Camunda vs TIBCO Business Studio comparison

"Having knowledge of the BPM and monitoring process has proven to be very beneficial, as I am currently engaged in documenting processes for Clientele."

"It has an open BPM"

"It is an absolutely stable solution."

"The most valuable feature is the scheduling."

"We have the ability to modify the product if we need to, and that comes in handy whenever we need to add new functionality and features."

"I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features."

"The architecture is good because it's a headless workflow. I can create my own frontend, and it's fully API-based."

"We can share, discuss, and develop the model together — from a distance. It's really helped us during these times of isolation."

"The setup cost is definitely reasonable."

"The product's initial setup phase is straightforward."

"The setup cost is definitely reasonable."

"Customization and tech stack could be up-to-date."

"If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map."

"I'm from the .NET world and I would like to use it, rather than Java."

"The product's initial setup phase is difficult for beginners."

"It lacks some preset features and configurations which would make it more plug-and-play for customers."

"The documentation could use improvement."

"Initial setup can be quite complex."

"They have a migration plugin that can be used to migrate from one BPM to another BPM. It is in the beta stage since last year. If they can make it available in the market, it would be great. We are going to have a couple of migration projects for migrating from IBM BPM to Camunda, and this plugin would be useful. I have already discussed this with them two weeks ago and asked them to look into this and add it as a feature. We are expecting this plugin to be available in the next version. This is the only requirement we have at present. They keep on coming up with different features, which is helping us a lot. Its latest release that came out last month was awesome."

"An artificial intelligence feature that evaluates the quality of the code developed with one click would definitely be good."

"An artificial intelligence feature that evaluates the quality of the code developed with one click would definitely be good."

"The interface is actually quite confusing."

"There is an open-source version available, that in its core features (workflow and decision engine, modeler) is exactly the same as in the enterprise version."

"We're using the open-source version for now."

"The evaluation of my customers on pricing is that it is reasonable."

"I think Camunda BPM can improve their licensing costs. It isn't easy to find clients with Camunda BPM licenses mainly because it's quite expensive."

"The product's price depends on the number of processes that need to be automated or where the orchestration part needs to be used. The product is affordable for medium and large enterprises."

"It is less cost-prohibitive than other solutions on the market. This solution was in our price range."

"Camunda is a cheaply priced product, making it one of its major USPs."

"While the license isn't budget-friendly, careful consideration and calculated planning for a significant number of licenses can make it more cost-effective."

"For my company, the tool costs about 2,0,000 Euros for three years...If one is bad and ten is good, I rate the price as one out of ten."