

Appian and BizTalk Server compete in the business process management and integration sectors. Appian appears to have an edge due to its flexible pricing and low-code model, which enhances rapid development and deployment.
Features:Appian offers rapid development with its low-code platform, enabling quick implementation of applications. Its case management and process modeling capabilities allow for diverse application development. Appian's ease of use is bolstered by its seamless integration and architecture, facilitating intuitive operations. BizTalk Server's strengths lie in its robust integration with various systems through adapters, the capability to handle complex mappings and orchestrations, and its stable platform for long-running transactions.
Room for Improvement:Appian can improve by offering more cost-effective solutions for its deployment, enhancing customization options for its UI components, and expanding its integration capabilities with third-party systems. BizTalk Server needs to address its substantial licensing costs, ensure better utilization of its features to justify expenses, and expand its cloud adapter options to remain competitive against newer cloud-based solutions.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Appian's deployment is generally straightforward, thanks to its low-code environment, with strong customer support that assists through the project lifecycle. BizTalk Server's deployment can be more complex, particularly for organizations new to integration solutions, but it benefits from longstanding support structures within the Microsoft ecosystem.
Pricing and ROI:Appian's pricing reflects its capabilities in automation and BPM, although it can be perceived as expensive. However, the ROI is supported by labor and operational efficiencies achieved through its platform. BizTalk Server's high licensing costs make it essential to fully leverage its capabilities to ensure cost-effectiveness, particularly in comparison to other more affordable integration solutions.
Using Appian is saving us five full-time employees, which is significant since we currently have only four team members.
They see return on investment in terms of cost savings, time savings, more efficient processes, and more efficient employees.
The Return on Investment is significant.
Now the direction is to move away from BizTalk Server to IBM WebMethods, which has more features compared to BizTalk Server.
BizTalk Server's ROI is comparatively higher than Boomi and Workato.
I would give Appian's customer support 10 out of 10 due to their next-level support.
Their customer service is responsive, and the team is very prompt for support.
The technical support for Appian rates as 10 out of 10 because they have a great support team.
On a scale of one to 10, Appian rates as a nine for scalability.
Our volume has increased by 20% in the two years since using Appian, and it can handle the increased volume effectively.
Initially, without much coding, I can easily handle five thousand records.
It is time for low-code, no-code, and a quick go-to-market should be faster.
We have tested Appian during peak usage and off-peak times, and we have not experienced any issues such as lagging or system disruptions.
It depends on how it has been designed and how it has been configured.
The stability of Appian would rate as nine, as it's a stable environment.
BizTalk Server's stability rates about eight or nine out of ten.
BizTalk Server is good for small companies but not for big companies.
It has room to improve for use cases where the users are public facing, where anonymous users could come to a site and run a business workflow or interact with some data.
Appian can be improved by adding a geo-location tagging feature, which would be really helpful for identifying remitter addresses.
It also suggests the best automation process that can be configured within Appian.
BizTalk Server needs improvements, especially because we use it for EDI messaging, and it would be very useful to have enhanced tracking capabilities for message tracking and archiving of messages.
We initially planned to move to Azure Integration Services, but there are challenges with AIS, so now we are evaluating WebMethods IO.
Appian provides value for money, is easy to use, has a straightforward setup procedure, and offers great support from the Appian team.
On the pricier side, both Appian and Pega are enterprise-level solutions, placing them on the slightly higher side.
The pricing of Appian is based on the number of users and generally ranges from 70 to 100 USD per user per month.
The only thing I heard is that it's not inexpensive.
The zero-code integration feature is remarkable, allowing for ease of data transfer and workflow enhancement.
Appian is aiding in leveraging AI technologies in multiple ways: one way is for developers, as they make development efficient and quick by enabling developer co-pilots across various phases of the application, which helps design Appian quickly and provides suggestions along the way.
After switching to Appian, it can extract data from MT103, eliminating the need for manual data entry.
Boomi has advantages over BizTalk Server because it is more flexible, low-code, no-code, easy to implement, and has a fast go-to-market.
BizTalk Server offers workflow functionality that I find very effective for process automation.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Appian | 4.5% |
| BizTalk Server | 1.1% |
| Other | 94.4% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 44 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
Appian is a unified low-code platform and solution used by businesses to build enterprise applications and workflows. This product adapts to the needs of clients and the technologies they are already using to combine their data in a single workflow and maximize resources. The platform has four main components through which it transforms the work process for companies of various sizes. They are:
Appian is utilized across a diverse set of industries, including automotive and manufacturing, energy and utilities, education, financial services, telecom and media, transportation, retail, insurance, healthcare, and life sciences. The most frequent use cases of Appian are customer journey, governance, risk and compliance, operational efficiency, supply chain, distributed order management, and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) management.
Appian Features
Appian has various features that allow users to create solutions for their businesses. These features can be separated into a few groups according to function, including automation, low-code application development, and integrations and data. Some of the most frequently used features of Appian include:
Appian Benefits
The benefits of using Appian include:
Reviews from Real Users
A practice leader - digital process automation at a computer software company values Appian highly because the product is easy to develop, low-code, and has a good user interface.
Alan G., an advisory board member at Codecon VR, Appian offers a clear application life cycle, easy to learn documentation, and comes with a fundamentals course.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.