Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Operations Orchestration vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.3
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is scalable, adaptable, and reliable for managing diverse system requirements in various enterprise sizes.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.2
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform simplifies automation, enhances versatility, and reduces errors and deployment times with its user-friendly features.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
5.7
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform needs improved UI, network support, modules, Windows integration, pricing, AI coding, and collaboration tools.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is highly rated for its stability, reliability, and performance, with issues typically user-related.
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.8
Customer service for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is mixed, with both high praise and complaints about response times and complexity.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.3
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform provides a cost-effective, open-source solution with flexible licensing and valuable support, despite some premium costs.
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Operations Orchest...
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
25
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (22nd), Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (21st)
Red Hat Ansible Automation ...
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
67
Ranking in other categories
Release Automation (3rd), Configuration Management (1st), Network Automation (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

OpenText Operations Orchestration and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. OpenText Operations Orchestration is designed for Process Automation and holds a mindshare of 1.1%, down 1.5% compared to last year.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, on the other hand, focuses on Configuration Management, holds 16.6% mindshare, up 16.4% since last year.
Process Automation
Configuration Management
 

Featured Reviews

HiteshKumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers good automation features to users
Only the tool's support can be a drawback where improvements are needed. The support can be too slow, so we have to wait due to a longer response time. There is also no live access for e-learning purposes, as no one is available on the platform. As time passes, new things are implemented which are easy to access. There is clear documentation of the solution, making it a good product for all. The product's screenshots and concepts are clear. In the tool, the first step is clear, and the second step will be after the third step based on what you need. You can add the screenshots. As the product's documentation is clear, the installation can be done very easily. In the future, I want the tool to offer AI, as it can make it easy for users to get help.
Muralitharan KS - PeerSpot reviewer
Efficient server management and detailed reporting with flexible deployment capabilities
We are primarily using Ansible for automation purposes as it is a configuration management tool. It is utilized for various activities such as DNS activity, changes to web servers, virtual host settings, and other day-to-day tasks, all of which are templated in Ansible Ansible allows us to manage…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
29%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Healthcare Company
7%
Educational Organization
30%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Operations Orchestration?
The tool is expensive. I rate the tool a six if one is cheap and ten is very expensive.
What needs improvement with Operations Orchestration?
Only the tool's support can be a drawback where improvements are needed. The support can be too slow, so we have to wait due to a longer response time. There is also no live access for e-learning p...
What advice do you have for others considering Operations Orchestration?
There is a need to maintain the product. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.
What is the difference between Red Hat Satellite and Ansible?
Red Hat Satellite has proven to be a worthwhile investment for me. Both its patch management and license management have been outstanding. If you have a large environment, patching systems is much ...
How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?
Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...
What do you like most about Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?
The most valuable features of the solution are automation and patching.
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus Operations Orchestration, Operations Orchestration, HPOO, HPE Operations Orchestration
Ansible
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Casablanca INT, Internet Initiative Japan, Railway Information Systems, Samsung SDS, and Turkcell.
HootSuite Media, Inc., Cloud Physics, Narrative, BinckBank
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, BMC and others in Process Automation. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.