OpenText ALM/Quality Center and Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer compete in the project management software category. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer seems to have the upper hand due to its features, but OpenText ALM/Quality Center excels in deployment, customer service, and ROI.
Features: OpenText ALM/Quality Center offers comprehensive test management capabilities, integration with other products, and robust reporting tools. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer provides intuitive design, automation capabilities, and effective requirements management.
Room for Improvement: OpenText ALM/Quality Center needs to improve performance, user experience, and integration flexibility. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer should enhance stability, scalability, and support documentation.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText ALM/Quality Center is noted for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer offers smooth deployment but has mixed reviews regarding customer support responsiveness.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText ALM/Quality Center offers better ROI due to lower setup costs and comprehensive features. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is higher in cost and valuable but doesn't match the ROI satisfaction of OpenText ALM/Quality Center.
It acts as an enabler for effective test and program management.
Technical support has been excellent.
Quality is always high yet not perfect.
OpenText ALM Quality Center is definitely scalable.
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
I see a stable tool that remains relevant in the market.
HPLM has one of the best UIs compared to other test management tools, allowing for efficient navigation between test pieces, test folders, test suites, and test execution.
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.