Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Camunda vs Resolve Actions comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Camunda
Ranking in Process Automation
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
77
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Design (1st), Business Process Management (BPM) (1st)
Resolve Actions
Ranking in Process Automation
31st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Camunda is 24.8%, down from 28.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Resolve Actions is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Camunda24.8%
Resolve Actions0.2%
Other75.0%
Process Automation
 

Featured Reviews

FABIO NAGAO - PeerSpot reviewer
Reduces costs with hardware abstraction and simplifies scaling
There is an issue where, in some situations, I need to scale up by observing both CPU and memory usage of containers, yet under the current options available at Amazon, this is not possible. I have to choose between monitoring CPU or memory to scale my solution. Not every software is built for deployment as a container service, although the current architecture trend is changing this.
Naresh Rayakwar - PeerSpot reviewer
Stable platform with a straightforward setup process
The initial setup process is straightforward. It usually takes a day if all the prerequisites are met. It requires correctly configuring the property file. The process is particularly uncomplicated if the deployment is on a standalone system. However, in a clustered environment, the property file needs to be deployed on each server with precise sequencing, following the guidelines provided by the system. The installation script is then executed to install the overall product. The deployment time depends on different use cases and requires one executive to work on it. The level of maintenance support is also based on the use cases. Two executives can easily maintain the product for a simple vanilla setup with normal use cases.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is simple to use. The user experience is very good."
"We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users."
"It is open-source. It supports microservice orchestration. This is what we are really interested in. We can customize our products depending on the use cases."
"Camunda Platform is better than IBM BPM, and Azure. It is more elaborate."
"I can use any other tools to create services and the UI, and then use them together with the Camunda BPMN engine."
"Camunda is a scalable product."
"It has been a stable solution so far since it meets our needs, including data modeling, which we need to do before we embark on analyzing and optimizing the business processes."
"I like everything about the entire BPM that comes with the BPM suite."
"The platform allows us to create workflows easily."
 

Cons

"The primary issue regarding the Camuto platform is its high cost of training. This is why I haven't discussed it extensively, as compared to other products that are more affordable in terms of developer training."
"When building interfaces, there are limited tools to work with, especially when dealing with different types of tasks, such as user tasks and system tasks."
"Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance."
"The deployment model could be improved for easier implementation."
"The setup process is a drawback as it has many dependencies, which affects our ability to migrate to Windows eleven due to security concerns."
"The product must provide more videos and training materials."
"Camunda needs to improve its user interface for low-code development and provide more user interface options beyond the basic workflow."
"Process interfaces between diagrams could be improved."
"Currently, the libraries are more specific to a few network equipment providers. They could introduce more libraries from different vendors."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year."
"I think Camunda BPM can improve their licensing costs. It isn't easy to find clients with Camunda BPM licenses mainly because it's quite expensive."
"Generally, the price could be better, as well as the licensing fees."
"The product's price depends on the number of processes that need to be automated or where the orchestration part needs to be used. The product is affordable for medium and large enterprises."
"We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost."
"Cheaper licensing and resources than competitors"
"We have an annual subscription to this solution."
"Compared to other software, Camunda Platform is quite cost-effective."
"They offer a subscription-based license and not a perpetual license for the platform. You have to purchase a yearly license."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
26%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
6%
Insurance Company
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business41
Midsize Enterprise15
Large Enterprise29
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?
One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...
Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?
Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...
Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?
Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...
What do you like most about Resolve Actions?
The platform allows us to create workflows easily.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Resolve Actions?
They offer a subscription-based license and not a perpetual license for the platform. You have to purchase a yearly license.
What needs improvement with Resolve Actions?
Currently, the libraries are more specific to a few network equipment providers. They could introduce more libraries from different vendors.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Camunda BPM
No data available
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando
1. IBM 2. Microsoft 3. Amazon 4. Google 5. Apple 6. Facebook 7. Tesla 8. Netflix 9. Adobe 10. Salesforce 11. Oracle 12. Cisco 13. Intel 14. HP 15. Dell 16. Samsung 17. Sony 18. Twitter 19. Uber 20. Airbnb 21. LinkedIn 22. Spotify 23. Pinterest 24. Snapchat 25. Dropbox 26. Slack 27. Square 28. Zoom 29. Shopify 30. Reddit 31. TikTok 32. Lyft
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, BMC, Temporal Technologies and others in Process Automation. Updated: August 2025.
867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.