Appian and OpenText Operations Orchestration are two competing products in the process automation field. Appian has the upper hand in customer support and cost satisfaction, while OpenText is favored for its extensive feature set, appealing to those who prioritize functionality over cost.
Features: Appian supports rapid custom application creation with low-code development and a comprehensive process design model. It offers strong integration capabilities and business process management features. OpenText excels in automation for complex IT workflows and includes integrated automation libraries. It supports horizontal scaling and distributed IT infrastructure management.
Room for Improvement: Appian could enhance its customization options and improve its process understanding tools. More advanced analytics features would be beneficial. OpenText might streamline its user interface for better usability, reduce deployment complexity, and improve initial setup efficiency.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Appian provides a cloud-based model that allows for quick deployment and strong customer support, ensuring easy onboarding. OpenText, with a focus on IT environments, has a more complex deployment, requiring advanced technical support. Appian favors business process automation, while OpenText leans towards technical IT operations.
Pricing and ROI: Appian offers a cost-effective pricing model that allows faster ROI with lower initial setup costs. In contrast, OpenText demands higher setup costs, but its advanced features aim to provide higher long-term value for comprehensive IT operations automation.
They see return on investment in terms of cost savings, time savings, more efficient processes, and more efficient employees.
Appian is very efficient, allowing us to build a lot of applications within a financial year, making it cost-effective.
The technical support for Appian rates as 10 out of 10 because they have a great support team.
Their customer service is responsive, and the team is very prompt for support.
The technical support is generally good.
On a scale of one to 10, Appian rates as a nine for scalability.
Initially, without much coding, I can easily handle five thousand records.
Appian is scalable, but it depends on how you build your applications.
It depends on how it has been designed and how it has been configured.
The stability of Appian would rate as nine, as it's a stable environment.
It has room to improve for use cases where the users are public facing, where anonymous users could come to a site and run a business workflow or interact with some data.
I would like to see more enhancement in the user interface to allow more freedom in designing the sites and pages.
If there is a very complex process that includes a lot of data transitioning and memory-centric processes, it consumes a lot of memory.
On the pricier side, both Appian and Pega are enterprise-level solutions, placing them on the slightly higher side.
The pricing of Appian is based on the number of users and generally ranges from 70 to 100 USD per user per month.
The price of Appian, on a competitive landscape, is a little bit on the higher side for companies, rating maybe a 6.5.
Appian is aiding in leveraging AI technologies in multiple ways: one way is for developers, as they make development efficient and quick by enabling developer co-pilots across various phases of the application, which helps design Appian quickly and provides suggestions along the way.
The zero-code integration feature is remarkable, allowing for ease of data transfer and workflow enhancement.
It is easy for me to define the process and create configurable workflows.
Appian is a unified low-code platform and solution used by businesses to build enterprise applications and workflows. This product adapts to the needs of clients and the technologies they are already using to combine their data in a single workflow and maximize resources. The platform has four main components through which it transforms the work process for companies of various sizes. They are:
Appian is utilized across a diverse set of industries, including automotive and manufacturing, energy and utilities, education, financial services, telecom and media, transportation, retail, insurance, healthcare, and life sciences. The most frequent use cases of Appian are customer journey, governance, risk and compliance, operational efficiency, supply chain, distributed order management, and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) management.
Appian Features
Appian has various features that allow users to create solutions for their businesses. These features can be separated into a few groups according to function, including automation, low-code application development, and integrations and data. Some of the most frequently used features of Appian include:
Appian Benefits
The benefits of using Appian include:
Reviews from Real Users
A practice leader - digital process automation at a computer software company values Appian highly because the product is easy to develop, low-code, and has a good user interface.
Alan G., an advisory board member at Codecon VR, Appian offers a clear application life cycle, easy to learn documentation, and comes with a fundamentals course.
OpenText Operations Orchestration (OO) automates, integrates, and orchestrates any IT process, on cloud or off. Automate using low-code/no-code workflow authoring options. Integrate with an API rich, extensible platform. Centrally orchestrate powerful, scalable workflows.
With OO you can automate and orchestrate infrastructure automation and IT processes from service fulfillment to incident remediation, cloud service delivery, and disaster recovery.
Operations Orchestration offers the tools needed to provide enterprise wide orchestration capabilities:
Operations Orchestration offers the following components:
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
