Camunda vs Resolve Actions comparison

Camunda and Resolve are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Camunda is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4, while Resolve is ranked #30 with an average rating of 8.0. Camunda holds a 23.9% mindshare in PA, compared to Resolve’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Camunda users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Resolve users who would recommend it.

Camunda

Read 78 Camunda reviews

21,608 Views
12,317 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Resolve Actions

Read 1 Resolve Actions review

190 Views
190 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Camunda

Resolve Actions

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Camunda and Resolve Actions based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, BMC, Temporal Technologies and others in Process Automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Process Automation Report (Updated: October 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Process Automation

October 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 871,408 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Camunda

Ranking in Process Automation

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (2nd), Business Process Management (BPM) (1st)

Resolve Actions

Ranking in Process Automation

30th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Camunda is 23.9%, down from 27.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Resolve Actions is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Camunda	23.9%
Resolve Actions	0.3%
Other	75.8%

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

CristianoGomes

Owner at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

Supports long-running asynchronous processes effectively but has not evolved much in recent years

I think Camunda is focusing too much on the SaaS offering right now and not much on improving and developing the product itself. I did not see any innovations on that aspect, especially for the open-source version. I was making some tests recently and the tool seemed pretty much the same as it was three or four years ago. Since they made the move to cloud deployment in a more SaaS-oriented way, they do not invest too much in the community version. To be honest, it did not change much from the Activiti initial version. Activiti was pretty much what Camunda is today. They invested a lot on Zeebe and made it the engine for their SaaS cloud version. Camunda itself, the embedded engine, did not evolve too much. They could invest more on that.

Read full review

Naresh Rayakwar

Lead architect at Tech Mahindra Limited

Stable platform with a straightforward setup process

The initial setup process is straightforward. It usually takes a day if all the prerequisites are met. It requires correctly configuring the property file. The process is particularly uncomplicated if the deployment is on a standalone system. However, in a clustered environment, the property file needs to be deployed on each server with precise sequencing, following the guidelines provided by the system. The installation script is then executed to install the overall product. The deployment time depends on different use cases and requires one executive to work on it. The level of maintenance support is also based on the use cases. Two executives can easily maintain the product for a simple vanilla setup with normal use cases.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is very user-friendly compared to IBM BPM. It's much simpler – it's more streamlined. That means even non-technical departments can use it."

"The graphical interface is very beneficial."

"It is quite easy to build a simple process without any knowledge of programming."

"Easy to use and easy to integrate into the products and applications we provide for our customers."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read."

"The biggest difference between Camunda and Bonita might be that Camunda is simpler and more flexible for setting, though we are at the beginning and need to experiment."

"The solution is good for data models."

", Camunda can be a powerful tool to work with when used in an optimized and well-implemented manner."

More Camunda pros

"The platform allows us to create workflows easily."

Cons

"Initially, installation was challenging, but recent improvements have made it much easier."

"In terms of features, it meets my needs, but I would like Camunda to have an office in Brazil and provide training in Portuguese. They should provide regional support and training courses in Portuguese."

"They have a migration plugin that can be used to migrate from one BPM to another BPM. It is in the beta stage since last year. If they can make it available in the market, it would be great. We are going to have a couple of migration projects for migrating from IBM BPM to Camunda, and this plugin would be useful. I have already discussed this with them two weeks ago and asked them to look into this and add it as a feature. We are expecting this plugin to be available in the next version. This is the only requirement we have at present. They keep on coming up with different features, which is helping us a lot. Its latest release that came out last month was awesome."

"I think Camunda is focusing too much on the SaaS offering right now and not much on improving and developing the product itself."

"The migration strategy needs to be improved."

"Collaborations and process documentation in Camunda Platform are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."

"I don't like the UI of the Camunda Platform, I have found the Signavio solution to be much better for me to create the process designs and execute them. Additionally, I have found the tools in the Camunda Platform are not compatible with some of my other tools. They should improve this in the future."

"Camunda needs to improve its user interface for low-code development and provide more user interface options beyond the basic workflow."

More Camunda cons

"Currently, the libraries are more specific to a few network equipment providers. They could introduce more libraries from different vendors."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay for the license of this solution annually."

