful, though some users desire quicker response times and better prioritization.
Sentiment score
7.4
Control-M support is praised for responsiveness and expertise, despite occasional response delays and challenges with ticketing and documentation.
They do not always provide timely support.
Solutions are available on the web.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.9
Appian requires improved tutorials, flexible UI design, better Microsoft integration, enhanced automation, and seamless mobile UX for new users.
Sentiment score
4.5
Control-M needs enhanced reporting, flexibility, automation, integration, reduced costs, and a user-friendly web-based interface for improved usability.
There should be an automation system for developers to set it up more easily and quickly.
The UI can be challenging for new users due to its learning curve.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
Appian is scalable and flexible, supporting integration, distributed environments, and cloud deployment, but faces challenges with large data volumes.
Sentiment score
7.7
Control-M offers excellent scalability and adaptability, efficiently handling significant workloads across diverse IT environments for enterprise growth.
As the workload on Control-M increases, its scalability is much higher.
It can absorb more workload wherever needed.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
5.8
Appian's pricing ranges from $90 to $2000+ monthly, often cheaper than Pega, but complex and expensive for on-premises setups.
Sentiment score
5.3
Control-M pricing is costly for small enterprises but seen as valuable by larger ones due to its features.
Pricing is generally affordable, though some features cost a bit more.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
Appian is highly stable with 99.99% uptime, minimal issues, and strong user satisfaction regarding performance and ease of use.
Sentiment score
7.7
Control-M is praised for its stability, reliability, and improved performance, crucial for handling complex, high-volume operations efficiently.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.3
Appian excels in rapid, low-code development, seamless integration, extensive automation, superior interface, and excellent technical support, enhancing productivity and scalability.
Sentiment score
8.3
Control-M excels in user-friendly automation, integration, and scheduling, enhancing workflow efficiency and reliability across diverse applications.
Automation is more advanced, deployment is fast, and version control has been simplified.
It is integrated into our CI/CD pipeline.
 

Categories and Ranking

Appian
Ranking in Process Automation
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
59
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (5th), Rapid Application Development Software (6th), Low-Code Development Platforms (4th), Process Mining (6th)
Control-M
Ranking in Process Automation
3rd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
119
Ranking in other categories
Managed File Transfer (MFT) (4th), Workload Automation (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Appian is 10.2%, down from 10.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Control-M is 4.2%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Devashish Mishra - PeerSpot reviewer
Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable
To determine whether a platform, such as Appian, is suitable for your domain industry, you must first assess whether it offers any out-of-the-box features relevant to your needs. If it does, utilizing that platform would be the best option since it already has the required functionalities. If the available features do not align with your requirements, consider choosing a platform that can easily build such services. Attempting to modify pre-existing features on a platform is a challenging task, and any upgrades to the platform could pose further issues for users. The solution has high performance but the main issue is the lack of customization after deploying it. I rate Appian an eight out of ten.
Pedro Fuentes - PeerSpot reviewer
Cost-effective, excellent support, and centralized access and control
They have a department that handles requests for enhancements. I talked to Control-M guys back in October or November when they had a gathering here in Atlanta. We talked about not being able to go back in history in Helix Control-M for more than two weeks. We submitted a request for enhancement. They told us that they are working on it, and they are thinking of expanding that to 30 days. We would like to see it expand to 90 days, but they are working on it. In Control-M, we were able to go back 180 days, but that was on-prem. The storage of that data was on our own servers. We know that storage is money, and we do not expect them to store that much of the data, but at least 30 to 60 days seem proper.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
823,795 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
29%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
28%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?
Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...
Is Appian a suitable solution for beginners who have no additional preparation?
Appian is actually pretty big on educating its users, including with courses that reward you with certifications. There is a whole section on their company’s website where you can check out the edu...
Is it easy to set up Appian or did you have to resort to professional help?
We had some issues when we were setting up Appian. It was quite surprising, since this is a low-code tool which, in its essence, means it is meant for business users and inexperienced beginners. So...
How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?
Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and th...
What do you like most about Control-M?
First of all, the shift from manual to automation has been valuable. We have a tool that can automate.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Control-M?
Pricing is generally affordable, though some features cost a bit more.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Appian BPM, Appian AnyWhere, Appian Enterprise BPMS
Control M
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Hansard Global plc, Punch Taverns, Pirelli, Crawford & Company, EDP Renewables, Queensland Government Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning (, Bank of Tennessee
CARFAX, Tampa General Hospital, Navistar, Amadeus, Raymond James, Railinc
Find out what your peers are saying about Appian vs. Control-M and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
823,795 professionals have used our research since 2012.