Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs Pillir comparison

Boomi and Pillir are both solutions in the Low-Code Development Platforms category. Boomi is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.8, while Pillir is ranked #39. Boomi holds a 0.7% mindshare in LCDP, compared to Pillir’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Boomi users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Pillir users who would recommend it.

Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Read 6 Boomi AtomSphere Flow reviews

374 Views
310 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Pillir

Read 2 Pillir reviews

117 Views
41 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Pillir

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Boomi AtomSphere Flow and Pillir offer distinct advantages in integration and rapid application development, respectively. Boomi AtomSphere Flow has a competitive edge with its integration features, while Pillir stands out for quick application development via its low-code capabilities.

Features: Boomi AtomSphere Flow is praised for its integration capabilities and flexibility in connecting various systems, which users find invaluable for complex data management tasks. Pillir, on the other hand, excels in its low-code development environment, allowing users to quickly build and deploy applications with minimal coding. While Boomi offers robust integration features, Pillir's ease of application development provides significant time savings.

Room for Improvement: Users of Boomi AtomSphere Flow highlight the need for improved API management and better support for complex workflows. Meanwhile, Pillir users suggest enhancements in the documentation provided and more extensive debugging tools. Boomi's users seem more focused on advanced integration improvements, whereas Pillir's users seek better development support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Boomi AtomSphere Flow is noted for its seamless deployment process and responsive customer service, making it easier for users to get started and receive assistance. Pillir also provides efficient deployment but receives higher marks for continuous customer support throughout the development cycle. Both products are user-friendly in terms of deployment, but Pillir's ongoing support is a differentiator.

Pricing and ROI: Users find Boomi AtomSphere Flow to be a cost-effective solution with a good ROI, especially given its robust feature set. Pillir's pricing is perceived as higher, but users feel the rapid development capabilities justify the investment, leading to a potentially higher ROI in fast-paced development environments. Pricing perceptions differ, but both tools deliver value aligned with their strengths.

To learn more, read our detailed Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. Pillir Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. Pillir

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (17th)

Pillir

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

39th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (46th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Boomi AtomSphere Flow is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pillir is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Low-Code Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

NarendraThota

Vice President of Technology Services at SAge IT inc

A tool that helps save money in the long run with a need to offer users the ability to deal with large datasets

From an improvement perspective, Boomi AtomSphere Flow should come up with the ability to deal with large datasets. The data integration part is a concern when you try to connect to an on-premises environment since the latency is high, making it an aspect where improvements are required to reduce the latency. Whenever Boomi AtomSphere Flow gets integrated with applications like SAP, it is important to ensure that what you develop is user-friendly, which is a process that takes time, especially when compared with webMethods.io or TIBCO. The development effort with Boomi AtomSphere Flow is more when you compare it with other tools, which is a drawback and an area of improvement.

Read full review

it_user130401

Application Developer Manager at Cerner Corporation

Helpful dashboard, supports offline capabilities for SAP, professional support, and a simple pricing model

I believe that this is the only product in the market that truly supports offline capabilities in an SAP environment. We have people going through all of their shifts without connectivity, yet it automatically later synchronizes well with SAP, without creating extra documents or anything like that. The ability to take ABAP code and automatically convert it to a mobile app and then adjust it to our needs is something that I haven't seen in any other low-code solution on the market, and it has been life-changing for us. I love how easy it is to manage the design of the process using drag and drop. I know they are working to make the developer experience even better, and I'm very excited about it. The modernizer element that converts existing ABAP business logic to the cloud-native mobile-friendly solution is a very powerful tool that I haven't seen in the market.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Boomi AtomSphere Flow is integrated through APIs, it exposes the API and any product can call the APIs in the queue. Additionally, it is secure."

"Boomi enhances application integration with scalability, reliability, and security."

"The most valuable features include the ease of designing Boomi flows and the significant cost savings and reduced time to market they offer our clients."

"Boomi AtomSphere Flow is very easy to develop and maintain compared to other tools like SAP HANA Cloud Integration or Cloud Platform."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its core integration with Boomi AtomSphere because it's extremely easy to tap into any informational system of a company."

"Boomi AtomSphere Flow gives us flexibility."

"In the long run, if you have a good team, solution architect, and an architect from Boomi's side, then it is a good tool from an ROI perspective since it can help save money."

"I love how they took the MIT Scratch concept and implemented it into the in-app backend. It makes the app creation so much more intuitive and easy to use."

"I believe that this is the only product in the market that truly supports offline capabilities in an SAP environment."

Cons

"Boomi is not as flexible compared to other integration products like IBM's. For complex integration scenarios, Boomi could improve its flexibility."

"The solution's user interface building needs improvement."

"The solution could improve by being more user-friendly. The whole solution is used through an interface and it could always be improved."

"The technical support is rated around 6.5 to seven out of ten. It lacks clarity on how to reach out, write emails, or understand responsiveness."

"There is room for improvement in Boomi's AI capabilities."

"Its stability could be improved."

"The development effort with Boomi AtomSphere Flow is more when you compare it with other tools, which is a drawback and an area of improvement."

"While we're not in a place of letting LOB analysts build apps, at some point, we may want to give them a bit more freedom - as long as we can limit their ability to harm the ERP data. I would like to see more tools pertaining to this area."

"The modernizer element should convert a higher percentage of the ABAP code, moving it from approximately 75%, closer to 100%."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When you use Boomi AtomSphere Flow in production, you have to pay for licenses. The solution is not expensive but it could be cheaper."

"Since its pricing positioning has a different construction with respect to its competitors, the solution is sometimes way more expensive and sometimes less expensive."

"It is straightforward consumption based on the number of end-users."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Non Profit

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Boomi AtomSphere Flow?

The solution's most valuable feature is its core integration with Boomi AtomSphere because it's extremely easy to tap into any informational system of a company.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Flow?

The pricing is good for a small-scale company like ours, and the licensing cost is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Flow?

Boomi is not as flexible compared to other integration products like IBM's. For complex integration scenarios, Boomi could improve its flexibility. Moreover, it lacks features like the ESQL scripti...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Camunda vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Compared 26% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Compared 18% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Compared 16% of the time

Pega Platform vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Compared 14% of the time

Appian vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Compared 14% of the time

More Boomi AtomSphere Flow Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

April 2025

Download Boomi AtomSphere Flow product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid Application Development Software

March 2025

Download Pillir product report

Also Known As

Boomi Flow

appsFreedom

Overview

Boomi Flow is a modern, cloud-native service for creating customer journeys and automating simple and sophisticated workflows that accelerate your business outcomes.

Boomi

Pillir is the developer of a low-code/no-code, cloud-native platform that enables organizations to develop mission-critical apps 20 times faster than traditional methods, leveraging the power of SAP’s digital core from any device, with or without connectivity. Pillir’s platform automatically converts legacy custom business processes to modern cloud-native applications, available on the web and via any mobile device. It enables organizations at any stage of their SAP journey to accelerate their digital transformation, enabling innovation at the edge while maintaining a clean SAP digital core.

Pillir

Sample Customers

bioventus, AM Transport Services

Dole packaed food, Par Pacific, Brown Forman (Jack Daniels and other brands), Mobile Mini, Nabors

Buyer's Guide

Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. Pillir

March 2025

Free Report: Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. Pillir

Find out what your peers are saying about Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. Pillir and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. Pillir report.

See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.