Camunda vs QualiWare X comparison

Camunda and QualiWare are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Camunda is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while QualiWare is ranked #39 with an average rating of 6.0. Camunda holds a 21.3% mindshare in BPM, compared to QualiWare’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Camunda users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of QualiWare users who would recommend it.

Camunda

Read 77 Camunda reviews

21,240 Views
14,235 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

QualiWare X

Read 3 QualiWare X reviews

118 Views
66 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Camunda

QualiWare X

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

QualiWare X and Camunda are business process management solutions, both vying in the BPM market. QualiWare X offers better pricing and customer support, whereas Camunda's extensive features justify its cost.

Features: QualiWare X offers a comprehensive view of enterprise architecture, integrated repository management, and collaborative modeling, focusing on strategic alignment and compliance. Camunda provides strong BPMN, CMMN, and DMN capabilities, offering robust automation and scalability, making it ideal for operational efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QualiWare X supports on-premises and cloud integrations with flexible options, offering responsive customer service tailored to enterprises. Camunda's deployment is straightforward but requires technical expertise, using docker images for complex environments. Both ensure effective support, but QualiWare X focuses on a user-friendly experience.

Pricing and ROI: QualiWare X offers accessible pricing with flexible subscriptions, reducing setup costs and aligning with strategic objectives for quick ROI. Camunda involves higher initial costs but promises long-term ROI through process efficiencies and automation capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Camunda vs. QualiWare X Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. QualiWare X

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,959 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Camunda

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (1st), Process Automation (1st)

QualiWare X

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

39th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Architecture Management (22nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Camunda is 21.3%, up from 21.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QualiWare X is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

FABIO NAGAO

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

Reduces costs with hardware abstraction and simplifies scaling

There is an issue where, in some situations, I need to scale up by observing both CPU and memory usage of containers, yet under the current options available at Amazon, this is not possible. I have to choose between monitoring CPU or memory to scale my solution. Not every software is built for deployment as a container service, although the current architecture trend is changing this.

Read full review

Gavin Bérubé

Enterprise Architect at a comms service provider with 5,001-10,000 employees

Works as a reference for architecture but not very intuitive

We use the solution as a reference for architecture so that we can connect business data applications. The tool helps us to know how these applications should be built. We use it mainly as reference material. I like the solution's traceability. The solution is not easy and intuitive to use. I…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The use of Java is a big plus for our intern developers, and Camunda scales well, as many of our departments are already using it in production with dedicated teams."

"The solution is useful for small projects."

"Its flexibility stands out as the most valuable feature."

"The headless nature of the Camunda Platform is something that has helped us to build our own logic and platforms on it."

"I think that the positives of Camunda Platform are that our customers can start with the free version. I think it is the most important."

"The most valuable features are the workflow, the task list, and the modeler where we use VPN."

"The most valuable feature is that, with a visual system, you can try to have a process client before beginning the programming for the application."

"The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand."

More Camunda pros

"I like the solution's traceability."

Cons

"It is not difficult to change existing processes. The difficulty was in integration, for example, to call an external web API, and in the security capabilities, to use a vault for secrets. That was difficult."

"Customization and tech stack could be up-to-date."

"The setup process is a drawback as it has many dependencies, which affects our ability to migrate to Windows eleven due to security concerns."

"The deployment model could be improved for easier implementation."

"The support offered by the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"We're trying to put the people from the business to do it. We are using APIs, and we have open APIs to define our APIs and the request-response that each call requires and sends. So, to base the mapping on that, there was nothing to help. I know that with some tools, such as Oracle tools, you can see the input and expected output. With drag and drop, you can take one property from the left and drag it to the right, and it does all the mapping itself, but that's not the case with Camunda. So, for me, this is something that can be improved."

"When addressing a complex and extensive process, the domain it belongs to, be it banking, healthcare, or HR, requires widespread access."

"Like all BPM tools, they're very bad with proprietary UIs. In general, anyone who uses BPM tools should not expect to use their proprietary UI."

More Camunda cons

"The solution is not easy and intuitive to use. I would also like the software to have a reference metamodel that can guide the modeling."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We're using the free version. We used the Enterprise version for some time. If I compare free versus what we paid at that time, the Enterprise version costs a lot. For the additional functionality that we got with the Enterprise version, it was too costly."

"Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year."

"We are using the open-source version, free of charge. We didn't bother with the enterprise features."

"Its price is decent. Everything is included in the license. The Community version is also good to start with. We are using the Community version."

"In Africa, the cost of deployment is an important factor to consider since it adds to the overall cost. This might be the only drawback to using it."

"I think Camunda BPM can improve their licensing costs. It isn't easy to find clients with Camunda BPM licenses mainly because it's quite expensive."

"The product is expensive for a small or medium-sized company."

"The license is quite expensive, which is why we went with the community version."

More Camunda pricing and cost advice

"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten since it's pretty expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,959 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Government

36%

Computer Software Company

15%

Media Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

See all answers

What do you like most about QualiWare X?

I like the solution's traceability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QualiWare X?

I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten since it's pretty expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with QualiWare X?

The solution is not easy and intuitive to use. I would also like the software to have a reference metamodel that can guide the modeling.

See all answers

Comparisons

Apache Airflow vs Camunda

Compared 12% of the time

Flowable vs Camunda

Compared 9% of the time

Bizagi vs Camunda

Compared 9% of the time

Temporal vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

IBM BPM vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

More Camunda Competitors

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs QualiWare X

Compared 100% of the time

More QualiWare X Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Camunda

April 2025

Download Camunda product report

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Architecture Management

March 2025

Download QualiWare X product report

Also Known As

Camunda BPM

No data available

Overview

Camunda enables organizations to orchestrate processes across people, systems, and devices to continuously overcome complexity and increase efficiency. A common visual language enables seamless collaboration between business and IT teams to design, automate, and improve end-to-end processes with the required speed, scale, and resilience to remain competitive. Hundreds of enterprises such as Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone orchestrate business-critical processes with Camunda to accelerate digital transformation. To learn more visit camunda.com.

Camunda

QualiWare enables positive change by providing tools and methods that ensure coherency, consensus and consistency, and we support the agile and innovative company in handling complex knowledge, maintained by multiple persons with different backgrounds, in a continuous process.

QualiWare

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando

Emiliambiente, OLI, Galletti, Hiref, Bugatti, Argelli, Culligan Italiana, Sal, Stefal Cablaggi, BrainBee Automotive, Varvel, Campagnola, Favini, G.F., Gruppo ROLD

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. QualiWare X

April 2025

Free Report: Camunda vs. QualiWare X

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. QualiWare X and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,959 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Camunda vs. QualiWare X report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.