Boomi iPaaS vs Qlik Replicate comparison

The compared Boomi and Qlik solutions aren't in the same category. Boomi is ranked #6 in PaaS , with an average rating of 7.3, and holds a 8.9% mindshare in the category. Qlik is ranked #16 in DI , with an average rating of 8.1, and holds a 3.4% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of Boomi users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Qlik users who would recommend it.

Boomi iPaaS

Read 25 Boomi iPaaS reviews

2,248 Views
1,550 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Qlik Replicate

Read 15 Qlik Replicate reviews

4,979 Views
4,167 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Boomi iPaaS

Qlik Replicate

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Boomi iPaaS and Qlik Replicate based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Boomi iPaaS vs. Qlik Replicate Report (Updated: May 2023).

Buyer's Guide

Boomi iPaaS vs. Qlik Replicate

May 2023

Download the complete report

Helped 814,649 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Boomi iPaaS

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (6th)

Qlik Replicate

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (16th)

Mindshare comparison

Boomi iPaaS and Qlik Replicate aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Boomi iPaaS is designed for Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) and holds a mindshare of 8.9%, up 8.4% compared to last year.
Qlik Replicate, on the other hand, focuses on Data Integration, holds 3.4% mindshare, up 3.2% since last year.

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Peter Pries

Owner Partner at Marketing plus X

Oct 10, 2023

A highly scalable and reasonably stable tool that needs to improve on its prices

In my company, we use many video conferencing tools. I have seen that in video conferencing tools, the counterparts are very different. I have experience with Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Tencent Meeting. I was not deeply involved in Boomi AtomSphere Integration since it was already up and running when I joined my company's project. I could look back in the past to find out the product's history, and that is the most I can do. I know what the product is used for, but I can't go too much into the details. Whether I would recommend the product or not actually depends on what a customer wants to achieve with the solution while also considering factors like the experience of the integration team and the kind of support a customer has in their company. It is not just about the technology but also the skills of a company or the partners with whom a company has relations. Compared to Boomi AtomSphere Integration, there are easier products around, like MuleSoft or Jitterbit. I see MuleSoft or Jitterbit evolving since they have established a lot of integrations, depending on the markets and other things. From my perspective, Jitterbit was easier to operate and set up, while MuleSoft tried to simplify their product a lot when compared to Boomi AtomSphere Integration. MuleSoft started off as a very complex product, but now it's getting easier and easier, and MuleSoft now has a lite version. I didn't hear anything about Boomi AtomSphere Integration, especially in terms of major product improvements, which I know about. I rate the overall tool a six out of ten.

Read full review

KrishnaBaddam

Presales Manager at Artha Solutions

Aug 28, 2024

Lightweight tool, ensures that data is replicated across different systems and simplify complex tasks such as defining relationships

Qlik Compose is something that will automate user's overall data modernization. Here data modernization includes data modeling, ETL jobs, etc. But the advantage is users can automate the overall process of data engineering and data modeling through Qlik Compose. I think that's useful when users are able to manage 60% of the workload automated. That will be very useful. That's fantastic. Replicate does not have a great AI capability. AI capabilities are present in Qlik Sense. Qlik Replicate is a very light tool. It is only meant to capture data from the log files, get the data, and transfer it, read that table structure, create the table structure, and transfer the data whenever there is a change. So, it basically integrates with the kernel of the operating system. The way it works is that these replicate tools will integrate with the kernel of the operating system, and they will access the redo log files of the database. The redo log should have access to all the files of the structure of the schema, too. So, using that technique, they redo all the data structures, create a similar structure, and replicate the structure in the target schema, table, and database. After that is done, it will start tracing the instances that are happening. For example, if data is inserted into the table, then an insert is fired on the statement on the table. So, that particular insert is captured. And based on that insert statement, it will pull the SQL query and say, "Okay, there is an insert. I need to get that data." It will get the data from the redo log itself rather than going to a database. Then, it will just pass that transaction into the target system, where it will just insert the data. And this happens instantaneously, within a microsecond. So, if there is an insert, an update, or a delete, everything is transferred immediately. It is picked from the redo log because it comes to the redo log, and then the redo log sends it to Qlik Replicate and Replicate to the target system on which Replicate is installed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AtomSphere Integration will suit those looking for small automation and simple integrations."

"Very effective with its drag-and-drop feature."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its monitoring part to debug certain issues and find problems."

"I really appreciate the on-the-go access through the browser and the B2B integration."

"The iPaaS functionality is very mature. The browser based IDE is also very mature and stable."

"It is a low-code and high-configuration platform, which is very valuable. Develop once and run anywhere is another useful feature. It also has connectors for more than 200 applications. It provides value for money. Our customers who have implemented this solution have a very high ROI."

"The best features are that it is a cloud-based and a multi-tenant tool."

"It is easy to learn and implement."

More Boomi iPaaS pros

"It enables us to transform data at the latest stage rather than in ETL loads, so it's more ELT which is one of the advantages. It is also in near real-time, which brings significant advantage for our embedded analytics approach."

"The main valuable feature is its real-time change data capture (CDC) capabilities, which process data with minimal latency. There is not much delay. It also performs well with batch-wise data applications."

"Support has been great."

"It is only meant to capture data from the log files, get the data, and transfer it, read that table structure, create the table structure, and transfer the data whenever there is a change."

"Great with replicating and updating records."

"Low-priced reporting and analytics solution, with good scalability and stability. It has on-premises and cloud versions that are cohesive and can integrate well."

"It's very user-friendly when it comes to settings and configuration. It also offers very detailed logging about warnings and errors."

"The most useful functions of Qlik Replicate are the data manipulation to transformations."