"We are using the open-source version of this solution."

"We use the free version."

"The license is quite expensive, which is why we went with the community version."

"Cheaper licensing and resources than competitors"

"We're using the free version. We used the Enterprise version for some time. If I compare free versus what we paid at that time, the Enterprise version costs a lot. For the additional functionality that we got with the Enterprise version, it was too costly."

"I use the open-source free version."

"It is good for a startup. When we started, its price was fair, but the way we are using it to orchestrate microservices makes it expensive. When you are growing as a company, you would have more microservices, and you would have more users. There is an exponential effect when you are growing in terms of the number of conditions, processes, and users because they bill you per process. So, the price was increasing very quickly for us, and it was very difficult."

More Camunda pricing and cost advice

"They offer a subscription-based license and not a perpetual license for the platform. You have to purchase a yearly license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

871,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Insurance Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	29

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

See all answers

What do you like most about Resolve Actions?

The platform allows us to create workflows easily.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Resolve Actions?

They offer a subscription-based license and not a perpetual license for the platform. You have to purchase a yearly license.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Resolve Actions?

Currently, the libraries are more specific to a few network equipment providers. They could introduce more libraries from different vendors.

See all answers

Comparisons

Flowable vs Camunda

Compared 11% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Camunda

Compared 10% of the time

Temporal vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

Bizagi vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

IBM BPM vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

More Camunda Competitors

ServiceNow Orchestration vs Resolve Actions

Compared 48% of the time

More Resolve Actions Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Camunda

October 2025

Download Camunda product report

Buyer's Guide

Process Automation

October 2025

Download Resolve Actions product report

Also Known As

Camunda BPM

No data available

Interactive Demo

Camunda

Demo not available

Resolve

Overview

Camunda revolutionizes process orchestration by enabling seamless automation and integration with AI, human tasks, and existing systems while ensuring security and governance.

Built for collaboration between business and IT, Camunda empowers organizations to manage complexity, boost efficiency, and maintain competitive advantage. With a clientele of over 700 top organizations like Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone, Camunda is a trusted partner in designing, orchestrating, automating, and refining critical business processes to accelerate digital transformation. Its open-source nature, ease of use, and REST API integration make it a versatile choice for various needs.

What are Camunda's key features?

Lightweight Architecture: Offers streamlined and efficient process management.
Scalability: Supports growth and complexity in operations.
Flexibility with BPMN, CMMN, and DMN Standards: Ensures adaptability to different process modeling needs.
Open-Source: Encourages customization and user-specific enhancements.
Graphical Process Modeling: Intuitive interface for designing and automating processes.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamlines processes for optimized performance.
Seamless Integration: Ensures smooth workflow across different systems.
Improved Collaboration: Facilitates effective cooperation between business and IT.
Customizability: Adapts to specific user requirements and system environments.

In banking, Camunda automates processes and manages transactions, while in telecommunications, it optimizes service orders. Governmental and public sectors benefit from workflow automation. Organizations often use either the enterprise edition or the open-source version to create APIs and manage business rules effectively.

Camunda

Resolve Actions is a powerful tool that effectively addresses and resolves issues or problems. It streamlines processes, improves efficiency, and ensures timely resolution of tasks. With features like task management, incident tracking, and request management, teams can collaborate and communicate effectively. Resolve Actions helps to prioritize and assign tasks, ensuring accountability and providing a centralized platform for monitoring progress and performance. Its seamless integration with other systems and user-friendly interface make it a valuable business tool.

Resolve

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando

1. IBM 2. Microsoft 3. Amazon 4. Google 5. Apple 6. Facebook 7. Tesla 8. Netflix 9. Adobe 10. Salesforce 11. Oracle 12. Cisco 13. Intel 14. HP 15. Dell 16. Samsung 17. Sony 18. Twitter 19. Uber 20. Airbnb 21. LinkedIn 22. Spotify 23. Pinterest 24. Snapchat 25. Dropbox 26. Slack 27. Square 28. Zoom 29. Shopify 30. Reddit 31. TikTok 32. Lyft

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, BMC, Temporal Technologies and others in Process Automation. Updated: October 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

871,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.