More Qlik Replicate pros

Cons

"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is not yet exposed to the world as a good product owing to certain shortcomings in the area of marketing where improvements are required."

"There should be more scripting possibilities."

"We would like to see more involvement between Dell Boomi and the end-users to help improve the customer experience."

"In my experience, I haven't encountered any major issues with the tool. However, there could be a learning curve for new users, especially depending on which tool you're using. For example, I've used MuleSoft in the past, which is more code-oriented and requires knowledge of Java. Transitioning to Boomi AtomSphere Integration took me a couple of months because of differences in terminology."

"It crashes if we run high-volume integration."

"They are lacking in some streaming features, and messaging features from a listener's point of view."

"Documentation could be improved."

"In day-to-day operations, tracking transactions is a major challenge. It takes hours to track a single transaction. It is not a straightforward process."

More Boomi iPaaS cons

"The product should improve its licensing limitation."

"Some features can also be overly dependent on each other. So, there is room for improvement."

"In various scenarios, an important consideration is when we encounter issues and Qlik Replicate suggests reloading a specific table. If we face any problems or encounter errors with that table, it becomes necessary to make a change in Qlik Replicate. Performing a full reload every time is not feasible or practical. Instead, we should identify the specific issues and address them without repeating the entire reloading process. Based on this approach, we can investigate and resolve the problem by performing targeted loads from the source itself. This change aligns with my perspective and is something I would like to implement."

"Support for this product is not great. It needs to be improved."

"We would like to see more details in messages about errors with the system."

"The disadvantage is people are not going for this license because it is not marketed properly."

"This product could be improved by providing more insight regarding errors. One of our customers that uses Qlik Replicate has had an issue. We tried to debug it, but we could not trace the error message. The infrastructure site should give us more insight about errors. Qlik Replicate is not a business solution, it's an IT solution. The reporting tools and bug site should be improved."

"It would be better if the solution’s pricing were more obvious."

More Qlik Replicate cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an expensive platform."

"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is a relatively cheap and cost-effective product compared to other products like SAP or Oracle."

"The pricing is a bit complex. While the entry fee may be lower than other solutions, it could be expensive depending on your usage."

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive."

"When it comes to pricing, it's not so much about being less expensive as it is about how they don't tie to the hardware on the underlined VMware that you run on, as other vendors do"

"There could be an easy-to-understand licensing model."

"The cost of the solution is in the neighborhood of $20,000 annually. There are no costs above the standard licensing fee."

"Approximately 20k annually."

More Boomi iPaaS pricing and cost advice

"Overall, Qlik is an expensive solution. You need to pay for all additional features that you would like to use."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Qlik Replicate's pricing a nine out of ten."

"Qlik Replicate is not expensive, compared to GoldenGate."

"Pricing for this solution is very reasonable."

"Unlike Azure, where you pay based on consumption, Qlik Replicate seems to charge per endpoint."

"Qlik Replicate is mainly suited for large companies. However, it is too costly for small businesses. Its pricing is high."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Boomi AtomSphere Integration?

The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Integration?

Boomi AtomSphere Integration is a relatively cheap and cost-effective product compared to other products like SAP or Oracle. I don't know the exact price of the product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Integration?

In my experience, I haven't encountered any major issues with the tool. However, there could be a learning curve for new users, especially depending on which tool you're using. For example, I've us...

See all answers

What do you like most about Qlik Replicate?

The main valuable feature is its real-time change data capture (CDC) capabilities, which process data with minimal latency. There is not much delay. It also performs well with batch-wise data appli...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qlik Replicate?

The disadvantage is, I think, people are not going for this license because it is not marketed properly. Qlik was not promoting it because Talend was acquired at the same time. So Talend has become...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qlik Replicate?

Qlik Compose is basically an integration tool, which has been acquired by Qlik from an Israeli IT company. So that Qlik can become leaders or can jump into the integration space. So, there are two ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 23% of the time

webMethods.io vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 8% of the time

SSIS vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 6% of the time

AWS Glue vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 6% of the time

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 5% of the time

More Boomi iPaaS Competitors

AWS Database Migration Service vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 18% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 18% of the time

Qlik Compose vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 13% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 9% of the time

Fivetran vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 7% of the time

More Qlik Replicate Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Boomi iPaaS

November 2024

Download Boomi iPaaS product report

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Replicate

October 2024

Download Qlik Replicate product report

Also Known As

Boomi

Replicate, Qlik Replicate

Learn More

Boomi

Qlik

Overview

The Boomi AtomSphere integration platform as a service (iPaaS) supports all your application integration processes – between cloud platforms, software-as-a-service applications, and on-premises systems. Your entire team has online access to a powerful range of integration and data management capabilities, that can be realized in a fraction of the time of legacy middleware technologies.

Qlik Replicate is a data replication solution for replicating data from one source database to another for business intelligence software. It offers data manipulation and transformations, replication without impacting source databases, and ease of use without needing ETL. The solution is stable and user-friendly, with detailed logging and support.

Qlik Replicate has improved the organization by allowing each team to replicate their data into a single-source data location. The most important feature of Qlik Replicate is its ability to replicate and update records without needing a programmer.

Sample Customers

DocuSign Inc., Innotas, Certent, Renesas Electronics America (REA), Kelly-Moore Paints, Mindjet, City of McKinney, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA), Daylight Transport, A10 Networks

American Cancer Society, Fanzz, SM Retail, Smart Modular, Tangerine Bank, Wellcare

Buyer's Guide

Boomi iPaaS vs. Qlik Replicate

May 2023

Free Report: Boomi iPaaS vs. Qlik Replicate

Find out what your peers are saying about Boomi iPaaS vs. Qlik Replicate and other solutions. Updated: May 2023.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Boomi iPaaS vs. Qlik Replicate report.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.